Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:57:38.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pindar, Pythian Xl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

C. M. Bowra
Affiliation:
Wadham College, Oxford

Extract

The story of Orestes in Pindar's Pythian XI presents two problems. First, there is the manner of its introduction; as Wilamowitz says, ‘ganz ausserlich ist die Verbindung mit dem Mythos.’ After praising the victory of the Theban Thrasydaeus in the Pythian Games Pindar moves with astonishing abruptness to the story of Agamemnon's death and the vengeance of Orestes. At first sight nothing could be more superficial than the way in which Pindar passes to the myth. Thrasydaeus has glorified his home

⋯ν ⋯φνεαῖς ⋯ραισι πυλ⋯δ

νικ⋯ν ξ⋯νου Λ⋯κωνος 'ο;ρ⋯στα,

τ⋯ν δ⋯ φονευομ⋯νου πατρ⋯ς κτλ.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 129 note 1 Pindaros p. 260.

page 129 note 2 Schol. Pyth. XI 23 a.

page 129 note 3 Cf. Farnell, L. R., The Works of Pindar I p. 146Google Scholar.

page 130 note 1 P.S.I. X (1934). No. 1174Google Scholar. The fragment was first published with a full discussion by Coppola, G., Introduzionc a Pindaro pp. 231242Google Scholar.

page 130 note 2 Fr. 2 Diehl.

page 130 note 3 VIII 778–9.

page 130 note 4 Theb. II 134–140.

page 131 note 1 Cf. Schroeder, O., Pindars Pythitn p. 103Google Scholar.

page 131 note 2 Cf. Wilamowitz, , Pindaros pp. 186–7Google Scholar.

page 132 note 1 Frs. 13–14 Diehl.

page 133 note 1 Cf. Wilamowitz, , Pindaros pp. 477480Google Scholar.

page 134 note 1 Aischylos: Orestie II p. 251.

page 134 note 2 Fr. 12 Diehl

page 134 note 3 Pindaros p. 263.

page 135 note 1 The problem is discussed with great care and fairness by Farnell, , The Works of Pindar pp. 221–5Google Scholar. It is of course possible that the Thrasydaeus of 454 is different from the Thrasydaeus of 454.

page 136 note 1 The whole situation is discussed by Wade-Gery, H. T. in J.H.S. LII (1932) pp. 211213Google Scholar.

page 137 note 1 For ⋯λικ⋯ο meaning ‘time of life’ as here compare Pyth. IV 157, γηραι⋯ν μ⋯ρος ⋯λικ⋯ας.Also Aesch. Pers. 914, Plat. Gorg. 484c.

page 141 note 1 Trs. W. Headlam.