Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T00:47:56.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biofilm formation in the life cycle of the cellulolytic actinomycete Thermobifida fusca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

A. N. Alonso ,
P. J. Pomposiello  and
S. B. Leschine
A. N. Alonso*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, 639 North Pleasant Street, University of Massachusetts, Morrill Science Center IVN, Amherst MA 01003, USA
P. J. Pomposiello
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, 639 North Pleasant Street, University of Massachusetts, Morrill Science Center IVN, Amherst MA 01003, USA
S. B. Leschine
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, 639 North Pleasant Street, University of Massachusetts, Morrill Science Center IVN, Amherst MA 01003, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Dr A. N. Alonso, Department of Microbiology, 639 North Pleasant Street, University of Massachusetts, Morrill Science Center IVN, Amherst MA 01003, USAT1 413 545 2051, F1 413-545-1578, Ealmaris.alonso@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Actinomycetes have been used with enormous success in industrial processes; however, little is known about biofilm formation by these filamentous microbes, or community development on insoluble substrates such as cellulose. We hypothesized that biofilm formation is a general strategy used by actinomycetes in the degradation of cellulose, and that it may serve as a means for these microbes to secure nutrients and persist in their environments. The objective of this study was to examine biofilm production by Thermobifida fusca, an actinomycete that rapidly degrades cellulose by means of a well-characterized extracellular cellulase system. Thermobifida fusca cells grew as biofilms attached to both nutritive (e.g. dialysis tubing membrane) and non-nutritive surfaces. Dialysis tubing was colonized by T. fusca aleuriospores but not by mycelial pellets, except when mycelial pellets were disrupted by sonication. Microscopic examination of surface-attached growth revealed structures characteristic of biofilms, with cells embedded in fibrous material suggestive of an extracellular polymeric matrix. Concanavalin A bound to the extracellular polymeric substance of biofilms and mycelial pellets, indicating alpha-linked d-mannosyl and/or alpha-linked d-glucosyl residues. The carbohydrate content of both biofilms and mycelial pellets increased during growth. Also, DNase I inhibited biofilm production, suggesting a role for extracellular DNA in T. fusca biofilm development. Cellulose degradation and expression of celE (encoding endoglucanase E5) was similar for T. fusca biofilms and mycelial pellets. Results of this study indicate that, in the life cycle of this actinomycete, cellulose is specifically colonized by aleuriospores, which germinate, grow and degrade cellulose, ultimately developing into biofilms encased in a carbohydrate-containing exopolymeric matrix, a hallmark of biofilm production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Biofilms , First View , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bellamy, W. D. (1973) The use of thermophilic microorganisms for the recycling of cellulosic wastes. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium 69, 138–140Google Scholar
Braun, S. & Vecht-Lifshitz, S. E. (1991) Mycelial morphology and metabolite production. Trends in Biotechnology 9, 63–68Google Scholar
Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., Clawell, D. E., Korber, D. R. & Lappin-Scott, H. M. (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 49, 711–745Google Scholar
Crawford, D. L. & Gonda, M. A. (1977) The sporulation process in Thermomonospora fusca as revealed by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 23, 1088–1095Google Scholar
Cui, Y. Q., van der Lans, R. G. J. M. & Luyben, K. Ch. A. M. (1998) Effects of dissolved oxygen tension and mechanical forces on fungal morphology in submerged fermentation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 57, 409–419Google Scholar
Doherty, D., Leigh, J. A., Glazebrook, J. & Walker, G. C. (1988) Rhizobium meliloti mutants that overproduce the R. meliloti acidic calcofluor-binding exopolysaccharide. Journal of Bacteriology 170, 4249–4256Google Scholar
Dunne, W. M. (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clinical Microbiological Reviews 15, 155–166Google Scholar
Ghannoum, M. & O'Toole, G. A. (2004) Microbial Biofilms. Washington, DC: ASM PressGoogle Scholar
Gusek, T. W., Johnson, R. D., Tyn, M. T. & Kinsella, J. E. (1991) Effect of agitational shear on growth and protease production by Thermomonospora fusca. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 37, 371–374Google Scholar
Hägerdal, B. G. R., Ferchak, J. D. & Pye, E. K. (1978) Cellulolytic enzyme system of Thermoactinomyces sp. grown on microcrystalline cellulose. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 36, 606–612Google Scholar
Hamilton, M., Heersink, J., Buckingham-Meyer, K. & Goeres, D. (2003) The Biofilm Laboratory: Step-By-Step Protocols for Experimental Design, Analysis and Data Interpretation. Bozeman, MT: Cytergy Publ.Google Scholar
Irwin, D. C., Spezio, M., Walker, L. P. & Wilson, D. B. (1993) Activity studies of eight purified cellulases: specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 42, 1002–1013Google Scholar
Irwin, D. C., Zhang, S. & Wilson, D. B. (2000) Cloning, expression and characterization of a family 48 exocellulase, Cel48a, from Thermobifida fusca. European Journal of Biochemistry 267, 4988–4997Google Scholar
Kalakoutskii, L. V. & Agre, N. S. (1976) Comparative aspects of development and differentiation in actinomycetes. Bacteriological Reviews 40, 469–524Google Scholar
Kauri, T. & Kushner, D. J. (1985) Role of contact in bacterial degradation of cellulose. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 31, 301–306Google Scholar
Kim, Y. M. & Kim, J. (2004) Formation and dispersion of mycelial pellets of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Journal of Microbiology 42, 64–67Google Scholar
Larue, R., Yu, Z. T., Parisi, V. A., Egan, A. R. & Morrison, M. (2005) Novel microbial diversity adherent to plant biomass in the herbivore gastrointestinal tract, as revealed by ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis and rrs gene sequencing. Environmental Microbiology 7, 530–543Google Scholar
Leschine, S. & Canale-Parole, E. (1983) Mesophilic cellulolytic clostridia from fresh water environments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 46, 728–737Google Scholar
Lin, E. & Wilson, D. B. (1987) Regulation of beta-1,4- endogluconase synthesis in Thermomonospora fusca. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53, 1352–1357Google Scholar
Lin, E. & Wilson, D. B. (1988) Transcription of the celE gene in Thermomonospora fusca. Journal of Bacteriology 170, 3838–3842Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Zhang, Y.-H. P. & Lynd, L. R. (2006) Enzyme–microbe synergy during cellulose hydrolysis by Clostridium thermocellum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103, 16165–16169Google Scholar
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H. & Pretorious, I. S. (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 66, 506–577Google Scholar
Manteca, A., Fernández, M. & Sánchez, J. (2005) Mycelium development in Streptomyces antibioticus ATCC11891 occurs in an orderly pattern which determines multiphase growth curves. BioMed Central Microbiology 5, 51Google Scholar
McAllister, T. A., Bae, H. D., Jones, G. A. & Cheng, K. J. (1994) Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 72, 3004–3018Google Scholar
Neu, T. R., Swerhone, G. D. W. & Lawrence, J. R. (2001) Assessment of lectin-binding analysis for in situ detection of glycoconjugates in biofilm systems. Microbiology 147, 299–313Google Scholar
O'Toole, G. A. & Kolter, R. (1998) Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signaling pathways: a genetic analysis. Molecular Microbiology 28, 449–461Google Scholar
Reguera, G. & Leschine, S. B. (2001) Chitin degradation by cellulolytic anaerobes and facultative aerobes from soil and sediments. FEMS Microbiology Letters 204, 367–374Google Scholar
Roach, A. W. & Silvey, J. K. G. (1958) The morphology and life cycle of freshwater actinomycetes. Transactions of the American Microscopy Society 77, 36–47Google Scholar
Stewart, P. S., Murga, R., Srinivasan, R. & de Beer, D. (1995) Biofilm structural heterogeneity visualized by three microscopic methods. Water Research 29, 2006–2009Google Scholar
Tengerdy, R. P., Rho, W. H. & Mohagheghi, A. M. (1991) Liquid fluidized-bed starter culture of Trichoderma reesei for cellulase production. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 27, 195–204Google Scholar
Whitaker, A. (1992) Actinomycetes in submerged culture. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 32, 23–35Google Scholar
Whitchurch, C. B., Tolker-Nielsen, T., Ragas, P. C. & Mattick, J. S. (2002) Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295, 1487Google Scholar
Wilson, D. B. (1992) Biochemistry and genetics of actinomycete cellulases. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 12, 45–63Google Scholar
Wingender, J., Neu, T. R. & Flemming, H. C. (1999) Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Characterization, Structure and Function. Berlin: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. J. (1980) Specificity in the interaction of direct dye with polysaccharides. Carbohydrate Research 85, 271–287Google Scholar
Zvyagintsev, D. G., Zenova, G. M., Sudnizin, I. I. & Doroshenko, E. A. (2005) The ability of soil actinomycetes to develop at an extremely low humidity. Doklady Biological Sciences 405, 461–463Google Scholar