Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T09:07:07.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old Outcomes. By Wolfgang Alschner. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 352 pages.

Review products

Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old Outcomes. By Wolfgang Alschner. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. 352 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2023

Laurence Marquis
Laurence Marquis*
Affiliation:
Professeure adjointe / Assistant Professor, Université de Sherbrooke laurencemarquis@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Recensions de livres
Information
Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international , Volume 60 , November 2023 , pp. 460 - 466
Copyright
© The Canadian Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Alschner, Wolfgang, Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old Outcomes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022) at 3.Google Scholar

2 Ibid at xviii.

3 Ibid.

4 Copper Mesa Mining Corporation v Republic of Ecuador, PCA No 2012-2, Award (15 March 2016) at paras 6.58–6.67; Bear Creek Mining Corporation v Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No ARB/14/ 21, Award (30 November 2017) at paras 459–74.

5 Alschner, supra note 1 at 7.

6 Ibid at xviii.

7 Wolfgang Alschner, “From a Backlash against Investment Arbitration to a Backlash by Investment Arbitrators?,” Kluwer Arbitration Blog (4 July 2022), online: <https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2022/07/04/from-a-backlash-against-investment-arbitration-to-a-backlash-by-investment-arbitrators/>.

8 Wolfgang Alschner & Florencia Sarmiento, “An Interview with Wolfgang Alschner on Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform: New Treaties, Old Outcomes,” Investment Treaty News (4 July 2022), online: <www.iisd.org/itn/en/2022/07/04/an-interview-with-wolfgang-alschner-on-investment-arbitration-and-state-driven-reform-new-treaties-old-outcomes-wolfgang-alschner-florencia-sarmiento/>.

9 Waibel, Michael et al, The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality (The Hague: Kluwer, 2011).Google Scholar

10 Alschner & Sarmiento, supra note 8.

11 Alschner, supra note 1 at 24.

12 North American Free Trade Agreement, 17 December 1992, Can TS 1994 No 2 (1993) 32 ILM 289 (entered into force 1 January 1994).

13 Ibid at 41; Suha Jubran-Ballan, “Investment Treaty Arbitration and Institutional Backgrounds: An Empirical Study” (2016) 34 Wis Intl LJ 31; Suha Jubran-Ballan, “How Institutions Matter: On the Judicial Reasoning of Investment Treaty Arbitration Awards” (2018) 41 Houston J Intl L 57.

14 Alschner & Sarmiento, supra note 8.

15 Alschner & Sarmiento, supra note 8.

16 Alschner, supra note 1 at 16.

17 Alschner & Sarmiento, supra note 8.

18 Alschner, supra note 1 at 19.

19 Ibid at 237; Windstream Energy LLC v Government of Canada, PCA Case No 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing, Day 1, Remarks by Ms Tabet, Counsel of Canada (15 February 2016) at 147–48, online: <www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7361.pdf>.

20 Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, 8 March 2018, ch 9, online: <www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/tpp-ptp/text-texte/toc-tdm.aspx?lang=eng> (entered into force 30 December 2018).