Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T18:46:32.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The impact of fragmented QRS on clinical findings and outcomes in children with dilated cardiomyopathy with or without left ventricular non-compaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2023

Özlem Bayram
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Mehmet G. Ramoğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Selen Karagözlü
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Jeyhun Bakhtiyarzada
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Alperen Aydın
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Anar Gurbanov
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Begüm Murt
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
M. Mustafa Yılmaz
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Burak Özerdem
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Tayfun Uçar
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
Tanıl Kendirli
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
H. Ercan Tutar*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: H. E. Tutar; Email: ercantutar@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of fragmented QRS and its associations with clinical findings and prognosis in children diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy with or without left ventricular non-compaction.

Methods:

This retrospective study was conducted between 2010 and 2020. Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy were classified into two groups according to the presence of left ventricular non-compaction: Dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular non-compaction and dilated cardiomyopathy without left ventricular non-compaction. Patients were also divided into two groups according to the presence of fragmented QRS (fragmented QRS group and non-fragmented QRS group).

Results:

Twenty-three of 44 patients (52.3%) were male. Among left ventricular non-compaction patients, the fragmented QRS group had more complex ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.003). Patients with fragmented QRS had a significantly higher rate of major adverse cardiac events and/or cardiac death in both cardiomyopathy groups (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005). However, the rate of major adverse cardiac events and/or cardiac death was similar between dilated cardiomyopathy patients with and without left ventricular non-compaction. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of fragmented QRS strongly predicts major adverse cardiac events and/or cardiac death (odds ratio, 31.186; 95% confidence interval, 2.347–414.307). Although the survival rates between cardiomyopathy groups were similar, patients with fragmented QRS had a markedly lower survival rate during the follow-up period, as mean of 15 months (p = 0.001).

Conclusion:

Our study showed that the presence of fragmented QRS may be an important ECG sign predicting an major adverse cardiac event and/or cardiac death in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We believe that recognising fragmented QRS could be valuable in forecasting patient prognosis and identifying high-risk patients who require additional support.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Dilated cardiomyopathy is the most common cardiomyopathy in children (50–70% of all cardiomyopathies) and is defined by the presence of a dilated left ventricle with systolic dysfunction. Reference Shaddy, Penny, Feltes, Cetta and Mital1 Dilated cardiomyopathy is also the most common cause of heart transplantation in children. Reference Alvarez, Orav and Wilkinson2 Patients with left ventricle non-compaction are identified by the presence of substantial left ventricle trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses. Left ventricle non-compaction may be isolated or may accompany dilated, hypertrophic, or restrictive cardiomyopathy. Reference Lipshultz, Law and Korang3

Fragmented QRS is a non-invasive ECG feature that can potentially be utilised to predict cardiac adverse events. In a standard 12-lead ECG, fragmented narrow QRS (QRS duration < 120 ms) is characterised by the presence of an additional R wave (R') or notching of R or S waves (fragmentation), and fragmented wide QRS (QRS duration > 120 ms) is described as two or more notches in the R or S wave in two consecutive leads corresponding to a coronary area (anterior, lateral, or inferior). The presence of fragmented QRS is attributed to heterogeneity in myocardial depolarisation due to myocardial scarring and fibrosis. Reference Mittal4,Reference Supreeth and Francis5 In recent years, numerous studies about the role of fragmented QRS in a wide range of cardiac disorders, including coronary artery disease, myocarditis, and cardiomyopathies, have been performed. Reference Das, Michael and Suradi6Reference Das, Maskoun and Shen8 However, studies in children are scarce. Reference Kong, Song, Kang and Huh9,Reference Ferrero and Piazza10 Furthermore, there has been no research on dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular non-compaction in children. We hypothesised that fragmented QRS would be more frequent in patients with left ventricular non-compaction because of their peculiar myocardial architecture. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of fragmented QRS and its associations with the clinical findings and prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy patients with or without left ventricular non-compaction.

Methods

Patients

Seventy-two patients with dilated cardiomyopathy were diagnosed at Ankara University Medical School’s Department of Pediatric Cardiology between December 2010 and January 2020. Forty-four patients were included in this retrospective study because the remaining 27 patients’ data was not available, and one patient required cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Twenty patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular non-compaction and twenty-four patients with dilated cardiomyopathy without left ventricular non-compaction were formed as two distinct groups of patients. American Heart Association criteria were used for the diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. Reference Alvarez, Orav and Wilkinson2 Patients were diagnosed with left ventricular non-compaction according to echocardiographic findings that included many trabeculations, deep intertrabecular recesses apparent on colour flow, and a 2-layered structure of the myocardium with a non-compacted to compacted myocardium ratio of > 2:1 in systole. Reference Jenni, Oechslin, Schneider, Attenhofer Jost and Kaufmann11 Patients were also divided into two groups according to the presence of fragmented QRS (fragmented QRS group and non-fragmented QRS group). Demographic data, the findings of laboratory tests, ECGs, and echocardiography were obtained from the files of all patients. The local ethics committee approved the study.

ECG, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters

The 12-channel ECG was recorded at a speed of 25 mm/s with a 10 mm/mV calibration, and the findings were reviewed by two physicians blinded to the identity and diagnosis of the patient. Heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, morphology of QRS, and any arrhythmias were evaluated at the time of diagnosis and on follow-up. Bazett’s formula was used to calculate the corrected QT interval. The presence of an additional R′ wave or notching in the nadir of the S′ wave in two continuous leads was defined as fragmented QRS (QRS duration < 120 ms)5 (Fig. 1). 24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in 28 of 44 patients. Complex ventricular arrhythmias were defined if there were ventricular premature beats that were 10 ventricular premature beats per hour, and/or couplets, and/or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Reference Priori, Blomströ and Mazzanti12

Figure 1. The arrows show a fragmented QRS complex on electrocardiography (DIII subtle).

All patients were evaluated with transthoracic echocardiography at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. Echocardiographic parameters included in the study were left ventricular shortening fraction by M-mode, biplane ejection fraction of left ventricle with Simpson’s method, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension z-score, and mitral regurgitation. Measurement of left ventricle dimension in diastole by M-mode and/or 2D imaging was carried out from the parasternal long axis perpendicular to the long axis of the ventricle at the tip of the mitral valve.

NT-proBNP concentrations were assessed on admission and during follow-up (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany, reference 0–125 pg/mL). There were decrease and increase in NT-proBNP during the follow-up according to the clinical status of the patients. However, the NT-proBNP value on admission was used in the statistical analysis.

Outcomes

We analysed outcomes in terms of major adverse cardiac events or cardiac death. Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, a history of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and a left ventricular assist device were all major adverse cardiac events. Cardiac death was defined as either a heart transplant or death due to intractable heart failure.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics are expressed as means, standard deviation, median, frequency distribution, and percentage values. The distribution normality of the continuous variables was controlled using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov/Shapiro–Wilk test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare two independent groups for nonparametric assessments. Nominal variables were compared using Pearson’’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether factors showing significant associations were independent predictors. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test was used to assess model fit. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed, and a log rank test was used for paired comparisons. The confidence interval was set as 95%, and a P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics (dilated cardiomyopathy with or without left ventricular non-compactions)

Table 1 summarises patient characteristics. The patients were classified into two groups: dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular non-compaction (N = 20) and without left ventricular non-compaction (N = 24). The median age at the time of diagnosis was 6 (range: neonatal-210) months and 18 (range: neonatal-192) months in dilated cardiomyopathy patients with and without left ventricular non-compaction, respectively. The median age of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy without left ventricular non-compaction was significantly higher than the left ventricular non-compaction group (p = 0.015). Twenty-one (47.7%) patients had fragmented QRS complex at the time of diagnosis, and all of them had narrow fragmented QRS. The frequency of fragmented QRS was similar in both cardiomyopathy groups. The functional classification of all patients at the time of the diagnosis was stage 3–4 according to the New York Heart Association Reference Dolgin, Fox, Gorlin and Levin13 or Modified Ross Heart Failure Classification. Reference Hsu and Pearson14 All patients were given angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, furosemide and acetylsalicylic acid, but spironolactone was used in 29 patients (66%), carvedilol in 17 patients (38.6%), and digoxin in 29 patients (66%).

Table 1. Patient characteristics.

* ECG and echocardiographic parameters at the diagnosis were compared.

The PR interval and QRS duration were similar between the two groups, but corrected QT was longer in the dilated cardiomyopathy without left ventricular non-compaction group. Both groups had similar biplane EF with Simpson’s method, Z-score of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and degree of MR. In addition, there was no significant difference in NT-proBNP levels on admission between dilated cardiomyopathy with and without left ventricular non-compaction.

Fragmented QRS and non-fragmented QRS groups

The comparison of fragmented QRS and non-fragmented QRS groups is shown in Table 2. The patients with fragmented QRS were significantly older than the non-fragmented QRS patients at the time of diagnosis. Although the PR interval and corrected QT were similar between the fragmented QRS and the non-fragmented QRS groups, QRS duration was longer in the fragmented QRS group but in the normal range according to age. There was no significant difference in shortening fraction, EF by Simpson’s method, left ventricle diameter Z-score, and NT-proBNP levels on admission between the fragmented QRS and the non-fragmented QRS groups, but moderate to severe MR was more frequent in patients with fragmented QRS (p = 0.027). Dilated cardiomyopathy patients with and without left ventricular non-compaction were also compared separately according to whether or not having fQRS (Table 3), and the systolic dysfunction, left ventricle diameter Z-score, ECG parameters, and NT-proBNP levels on admission were similar between in fragmented QRS and non-fragmented QRS groups. However, among patients with dilated cardiomyopathy without left ventricular non-compaction, the fragmented QRS group had more frequent moderate to severe MR than the non-fQRS group (p = 0.034). On 12-lead surface ECG and/or 24-hour Holter monitorizations, fragmented QRS groups had more complex ventricular arrhythmias in dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular non-compaction patients (77.8 and 9%, p = 0.003).

Table 2. Fragmented QRS and nonfQRS groups.

* ECG and echocardiographic parameters at the diagnosis were compared.

Table 3. ECG, echocardiographic, laboratory findings and outcomes between fQRS group and non-fQRS group.

* ECG and echocardiographic parameters at the diagnosis were compared.

Survival and outcomes

The median follow-up time was 15.5 (range: 1–144 months) months. Major adverse cardiac event was present in 22 of 44 patients (50%) (with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia in 14 patients, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 10, and left ventricular assist device in 7). Nineteen out of 44 patients died (43%); 3 patients underwent heart transplantation (one of the transplanted patients died). The frequency of major adverse cardiac event and cardiac death was similar between the two groups.

Patients with fragmented QRS had higher rates of major adverse cardiac event and/or cardiac death (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005) irrespective of the underlying cardiomyopathy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis that included age at diagnosis, cardiomyopathy group of the patients, FS by M-Mode, biplane EF with Simpson’s method, degree of MR, Z-score of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, NT-proBNP, and fragmented QRS showed that the presence of fragmented QRS strongly predicted major adverse cardiac event and/or cardiac death (odds ratio; 31.186 95% CI, 2.347 – 414.307, p = 0.009). Patients with fragmented QRS had a markedly lower survival rate than those without (a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis Log rank, p = 0.001) (Fig. 2). The survival rate was lower in left ventricular non-compaction patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias, though it was not statistically significant (p = 0.076). The survival rates between dilated cardiomyopathy patients with and without left ventricular non-compaction were similar.

Figure 2. The survival in all patients according to having fQRS or not.

Discussion

Our study showed that the presence of a fragmented QRS complex at the time of diagnosis in dilated cardiomyopathy patients with or without left ventricular non-compaction is an important risk factor for poor outcome. Furthermore, the overall survival of patients with fragmented QRS is significantly lower.

In recent years, there has been an increase in studies on fragmented QRS in cardiac disorders. However, research on the role of fragmented QRS in the paediatric population is severely limited. Although the new therapies for heart failure improve the clinical condition of dilated cardiomyopathy patients; these patients may experience cardiac arrhythmias, and/or sudden cardiac death, may become intrope dependent, progressive heart failure. Left ventricular non-compaction may be isolated or may accompany dilated, hypertrophic, or restrictive cardiomyopathy and cause left and/or right ventricular failure. Reference Towbin, Lorts and Jefferies15 According to the Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry, left ventricular non-compaction with a dilated phenotype has the worst prognosis. Reference Jefferies, Wilkinson and Sleeper16 Therefore, it is critical to investigate the predictors of outcomes in the management of these patients. In this study, we found that the presence of fragmented QRS strongly predicted major adverse cardiac event and/or cardiac death. Similarly, in a retrospective study of 63 paediatric patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in Korea between 2003 and 2014, the positive fragmented QRS complex was reported as a strong predictor for adverse outcomes9. In the study includes 842 patients over 20 years old with left ventricle dysfunction, the presence of fragmented QRS was not found related with poor outcomes or death caused arrhythmia. Reference Cheema, Khalid and Wimmer17 The fragmented QRS is a new finding on the ECG; however, the results of multiple studies support that the fragmented QRS is associated with myocardial fibrosis, and it might be important for predicting a worse prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Reference Wang, Xu and Wang18

In our cohort, the median age at the time of diagnosis among dilated cardiomyopathy patients with and without left ventricular non-compaction was 6 months and 18 months, respectively. The fragmented QRS group had an older age at diagnosis in both patient groups (dilated cardiomyopathy with and without left ventricular non-compaction). In Kong et al.’s study9, the median age at diagnosis was also reported to be older in the patients with fragmented QRS compared to the non-fragmented QRS group (86.6 and 44.1 months, p = 0.026). In fact, myocardial damage and scar formation in dilated cardiomyopathy patients are increasing over time, the fragmented QRS is manifested as a result of altered myocardial activation due to fibrosis and scar repair. Reference Wang, Xu and Wang18 In our study, the older age at diagnosis of patients with fragmented QRS might be related to this process. It must be kept in mind that patients may already have myocardial damage at the time of diagnosis. Thus, the fragmented QRS may have appeared long before the time of diagnosis because the disease process had started before the time of diagnosis. Also, the worse prognosis in patients with fragmented QRS may be related to the higher mean age at the time of diagnosis.

In the dilated cardiomyopathy patients with and without left ventricular non-compaction, the systolic dysfunction, left ventricle diameter Z-score, ECG parameters, and NT-proBNP levels on admission were similar between the fragmented QRS and the non-fragmented QRS groups. However, the fragmented QRS group had more mild to severe MR than the non-fragmented QRS group among individuals with dilated cardiomyopathy without left ventricular non-compaction. Kong et al. evaluated 63 children diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy retrospectively and reported that in patients with fragmented QRS, the QRS duration at diagnosis was significantly longer, and M-mode ejection fraction was lower in the fragmented QRS group.

According to previous studies, arrhythmia was one of the most important factors affecting mortality in patients with left ventricular non-compaction. Reference Brescia, Rossano and Pignatelli19,Reference Łuczak-Wö and Werner20 In our study, 24-hour Holter monitoring could be performed in 28 of 44 patients (60%), and complex ventricular arrhythmias were more frequent in left ventricular non-compaction patients with fragmented QRS (p = 0.003). Patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias had a lower survival rate, but it was not statistically significant (37.5 and 83.3%, p = 0.076).

Study limitations

Our study was subject to the usual restrictions of retrospective studies. The sample size was relatively small. In addition, cardiovascular MRI was not performed on all patients; therefore, we could not assess the relationship between myocardial fibrosis and fragmented QRS. Another limitation was that 24-hour Holter monitoring was performed in only 60% of patients due to technical difficulties or patient’s refusal. Because this study data spans a decade, the introduction of newer drugs, the development of new treatment strategies for dilated cardiomyopathy, and the introduction of mechanical assist devices in the last decade may cause a bias affecting prognosis and outcome. Our results need to be supported by prospective studies with a larger number of patients.

Conclusion

Fragmented QRS may be an important finding for predicting severe cardiac events and/or cardiac death in dilated cardiomyopathy patients. We did not find any difference between dilated cardiomyopathy with and without left ventricular non-compaction in terms of fragmented QRS and adverse outcomes. We believe that recognising fragmented QRS to predict major adverse cardiac events and mortality risk in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, both with and without left ventricular non-compaction, could be useful to provide additional support in a timely manner.

Acknowledgements

We thank the nurses and staff of the Ankara University School of Medicine, as well as the patients and their families.

Financial support

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work follow the ethical standards of the relevant national guidelines on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008, and has been approved by the ethics committee of Ankara University.

References

Shaddy, RE, Penny, DJ, Feltes, TF, Cetta, F, Mital, S. Moss and Adams’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children and Adolescents Including the Fetus and Young Adult. In In section 7, Diseases of the Endocardium, Myocardium, and Pericardium, 10th. Wolters Kluwer, China, 2022: 9881010.Google Scholar
Alvarez, JA, Orav, EJ, Wilkinson, JD, et al. Pediatric cardiomyopathy registry investigators. competing risks for death and cardiac transplantation in children with dilated cardiomyopathy: results from the pediatric cardiomyopathy registry. Circulation 2011; 124: 814823. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.973826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipshultz, SE, Law, YM, Korang, AA, et al. Cardiomyopathy in children: classification and diagnosis a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 2019; 140: e9e68. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittal, SR. Fragmented QRS: a simple electrocardiographic prognostic marker in cardiovascular disease. J Clin Prev Cardiol 2016; 5: 9498. DOI: 10.4103/2250-3528.191100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supreeth, RN, Francis, J. Fragmented QRS - Its significance. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2020; 20: 2732. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Das, MK, Michael, MA, Suradi, H, et al. Usefulness of fragmented QRS on a 12-lead electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndrome for predicting mortality. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 16311637. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ari, H, Cetinkaya, S, Ari, S, Koca, V, Bozat, T. The prognostic significance of a fragmented QRS complex after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels 2012; 27: 2028. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-011-0121-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Das, MK, Maskoun, W, Shen, C, et al. Fragmented QRS on twelve-lead electrocardiogram predicts arrhythmic events in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 2010; 7: 7480. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.09.065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, Y, Song, J, Kang, IS, Huh, J. Clinical implications of fragmented QRS complex as an outcome predictor in children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Pediatr Cardiol 2021; 42: 255263. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-020-02473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrero, P, Piazza, I. QRS fragmentation in children with suspected myocarditis: a possible additional diagnostic sign. Cardiol Young 2020; 30: 962966. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951120001262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenni, R, Oechslin, E, Schneider, J, Attenhofer Jost, C, Kaufmann, PA. Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: a step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy. Heart 2001; 86: 666671. DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.6.666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priori, SG, Blomströ, m-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti, A, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 27932867. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adapted from, Dolgin, M, Association NYH, Fox, AC, Gorlin, R, Levin, RI, New York Heart Association. Criteria Committee Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. 9th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Boston, MA, 1994.Google Scholar
Hsu, DT, Pearson, GD. Heart failure in children part 2: diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Circ: Heart Fail 2009; 2(5): 490–498.Google ScholarPubMed
Towbin, JA, Lorts, A, Jefferies, JL. Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Lancet 2015; 386: 22 1325. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61282-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jefferies, JL, Wilkinson, JD, Sleeper, LA, et al. Cardiomyopathy phenotypes and outcomes for children with left ventricular myocardial noncompaction: results from the pediatric cardiomyopathy registry. J Card Fail 2015; 21: 877884. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.06.381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheema, A, Khalid, A, Wimmer, A, et al. Fragmented QRS and mortality risk in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010; 3: 339344. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M, Xu, Y, Wang, S, et al. Predictive value of electrocardiographic markers in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. Front Pediatr 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.917730.Google ScholarPubMed
Brescia, ST, Rossano, JW, Pignatelli, R, et al. Mortality and sudden death in pediatric left ventricular noncompaction in a tertiary referral center. Circulation 2013; 127: 22022208. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Łuczak-Wö, zniak K, Werner, B. Left ventricular noncompaction—A systematic review of risk factors in the pediatric population. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 1232. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The arrows show a fragmented QRS complex on electrocardiography (DIII subtle).

Figure 1

Table 1. Patient characteristics.

Figure 2

Table 2. Fragmented QRS and nonfQRS groups.

Figure 3

Table 3. ECG, echocardiographic, laboratory findings and outcomes between fQRS group and non-fQRS group.

Figure 4

Figure 2. The survival in all patients according to having fQRS or not.