Cambridge Catalogue  
  • Help
Home > Catalogue > A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism
A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism

Details

  • Page extent: 272 pages
  • Size: 228 x 152 mm
  • Weight: 0.568 kg

Hardback

 (ISBN-13: 9780521876490)

A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism Cambridge University Press
9780521876490 - A METAPHYSICS FOR SCIENTIFIC REALISM - by Anjan Chakravartty
Frontmatter/Prelims


A METAPHYSICS FOR SCIENTIFIC REALISM

Scientific realism is the view that our best scientific theories give approximately true descriptions of both observable and unobservable aspects of a mind-independent world. Debates between realists and their critics are at the very heart of the philosophy of science. Anjan Chakravartty traces the contemporary evolution of realism by examining the most promising recent strategies adopted by its proponents in response to the forceful challenges of antirealist sceptics, resulting in a positive proposal for scientific realism today. He examines the core principles of the realist position, and sheds light on topics including the varieties of metaphysical commitment required, and the nature of the conflict between realism and its empiricist rivals. By illuminating the connections between realist interpretations of scientific knowledge and the metaphysical foundations supporting them, his book offers a compelling vision of how realism can provide an internally consistent and coherent account of scientific knowledge.

ANJAN CHAKRAVARTTY is Associate Professor at the Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology and Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto.




A METAPHYSICS FOR SCIENTIFIC REALISM

Knowing the Unobservable

ANJAN CHAKRAVARTTY
University of Toronto




CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo

Cambridge University Press
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK

Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York

www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521876490

© Anjan Chakravartty 2007

This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without
the written permission of Cambridge University Press.

First published 2007

Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge

A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library

ISBN 978-0-521-87649-0 hardback


Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for
external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee
that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.





It is the fault of our science that it wants to explain all; and
if it explain not, then it says there is nothing to explain.

Van Helsing to Dr Seward
Bram Stoker, Dracula




Contents

List of tablespage ix
List of figuresx
Prefacexi
List of abbreviationsxvii

Part 1 Scientific realism today

1

Realism and antirealism; metaphysics and empiricism
3
1.1      The trouble with common sense3
1.2      A conceptual taxonomy8
1.3      Metaphysics, empiricism, and scientific knowledge13
1.4      The rise of stance empiricism17
1.5      The fall of the critique of metaphysics20

2

Selective scepticism: entity realism, structural realism, semirealism
27
2.1      The entities are not alone27
2.2      Lessons from epistemic structuralism33
2.3      Semirealism (or: how to be a sophisticated realist)39
2.4      Optimistic and pessimistic inductions on past science45
2.5      The minimal interpretation of structure52

3

Properties, particulars, and concrete structures
58
3.1      Inventory: what realists know58
3.2      Mutually entailed particulars and structures61
3.3      Ontic structuralism: farewell to objects?70
3.4      Ontological theory change76
3.5      Return of the motley particulars80

Part II Metaphysical foundations

4

Causal realism and causal processes
89
4.1      Causal connections and de re necessity89
4.2      Is causal realism incoherent?96
4.3      A first answer: relations between events102
4.4      A better answer: causal processes107
4.5      Processes for empiricists114

5

Dispositions, property identity, and laws of nature
119
5.1      The causal property identity thesis119
5.2      Property naming and necessity126
5.3      Objections: epistemic and metaphysical134
5.4      Vacuous laws and the ontology of causal properties141
5.5      Causal laws, ceteris paribus147

6

Sociability: natural and scientific kinds
151
6.1      Law statements and the role of kinds151
6.2      Essences and clusters: two kinds of kinds156
6.3      Clusters and biological species concepts162
6.4      Sociability (or: how to make kinds with properties)168
6.5      Beyond objectivity, subjectivity, and promiscuity174

Part III Theory meets world

7

Representing and describing: theories and models
183
7.1      Descriptions and non-linguistic representations183
7.2      Representing via abstraction and idealization187
7.3      Extracting information from models192
7.4      The inescapability of correspondence199
7.5      Approximation and geometrical structures205

8

Approximate truths about approximate truth
212
8.1      Knowledge in the absence of truth simpliciter212
8.2      Measuring “truth-likeness”214
8.3      Truth as a comparator for art and science218
8.4      Depiction versus denotation; description versus reference224
8.5      Products versus production; theories and models versus practice230

References
235
Index244



Tables

Table 1.1:Scientific realism and antirealismspage 10
Table 6.1:Three types of law-like generalizations155



Figures

Figure 1.1:Observables and unobservablespage 15
Figure 2.1:Incident, reflected, and refracted light beams at the interface of two media35
Figure 2.2:Property distinctions underlying semirealism48
Figure 5.1:Problems associated with vacuous law statements145
Figure 7.1:Using representations and descriptions186



© Cambridge University Press
printer iconPrinter friendly versionemail iconEmail a colleague AddThis