Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 58
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
February 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781316143629
Series:
Ideas in Context (108)

Book description

Roman Law in the State of Nature offers a new interpretation of the foundations of Hugo Grotius' natural law theory. Surveying the significance of texts from classical antiquity, Benjamin Straumann argues that certain classical texts, namely Roman law and a specifically Ciceronian brand of Stoicism, were particularly influential for Grotius in the construction of his theory of natural law. The book asserts that Grotius, a humanist steeped in Roman law, had many reasons to employ Roman tradition and explains how Cicero's ethics and Roman law - secular and offering a doctrine of the freedom of the high seas - were ideally suited to provide the rules for Grotius' state of nature. This fascinating new study offers historians, classicists and political theorists a fresh account of the historical background of the development of natural rights, natural law and of international legal norms as they emerged in seventeenth-century early modern Europe.

Reviews

‘Grotius’ significant influence on the development of international law is undisputed, and existing scholarship has investigated his works from almost every possible perspective. The more surprising it seems, then, that the Roman legacy and, in particular, the significant influence of Cicero’s writings on Grotius, have been neglected. Straumann addresses this issue masterfully in his competent and original interpretation. His command of the ancient and early modern material is exemplary.’

Peter Schröder Source: History Today

‘Straumann’s interpretation … is based on a line of argument that in many ways is original … [a few] words do not do justice to the riches of Straumann’s use of classical sources to interpret Grotius, but his ambition goes beyond this.’

Knud Haakonssen Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

'Focusing on the ideas in the texts, rather than the texts themselves, Grotius may very well be considered a pioneering thinker, and the work under review does a very good job of cementing his place in the history of ideas. I would therefore strongly recommend legal historians, Romanists and historians of political theory, philosophy and ideas alike to pick up this book.'

Jacob Giltaij Source: Grotiana

'Straumann’s book is a magnificent achievement … it deserves a wide readership. The book, which will be an instant classic in Grotius studies, will naturally attract the interest of historians of political thought, legal historians and classicists. But I would also recommend this book especially to practitioners of contemporary Anglophone moral and political philosophy, who should be reminded why Grotius was, for centuries, regarded as the towering figure in the history of modern ethics.'

Daniel Lee Source: History of Political Thought

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

  • Introduction
    pp 1-23

Bibliography

Albert, Sigrid. 1980. Bellum iustum: die Theorie des “gerechten Krieges” und ihre praktische Bedeutung für die auswärtigen Auseinandersetzungen Roms in republikanischer Zeit. Kallmünz.
Albrecht, Michael von. 1998. Rom: Spiegel Europas. Das Fortwirken antiker Texte und Themen in Europa. 2nd edn. Tübingen.
Alexandrowicz, C. H. 1967. An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies. Oxford.
Ando, C. 2006. “Religion and ius publicum,” in id. and J. Rüpke (eds.), Religion and Law in Classical and Christian Rome. Stuttgart: 126–45.
Ando, C. 2010. “Empire and the Laws of War: A Roman Archeology,” in B. Kingsbury and B. Straumann, eds., The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford: 30–52.
Annas, Julia. 1989. “Cicero on Stoic Moral Philosophy and Private Property,” in Miriam Griffin and Jonathan Barnes (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford: 151–73.
Annas, Julia. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford.
Armitage, David. 2004. Introduction, in: MLArmitage: xi–xx.
Armitage, David. 2012. “What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée,” History of European Ideas 38.4: 1–15.
Atkins, E. M. 1990. “‘Domina et Regina Virtutum’: Justice and Societas in De Officiis,” Phronesis 35: 258–89.
Aubert, Jean-Marie. 1955. Le droit romain dans l’œuvre de saint Thomas. Paris.
Baker, Keith. 1990. Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge.
Baker, Keith. 2001. “Transformations of Classical Republicanism in Eighteenth-Century France,” Journal of Modern History 73: 32–53.
Barbeyrac, J. 1749. Historical and Critical Account of the Science of Morality, and the Progress it has Made in the World, From the Earliest Times down to the Publication of this Work, Preface to Pufendorf, The Law of Nature and Nations, tr. B. Kennett. 5th edn. London.
Barducci, Marco. 2010a. Grozio ed il pensiero politico e religioso inglese 1632–1678. Florence.
Barducci, Marco. 2010b. “Clement Barksdale, Translator of Grotius: Erastianism and Episcopacy in the English Church, 1651–1658,” The Seventeenth Century 25.2: 265–80.
Barnes, Jonathan. 1986. “Cicéron et la guerre juste,” Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie 80: 37–80.
Bayle, Pierre. 1740. Dictionnaire historique et critique. Vol. 2. 5th edn. Amsterdam.
Bederman, David. 1995/96. “Reception of the Classical Tradition in International Law: Grotius’ De Jure Belli ac Pacis,” Grotiana 16/17: 3–34.
Beitz, Charles. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton.
Belissa, Marc, Yannick Bosc, and Florence Gauthier (eds.). 2009. Républicanismes et droit naturel: des humanistes aux révolutions des droits de l’homme et du citoyen: actes du colloque tenu à l’Université Paris VII Denis Diderot en juin 2008. Kimé.
Benton, Lauren, and Benjamin Straumann. 2010. “Acquiring Empire by Law: From Roman Doctrine to Early Modern European Practice.” Law and History Review 28.1: 1–38.
Bergh, G. C. J. van den. 2002. Die holländische elegante Schule. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte von Humanismus und Rechtswissenschaft in den Niederlanden 1500-1800. Frankfurt a. M.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in id., Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: 118–72.
Berry, Christopher J. 1994. The Idea of Luxury. A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge.
Berry, Christopher J. 1997. Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh.
Besselink, L. 1988. “The Impious Hypothesis Revisited,” Grotiana 9: 3–63.
Besselink, L. 2004. “Cynicism, Scepticism and Stoicism. A Stoic Distinction in Grotius’ Concept of Law,” in Blom and Winkel: 177–95.
Blom, Hans W., and Laurens C. Winkel (eds.). 2004. Grotius and the Stoa. Assen, 2004 (= Grotiana 22/23 [2001/2]).
Blundell, Sue. 1986. The Origins of Civilization in Greek and Roman Thought. London.
Böcler, Johann Heinrich. 1687. In Hugonis Grotii Jus Belli et Pacis Librum Primum Commentatio. Giessen.
Böcler, Johann Heinrich. 1715. Bibliographia critica scriptores omnium artium atque scientiarum ordine percensens, rec. Io. Gottlieb Krause, Leipzig.
Borschberg, Peter. 1999. “Hugo Grotius, East India Trade and the King of Johor,” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 30.2: 225–48.
Borschberg, Peter. 2002. “The Seizure of the Sta. Catarina Revisited: The Portuguese Empire in Asia, VOC Politics and the Origins of the Dutch–Johor Alliance (1602–ca. 1616),” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33: 31–62.
Borschberg, Peter. 2006/7. “Grotius, the Social Contract and Political Resistance. A Study of the Unpublished Theses LVI,” IILJ Working Paper (2006/7), available at SSRN eLibrary (2007), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=969250.
Bouwsma, William J. 1975. “The Two Faces of Humanism: Stoicism and Augustinianism in Renaissance Thought,” in Heiko A. Oberman and Thomas A.Brady, Jr. (eds.), Itinerarium Italicum: The Profile of the Italian Renaissance in the Mirror of Its European Transformations (Festschrift Kristeller). Leiden: 3–60.
Brandt, Reinhard. 1974. Eigentumstheorien von Grotius bis Kant. Stuttgart.
Brett, Annabel S. 1997. Liberty, Right, and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought. Cambridge.
Brett, Annabel S. 2002. “Natural Right and Civil Community: The Civil Philosophy of Hugo Grotius,” The Historical Journal 45.1: 31–51.
Brett, Annabel S. 2011. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton.
Brink, C. O. 1956. “Oikeiosis and oikeiotes: Theophrastus and Zeno on Nature in Moral Theory,” Phronesis 1: 123–45.
Brooke, Christopher. 2012. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau. Princeton.
Brunschwig, J. 1986. “The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism,” in M. Schofield and G. Striker (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge: 113–44.
Brunt, P. A. 1978. “Laus imperii,” in P. D. A. Garnsey and C. R. Whittaker (eds.), Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge: 159–91.
Buckland, W. W. 1963. A Text-Book of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian. 3rd edn. rev. Peter Stein. Cambridge.
Buckle, Stephen. 1991. Natural Law and the Theory of Property. Grotius to Hume. Oxford.
Burnyeat, Myles. 1994. “Did the Ancient Greeks have the Concept of Human Rights?,” Polis 13: 1–11.
Carmichael, Gershom. 2002. Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Scottish Enlightenment: The Writings of Gershom Carmichael, ed. J. Moore and M. Silverthorne. Indianapolis (orig. 1724).
Chroust, A.-H. 1943. “Hugo Grotius and the Scholastic Natural Law Tradition,” New Scholasticism 17: 101–33.
Clark, George N., and Willem J. M. Eysinga. 1951. The Colonial Conferences between England and the Netherlands in 1613 and 1615. Vol. 2 (Bibliotheca Visseriana 17). Leiden.
Coing, Helmut. 1982. “Zur Geschichte des Begriffs ‘subjektives Recht,’” in id., Gesammelte Aufsätze. Vol. 1. Frankfurt a. M.: 241–62.
Constant, Benjamin. 1988. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns,” in id., Political Writings, ed. B. Fontana. Cambridge.
Crawford, J. 2002. The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility. Cambridge.
Dahlheim, W. 1968. Struktur und Entwicklung des römischen Völkerrechts im 3. und 2. Jhd. v. Chr. Munich.
Diesselhorst, Malte. 1959. Die Lehre des Hugo Grotius vom Versprechen. Cologne.
Donahue, Charles. 2001. “Ius in the Subjective Sense,” in D. Maffei (ed.), A Ennio Cortese. Vol. 1. Rome: 506–35.
Dufour, Alfred. 1980. “L’influence de la méthodologie des sciences physiques et mathématiques sur les Fondateurs de l’Ecole du Droit naturel moderne (Grotius, Hobbes, Pufendorf),” Grotiana 1: 33–52.
Dyck, Andrew R. 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor.
Dyck, Andrew R. 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor.
Edelstein, Dan. 2009. The Terror of Natural Right: Republicanism, the Cult of Nature, and the French Revolution. Chicago.
Edwards, Charles S. 1981. Hugo Grotius. The Miracle of Holland: A Study in Political and Legal Thought. Chicago.
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. 1990. The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Aarhus 1990.
Eyffinger, Arthur C. 1996. “Hugo Grotius’ Parallelon Rerumpublicarum,” in H. J. M. Nellen and J. Trapman (eds.), De Hollandse Jaren van Hugo de Groot (1583–1621). Hilversum.
Eyffinger, Arthur C. 2001/2. “The Fourth Man. Stoic Tradition in Grotian Drama,” Grotiana 22/23: 117–53.
Eysinga, Willem J. M. van. 1947. “Quelques observations sur Grotius et le droit romain,” Grotiana 10: 18–28.
Eysinga, Willem J. M. van. 1952. Hugo Grotius. Eine biographische Skizze. Basel.
Fahl, Gundolf. 1969. Der Grundsatz der Freiheit der Meere in der Staatenpraxis von 1493–1649. Eine rechtsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Cologne.
Feenstra, Robert. 1984. “Quelques remarques sur les sources utilisées par Grotius dans ses travaux de droit naturel,” in The World of Hugo Grotius (1583–1645). Proceedings of the International Colloquium Organized by the Grotius Committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Amsterdam: 65–81.
Feenstra, Robert. 1991. “La systématique du droit dans l’œuvre de Grotius,” in La sistematica giuridica: Storia, teoria e problemi attuali (Biblioteca internazionale di cultura 22). Rome: 333–43 (= Robert Feenstra, Legal Scholarship and Doctrines of Private Law, 13th–18th Centuries. Scholarship and Doctrines of Private Law, 13th–18th Centuries. Aldershot, 1996).
Feenstra, Robert. 1992. “Ius commune et droit comparé chez Grotius. Nouvelles remarques sur les sources citées dans ses ouvrages juridiques, à propos d’une réimpression du De iure belli ac pacis,” Rivista internazionale di diritto commune 3 (1992): 7–36 (= Robert Feenstra, Legal Scholarship and Doctrines of Private Law, 13th–18th Centuries, Aldershot, 1996).
Feinberg, J. 1973. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs.
Ferrary, J.-L. 1984. “L’archéologie du ‘De re publica’ (2, 2, 4–37, 63),” Journal of Roman Studies 74: 87–98.
Fikentscher, W. 1979. De fide et perfidia. Der Treuegedanke in den “Staatsparallelen” des Hugo Grotius aus heutiger Sicht. Munich.
Filmer, Robert. 1991. Patriarcha and Other Writings, ed. Johann P. Sommerville. Cambridge.
Fisch, Jörg. 1984. Die europäische Expansion und das Völkerrecht. Stuttgart.
Forbes, Duncan. 1982. “Natural Law and the Scottish Enlightenment,” in R. Campbell and A. Skinner (eds.), Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: 186–204.
Fortuin, H. 1946. De natuurrechtelijke grondslagen van de Groot’s volkenrecht. ’s Gravenhage.
Franklin, Julian H. 1963. Bodin and the Sixteenth-Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History, New York.
Frowein, J. A. 1994. “Reactions by Not Directly Affected States to Breaches of Public International Law,” Recueil des Cours 248: 345–437.
Fruin, Robert. 1925. An Unpublished Work of Hugo Grotius’s (Bibliotheca Visseriana5).
Gaastra, F. 1991. Geschiedenis van de VOC. Zutphen.
Garnsey, Peter. 2007. Thinking about Property. From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge.
Gelderen, Martin van. 1993/94. “The Challenge of Colonialism: Grotius and Vitoria on Natural Law and International Relations,” Grotiana 14/15: 3–37.
Gelderen, Martin van. 2009. “Menschenrechte und Demokratie. James Madison, Hugo Grotius und die Probleme des neuen Europa,” Gerald-Stourzh-Vorlesung (http://www.univie.ac.at/gerald-stourzh-vorlesungen).
Gelderen, Martin van, and Quentin Skinner. 2002. Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Gentili, Alberico. 2011. The Wars of the Romans. A Critical Edition and Translation of De armis Romanis, ed. B. Kingsbury and B. Straumann, trans. David Lupher, Oxford.
Gewirth, Alan. 1978. Reason and Morality, Chicago.
Giltaij, Jacob. 2011. Mensenrechten in het Romeinse recht?Nijmegen.
Gizewski, Christian. 1993. “Hugo Grotius und das antike Völkerrecht,” Der Staat 32: 325–55.
Gough, J. W. 1957. The Social Contract. A Critical Study of its Development. 2nd edn. Oxford.
Grafton, Anthony. 1988. “The Availability of Ancient Works,” in Charles B. Schmitt (ed.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: 767–91.
Grewe, Wilhelm G. 1988. Epochen der Völkerrechtsgeschichte. 2nd edn. Baden-Baden.
Grosso, G. 1973. “Riflessioni su ‘ius civile,’ ‘ius gentium,’ ‘ius honorarium’ nella dialettica fra tecnicismo-tradizionalismo giuridico e adeguazione allo sviluppo economico e sociale in Roma,” in Studi in memoria di Guido Donatuti. Vol. 1. Milan: 439–53.
Grunert, Frank. 2000. Normbegründung und politische Legitimität. Zur Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie der deutschen Frühaufklärung. Tübingen.
Grunert, F. 2003. “The Reception of Hugo Grotius’s De jure belli ac pacis in the Early German Enlightenment,” in Hochstrasser and Schröder: 89– 105.
Haakonssen, Knud. 1985. “Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought,” Political Theory 13: 239–65.
Haakonssen, Knud. 1996. Natural law and Moral Philosophy. From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge.
Haakonssen, Knud. 2002. “The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights,” in Ian Hunter and David Saunders (eds.), Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought. New York: 27–42.
Häberlin, Carl Friedrich. 1797. “Darf der Ausdruck: unveräusserliche Menschenrechte in Satzschriften bey dem Reichskammergericht nicht gebraucht werden?,” Staats-Archiv 3: 365–68.
Haggenmacher, Peter. 1981. “Genèse et signification du concept de ‘ius gentium’ chez Grotius,” Grotiana 2: 44–102.
Haggenmacher, Peter. 1983a. Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. Paris.
Haggenmacher, Peter. 1983b. “Sur un passage obscur de Grotius,” The Legal History Review 51: 295–315.
Haggenmacher, Peter. 1985. “On Assessing the Grotian Heritage,” in International Law and the Grotian Heritage. The Hague: 150–60.
Haggenmacher, Peter. 1990. “Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland’s Inaugural Lecture,” in Hedley Bull, Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts (eds.), Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: 133–76.
Haggenmacher, Peter. 1997. “Droits subjectifs et système juridique chez Grotius,” in Luc Foisneau (ed.), Politique, droit et théologie chez Bodin, Grotius et Hobbes. Paris: 73–130.
Hankins, J. 2010: “Exclusivist Republicanism and the Non-Monarchical Republic,” Political Theory 38.4: 452–82.
Harrison, Ross. 2003. Hobbes, Locke, and Confusion’s Masterpiece. An Examination of Seventeenth-Century Political Philosophy. Cambridge.
Hart, H. L. A. 1984. “Are There Any Natural Rights?,” in J. Waldron (ed.), Theories of Rights, Oxford: 77–90 (orig. The Philosophical Review 64.2 [1955]: 175–91).
Hartenstein, Gustav. 1850. Darstellung der Rechtsphilosophie des Hugo Grotius (Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Classe der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 1) Leipzig.
Heck, E. 1966. Die Bezeugung von Ciceros Schrift De re publica. Hildesheim.
Heuss, A. 1933. Die völkerrechtlichen Grundlagen der römischen Aussenpolitik in republikanischer Zeit. Leipzig.
Higgins, R. 1994. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford.
Hochstrasser, T. 2000. Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge.
Hochstrasser, T., and P. Schröder (eds.). 2003. Early Modern Natural Law Theories. Context and Strategies in the Early Enlightenment. Dordrecht.
Höpfl, Harro, and Martyn P. Thompson. 1979. “Contract as a Motif in Political Thought,” American Historical Review 84.4: 919–44.
Hofmann, Hasso. 1995. “Hugo Grotius,” in M. Stolleis (ed.), Staatsdenker in der frühen Neuzeit. 3rd edn. Munich: 52–77.
Hohfeld, Wesley N. 1946. Fundamental Legal Conceptions. New Haven.
Hont, István. 2005. Jealousy of Trade. International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.
Hont, István, and Michael Ignatieff. 1983. “Needs and Justice in the Wealth of Nations,” in Hont and Ignatieff (eds.), Wealth and Virtue. The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge:1–44 (= Hont 2005: 389–443).
Howard, A. E. D. 1968. The Road from Runnymede: Magna Carta and Constitutionalism in America. Charlottesville.
Hulsebosch, Daniel. 2003. “The Ancient Constitution and the Expanding Empire: Sir Edward Coke’s British Jurisprudence,” Law and History Review 21: 439–82.
Ilting, K.-H. 1978. “Naturrecht,” in Otto Brunner et al. (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Vol. 4. Stuttgart: 245–313.
Inwood, Brad. 1999. “Stoic Ethics,” in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Keimpe Algra. Cambridge: 684–87.
Irwin, T. 1986. “Stoic and Aristotelian Conceptions of Happiness,” in M. Schofield and G. Striker (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge: 205–44.
Irwin, T. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford.
Irwin, T. 2007. The Development of Ethics. A Historical and Critical Study, Vol. I: From Socrates to the Reformation. Oxford.
Irwin, T. 2008. The Development of Ethics. A Historical and Critical Study, Vol. II: From Suarez to Rousseau. Oxford.
Israel, Jonathan. 1989. Dutch Primacy in World Trade, 1585–1740. Oxford.
Israel, Jonathan. 1995. The Dutch Republic. Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall, 1477–1806. Oxford.
Israel, Jonathan. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford.
Ittersum, Martine Julia van. 2003. “Hugo Grotius in Context: Van Heemskerck’s Capture of the Santa Catarina and Its Justification in De Jure Praedae (1604–1606),” Asian Journal of Social Science 31.3: 511–48.
Ittersum, Martine Julia van. 2006. Profit and Principle: Hugo Grotius, Natural Rights Theories and the Rise of Dutch Power in the East Indies, 1595–1615. Leiden.
Ittersum, Martine Julia van. 2007a. “Preparing Mare Liberum for the Press: Hugo Grotius’ Rewriting of Chapter 12 of De Iure Praedae in November–December 1608,” Grotiana 26.1: 246–80.
Ittersum, Martine Julia van. 2007b. “Mare Liberum in the West Indies?: Hugo Grotius and the Case of the Swimming Lion, a Dutch Pirate in the Caribbean at the Turn of the Seventeenth Century,” Itinerario 31.3: 59–94.
Ittersum, Martine Julia van. 2009. “Dating the Manuscript of De Jure Praedae (1604–1608): What Watermarks, Foliation and Quire Divisions Can Tell Us About Hugo Grotius’ Development as a Natural Rights and Natural Law Theorist,” History of European Ideas 35.2: 125–93.
Ittersum, Martine Julia van. 2010a. “The Wise Man Is Never Merely a Private Citizen: The Roman Stoa in Hugo Grotius’ De Jure Praedae (1604–1608),” History of European Ideas 36.1: 1–18.
Ittersum, Martine Julia van. 2010b. “The Long Goodbye: Hugo Grotius’ Justification of Dutch Expansion Overseas, 1615–1645,” History of European Ideas 36.4: 386–411.
Johann, Horst-Theodor. 1981. Gerechtigkeit und Nutzen. Studien zur ciceronischen und hellenistischen Naturrechts- und Staatslehre. Heidelberg.
Kaltenborn, Carl von. 1848. Die Vorläufer des Hugo Grotius auf dem Gebiete des jus naturae et gentium sowie der Politik. Leipzig.
Kammasch, T., and S. Schwarz. 2001. “Menschenrechte,” in M. Landfester (ed.), Der Neue Pauly. Enzyklopädie der Antike. Vol. 15/1. Stuttgart: 383–91.
Kapust, Daniel. 2011. Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.
Kaser, Max. 1971/75. Das römische Privatrecht. 2 vols. (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft 10.3.3) 2nd edn. Munich.
Kaser, Max. 1977. “Zum ‘Ius’-Begriff der Römer,” in Essays in Honour of Ben Beinart. Vol. 2 (= Acta Juridica 1977): 63–81.
Kaser, Max. 1993. Ius gentium. Cologne.
Kelley, D. R. 1970. Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship. Language, Law and History in the French Renaissance. New York.
Kersting, Wolfgang. 1994. Die politische Philosophie des Gesellschaftsvertrags. Darmstadt.
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1997. “A Grotian Tradition of Theory and Practice? Grotius, Law, and Moral Skepticism in the Thought of Hedley Bull,” Quinnipiac Law Review 17: 3–33.
Kingsbury, Benedict. 2000. “Gentili, Grotius, and the Extra-European World,” in H. Scheiber (ed.), The Law of the Sea. The Hague.
Kingsbury, Benedict, and Benjamin Straumann. 2010a. “The State of Nature and Commercial Sociability in Early Modern International Legal Thought,” Grotiana 31: 1–22.
Kingsbury, Benedict and Benjamin Straumann. (eds.). 2010b. The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford.
Kingsbury, Benedict and Benjamin Straumann. 2011. Introduction toAlberico Gentili, The Wars of the Romans. A Critical Edition and Translation of De armis Romanis, ed. B. Kingsbury and B. Straumann, trans. David Lupher. Oxford: x–xxv.
Klein, E. 1985. “Samuel Pufendorf und die Anfänge der Naturrechtslehre,” in W. Doerr (ed.), Semper apertus: sechshundert Jahre Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, 1386–1986. Vol. 1. Berlin: 414–39.
Klein, Jacob. 2012. “Stoic Eudaimonism and the Natural Law Tradition,” in J. A. Jacobs (ed.), Reason, Religion, and Natural Law: From Plato to Spinoza. Oxford: 57–80.
Klippel, Diethelm. 2006. Naturrecht und Staat. Politische Funktionen des europäischen Naturrechts. Munich.
Knight, W. S. M. 1925. The Life and Works of Hugo Grotius. London.
Korkman, Petter. 1999/2000. “Barbeyrac on Scepticism and on Grotian Modernity,” Grotiana 20/21: 77–105.
Kraut, Richard. 2002. Aristotle: Political Philosophy. Oxford.
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1990. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft. 3rd edn. Stuttgart.
Lauterpacht, Hersch. 1927. Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law. London.
Lee, Daniel. 2011. “Popular Liberty, Princely Government, and the Roman Law in Hugo Grotius’s De Jure Belli ac Pacis,” Journal of the History of Ideas 72.3: 371–92.
Lefèvre, Eckard. 2001. Panaitios’ und Ciceros Pflichtenlehre. Stuttgart.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1972. Political Writings, ed. Patrick Riley. Cambridge.
Lesaffer, R. 2005. “Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law: Occupation and Acquisitive Prescription,” The European Journal of International Law 16: 25–58.
Lipsius, Justus. 2004. Politica. Six Books of Politics or Political Instruction, ed. J. Waszink. Assen.
Locke, John. 1967. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge.
Long, A. A. 1995. “Cicero’s Politics in De officiis,” in André Laks and Malcolm Schofield (eds.), Justice and Generosity. Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: 213–40.
Long, A. A.,. 1997. “Stoic Philosophers on Persons, Property-Ownership and Community,” in Richard Sorabji (ed.), Aristotle and After. London: 13–31.
Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources, with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge.
Lupher, David. 2003. Romans in a New World. Classical Models in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America, Ann Arbor.
Lupher, David. 2010b. “The De armis Romanis and the Exemplum of Roman Imperialism,” in Kingsbury and Straumann: 85–100.
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue. 2nd edn., Notre Dame.
Maine, Henry Sumner. 2002. Ancient Law, with introduction by Dante J. Scala. New Brunswick (orig. 1866).
Malcolm, Noel. 2002. “Hobbes’s Theory of International Relations,” in Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: 432–56.
Mautner, Thomas. 2005. “Grotius and the Skeptics,” Journal of the History of Ideas 66.4: 577–601.
Mill, John Stuart. 1963. Three Essays on Religion, ed. J. M. Robson (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill 10). Toronto (orig. 1874).
Miller, Fred D., Jr. 1995. Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford.
Miller, Jon. 2003. “Stoics, Grotius, and Spinoza on Moral Deliberation,” in Jon Miller and Brad Inwood (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: 116–40.
Miller, Jon. 2004. “Innate Ideas in Stoicism and Grotius,” in Blom and Winkel: 157–75.
Miller, Jon. 2007. “Grotius and Stobaeus,” Grotiana 26.1: 104–26.
Miller, Peter N. 2002. “Nazis and Neo-Stoics: Otto Brunner and Gerhard Oestreich before and after the Second World War,”Past & Present 176.1: 144–86.
Mitsis, Phillip. 1994. “Natural Law and Natural Right in Post-Aristotelian Philosophy. The Stoics and their Critics,” in Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.7. Berlin: 4812–50.
Mitsis, Phillip. 1999. “The Stoic Origin of Natural Rights,” in K. Ierodiakonou (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: 153–77.
Mitsis, Phillip. 2003. “The Stoics and Aquinas on Virtue and Natural Law,” The Studia Philonica Annual 15: 35–53.
Mitsis, Phillip. 2005. “The Stoics on Property and Politics,” in Ancient Ethics and Political Philosophy, ed. T. Roche (= The Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 43): 230–49.
Molhuysen, P. C. 1943. “De bibliotheek van Hugo de Groot in 1618,” Mededeelingen der Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks 6.3: 45–63.
Moore, James and Michael Silverthorne. 1983. “Gershom Carmichael and Natural Jurisprudence,” in I. Hont and M. Ignatieff (eds.), Wealth and Virtue. The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: 73–87.
Moyn, Samuel. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, Mass.
Nagel, Thomas. 1959. “Hobbes’s Concept of Obligation,” Philosophical Review 68.1: 68–83.
Nellen, H. J. M. 1985. Hugo de Groot: de loopbaan van een geleerd staatsman. Weesp.
Nelson, Eric. 2004. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge.
Nelson, Eric. 2010. The Hebrew Republic. Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, Mass.
Newman, W. L. 1902. The Politics of Aristotle. Vol. 3. Oxford.
Nippel, Wilfried. 1993. “Macht, Machtkontrolle und Machtentgrenzung. Zu einigen antiken Konzeptionen und ihrer Rezeption in der frühen Neuzeit,” in Jürgen Gebhardt and Herfried Münkler (eds.), Bürgerschaft und Herrschaft: Zum Verhältnis von Macht und Demokratie im antiken und neuzeitlichen politischen Denken. Baden-Baden:58–78.
Nippel, Wilfried. 2003. “Antike und moderne Freiheit,” in W. Jens and B. Seidensticker (eds.), Ferne und Nähe der Antike. Berlin: 49–68.
Nörr, Dieter. 1991. Die Fides im römischen Völkerrecht. Heidelberg.
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York.
Nussbaum, A. 1951/52. “The Significance of Roman Law in the History of International Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 100: 678–87.
Obbink, Dirk. 1992. “‘What all men believe – must be true’: common conceptions and consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic Philosophy,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 10: 193–231.
Oestreich, Gerhard. 1980. Strukturprobleme der frühen Neuzeit. Ausgewählte Aufsätze, ed. Brigitta Oestreich. Berlin.
Oestreich, Gerhard. 1989. Antiker Geist und moderner Staat bei Justus Lipsius (1547–1606), ed. N. Mout. Göttingen.
Ottenwälder, Paul. 1950. Zur Naturrechtslehre des Hugo Grotius. Tübingen.
Ottmann, Henning. 2001/12. Geschichte des politischen Denkens. 4 vols. Stuttgart.
Pagden, Anthony. 1995. Lords of all the World. Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France, c. 1500–c.1800. New Haven.
Pagden, Anthony. 2003. “Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe’s Imperial Legacy,” Political Theory 31: 171–99.
Passerin d’Entrèves, A. 1967. Natural Law. An Introduction to Legal Philosophy. London.
Pauw, F. E. R. de. 1965. Grotius and the Law of the Sea (Publications du Centre de droit international et de sociologie appliquée au droit international). Brussels.
Pembroke, S. G. 1971. “Oikeiosis,” in A. A. Long (ed.), Problems in Stoicism. London: 114–49.
Piirimäe, P. 2002. “Just War in Theory and Practice: The Legitimation of Swedish Intervention in the Thirty Years War,” The Historical Journal 45.3: 499–523.
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Political Tradition. Princeton.
Pocock, J. G. A. 1987. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. A Study of English Historical Though in the Seventeeth Century. A Reissue with a Retrospect. Cambridge.
Pohlenz, Max. 1940. Grundfragen der stoischen Philosophie (Abhandlungen der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philosophisch-historische Klasse 3.26). Göttingen.
Pohlenz, Max. 1970. Die Stoa. Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. 2 vols. 4th edn. Göttingen.
Popkin, R. 2003. The History of Scepticism. From Savonarola to Bayle, rev. and expanded edn. Oxford.
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1998. De jure naturae et gentium, ed. F. Böhling. 2 vols. (Samuel Pufendorf, Gesammelte Werke, ed. W. Schmidt- Biggemann 4.1–2). Berlin.
Pugliese, G. 1954. “‘Res corporales,’ ‘res incorporales’ e il problema del diritto soggetivo,” in Studi in onore di Vincenzo Arangio-Ruiz. Vol. 3. Naples: 223–60.
Raaflaub, K. 2004. The Discovery of Freedom in Ancient Greece. Chicago.
Rahe, Paul. 1992. Republics Ancient and Modern. Chapel Hill.
Remec, P. P. 1960. The Position of the Individual in International Law according to Grotius and Vattel. The Hague.
Röd, W. 1970. Geometrischer Geist und Naturrecht. Munich.
Röling, B. V. A. 1990. “Are Grotius’ Ideas Obsolete?,” in Hedley Bull, Benedict Kingsbury, and Adam Roberts (eds.), Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: 281–99.
Roelofsen, C. G. 1983. “Some Remarks on the ‘Sources’ of the Grotian System of International Law,” Netherlands International Law Review 30: 73–79.
Roelofsen, C. G. 1989. “Grotius and the State Practice of his Day,” Grotiana 10: 3–46.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1966. Emile ou De l’éducation. Paris.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, ed. V. Gourevitch. Cambridge.
St. Leger, J. 1962. The ‘Etiamsi Daremus’ of Hugo Grotius: A Study in the Origins of International Law. Rome.
Saulnier, C. 1980. “Le rôle des prêtres fétiaux et l’application du ‘ius fetiale’ à Rome,” Revue historique de droit français et étranger 58: 171–99.
Sauter, Johann. 1932. Die philosophischen Grundlagen des Naturrechts. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Rechts- und Staatslehre. Vienna.
Schaffner, Tobias. 2012. “Universelle Gleichheit in Hugo Grotius’ Lehre vom natürlichen Privatrecht,” in S. Ast, J. Hänni, K. Mathis, and B. Zabel (eds.), Gleichheit und Universalität. Stuttgart: 227–45.
Scheltens, D. F. 1983. “Grotius’ Doctrine of the Social Contract,” Netherlands International Law Review 30: 43–60.
Schmitz, Philip. 2014. ‘Cato peripateticus’ – stoische und peripatetische Ethik im Dialog. Cic. ‘Fin’ 3 und der Aristotelismus des ersten Jh. v. Chr. Berlin.
Schneewind, J. B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy. A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge.
Schneewind, J. B. 2003. “Introduction,” in J. Miller and B. Inwood (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: 1–6.
Schnepf, Robert. 1998. “Naturrecht und Geschichte bei Hugo Grotius. Ein methodologisches Problem rechtsphilosophischer Begründung,” Zeitschrift für Neuere Rechtsgeschichte 20: 1–14.
Schofield, Malcolm. 1991. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge.
Schofield, Malcolm. 1995. “Two Stoic Approaches to Justice,” in A. Laks and M. Schofield (eds.), Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: 191–212.
Schofield, Malcolm. 1999. “Morality and the Law: The Case of Diogenes of Babylon,” in id., Saving the City. Cambridge: 140–54.
Schwelb, E. 1972. “The Actio Popularis and International Law,” Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 2: 46–55.
Seelmann, K. 1979. Die Lehre des Fernando Vázquez de Menchaca vom ‘dominium.’ Cologne.
Seelmann, K. 1997. Theologie und Jurisprudenz an der Schwelle zur Moderne. Die Geburt des neuzeitlichen Naturrechts in der iberischen Spätscholastik. Baden- Baden.
Shaver, Robert. 1996. “Grotius on Scepticism and Self-Interest,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78: 27–47.
Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. 1st edn. London.
Skinner, Quentin 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Skinner, Quentin. 1980. “The Origins of the Calvinist Theory of Revolution,” in B. C. Malament (ed.), After the Reformation, Essays in Honour of J. H. Hexter. Manchester: 309–30.
Skinner, Quentin. 1988. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” in J. Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics. Princeton: 29–67 (= History and Theory 8 [1969]: 3–53).
Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge.
Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge.
Skinner, Quentin. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty, Cambridge.
Somos, Mark. 2011. Secularisation and the Leiden Circle. Leiden.
Sorabji, Richard. 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. London.
Stahl, Friedrich Julius. 1847. Die Philosophie des Rechts. Vol. 1. 2nd edn. Heidelberg.
Stein, Lorenz von. 1884. Die Verwaltungslehre. Stuttgart (rpt. Aalen, 1962).
Stolleis, M. 1988. Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland. Vol. 1. Munich.
Straumann, Benjamin. 2003/4. “Appetitus societatis and oikeiosis: Hugo Grotius’ Ciceronian Argument for Natural Law and Just War,” Grotiana 24/25: 41–66.
Straumann, Benjamin. 2006a. “The Right to Punish as a Just Cause of War in Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law,” Studies in the History of Ethics 2: 1–21 (=www.historyofethics.org/022006/022006Straumann.html).
Straumann, Benjamin. 2006b. “‘Ancient Caesarian Lawyers’ in a State of Nature: Roman Tradition and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius’s De iure praedae,” Political Theory 34: 328–50.
Straumann, Benjamin. 2007. Hugo Grotius und die Antike. Römisches Recht und römische Ethik im frühneuzeitlichen Naturrecht. Baden-Baden.
Straumann, Benjamin. 2008. “The Peace of Westphalia as a Secular Constitution,” Constellations 15.2: 173–88.
Straumann, Benjamin. 2009. “Is Modern Liberty Ancient? Roman Remedies and Natural Rights in Hugo Grotius’ Early Works on Natural Law,” Law and History Review 27.1: 55–85.
Straumann, Benjamin. 2010. “The Corpus iuris as a Source of Law between Sovereigns in Alberico Gentili’s Thought,” in Kingsbury and Straumann 2010b: 101–23.
Strauss, Leo. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago.
Striker, Gisela 1987. “Origins of the Concept of Natural Law,” in ead., Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: 209–20 (= Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2: 79–102).
Striker, Gisela. 1996. “The Role of oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics,” in ead., Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: 281–97 (orig. “The Role of oikeiosis in Stoic Ethics,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1 [1983]: 145–67).
Swenson, James. 2000. On Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Considered as One of the First Authors of the Revolution. Stanford.
Tanaka, Tadashi. 1993. “Grotius’ Method: With Special Reference to Prolegomena,” in Yasuaki Onuma (ed.), A Normative Approach to War: Peace, War, and Justice in Hugo Grotius. Oxford: 11–31.
Telders, B. M. 1948a. Hugonis Grotii De Iure Belli ac Pacis, An Extract by B. M. Telders, ed. J. Barents and A. J. S. Douma. The Hague.
Telders, B. M. 1948b. “Pour qu’on lise Grotius,” in Verzamelde geschriften. Vol. 2. The Hague: 7–17 (orig. Grotiana 8 [1940]: 30–40).
Ter Meulen, J., and P. J. J. Diermanse. 1950. Bibliographie des écrits imprimés de Hugo Grotius. The Hague.
Tex, Jan den. 1973. Oldenbarnevelt, trans. R. B. Powell. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Tierney, Brian. 1983. “Tuck on Rights. Some Medieval Problems,” History of Political Thought 6: 429–41.
Tierney, Brian. 1997. The Idea of Natural Rights. Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law 1150–1625. Atlanta, Ga.
Todescan, Franco. 2003. Etiamsi daremus: Studi sinfonici sul diritto naturale. Padua.
Tuck, Richard. 1979. Natural Rights Theories. Their Origin and Development. Cambridge.
Tuck, Richard. 1983. “Grotius, Carneades and Hobbes,” Grotiana 4: 43–62.
Tuck, Richard. 1987. “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law,” in A. Pagden (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: 99–119.
Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651, Cambridge.
Tuck, Richard. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford.
Tugendhat, Ernst. 1993. Vorlesungen über Ethik. Frankfurt a. M.
Tully, J. 1980. A Discourse on Property. John Locke and his Adversaries. Cambridge.
Vander Waerdt, Paul A. 1991. “Politics and Philosophy in Stoicism. A Discussion of A. Erskine, The Hellenistic Stoa: Political Thought and Action,” in Julia Annas (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9: 185–211.
Vander Waerdt, Paul A. 1994a. “Philosophical Influence on Roman Jurisprudence? The Case of Stoicism and Natural Law,” in Wolfgang Haase (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.7. Berlin: 4851–900.
Vander Waerdt, Paul A. 1994b. “Zeno’s Republic and the Origins of Natural Law,” in The Socratic Movement, ed. P. A. Vander Waerdt. Ithaca: 272–308.
Vermeulen, B. P. 1982/83. “God, wil en rede in Hugo de Groots natuurrecht,” Wijsgerig perspectief of maatschappij en wetenschap 23: 54–59.
Vermeulen, B. P., and G. A. Van der Wal. 1995/96. “Grotius, Aquinas and Hobbes. Grotian Natural Law between lex aeterna and Natural Rights,” Grotiana 16/17: 55–83.
Villey, M. 1946. “L’idée du droit subjectif et les systèmes juridiques romains,” Revue historique de droit français et étranger 4, 24: 201–27.
Villey, M. 1962. “Les origines de la notion de droit subjectif,” in id. (ed.), Leçons d’histoire de la philosophie du droit. 2nd edn. Paris: 221–50.
Villey, M. 1964. “La genèse du droit subjectif chez Guillaume d’Occam,” Archives de philosophie de droit 9: 97–127.
Villey, M. 1976. “Déformations de la philosophie du droit d’Aristote entre Vitoria et Grotius,” in Platon et Aristote à la Renaissance. XVIe Colloque International de Tours. Paris: 201–15.
Vivenza, Gloria. 2001. Adam Smith and the Classics. The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith’s Thought. Oxford.
Voggensperger, R. 1952. Der Begriff des “Ius naturale” im römischen Recht. Basel.
Vollenhoven, C. van. 1931. The Framework of Grotius’ Book De iure belli ac pacis (1625) (Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Afdeeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel 30, 4). Amsterdam.
Voltaire. 1762. L’ A, B, C, dialogue curieux, traduit de l’Anglais de Monsieur Huet. London (i.e., Geneva, 1768).
Voltaire. 1974. Correspondence and Related Documents, ed. Theodore Besterman (The Complete Works of Voltaire 115). Banbury.
Wacht, Manfred. 1982. “Privateigentum bei Cicero und Ambrosius,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 25: 28–64.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford.
Waszink, Jan. 2012. “Lipsius and Grotius: Tacitism,” History of European Ideas 12: 1–18.
Watson, A. 1993. International Law in Archaic Rome. War and Religion. Baltimore.
Wehberg, H. 1954. “Die Unterscheidung zwischen Natur- und Völkerrecht in der Lehre von Hugo Grotius,” in Mensch und Staat in Recht und Geschichte. Festschrift für Herbert Kraus. Kitzingen: 227–32.
Weiler, J., A. Cassese, and M. Spinedi. International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility. Berlin.
White, M. 1978. The Philosophy of the American Revolution, New York.
Whitman, James. 1996. “The Moral Menace of Roman Law and the Making of Commerce: Some Dutch Evidence,” Yale Law Journal 105: 1841–89.
Wieacker, Franz. 1967. Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Entwicklung. 2nd rev. edn. Göttingen.
Wiedemann, T. 1986. “The fetiales: A Reconsideration,” Classical Quarterly 36: 478–90.
Wight, Martin. 1991. International Theory: The Three Traditions, ed. G. Wight and B. Porter. Leicester.
Willoweit, Dietmar. 1974. “Dominium und Proprietas. Zur Entwicklung des Eigentumsbegriffs in der mittelalterlichen und neuzeitlichen Rechtswissenschaft,” Historisches Jahrbuch 94: 131–56.
Winkel, Laurens. 1988. “Die stoische oikeiosis-Lehre und Ulpians Definition der Gerechtigkeit,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung 105: 669–79.
Winkel, Laurens. 1993. “Einige Bemerkungen über ius naturale und ius gentium,” in M. J. Schermaier and Z. Vegh (eds.), Ars boni et aequi: Festschrift für Wolfgang Waldstein zum 65. Geburtstag. Stuttgart: 443–49.
Winkel, Laurens. 2000. “Les origines antiques de l’appetitus societatis de Grotius,” Legal History Review 68.3: 393–403.
Winterbottom, M. 1964. “Quintilian and the vir bonus,” Journal of Roman Studies 54: 90–97.
Wirszubski, Chaim. 1950. Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.
Wolf, Erik. 1963. “Hugo Grotius,” in id., Grosse Rechtsdenker der deutschen Geistesgeschichte. 4th edn. Tübingen: 253–310.
Wood, Neal. 1988. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley.
Wright, Johnson. 1997. A Classical Republican in Eighteenth-Century France: The Political Thought of Mably, 1st edn. Stanford.
Wright, M. R. 1995. “Cicero on Self-Love and Love of Humanity in De Finibus 3,” in J. G. F. Powell (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford: 171–95.
Zagorin, Perez. 2000. “Hobbes without Grotius,” History of Political Thought 21.1: 16–40.
Zagorin, Perez. 2009. Hobbes and the Law of Nature. Princeton.
Zajadlo, J. 1988. “Die Bedeutung der Hypothese etiamsi daremus,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 74: 83–92.
Zarka, Yves Charles. 1999/2000. “The Mutation of the Right of Resistance in Grotius and Hobbes,” Grotiana 20/21: 35–47.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1996. “Natural Law and Poetic Justice: A Carneadean Debate in Cicero and Virgil,” Classical Philology 91.1: 297–319.
Ziegler, Karl-Heinz. 1972. “Die römischen Grundlagen des europäischen Völkerrechts,” Ius Commune 4: 1–27.
Ziegler, Karl-Heinz. 1991/92. “Grotius Topical, or the Import of Antiquity into the International Law of Europe,” Grotiana 12/13: 78–87.
Ziskind, Jonathan. 1973. “International Law and Ancient Sources: Grotius and Selden,” The Review of Politics 35: 537–59.
Zuckert, M. 1989. “‘Bringing Philosophy Down From the Heavens’: Natural Right in the Roman Law,” The Review of Politics 51.1: 70–85.
Zuckert, Michael P. 1994. Natural Rights and the New Republicanism. Princeton.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.