Myths of the Archaic State
In this ground-breaking work, Norman Yoffee challenges prevailing myths underpinning our understanding of the evolution of the earliest cities, states, and civilizations. He counters the emphasis in traditional scholarship that the earliest states were large and despotically controlled and their evolution can be adequately modeled by ethnographic analogies. By illuminating the creation and changes in social roles – not simply of male leaders but also of slaves and soldiers, priests and priestesses, peasants and prostitutes, merchants and craftsmen – Yoffee depicts an evolutionary process centered on the concerns of everyday life. Drawing on evidence from ancient Mesopotamia as well as from Egypt, South Asia, China, Mesoamerica, and South America, the author explores the changes in human societies that created the world we live in. This book offers a bold new interpretation of social evolutionary theory, and as such it is essential reading for any student or scholar with an interest in the emergence of complex society.
NORMAN YOFFEE is Professor of Near Eastern Studies and Anthropology at the University of Michigan. His various publications include Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? (co-editor with Andrew Sherratt, Cambridge University Press, 1993) and The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations (co-editor with George L. Cowgill, University of Arizona Press, 1988). He is editor of the Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient and Cambridge World Archaeology.
MYTHS OF THE ARCHAIC STATE
Evolution of the Earliest Cities, States, and Civilizations
NORMAN YOFFEE
PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE
The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, CB2 2RU, UK
40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011–4211, USA
477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia
Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain
Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa
http://www.cambridge.org
© Norman Yoffee 2005
This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2005
Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge
Typeface Minion 10.5/14.5 pt. System LATEX 2e [TB]
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data
Yoffee, Norman.
Myths of the archaic state : evolution of the earliest cities, states, and civilizations / Norman Yoffee.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0 521 81837 0 – ISBN 0 521 52156 4 (pbk.)
1. State, The. 2. Cities and towns, Ancient. 3. Civilization, Ancient. I. Title.
JC51.Y64 2004
320.1′09′01 – dc22 2004052683
ISBN 0 521 81837 0 hardback
ISBN 0 521 52156 4 paperback
For Barbara
CONTENTS
| List of figures | page x | ||
| List of tables | xiii | ||
| INTRODUCTION | 1 | ||
| 1 | THE EVOLUTION OF A FACTOID | 4 | |
| An introduction to social evolutionary mythology | 5 | ||
| Types, rules, and factoids | 6 | ||
| Neo-evolutionism evolving | 8 | ||
| States and civilizations: beyond heuristics | 15 | ||
| 2 | DIMENSIONS OF POWER IN THE EARLIEST STATES | 22 | |
| The pursuit of the wily chiefdom | 22 | ||
| Neo-evolutionism and new social evolutionary theory: back to the future | 31 | ||
| The evolution of power and its distribution in the earliest states | 33 | ||
| Dimensions of power in social evolutionary theory | 34 | ||
| States as states of mind | 38 | ||
| What neo-evolutionism cannot explain | 41 | ||
| 3 | THE MEANING OF CITIES IN THE EARLIEST STATES AND CIVILIZATIONS | 42 | |
| City-states and chimeras | 44 | ||
| Cities and states | 45 | ||
| Mesopotamian city-states and Mesopotamian civilization | 53 | ||
| Cities and city-states in social evolutionary perspective | 59 | ||
| 4 | WHEN COMPLEXITY WAS SIMPLIFIED | 91 | |
| Simplifying the path to power in early Chinese states | 94 | ||
| Law and order in ancient Mesopotamia | 100 | ||
| The context of Mesopotamian law | 102 | ||
| The context and function of the code of Hammurabi | 104 | ||
| The complexities of legal simplification: decision-making in Mesopotamia | 109 | ||
| 5 | IDENTITY AND AGENCY IN EARLY STATES: CASE STUDIES | 113 | |
| A peculiar institution in Old Babylonian Mesopotamia | 116 | ||
| Imagining sex in an early state | 121 | ||
| Conclusion: Encounters with women in early states | 128 | ||
| 6 | THE COLLAPSE OF ANCIENT STATES AND CIVILIZATIONS | 131 | |
| Theorizing collapse | 132 | ||
| Neo-evolutionism and collapse | 134 | ||
| Collapse as the drastic restructuring of social institutions | 138 | ||
| The collapse of ancient Mesopotamian states and civilization | 140 | ||
| The Old Akkadian state | 142 | ||
| The Third Dynasty of Ur | 144 | ||
| The Old Babylonian and Old Assyrian states | 147 | ||
| The end of the cycle? | 151 | ||
| Collapse as the mutation of social identity and suffocation of cultural memory | 153 | ||
| The collapse of Mesopotamian civilization and its regeneration | 159 | ||
| 7 | SOCIAL EVOLUTIONARY TRAJECTORIES | 161 | |
| Evolutionary history of the Chaco “rituality” | 162 | ||
| Non-normative thinking in social evolutionary theory | 171 | ||
| Southwest and Southeast | 173 | ||
| Towards a history of social evolutionary trajectories | 177 | ||
| 8 | NEW RULES OF THE GAME | 180 | |
| The game of archaeological neologisms | 181 | ||
| The engineering of archaeological theory: mining and bridging | 182 | ||
| How archaeologists lost their innocence | 183 | ||
| Levels of archaeological theory | 185 | ||
| Sources of analogy in archaeological theory | 188 | ||
| Analogy and the comparative method | 192 | ||
| 9 | ALTERED STATES: THE EVOLUTION OF HISTORY | 196 | |
| An essay on the evolution of Mesopotamian states and civilization | 198 | ||
| Initial conditions and emergent properties | 200 | ||
| Interaction and identity | 204 | ||
| The formation of Mesopotamian civilization and Mesopotamian city-states | 209 | ||
| Evolutionary histories of the earliest cities, states, and civilizations | 228 | ||
| Acknowledgments | 233 | ||
| References | 236 | ||
| Index | 268 |
LIST OF FIGURES
| 1.1 | Neo-evolutionist step-ladder model of stages | page 18 | |
| 1.2 | Myth of “our contemporary ancestors” | 19 | |
| 2.1 | “Real” stratification | 30 | |
| 2.2 | Hypothetical potential stratification | 30 | |
| 3.1 | Earliest states and civilizations | 63 | |
| 3.2 | Egypt | 63 | |
| 3.3 | Hierakonpolis | 64 | |
| 3.4 | Memphis (Early Dynastic and Old Kingdom) | 65 | |
| 3.5 | Thebes | 66 | |
| 3.6 | Amarna | 66 | |
| 3.7 | Amarna – workmen’s village | 67 | |
| 3.8 | Mesoamerica | 68 | |
| 3.9 | Teotihuacan | 68 | |
| 3.10 | Teotihuacan, urban growth | 69 | |
| 3.11 | North China | 70 | |
| 3.12 | Erlitou | 70 | |
| 3.13 | Zhengzhou | 71 | |
| 3.14 | Anyang | 71 | |
| 3.15 | Indus Valley/Harappan sites | 72 | |
| 3.16 | Mohenjo-Daro | 73 | |
| 3.17 | Mohenjo-Daro – DK-G area | 74 | |
| 3.18 | Harappa | 74 | |
| 3.19 | North coast of Peru and Central Andes | 75 | |
| 3.20 | Moche | 76 | |
| 3.21 | Tiwanaku | 76 | |
| 3.22a | Wari | 77 | |
| 3.22b | Wari, aerial view | 77 | |
| 3.23 | Wari, urban growth | 78 | |
| 3.24 | Maya region | 79 | |
| 3.25 | El Mirador | 79 | |
| 3.26a | Tikal, greater city | 80 | |
| 3.26b | Tikal, urban core | 81 | |
| 3.27 | Copán | 81 | |
| 3.28 | Selected Mesopotamian cities | 82 | |
| 3.29 | Mesopotamian settlement pattern in the late Uruk period | 82 | |
| 3.30 | Mesopotamian settlement pattern in the Early Dynastic Ⅱ and Ⅲ periods | 83 | |
| 3.31 | Uruk | 84 | |
| 3.32 | Nagar/Tell Brak | 85 | |
| 3.33 | Kish | 85 | |
| 3.34 | Lagash city-state | 86 | |
| 3.35 | Comparison of some ancient cities | 87 | |
| 3.36 | Comparison of some modern urban places on the scale of the earliest cities | 88 | |
| a. Amsterdam, 1936 | |||
| b. Leiden, 1936 | |||
| c. Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2003 | |||
| d. University of Michigan, Central Campus, Ann Arbor | |||
| e. Hong Kong Island | |||
| f. New Orleans (Métropole de La Nouvelle Orléans, 1765) | |||
| 4.1 | Chinese potters’ marks | 95 | |
| 4.2 | Mesopotamian tokens | 95 | |
| 4.3 | Shang period bronze | 97 | |
| 4.4 | Shang period oracle bone | 99 | |
| 4.5 | Code of Hammurabi | 105 | |
| 7.1 | Northern Southwest | 163 | |
| 7.2 | Chaco, outliers, roads | 164 | |
| 7.3 | Great house sites of Chaco Canyon | 165 | |
| 7.4 | Shapes of great houses | 166 | |
| 7.5 | Pueblo Bonito | 166 | |
| 7.6 | Mississippian sites | 175 | |
| 7.7 | Cahokia | 176 | |
| 7.8 | Examples of some evolutionary trajectories discussed in the text | 178 | |
| 8.1 | Structure of archaeological theory | 187 | |
| 8.2 | Valley of Oaxaca | 190 | |
| 8.3 | Monte Albán | 191 | |
| 9.1 | Selected Mesopotamian sites from various periods | 215 | |
| 9.2 | Selected early Holocene and Neolithic sites | 215 | |
| 9.3 | Selected Hassuna and Samarra sites | 216 | |
| 9.4 | Yarim Tepe I | 216 | |
| 9.5 | Hassuna ceramics | 217 | |
| 9.6 | Samarra ceramics | 218 | |
| 9.7 | Tell es-Sawwan, levels Ⅲ and Ⅳ | 219 | |
| 9.8 | Selected Halaf sites | 220 | |
| 9.9 | Halaf ceramics | 220 | |
| 9.10 | Tell Arpachiyah burnt house | 221 | |
| 9.11 | Eridu, temple Ⅶ | 221 | |
| 9.12 | Tepe Gawra, acropolis, level ⅩⅢ | 222 | |
| 9.13 | Tell Madhhur house | 222 | |
| 9.14 | Tell Abada village | 223 | |
| 9.15 | Eanna precinct, Uruk | 224 | |
| 9.16 | White temple, Anu ziggurat, Uruk | 225 | |
| 9.17 | Beveled-rim bowls | 225 | |
| 9.18 | Archaic tablet scribal exercises | 226 | |
| 9.19 | Archaic tablet list of professions with later copies | 226 | |
| 9.20 | Uruk expansion sites | 227 | |
| 9.21 | Some southern Mesopotamian city-states in the early third millennium BC | 227 |
LIST OF TABLES
| 3.1 | Area and population size estimates of the earliest cities mentioned in the text | page 43 | |
| 9.1 | Chronological table of selected periods in Mesopotamia | 199 |


