Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T10:31:42.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation of Two-Dimensional Scramjet Combustor Reacting Flow Field Using Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes WENO Solver

Part of: Reaction effects in flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Juan-Chen Huang ,
Yu-Hsuan Lai ,
Jeng-Shan Guo  and
Jaw-Yen Yang
Juan-Chen Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Merchant Marine, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
Yu-Hsuan Lai
Affiliation:
Department of Merchant Marine, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
Jeng-Shan Guo
Affiliation:
Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology, Longtan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Jaw-Yen Yang*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10764, Taiwan Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author. Email addresses: jchuang@ntou.edu.tw (J.-C. Huang), yangjy@iam.ntu.edu.tw (J.-Y. Yang), yhlai1125@gmail.com (Y.-H. Lai), guo1125@gmail.com (J.-S. Guo)
Get access

Abstract

The non-equilibrium chemical reacting combustion flows of a proposed long slender scramjet system were numerically studied by solving the turbulent Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. The Spalart-Allmaras one equation turbulence model is used which produces better results for near wall and boundary layer flow field problems. The lower-upper symmetric Gauss-Seidel implicit scheme, which enables results converge efficiently under steady state condition, is combined with the weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) scheme to yield an accurate simulation tool for scramjet combustion flow field analysis. Using the WENO schemes high-order accuracy and its non-oscillatory solution at flow discontinuities, better resolution of the hypersonic flow problems involving complex shock-shock/shock-boundary layer interactions inside the flow path, can be achieved. Two types of scramjet combustor with cavity-based and strut-based fuel injector were considered as the testing models. The flow characteristics with and without combustion reactions of the two types combustor model were studied with a transient hydrogen/oxygen combustion model. The detailed results of aerodynamic data are obtained and discussed, moreover, the combustion properties of varying the equivalent ratio of hydrogen, including the concentration of reacting species, hydrogen and oxygen, and the reacting products, water, are demonstrated to study the combustion process and performance of the combustor. The comparisons of flow field structures, pressure on wall and velocity profiles between the experimental data and the solutions of the present algorithms, showed qualitatively as well as the quantitatively in good agreement, and validated the adequacy of the present simulation tool for hypersonic scramjet reacting flow analysis.

Keywords

Scramjet combustionstrut injectorcavity-based injectorWENO schemeReynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations

MSC classification

Secondary: 76V05: Reaction effects in flows
Type
Research Article
Information
Communications in Computational Physics , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 1181 - 1210
Copyright
Copyright © Global-Science Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Gruber, M.R. and Nejad, A.S., New supersonic combustion research facility, J. Prop. Power, 11(5), 1995, pp. 1080–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Riggins, D.W.; McClinton, C.R. and Vitt, P.H., Thrust losses in hypersonic enginesPart 1: Methodology, J. Prop. Power, 13(2), 1997.Google Scholar
[3]Riggins, D.W.; McClinton, C.R. and Vitt, P.H., Thrust losses in hypersonic enginesPart 2: Applications, J. Prop. Power, 13(2), 1997.Google Scholar
[4]Baurle, R. A., and Gruber, M. R., Study of Recessed Cavity Flow fields for Supersonic Combustion Applications, AIAA Paper 98-0938, Jan. 1998.Google Scholar
[5]Ben-Yakar, A., and Hanson, R., Cavity Flame holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: Review and Experimental Study, AIAA Paper 98-3122, July 1998.Google Scholar
[6]Tishk Off, J.M., Drummond, J. P., Edwards, T., and Nejad, A. S., Future Direction of Supersonic Combustion Research: Air Force/NASA Workshop on Supersonic Combustion, AIAA Paper 97-1017, Jan. 1997.Google Scholar
[7]Gruber, M.R., Baurle, R.A., Mathur, T. and Hsu, K.-Y., Fundamental studies of cavity-based flameholder concepts for supersonic combustors, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 17, 2001, pp. 146–153.Google Scholar
[8]Rasmussen, C. C., Driscoll, J. F., Hsu, K.Y. and ETC., Stability Limits of Cavity-Stabilized Flames in Supersonic Flow, Proceedings of Combustion Institute, 30,2005, pp. 2825–2833.Google Scholar
[9]Liu, J., Tam, C., Lu, T. and Law, C.K., Simulations of Cavity-stabilized Flames in Supersonic Flows Using Reduced Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms, 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2006, July 9-12, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
[10]Gerlinger, P. and Bruggemann, D., Numerical investigation of hydrogen strut injections into supersonic air flows, J. Prop. Power, 16(1), 2000, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
[11]Tomioka, S.; Kanda, T.; Tani, K.; Mitani, T.; Shimura, T. and Chinzei, N., Testing of a scramjet engine with a strut in M8 flight conditions, AIAA Paper No. 98-3134, 1998.Google Scholar
[12]Tomioka, S., Combustion tests of a staged supersonic combustor with a strut, AIAA Paper No. 98-3273, 1998.Google Scholar
[13]Shigeru, Aso, Arifnur, Hakim, Shingo, Miyamoto, Kei, Inoue and Yasuhiro, Tani, Fundamental Study Of Supersonic Combustion In Pure Air Flow With Use Of Shock Tunnel, Acta Astronautica 57, 2005, pp. 384389.Google Scholar
[14]Xu, Z. and Shu, C.W., Anti-diffusive Flux Corrections for High Order Finite Difference WENO Scheme, J. Comput. Physics, 205, 2005, pp. 458–485.Google Scholar
[15]Huang, J.C., Lin, H. and Yang, J. Y., Implicit Preconditioned WENO Schemes for Steady Viscous Flows, J. Comput. Phys., 228, 2009, pp. 420–438.Google Scholar
[16]Yang, J.Y., Perng, Y.C. and Yen, R.H., Implicit Weighted ENO Schemes for the Three-Dimensional Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations, AIAA J., 38, 2001, pp. 464-.Google Scholar
[17]Yang, J.Y, Hsieh, T.J. and Wang, C.H, Implicit Anti-Diffusive Weighted ENO Schemes for the Three-Dimensional Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations, AIAA Journal, 47:6, 2009, pp. 1435–1444.Google Scholar
[18]Jiang, G.S. and Shu, C.W., Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes, Journal of Computational Physics, 126, 1996, pp. 202228Google Scholar
[19]Singh, G., Pattamatta, A., and Mongia, H., Assessment of Turbulence Models for Heated Wall Jet Flow, AIAA 2011-3951, 42nd AIAA Thermophysics Conference, 27-30 June 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
[20]Tahsini, A.M., Assessment of the Accuracy of Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model for Application in Turbulent Wall Jets, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Issue 51, Mar. 2011, p120Google Scholar
[21]Rose, J. W. and Cooper, J. R., Technical Data on Fuel, Scottish Acadedic Press, Edinburgh, 1977Google Scholar
[22]Perry, R.H., Gree, D. W. and Maloney, J.O., Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, McGral-Hill, New York, 6th edition, 1984Google Scholar
[23]Spalart, P.R. and Allmaras, S.R., A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows, AIAA Paper 92-257, 1992.Google Scholar
[24]Yoon, S. and Jameson, A., Lower-upper Symmetric-Gauss-Seidel Method for the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations, AIAA J., 26, 1988, 10251026.Google Scholar
[25]Guerra, R., Waidmann, W. and Laible, C., An experimental investigation of the combustion of a hydrogen jet injected parallel in a supersonic air stream, AIAA 3rd International Aerospace Planes Conference, Orlando, AIAA 91-5102, December 1991.Google Scholar
[26]Oevermann, M., Numerical investigation hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. J., 4 (2000) pp. 463–480.Google Scholar