Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition
A “sample” is not only a concept from statistics that has penetrated common sense but also a metaphor that has inspired much research and theorizing in current psychology. The sampling approach emphasizes the selectivity and biases inherent in the samples of information input with which judges and decision makers are fed. Because environmental samples are rarely random, or representative of the world as a whole, decision making calls for censorship and critical evaluation of the data given. However, even the most intelligent decision makers tend to behave like “naïve intuitive statisticians”: They are quite sensitive to the data given but uncritical concerning the source of the data. Thus, the vicissitudes of sampling information in the environment together with the failure to monitor and control sampling effects adequately provide a key to reinterpreting findings obtained in the past two decades of research on judgment and decision making.
Klaus Fiedler is Professor of Psychology at the University of Heidelberg in Germany. Among his main research interests are cognitive social psychology, language and communication, social memory, inductive cognitive processes in judgment and decision making, and computer modeling of the human mind. Professor Fiedler is the winner of the 2000 Leibniz Award.
Peter Juslin is Professor of Psychology at Uppsala University in Sweden. His main research interests concern judgment and decision making, categorization, and computational modeling. He received the Brunswik New Scientist Award in 1994 and the Oscar’s Award at Uppsala University in 1996 for young distinguished scientists. He has published numerous scientific papers in various journals, including many articles in the major APA journals such as Psychological Review.
Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition
Edited by
KLAUS FIEDLER
University of Heidelberg
PETER JUSLIN
Uppsala University
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo
Cambridge University Press
40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521831598
© Cambridge University Press 2006
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2006
Printed in the United States of America
A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library.
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Information sampling and adaptive cognition / edited by Klaus Fiedler, Peter Juslin.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-521-83159-8 (casebound) – ISBN 0-521-53933-1 (pbk.)
1. Human information processing. 2. Cognition. I. Fiedler, Klaus, 1951–
II. Juslin, Peter. III. Title.
BF444.155 2005
153.4 – dc22 2004025856
ISBN-13 978-0-521-83159-8 hardback
ISBN-10 0-521-83159-8 hardback
ISBN-13 978-0-521-53933-3 paperback
ISBN-10 0-521-53933-1 paperback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for
the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or
third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication
and does not guarantee that any content on such
Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Contents
| List of Contributors | page vii | ||
| PART I INTRODUCTION | |||
| 1. | Taking the Interface between Mind and Environment Seriously | 3 | |
| Klaus Fiedler and Peter Juslin | |||
| PART II THE PSYCHOLOGICAL LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS | |||
| 2. | Good Sampling, Distorted Views: The Perception of Variability | 33 | |
| Yaakov Kareev | |||
| 3. | Intuitive Judgments about Sample Size | 53 | |
| Peter Sedlmeier | |||
| 4. | The Role of Information Sampling in Risky Choice | 72 | |
| Ralph Hertwig, Greg Barron, Elke U. Weber, and Ido Erev | |||
| 5. | Less Is More in Covariation Detection – Or Is It? | 92 | |
| Peter Juslin, Klaus Fiedler, and Nick Chater | |||
| PART III BIASED AND UNBIASED JUDGMENTS FROM BIASED SAMPLES | |||
| 6. | Subjective Validity Judgments as an Index of Sensitivity to Sampling Bias | 127 | |
| Peter Freytag and Klaus Fiedler | |||
| 7. | An Analysis of Structural Availability Biases, and a Brief Study | 147 | |
| Robyn M. Dawes | |||
| 8. | Subjective Confidence and the Sampling of Knowledge | 153 | |
| Joshua Klayman, Jack B. Soll, Peter Juslin, and Anders Winman | |||
| 9. | Contingency Learning and Biased Group Impressions | 183 | |
| Thorsten Meiser | |||
| 10. | Mental Mechanisms: Speculations on Human Causal Learning and Reasoning | 210 | |
| Nick Chater and Mike Oaksford | |||
| PART IV WHAT INFORMATION CONTENTS ARE SAMPLED? | |||
| 11. | What’s in a Sample? A Manual for Building Cognitive Theories | 239 | |
| Gerd Gigerenzer | |||
| 12. | Assessing Evidential Support in Uncertain Environments | 261 | |
| Chris M. White and Derek J. Koehler | |||
| 13. | Information Sampling in Group Decision Making: Sampling Biases and Their Consequences | 299 | |
| Andreas Mojzisch and Stefan Schulz-Hardt | |||
| 14. | Confidence in Aggregation of Opinions from Multiple Sources | 327 | |
| David V. Budescu | |||
| 15. | Self as Sample | 353 | |
| Joachim I. Krueger, Melissa Acevedo, and Jordan M. Robbins | |||
| PART V VICISSITUDES OF SAMPLING IN THE RESEARCHER’S MIND AND METHOD | |||
| 16. | Which World Should Be Represented in Representative Design? | 381 | |
| Ulrich Hoffrage and Ralph Hertwig | |||
| 17. | “I’m m/n Confident That I’m Correct”: Confidence in Foresight and Hindsight as a Sampling Probability | 409 | |
| Anders Winman and Peter Juslin | |||
| 18. | Natural Sampling of Stimuli in (Artificial) Grammar Learning | 440 | |
| Fenna H. Poletiek | |||
| 19. | Is Confidence in Decisions Related to Feedback? Evidence from Random Samples of Real-World Behavior | 456 | |
| Robin M. Hogarth | |||
| Index | 485 | ||
List of Contributors
Melissa Acevedo, Brown University
Greg Barron, Harvard Business School
David J. Budescu, University of Illinois
Nick Chater, University College, London
Robyn Dawes, Carnegie Mellon University
Ido Erev, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology
Klaus Fiedler, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Peter Freytag, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Gerd Gigerenzer, Max Planck Institute, Germany
Ralph Hertwig, University of Basel, Switzerland
Ulrich Hoffrage, Max Planck Institute, Germany
Robin M. Hogarth, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
Peter Juslin, University of Uppsala, Sweden
Yakoov Kareev, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Joshua Klayman, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business
Derek S. Koehler, University of Waterloo, Canada
Joachim Krueger, Brown University
Thorsten Meiser, University of Jena, Germany
Andreas Mojzisch, Universität Göttingen, Germany
Mike Oaksford, University of London
Fenna Poletiek, Leiden University, The Netherlands
Jordan M. Robbins, Brown University
Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Universität München, Germany
Peter Sedlmeier, Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany
Jack B. Soll, INSEAD Business School, France
Elke Weber, Columbia University
Chris M. White, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland
Anders Winman, Uppsala University, Sweden


