Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T03:18:05.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Superiority of Denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography over single-stranded conformation and conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for mutation detection in TSC2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

Y. S. CHOY
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02115 Division of Genetics, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02115
S. L. DABORA
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02115
F. HALL
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02115
V. RAMESH
Affiliation:
Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Massachussetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114
Y. NIIDA
Affiliation:
Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Massachussetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114
D. FRANZ
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Neurology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229
J. KASPRZYK-OBARA
Affiliation:
Department of Child Neurology, Children's Memorial Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
M. P. REEVE
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02115
D. J. KWIATKOWSKI
Affiliation:
Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02115
Get access

Abstract

We evaluated denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography (DHPLC) as a scanning method for mutation detection in TSC2, and compared it to conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis (CSGE) and single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP). The first 20 exons of TSC2 were amplified from 84 TSC patients and screened initially by CSGE and then by DHPLC. Optimization of DHPLC analysis of each exon was carried out by design of primers with minimum variation in the melting temperature of the amplicon, and titration of both elution gradient and temperature. CSGE analysis identified 40 shifts (21 unique) in the 84 patients and 20 exons. All of these variants were detected by DHPLC, and an additional 27 changes (14 unique) were identified. Overall 15 of 28 (54%) unique single base substitutions were detected by CSGE; all were detected by DHPLC. 25 definite or probable mutations were found in these 84 patients (30%) in exons 1–20 of TSC2. In a subsequent blinded analysis of 15 samples with 18 distinct TSC2 sequence variants originally detected by SSCP in another centre, all variants were detected by DHPLC except one where the variation occurred within the primer. Ten other (7 unique) sequence variants were detected in these samples which had not been detected by SSCP. Overall, 11 of 16 (69%) unique single base substitutions were detected by SSCP; all were detected by DHPLC. We conclude that DHPLC is superior to both CSGE and SSCP for detection of DNA sequence variation in TSC2, particularly for single base substitution mutations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© University College London 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)