Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T14:47:52.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Qualitative research: what it is and what it can contribute to cardiology in the young

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

Alexander M. Clark
Alexander M. Clark*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Alexander M. Clark, Faculty of Nursing, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaTR32G3. Tel: 001 780 492 8347; Fax: 001 780 492 2551; E-mail: Alex.clark@ualberta.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Methodologylay perspectivesdecision-making
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 131 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Rempel, GR, Harrison, MJ, Williamson, DL. “Treating your child normally”: Is this helpful advice for parents of survivors of hypoplastic left heart syndrome? Cardiol Young 2009; 19: in press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Pope, C, Mays, N. Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 42–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Greenhalgh, T, Taylor, R. Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ 1997; 315: 740–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Britten, N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 1995; 311: 251–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Kitzinger, J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995; 311: 182–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Mays, N, Pope, C. Qualitative Research: Observational methods in health care settings. BMJ 1995; 311: 182–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Hanratty, B, Hibbert, D, Mair, F, et al. Doctors’ perceptions of palliative care for heart failure: focus group study. BMJ 2002; 325 (7364): 581–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Murphy, R, Dingwall, R, Greatbatch, D, Parker, S, Watson, P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2 (16).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Clark, AM, Whelan, HK, Barbour, RS, MacIntyre, PD. A realist study of the mechanisms of cardiac rehabilitation. J Adv Nurs 2005; 52 (4): 362–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Gray, J. Evidence-Based Healthcare. Churchill, Livingstone, London, 1997.Google Scholar
11.Clark, A. Evidence-based practice. In: Given L (ed). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 2008, pp 308–311.Google Scholar
12.Guyatt, G, Rennie, D, Meade, M, Cook, D. User’s guide to the medical literature. American Medical Association, NY, New York, 2008.Google Scholar
13.Charlton, B, Miles, A. The rise and fall of EBM. QJM 1998; 91: 371–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Davison, C, Smith, GD, Frankel, S. Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: The implications of coronary candidacy for health education. Sociol Health Ill 1991; 13 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Horowitz, CR, Rein, SB, Leventhal, H. A story of maladies, misconceptions and mishaps: Effective management of heart failure. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58 (3): 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Field, K, Ziebland, S, McPherson, A, Lehman, R. ‘Can I come off the tablets now?’ A qualitative analysis of heart failure patients’ understanding of their medication. Fam Pract 2006; 23 (6): 624–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Pound, P, Britten, N, Morgan, M, et al. Resisting medicines: A synthesis of qualitative studies of medication taking. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61: 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.King, KB, Clark, PC, Friedman, MM. Social comparisons and temporal comparisons after coronary artery surgery. Heart Lung 1999; 28 (5): 316–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Clark, AM, Barbour, RS, White, M, MacIntyre, PD. Promoting participation in cardiac rehabilitation : Patients’ choices and experiences. J Adv Nurs 2004; 47 (1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.World Health Organisation. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. WHO, Geneva, 2003.Google Scholar
21.van der Wal, M, Jaarsma, T, Moser, D, Veeger, NJGM, van Gilst, W, van Veldhuisen, D. Compliance in heart failure patients: the importance of knowledge and beliefs. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 343–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Veldtmann, GR, Matley, SL, Kendall, L, Quirk, J, Parsons, JM, Hewison, J. Illness understanding in children and adolescents with heart disease. Heart 2000; 84: 395–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Olausson, B, Utbult, Y, Hansson, S, et al. Transplanted children’s experiences of daily living: Children’s narratives about their lives following transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2006; 10: 575–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.McMurray, R, Kendall, L, Parsons, JM, et al. A life less ordinary: growing up and coping with congenital heart disease. Coronary Health Care 2001; 5: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Kendall, L, Sloper, P, Lewin, R, Parsons, JM. The views of young people with congenital cardiac disease on designing the services for their treatment. Cardiol Young 2003; 13: 11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Fernandes, JRH. The experience of a broken heart. Crit Care Nurs Clin N Am 2005; 17: 319–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Lawoko, S, Soares, JJF. Distress and hopelessness among parents of children with congenital heart disease, parents of children with other diseases, and parents of healthy children. J Psychosom Res 2002; 52 (4): 193–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Sparacino, PS, Tong, EM, Messias, DKH, Chesla, CA, Gilliss, CL. The dilemmas of parents of adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease. Heart Lung J Acute Crit Care 1997; 26 (3): 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Kools, S, Tong, EM, Hughes, R, et al. Hospital Experiences of Young Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Divergence in Expectations and Dissonance in Care. Am J Crit Care 2002; 11 (2): 115–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Wray, J, Maynard, L. The needs of families of children with heart disease. Dev Behav Pediatr 2006; 27 (1): 11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Mays, N, Pope, C. Rigour in qualitative research. BMJ 1995; 311: 109–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Mays, N, Pope, C. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000; 320: 50–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Feder, GS, Hutson, M, Ramsay, J, Taket, AR. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health professionals: A Meta analaysis of Qualitative Studies. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Seale, C. The Quality of Qualitative Research. Sage, London, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Barbour, RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ 2001; 322: 1115–1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.NHS Learning and Development. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Evidence-based Practice: CASP qualitative appraisal tool 2007.Google Scholar