No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evaluating guidelines as key components of conservation policies: a conceptual framework and a pilot application
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2024
Summary
Guidelines for managers of protected areas are an important component of conservation policies, on a par with large-scale frameworks and vehicles for conservation funding. In line with the recent literature proposing evaluations of conservation actions or political strategies to improve them, here we use an innovative, hybrid methodology, based both on an interpretative approach anchored in social sciences and a quantitative literature review, to identify available frameworks for evaluating conservation guidelines. The main result of this analysis is that the relevant literature in conservation is sparse and heterogeneous, but a relevant encompassing framework is provided by the literature in decision sciences based on the policy analytics framework. This evaluation framework consists of three criteria: scientific credibility, operationality and legitimacy. We then implement a pilot application by evaluating guidelines currently used in France to support all of the actors involved in protected areas management. The study concludes that these guidelines are plagued by significant weaknesses that could be overcome by implementing relevant participatory processes.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation
References
Alder, J (1996) Have tropical marine protected areas worked? An initial analysis of their success. Coastal Management 24: 97–114.10.1080/08920759609362285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L, Holland, KK, Holland, H, Tome’, S, Nabaala, M, Seno, S et al. (2019) Expanding staff voice in protected area management effectiveness assessments within Kenya’s Maasai Mara National Reserve. Environmental Management 63: 46–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Álvarez-Fernández, I, Fernández, N, Sánchez-Carnero, N, Freire, J (2017) The management performance of marine protected areas in the north-east Atlantic Ocean. Marine Policy 76: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Fernández, I, Freire, J, Naya, I, Fernández, N, Sánchez-Carnero, N (2020a) Failures in the design and implementation of management plans of marine protected areas: an empirical analysis for the North-east Atlantic Ocean. Ocean & Coastal Management 192: 105178.10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Fernández, I, Freire, J, Sánchez-Carnero, N (2020b) Low-quality management of marine protected areas in the north-east Atlantic. Marine Policy 117: 103922.10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananda, J, Proctor, W (2013) Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: an institutional perspective. Ecological Economics 86: 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthamatten, P., Hazen, H. (2007) Unnatural selection: an analysis of the ecological representativeness of natural world heritage sites. The Professional Geographer 59: 256–
268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00611.x
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, BP, Shestackova, E (2015) Do global indicators of protected area management effectiveness make sense? A case study from Siberia. Environmental Management 56: 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apitz, SE (2008) Adaptive management principles and sediment management: a call for discussions. Journal of Soils and Sediments 8: 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlettaz, R, Schaub, M, Fournier, J, Reichlin, TS, Sierro, A, Watson, JEM et al. (2010) From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience 60: 835–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpin, I (2019) The rise of planning in nature conservation and the practitioners’ approach to conflicts. The inspiring case of the northern French Alps nature reserves. Journal for Nature Conservation 48: 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpin, I, Cosson, A (2021) Seeking legitimacy in European biodiversity conservation policies: the case of French national parks. Environmental Science & Policy 116: 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayivor, JS, Gordon, C, Tobin, GA, Ntiamoa-Baidu, Y (2020) Evaluation of management effectiveness of protected areas in the Volta Basin, Ghana: perspectives on the methodology for evaluation, protected area financing and community participation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22: 239–255.10.1080/1523908X.2019.1705153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A, Stockdale, A (2008) Out of the wilderness? Achieving sustainable development within Scottish national parks. Journal of Environmental Management 88: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barreto, GC, Di Domenico, M, Medeiros, RP (2020) Human dimensions of marine protected areas and small-scale fisheries management: a review of the interpretations. Marine Policy 119: 104040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, K, Honey-Rosés, J, Börner, J, Corbera, E, Ezzine-de-Blas, D, Ferraro, PJ, et al. (2015). Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conservation Letters 9: 58–
64.10.1111/conl.12180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, J, Böller, M, Erhardt, A, Schwanghart, W (2014) Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species’ geographic distributions. Ecological Informatics 19: 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, NJ, Roth, R, Klain, SC, Chan, K, Christie, P, Clark, DA et al. (2017) Conservation social science: understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation 205: 93–108.10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bormann, BT, Haynes, RW, Martin, JR (2007) Adaptive management of forest ecosystems: did some rubber hit the road? BioScience 57: 186–191.10.1641/B570213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottrill, MC, Hockings, M, Possingham, HP (2011) In pursuit of knowledge: addressing barriers to effective conservation evaluation. Ecology and Society 16: 14.10.5751/ES-04099-160214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottrill, MC, Pressey, RL (2012) The effectiveness and evaluation of conservation planning: evaluation and conservation planning. Conservation Letters 5: 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouyssou, D, Marchant, T, Pirlot, M, Perny, P, Tsoukiàs, A, Vincke, P (2000) Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective. Boston, MA, USA: Springer US.10.1007/978-1-4615-1593-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choulak, M, Marage, D, Gisbert, M, Paris, M, Meinard, Y (2019) A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies – with an application to wetland prioritization. Science of the Total Environment 655: 384–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claudet, J, Pelletier, D (2004) Marine protected areas and artificial reefs: a review of the interactions between management and scientific studies. Aquatic Living Resources 17: 129–138.10.1051/alr:2004017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courrau, J, Dudley, N, Hockings, M, Leverington, F, Stolton, S (2006) Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.10.2305/IUCN.CH.2005.PAG.14.enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Marchi, G, Lucertini, G, Tsoukiàs, A (2016) From evidence-based policy making to policy analytics. Annals of Operations Research 236: 15–38.10.1007/s10479-014-1578-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, NS, Gomez, A, Carlson, S, Russell, D (2020) Bridging the research–implementation gap requires engagement from practitioners. Conservation Science and Practice 2: e134.10.1111/csp2.134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernoul, L, Beck, N, Cohez, D, Perennou, C, Thibault, M, Willm, L et al. (2015) Trends in management plans and guides: 25 years of experience from southern France. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58: 1096–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, J (2003) WWF rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management (RAPPAM) methodology. Gland, Switzerland: WWF [www document]. URL https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/rappam.pdf
Google Scholar
Evans, D (2012) Building the European Union’s Natura 2000 network. Nature Conservation 1: 11–26.10.3897/natureconservation.1.1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, NI, Muldashev, AA, Martynenko, VB, Baisheva, EZ, Shirokikh, PS, Elizaryeva, OA et al. (2020) Identifying highly diverse areas of rare plant species as a basis for assessing representativeness and improving the network of protected areas. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 13: 418–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, PJ, Pattanayak, SK (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4: e105.10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C, Hahn, T, Olsson, P, Norberg, J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Montes, N, Arnanz Monreal, L (2019) Metodologías participativas para la planificación de la sostenibilidad ambiental local. El caso de la Agenda 21. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales (epub ahead of print) doi: 10.5944/empiria.44.2019.25354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geldmann, J, Barnes, M, Coad, L, Craigie, ID, Hockings, M, Burgess, ND (2013) Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation 161: 230–238.10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grantham, HS, Bode, M, McDonald-Madden, E, Game, ET, Knight, AT (2009) Effective conservation planning requires learning and adaptation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 431–
437.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, CD, Wintle, BA, Kujala, H, Whitehead, AL, Nicholson, E (2020) Measuring impacts on species with models and metrics of varying ecological and computational complexity. Conservation Biology 34: 1512–1524.10.1111/cobi.13524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockings, M (1998) Evaluating management of protected areas: integrating planning and evaluation. Environmental Management 22: 337–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockings, M, Cook, CN, Carter, RW, James, R (2009) Accountability, reporting, or management improvement? Development of a state of the parks assessment system in New South Wales, Australia. Environmental Management 43: 1013–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockings, M, Stolton, S, Dudley, N (2000) Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN [www document]. URL https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/pag-014.pdf
Google Scholar
Holling, CS (1996) Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecological Applications 6: 733–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarić, I, Quétier, F, Meinard, Y (2019) Procrustean beds and empty boxes: on the magic of creating environmental data. Biological Conservation 237: 248–252.10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeanmougin, M, Dehais, C, Meinard, Y (2017) Mismatch between habitat science and habitat directive: lessons from the French (counter) example: evaluating the European habitat policy. Conservation Letters 10: 634–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, PJS (1994) A review and analysis of the objectives of marine nature reserves. Ocean & Coastal Management 24: 149–178.10.1016/0964-5691(94)90036-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, AT, Cowling, RM, Rouget, M, Balmford, A, Lombard, AT, Campbell, BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conservation Biology 22: 610–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovács, E, Kelemen, E, Kiss, G, Kalóczkai, Á, Fabók, V, Mihók, B et al. (2017) Evaluation of participatory planning: lessons from Hungarian Natura 2000 management planning processes. Journal of Environmental Management 204: 540–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linares Quero, A, Iragui Yoldi, U, Gava, O, Schwarz, G, Povellato, A, Astrain, C (2022) Assessment of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014–2020 in supporting agroecological transitions: a comparative study of 15 cases across Europe. Sustainability 14: 9261.10.3390/su14159261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, D-J, Kao, C-W, Chao, C-L (2012) Evaluating the management effectiveness of five protected areas in Taiwan using WWF’s RAPPAM. Environmental Management 50: 272–282.10.1007/s00267-012-9875-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luyet, V, Schlaepfer, R, Parlange, MB, Buttler, A (2012) A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management 111: 213–219.10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maestro, M, Chica-Ruiz, JA, Pérez-Cayeiro, ML (2020) Analysis of marine protected area management: the Marine Park of the Azores (Portugal). Marine Policy 119: 104104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, L, Deinet, S, Freeman, R (2017) The diversity-weighted living planet index: controlling for taxonomic bias in a global biodiversity indicator. PLoS ONE 12: e0169156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinard, Y (2017) What is a legitimate conservation policy? Biological Conservation 213: 115–123.10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinard, Y, Barreteau, O, Boschet, C, Daniell, KA, Ferrand, N, Girard, S et al. (2021) What is policy analytics? An exploration of 5 years of environmental management applications. Environmental Management 67: 886–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, C, Kreft, H, Guralnick, R, Jetz, W (2015) Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nature Communications 6: 8221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milla–Figueras, D, Schmiing, M, Amorim, P, Horta e Costa, B, Afonso, P, Tempera, F (2020) Evaluating seabed habitat representativeness across a diverse set of marine protected areas on the Mid–Atlantic Ridge. Biodiversity and Conservation 29: 1153–1175.10.1007/s10531-019-01929-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mingarro, M, Lobo, JM (2018) Environmental representativeness and the role of emitter and recipient areas in the future trajectory of a protected area under climate change. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 41: 333–344.10.32800/abc.2018.41.0333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, RKA, Bennett, T, Blyth-Skyrme, R, Barham, PJ, Ball, A (2014) Managing Natura 2000 in the marine environment – an evaluation of the effectiveness of ‘management schemes’ in England. Ocean & Coastal Management 87: 40–51.10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.10.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, L, Hausner, V (2013) What do the IUCN categories really protect? A case study of the alpine regions in Spain. Sustainability 5: 2367–2388.10.3390/su5062367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio, A, Schmitt, L, Badariotti, D, Meinard, Y (2022) Mise en œuvre d’un processus de « participation contre-argumentative » dans la gestion et la restauration des milieux fluviaux : retour d’expérience dans une Réserve Naturelle Nationale rhénane. Géocarrefour 96: 19984.10.4000/geocarrefour.19984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio, A, Schmitt, L, Badariotti, D, Meinard, Y (2023) Améliorer la gestion des espaces naturels par la participation. Une analyse du guide français pour l’élaboration des plans de gestion. VertigO (epub ahead of print) doi: 10.4000/vertigo.40230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paletto, A, Hamunen, K, De Meo, I (2015) Social network analysis to support stakeholder analysis in participatory forest planning. Society & Natural Resources 28: 1108–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pe’er, G, Mihoub, J-B, Dislich, C, Matsinos, Y (2014) Towards a different attitude to uncertainty. Nature Conservation 8: 95–114.10.3897/natureconservation.8.8388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, DE, Clark, TJ, Hahn, PG (2022) Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management. Conservation Biology 36: e13734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piwowarczyk, J, Wróbel, B (2016) Determinants of legitimate governance of marine Natura 2000 sites in a post-transition European Union country: a case study of Puck Bay, Poland. Marine Policy 71: 310–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pranckutė, R (2021) Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications 9: 12.10.3390/publications9010012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, FJ, Pople, RG, Ieronymidou, C, Burfield IJ, Gregory RD, Willis SG et al. (2015). Assessing the performance of EU nature legislation in protecting target bird species in an era of climate change: impacts of EU nature legislation. Conservation Letter, 9, 172–
180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santana-Medina, N, Franco-Maass, S, Sánchez-Vera, E, Imbernon, J, Nava-Bernal, G (2013) Participatory generation of sustainability indicators in a natural protected area of Mexico. Ecological Indicators 25: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, CZ, Schiavetti, A (2014) Assessment of the management in Brazilian marine extractive reserves. Ocean & Coastal Management 93: 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, MW, Cook, CN, Pressey, RL, Pullin, AS, Runge, MC, Salafsky, N et al. (2018) Decision support frameworks and tools for conservation: decision support for conservation. Conservation Letters 11: e12385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scianna, C, Niccolini, F, Bianchi, CN, Guidetti, P (2018) Applying organization science to assess the management performance of marine protected areas: an exploratory study. Journal of Environmental Management 223: 175–184.10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sendzimir, J, Magnuszewski, P, Gunderson, L (2018) Adaptive management of riverine socio-ecological systems. In Schmutz, S, Sendzimir, J (eds), Riverine Ecosystem Management: Science for Governing towards a Sustainable Future (pp. 301–324). New York, NY, USA: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolton, S, Dudley, N, Belokurov, A, Deguignet, M, Burgess, ND, Hockings, M et al. (2019) Lessons learned from 18 years of implementing the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT): a perspective from the METT developers and implementers. PARKS 25: 79–92.10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKS-25-2SS.enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stori, FT, Shinoda, DC, Turra, A (2019) Sewing a blue patchwork: an analysis of marine policies implementation in the southeast of Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management 168: 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, WJ, Taylor, NG, MacFarlane, D, Amano, T, Christie, AP, Dicks, LV et al. (2019) Building a tool to overcome barriers in research–implementation spaces: the Conservation Evidence database. Biological Conservation 238: 108199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troudet, J, Grandcolas, P, Blin, A, Vignes-Lebbe, R, Legendre, F (2017) Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Scientific Reports 7: 9132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnhout, E, Metze, T, Wyborn, C, Klenk, N, Louder, E (2020) The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42: 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, JEM, Dudley, N, Segan, DB, Hockings, M (2014) The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515: 67–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyatt, S, Merrill, S, Natcher, D (2011) Ecosystem management and forestry planning in Labrador: how does Aboriginal involvement affect management plans? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 2247–2258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W, Ma, K, Kreft, H (2013) Geographical sampling bias in a large distributional database and its effects on species richness–environment models. Journal of Biogeography 40: 1415–1426.10.1111/jbi.12108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, JC, Jordan, A, Searle, KR, Butler, A, Chapman, DS, Simmons, P, Watt, AD (2013) Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biological Conservation 158: 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osorio et al. supplementary material
Osorio et al. supplementary material
File
6.1 MB