Cambridge University Press
0521839769 - How the Weak Win Wars - A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict - by Ivan Arreguín-Toft
Frontmatter/Prelims
How the Weak Win Wars
How do the weak win wars? The likelihood of victory and defeat in asymmetric conflicts depends on the interaction of the strategies weak and strong actors use. Using statistical and in-depth historical analyses of conflicts spanning two hundred years, Ivan Arreguín-Toft shows that, independent of regime type and weapons technology, the interaction of similar strategic approaches favors strong actors, while opposite strategic approaches favor the weak. This new approach to understanding asymmetric conflicts allows us to makes sense of how the United States was able to win its war in Afghanistan (2002) in a few months, while the Soviet Union lost after a decade of brutal war (1979–1989). Arreguín-Toft’s strategic interaction theory has implications not only for international relations theory, but for policymakers grappling with interstate and civil wars, as well as terrorism.
IVAN ARREGUÍN-TOFT is Fellow in the International Security Program, at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. He has authored numerous conference papers and his articles have appeared in International Security and the Cambridge Review of International Affairs. He is a veteran of the US Army where he served in Augsburg, Germany as a military intelligence analyst from 1985 to 1987.
CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: 99
How the Weak Win Wars
A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict
Editorial Board
Steve Smith (Managing editor)
Thomas Biersteker Phil Cerny Michael Cox
A. J. R. Groom Richard Higgott Kimberley Hutchings
Caroline Kennedy-Pipe Steve Lamy Michael Mastanduno
Louis Pauly Ngaire Woods
Cambridge Studies in International Relations is a joint initiative of Cambridge University Press and the British International Studies Association (BISA). The series will include a wide range of material, from undergraduate textbooks and surveys to research-based monographs and collaborative volumes. The aim of the series is to publish the best new scholarship in International Studies from Europe, North America and the rest of the world.
CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
100 Michael C. Williams
The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations
99 Ivan Arreguín-Toft
How the Weak Win Wars
A theory of asymmetric conflict
98 Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall (eds.)
Power in Global Governance
97 Yale H. Ferguson and Richard W. Mansbach
Remapping Global Politics
History’s revenge and future shock
96 Christian Reus-Smit (ed.)
The Politics of International Law
95 Barry Buzan
From International to World Society?
English School theory and the social structure of globalisation
94 K. J. Holsti
Taming the Sovereigns
Institutional change in international politics
93 Bruce Cronin
Institutions for the Common Good
International protection regimes in international society
92 Paul Keal
European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
The moral backwardness of international society
91 Barry Buzan and Ole Wœver
Regions and Powers
The structure of international security
90 A. Claire Cutler
Private Power and Global Authority
Transnational merchant law in the global political economy
Series list continued after index
How the Weak Win Wars:
A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict
Ivan Arreguín-Toft
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press,
New York
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521548694
© Ivan Arreguín-Toft 2005
This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2005
Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Arreguín-Toft, Ivan.
How the weak win wars: a theory of asymmetric conflict / Ivan Arreguín-Toft.
p. cm. – (Cambridge studies in international relations; 99)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0 521-83976-9 – ISBN 0-521-54869-1 (pbk.)
1. Asymmetric warfare – Case studies. 2. Military history, Modern – Case
studies. I. Title. II. Series.
U163.A776 2005
355.4’2 – dc 22 2004058131
ISBN-13 978-0-521-83976-1 hardback
ISBN-10 0-521-83976-9 hardback
ISBN-13 978-0-521-54869-4 paperback
ISBN-10 0-521-54869-1 paperback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for
the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or
third-party internet websites referred to in this book,
and does not guarantee that any content on such
websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
To Monica
Epigraph
Do not press a desperate enemy
Sun Tzu
Contents
| List of figures | page x | |||||
| Preface | xi | |||||
| Acknowledgments | xiii | |||||
| List of abbreviations | xv | |||||
| 1 | Introduction | 1 | ||||
| 2 | Explaining asymmetric conflict outcomes | 23 | ||||
| 3 | Russia in the Caucasus: the Murid War, 1830–1859 | 48 | ||||
| 4 | Britain in Orange Free State and Transvaal: the South African War, 1899–1902 | 72 | ||||
| 5 | Italy in Ethiopia: the Italo-Ethiopian War, 1935–1940 | 109 | ||||
| 6 | The United States in Vietnam: the Vietnam War, 1965–1973 | 144 | ||||
| 7 | The USSR in Afghanistan: the Afghan Civil War, 1979–1989 | 169 | ||||
| 8 | Conclusion | 200 | ||||
| Appendix | 228 | |||||
| References | 235 | |||||
| Index | 243 | |||||
Figures
| 1 | Percentage of asymmetric conflict victories by type of actor, 1800–2003 | page 3 | |||
| 2 | Percentage of conflict victories by type of actor over time | 4 | |||
| 3 | Expected effects of strategic interaction on conflict outcomes | 39 | |||
| 4 | Strategic interaction and asymmetric conflict outcomes, 1800–2003 | 45 | |||
| 5 | Strategic interaction and conflict outcomes when weak actor received no external support | 46 | |||
© Cambridge University Press


