Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T22:03:16.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sulla's New Senators in 81 B.C.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

H. Hill
Affiliation:
University College, Swansea

Extract

One of Sulla's first acts on assuming the dictatorship in 81 B.C. was to fill up the numbers of the Senate by the addition of some 300 new members. Tradition is divided on the question of the rank of these men before their promotion, and no unanimity has yet been reached in the matter. There are two distinct versions in the ancient authorities, both equally well attested. Appian and the Epitomator of Livy state that the new members were equites, while Sallust and Dionysius of Halicarnassus assert that they included men of the lowest rank (gregarii milites is Sallust's phrase). When we turn to modern historians we find opinion similarly divided. Writers such as Lange, Zumpt and Herzog accept the first version, whereas Niebuhr, Botsford, Willems and Gelzer incline to the view of Sallust. It is tempting to do as some writers have done and to combine the two versions, saying that some of the new Senators were equites and some common soldiers. But this is a very arbitrary cutting of the knot. Herzog seems to play with the idea that Sulla promoted ordinary soldiers via the equites when he says ‘wobei noch dazu mancher war, der seine Ritterstellung erst eben errungen hatte.’ This, however, is mere guesswork.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 170 note 1 Civ. I. 100.

page 170 note 2 Epit. 89.

page 170 note 3 Cat. 37.

page 170 note 4 Ant. Rom. V. 77.

page 170 note 5 Röm. Alt. III. 155–6.

page 170 note 6 Criminalrecht II. 295 sq.

page 170 note 7 Gesch. und Syst. I. 513.

page 170 note 8 Lectures II. 388.

page 170 note 9 Roman Assemblies, p. 418.

page 170 note 10 Le Sénat I. 407.

page 170 note 11 Die Nobilität, etc., p.3.

page 170 note 12 E.g. Pauly-Wiss. s. v. Cornelius Sulla; Rice-Holmes, , Roman Republic I., p. 62Google Scholar.

page 170 note 13 Rosenberg, , Einleit. und Quellenkunde, p. 206Google Scholar. On Appian's use of Livy, see Year's Work, 19251926, p. 37Google Scholar.

page 170 note 14 Pauly-Wiss. l.c.; Gelzer, , op. cit., p. 3Google Scholar.

page 170 note 15 Ann. III. 75.

page 170 note 16 V. 21. 3, and cp. Pauly.-Wiss. s.v.

page 170 note 17 Sall, . Orat. Lepidi 22Google Scholar; Plut, . Sull. 31. 3Google Scholar; id.Sert. 12, etc.

page 170 note 18 Sall. l.c.

page 171 note 1 Le Sénat I., p. 411 sq.

page 171 note 2 Pro Sull. 82.

page 171 note 3 Pauly-Wiss. s.v.

page 171 note 4 Röm. Alt. III., p. 156.

page 171 note 5 Cic. Rep. IV. 2. 2.

page 171 note 6 Cato ap. Priscian VII. 8, p. 317. K.

page 171 note 7 Willems, , Le Sénat I., p. 161 sqGoogle Scholar.

page 172 note 1 Civ. I. 22.

page 172 note 2 Civ. I. 80.

page 172 note 3 Civ. I. 95.

page 172 note 4 Civ. I. 100.

page 172 note 5 Two points in connection with Appian's terminology are worthy of notice: (a) In long passages dealing with the equestrian middle class (e.g. Civ. I. 22) he introduces this class by the title οἱ καλούμενοɩ ἱππεȋς, but he does not repeat the καλούμενοɩ in subsequent references which are obviously to the same people. This shows that his use of καλούμενοɩ was a personal idiosyncrasy, and that he knew that once he had defined which equites he meant his readers would find ἱππεȋς sufficient.

(b) His reference to the proposals of the younger Drusus, (Civ. I. 35) is strikingGoogle Scholar. He says, τήν τε βονλὴν καὶ τοὺς ἱππέας, οἲ μάλιστα δὴ τότε ἀλλήλοις διὰ τὰ δικαστήρια διεϕέροντο, ἐπὶ κοινῷ νόμῳ συναγαγεῖν ἐπειρᾶτο. It is usually assumed that Drusus was concerned with the middle class, but Appian's terminology would imply the Eighteen Centuries. This raises a fundamental point about Drusus' policy which cannot be discussed here.

page 172 note 6 See Class. Phil. XXV. 3 (07, 1930), pp. 244–9Google Scholar. Momms, . Staats. III. 483, n. 3Google Scholar.

page 172 note 7 Epit. 60.

page 172 note 8 The reading here is doubtful. I agree that a negative is required, but I would suggest nondum rather than non.

page 172 note 9 It is significant that the three groups here mentioned correspond to those mentioned by Appian IV. 95 (see above), where the last group are ἱππεȋς. They also correspond closely with the categories excluded from the juries by the so-called Lex Acilia, the last of which is usually taken to be the equites equo publico (see Hardy, E. G., Roman Laws Charters, p. 14Google Scholar).

page 173 note 1 E.g. L. Cornelius Sisenna and D. Iunius Brutus, p. 175.

page 173 note 2 E.g. Galba, P. Sulpicius, Cic. Verr. I. 10Google Scholar. 30, and Scol. Gron, . ad loc, p. 395 (Orelli)Google Scholar.

page 173 note 3 Willems, , op. cit. I., p. 409Google Scholar.

page 173 note 4 The chief works used in this compilation. have been Pauly-Wissowa and, where this incomplete, Smith's Dictionary of Biography. In addition, valuable help was gained from Willems' Le Sénat and Orelli's Onomasticon Tullianum.

page 174 note 1 For all these three and the facts quoted about them see P.-W. s.vv.

page 174 note 2 Appian, , Civ. I. 37Google Scholar, appears to include him among the ἐπɩϕανέστατοι τῶν βονλεντῶν 90 B.C.

page 174 note 3 C. Annius, M. Aurelius Cotta, L. Bellienus, Cn. Cornelius Dolabella, L. Licinius Lucullus, L. Licinius Murena, L. Manlius, M. Pupius Piso, C. Scribonius Curio, M. Servilius, P. Servilius Isauricus. For all these see P.-W. s.vv.

page 174 note 4 Plut, . Crassus 6. 7Google Scholar.

page 174 note 5 Cic, . Brut. 308. 311Google Scholar.

page 174 note 6 P.-W. s.v. states that he entered the Senate in 78, but without evidence.

page 174 note 7 See P.-W. s.vv. and Cic, . Rosc. Am. 77. 119Google Scholar.

page 175 note 1 Teuffel I. 156.

page 175 note 2 , P.-W. s.v., No. 46Google Scholar.

page 175 note 3 Röm. Stud., p. 219 sq.

page 175 note 4 Id.ib., pp. 193–4.

page 175 note 5 M'. Acilius Glabrio (P.-W., No. 38), M'. Aemilius Lepidus (P.-W., No. 62), M. Antonius Creticus (P.-W., No. 29), C. Antonius Hybrida (P.-W., No. 19), M'. Aquilius (Willems, , op. cit., I., p. 412Google Scholar), Cn. Aufidius Orestes (P.-W., No. 32), M. Baebius(P.-W., No. 18), C. Calpurnius Piso (P.-W., No. 63), L. Cassius Longinus (P.-W., No. 64), C. Claudius Glaber (P.-W., No. 165), C. Claudius Nero (P.-W., No. 247), C. Cornelius Lentulus Caudinus (Cic, . Pro. Clu. 107Google Scholar), P. Cornelius Sulla (P.-W., No. 386), Q. Cornificius (P.-W., No. 7), C. Fonteius (P.-W., No. 7), L. Furius (P.-W., No. 18), A. Gabinius (P.-W., No. 10), L. Lucretius Trio (P.-W., No. 33), A. Manlius (P.-W., No. 13), Q. Manlius (P.-W., No. 34) T. Manlius Torquatu (P.-W., No. 85), Q. Marcius Rex (P.-W., No. 92), Sex. Nonius Suffenas (Willems I., p. 450), Sex. Peducaeus (Smith, No. 2), Q. Petillius (Smith, No. 6; cp. Willems I., p. 504), C. Publicius Malleolus (Smith, No. 4), P. Sulpicius Galba (P.-W., No. 55), Terentius Varro (Willems, p. 451), P. Valerius Triarius (Willems I., p. 455), C. (or L.) Valerius Triarius (Smith, No. 1).

page 175 note 6 Röm. Adelsparteien, p. 302 sq.

page 175 note 7 P.-W. s.v., No. 44.

page 175 note 8 Cic, . Pro Clu. 26. 71Google Scholar.

page 175 note 9 P.-W. s.v., No. 23; Plin, . N.H. XVII. 1Google Scholar.

page 175 note 10 Tog. Cand. 73.

page 176 note 1 P.-W. s.v., No. 154, and cp. Furnius, C. (P.-W. s.v., No. 3)Google Scholar and Racilius, L. (P.-W. s.v., No. 1)Google Scholar.

page 176 note 2 P..W. s.v., No. 6.

page 176 note 3 Smith, , Dict. Biog. s.v., No. 2Google Scholar.

page 176 note 4 Plut, . Pomp. 11Google Scholar.

page 176 note 5 Oros. V. 23. 12.

page 176 note 6 Smith, , s.v., Basilus 1 and 2Google Scholar.

page 176 note 7 Id. s.v., Balbus.

page 176 note 8 P.-W. s.v., No. 1.

page 176 note 9 Willems I., p. 506.

page 176 note 10 P.-W. s.v.

page 176 note 11 Smith, s.v., Naso.

page 176 note 12 Smith, s.v.

page 176 note 13 See e.g. Sextilius (P.-W. s.v., Nos. 2 and 3 [probably identical]), Gallius, Q. (P.-W. s.v., No. 6)Google Scholar, P. Varinius Glaber (Smith, s.v., Glaber).

page 176 note 14 Livy XLIII. 16; Val. Max. VI. 9. 8; Pseud-Ascon., p. 212.

page 176 note 15 Val. Max. VI. 9. 7.

page 177 note 1 Cic, . Brut. 179Google Scholar.

page 177 note 2 Val. Max. IX. 1. 1; Cic, . Pro Clu. 107Google Scholar.

page 177 note 3 P.-W. s.v.

page 177 note 4 Cic, . Verr. IV. 20. 42Google Scholar.

page 177 note 5 Id.ib. I. 100; Smith s.v., No. 3.

page 177 note 6 Cic, . Verr. I. 130Google Scholar; P.-W. s.v., No. 9.

page 177 note 7 Cic, . Verr. I. 128Google Scholar.

page 177 note 8 Cic, . Pro Planc. 5. 12Google Scholar; P.-W. s.v.

page 177 note 9 Cic, . Pro Clu. 98. 131–2Google Scholar.

page 177 note 10 I., p. 414.

page 177 note 11 II. 1. 10.

page 177 note 12 Livy XXIII. 23.

page 177 note 13 See above, p. 172.

page 177 note 14 App, . Civ. I. 100Google Scholar.

page 177 note 15 J.R.S. VI. (1916)Google Scholar; I., p. 59 sq.