We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
As shown by Goodwin (Moods and Tenses, § 197, 208, and 216) and corroborated by A. C. Moorhouse (C.Q. xl (1946), 1), 
with the future whether indicative, infinitive, or participle is proved by manuscript authority to be a permissible, though comparatively rare, Attic usage. Moorhouse's case, moreover, is strengthened, rather than weakened, as he supposed, by the usage of Lucian, for, though the construction may be condemned in Solecist, §§ 2 and 8, there are considerably more examples of 
with the future in Lucian than Asinus
page 107 note 1 Who notes its absence in papyri.
page 108 note 1 Alternative masc. sing, titles refer to the same person, except for Philopseudes, an inset dialogue with a suspect title.
page 108 note 2 Or, possibly, exposer of falsehood.
page 108 note 3 Or to the sophist, unless 
means ‘named in the title.’
page 109 note 1 Unless the alternative titles refer to but cf. preceding footnote. different people and Lucian be the Solecist, but cf. preceding footnote.
