Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:24:49.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ERP priming studies of bilingual language processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2018

SINA BOSCH  and
ALINA LEMINEN
SINA BOSCH*
Affiliation:
Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, University of Potsdam
ALINA LEMINEN
Affiliation:
Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki
*
Address of correspondence: Sina Bosch, Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germanybosch@uni-potsdam.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this review is to provide a selective overview of priming studies which have employed the event-related brain potential (ERP) technique in order to investigate bilingual language processing. The priming technique can reveal an implicit memory effect in which exposure to one stimulus influences the processing of another stimulus. Behavioral approaches, such as measuring reaction times, may not always be enough for providing a full view on the exact mechanisms and the time-course of language comprehension. Instead, ERPs have a time-resolution of a millisecond and hence they offer a precise temporal overview of the underlying neural processes involved in language processing. In our review, we summarize experimental research that has combined priming with ERP measurements, thus creating a valuable tool for examining the neurophysiological correlates of language processing in the bilingual brain.

Keywords

event-related brain potentialsprimingbilinguals
Type
Review Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 462 - 470
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*Our work in this article has been supported by an Alexander-von-Humboldt Professorship to Harald Clahsen. We thank the BLC Editors and reviewers as well as the members of the Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism for their thoughtful and constructive comments on earlier versions of our manuscript.

References

Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition. Language, 68, 706–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, S., & Clahsen, H. (2016). Accessing morphosyntax in L1 and L2 word recognition: A priming study of inflected German adjectives. The Mental Lexicon, 11, 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, S., Krause, H., & Leminen, A. (2016). The time-course of morphosyntactic and semantic priming in late bilinguals: A study of German adjectives. Bilingualsim: Language and Cognition, available on CJO 2016 doi:10.1017/S1366728916000055.Google Scholar
Casaponsa, A., Carreiras, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2015). How do bilinguals identify the language of the words they read? Brain Research, 1624, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2009). Primed picture naming within and across languages: an ERP investigation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 286–303.Google Scholar
Christoffels, I. K., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. O. (2007). Bilingual language control: an event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1147, 192–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006a). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–570.Google Scholar
De Bruijn, E., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: evidence from event-related potentials and response times in semantic priming. Bilingualsim: Language and Cognition, 4, 155–168.Google Scholar
de Diego Balaguer, R., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Diaz, B., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2005). Morphological processing in early bilinguals: An ERP study of regular and irregular verb processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 312–327.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 51–66.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A. F. J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, A., de Vega, M., & Barber, H. (2004). Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 598–608.Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J., Dimitropoulou, M., Uribe-Etxebarria, O., Laka, I., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of the masked translation priming effect with highly proficient simultaneous bilinguals. Brain Research, 1359, 142–154.Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Dimitropoulou, M., Gillon Dowens, M., Molinaro, N., & Martin, C. (2016). The electrophysiology of the bilingual brain. In Heredia, R. R., Altarriba, J., & Cieslicka, A. B. (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension research (pp. 265–312), New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973–2987.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 226–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. (Vol. Fourth, pp. 819–837). Cambridge, Massachusets: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hahne, A., Müller, J., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Morphological processing in a second language: behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 121–134.Google Scholar
Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2006). On the time course of visual word recognition: an event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1631–1643.Google Scholar
Hoshino, N., & Thierry, G. (2012). Do Spanish–English Bilinguals have Their Fingers in Two Pies – or is It Their Toes? An Electrophysiological Investigation of Semantic Access in Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoshino, N., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2010). An ERP investigation of masked cross-script translation priming. Brain Research, 1344, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, G. M., Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S. R. (2001). ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism, 4, 169–178.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 60–99.Google Scholar
Kerkhofs, R., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D., & de Bruijn, E. (2006). Testing a model for bilingual semantic priming with interlingual homographs: RT and N400 effects. Brain Research, 1068, 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielar, A., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). Graded effects of regularity in language revealed by N400 indices of morphological priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1373–1398.Google Scholar
Kielar, A., & Joanisse, M. F. (2011). The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: An ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology. Neuropsychologia, 49, 161–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotz, S., & Elston-Guettler, K. (2004). The role of proficiency on processing categorial and asociative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 215–235.Google Scholar
Kotz, S.A. (2001). Neurolinguistic evidence for bilingual language representation: a comparison of reaction times and event related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, H., Bosch, S., & Clahsen, H. (2015). Morphosyntax in the bilingual mental lexicon. An experimental study of strong stems in German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, doi:10.1017/S0272263114000564.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the [400N] component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 14.1–14.27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: a masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866–877.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M., Cunillera, T., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Hulten, A., Tuomainen, J., & Laine, M. (2007). Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1148, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leinonen, A., Gronholm-Nyman, P., Jarvenpaa, M., Soderholm, C., Lappi, O., Laine, M., & Krause, C. M. (2009). Neurocognitive processing of auditorily and visually presented inflected words and pseudowords: Evidence from a morphologically rich language. Brain Research, 1275, 54–66.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K. M. L., & Dijkstra, A. F. J. (2004). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 32, 533–550.Google Scholar
Leminen, A., & Clahsen, H. (2014). Brain potentials to inflected adjectives: beyond storage and decomposition. Brain Research, 1543, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín, M. C., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2010). Time course of inhibitory processes in bilingual language processing. British Journal of Psychology, 101 (4), 679–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2009). Masked repetition and translation priming in second language learners: a window on the time-course of form and meaning activation using ERPs. Psychophysiology, 46, 551–565.Google Scholar
Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P.J. (2007). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44, 506–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1021–1056.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. L. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing. Second Language Research, 21, 152–174.Google Scholar
Müller, O., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different? Psychophysiology, 47 (3), 455–466.Google Scholar
Münte, T., Say, T., Clahsen, H., & Kutas, M. (1999). Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 241–253.Google Scholar
Proverbio, A. M., Leoni, G., & Zani, A. (2004). Language switching mechanisms in simultaneous interpreters: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1636–1656.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Muente, T., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Morphological priming in Spanish verb forms: An ERP repetition priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 443–454.Google Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Eventrelated potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2030–2048.Google Scholar
Rugg, M. D. (1995). ERP studies of memory. In Rugg, M. D. & Coles, M. G. H. (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp.132–170), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Testing asymmetries in noncognate translation priming: Evidence from RTs and ERPs. Psychophysiology 1–8.Google Scholar
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104, 12530–12535.Google Scholar
Von Studnitz, R. E., & Green, D. W. (2002). The cost of switching language in a semantic categorization task. Bilingualism, 5, 241–251.Google Scholar
Weber, K., & Lavric, A. (2008). Syntactic anomaly elicits a lexico-semantic (N400) ERP effect in the second language but not the first. Psychophysiology, 45, 920–925.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.Google Scholar
Weyerts, H., Münte, T. F., Smid, H. G. O. M., & Heinze, H. J. (1996). Mental representations of morphologically complex words: An event-related potential study with adult humans. Neuroscience Letters, 206, 125–128.Google Scholar