The Paradox of Predictivism
Cambridge University Press
9780521879620 - The Paradox of Predictivism - by Eric Christian Barnes
Table of Contents
Contents
| Acknowledgments | page ix | ||
| 1 | The paradox of predictivism | 1 | |
| 1.1 | Introduction | 1 | |
| 1.2 | Pumping up the intuition that prediction matters | 2 | |
| 1.3 | The paradox of predictivism | 5 | |
| 1.4 | A sketchy history of predictivism | 7 | |
| 1.5 | Weak and strong predictivism | 24 | |
| 1.6 | Overview of the argument of this book | 27 | |
| 2 | Epistemic pluralism | 31 | |
| 2.1 | Introduction | 31 | |
| 2.2 | Novelty for pluralist evaluators | 33 | |
| 2.3 | A pluralist model of theory evaluation | 38 | |
| 2.4 | Expert pluralism | 51 | |
| 2.5 | Conclusion | 58 | |
| 3 | Predictivism and the Periodic Table of the Elements | 60 | |
| 3.1 | Introduction | 60 | |
| 3.2 | Unvirtuous predictivism | 61 | |
| 3.3 | Virtuous predictivism | 64 | |
| 3.4 | Virtuous predictivism in Bayesian terms | 69 | |
| 3.5 | Four species of predictivism | 80 | |
| 3.6 | Mendeleev and the periodic law | 82 | |
| 3.7 | Mendeleev’s background beliefs | 87 | |
| 3.8 | Predictivism and the periodic law | 96 | |
| 3.9 | Conclusion | 122 | |
| 4 | Miracle arguments and the demise of strong predictivism | 123 | |
| 4.1 | Introduction | 123 | |
| 4.2 | Neither truth nor empirical adequacy explain novel success | 126 | |
| 4.3 | The miraculous endorsement argument for realism | 141 | |
| 4.4 | The base rate fallacy | 162 | |
| 4.5 | The realist is a pluralist | 166 | |
| 5 | The predicting community | 168 | |
| 5.1 | Introduction | 168 | |
| 5.2 | The coin flip example once again | 169 | |
| 5.3 | Eva meets Priscilla | 172 | |
| 5.4 | The community of predicting scientists | 173 | |
| 5.5 | A predictive paradox | 179 | |
| 5.6 | Counterpredictors | 181 | |
| 5.7 | Applications | 185 | |
| 5.8 | Realism, pluralism, and individualism | 187 | |
| 5.9 | Conclusion | 189 | |
| 6 | Back to epistemic pluralism | 190 | |
| 6.1 | Introduction | 190 | |
| 6.2 | Toward a more rigorous model of pluralistic theory evaluation | 195 | |
| 6.3 | Scenario one: the mapmakers | 197 | |
| 6.4 | Scenario two: the probabilistic jury | 205 | |
| 6.5 | Applications for the two scenarios | 210 | |
| 6.6 | Mixed weights | 212 | |
| 6.7 | Weighting gone wrong | 214 | |
| 7 | Postlude on old evidence | 217 | |
| 7.1 | Introduction | 217 | |
| 7.2 | H-independent e-evidence: Einstein in 1915 | 223 | |
| 7.3 | Beyond the e-difference approach: a theistic solution to the quantitative problem | 230 | |
| 7.4 | Two solutions to the quantitative problem | 232 | |
| 7.5 | Implications for Bayesianism? | 237 | |
| 7.6 | Conclusion | 238 | |
| 8 | A paradox resolved | 240 | |
| 8.1 | Introduction | 240 | |
| 8.2 | Confirmation theory | 240 | |
| 8.3 | The realist/anti-realist debate | 242 | |
| 8.4 | The methodology of science | 243 | |
| Glossary | 246 | ||
| Bibliography | 249 | ||
| Index | 258 | ||
© Cambridge University Press

