No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Taking stock of far-right terrorism through manifestos: Glorification of identity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2024
Abstract
This research delves into the identity construction and violence justification within the context of far-right lone-actor terrorism, particularly motivated by white supremacist ideologies. Employing a qualitative analysis of manifestos compiled by five lone-actor terrorists, this study adopts a model to unveil the nuanced processes behind the justification of violence and glorification of collective identities. The model has been formed for the purpose of the study, drawing from social identity and identity fusion approaches, including steps such as group alignment, exclusion, threat, virtue, and celebration. The analysis of these manifestos illuminates a progression through each phase of the violent act, meticulously crafted through textual expression. Central to the terrorists’ objectives is the creation of a rhetorical platform aimed at fomenting violence against non-white, ethnic, and religious groups. Their motivation arises from the perceived threat of the ‘white race’ being supplanted by immigrant communities across various social, political, and economic domains. This justification of violence hinges on the portrayal of themselves as protectors of the majority society, pitted against these minority groups. Strikingly, the terrorists celebrate their actions by commemorating past white supremacists who employed violence against marginalised communities.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The British International Studies Association.
References
1 Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism, ‘Murder and extremism in the United States in 2019’, New York (2020), available at: {www.adl.org/resources/report/murder-and-extremism-united-states-2019}.
2 Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism, ‘Murder and extremism in the United States in 2021’, New York (2022), available at: {www.adl.org/resources/report/murder-and-extremism-united-states-2021}.
3 Christopher Hewitt, Understanding Terrorism in America: From the Klan to al Qaeda (New York: Routledge, 2003), p. 15.
4 Tore Bjørgo and Jacob Aasland Ravndal, ‘Extreme-right violence and terrorism: Concepts, patterns, and responses’, ICCT Policy Brief, International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, The Hague (2019), p. 2.
5 Daniel Koehler, ‘Right-wing extremism and terrorism in Europe: Current developments and issues for the future’, Prism, 6:2 (2016), pp. 84–105.
6 Institute for Economics & Peace, ‘Global Terrorism Index 2019: Measuring the impact of terrorism’, Sydney (November 2019), pp. 44–51, available at: {visionofhumanity.org/reports}.
7 See, for example, Bjørgo and Ravndal, ‘Extreme-right violence and terrorism’; Tahir Abbas, ‘Ethnicity and politics in contextualising far right and Islamist extremism’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 11:3 (2017), pp. 54–61; John M. Berger, ‘The dangerous spread of extremist manifestos’, The Atlantic (26 February 2019), available at {www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/christopher-hasson-was-inspired-breivik-manifesto/583567/}; Yasmine Ahmed and Orla Lynch, ‘Terrorism Studies and the far right: The state of play’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 47:2 (2024), pp. 199–219; Daniel Koehler, ‘Recent trends in German right-wing violence and terrorism: What are the contextual factors behind “hive terrorism”?’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 12:6 (2018), pp. 72–88; Daniel Koehler and Peter Popella, ‘Mapping far-right chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) terrorism efforts in the West: Characteristics of plots and perpetrators for future threat assessment’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 32:8 (2020), pp. 1666–90.
8 See, for example, Ahmed and Lynch, ‘Terrorism Studies’; Lee Jarvis, ‘Critical Terrorism Studies and the far-right: Beyond problems and solutions?’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 15:1 (2022), pp. 13–37; Harmonie Toros, ‘Better researchers, better people? The dangers of empathetic research on the extreme right’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 15:1 (2022), pp. 225–31.
9 See, for example, Stephane J. Baele, Lewys Brace, and Travis G. Coan, ‘Uncovering the far-right online ecosystem: An analytical framework and research agenda’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46:9 (2023), pp. 1599–623; Thomas J. Holt, Joshua D. Freilich, and Steven M. Chermak, ‘Examining the online expression of ideology among far-right extremist forum users’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 34:2 (2022), pp. 364–84; Thomas James Vaughan Williams and Calli Tzani, ‘How does language influence the radicalisation process? A systematic review of research exploring online extremist communication and discussion’, Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression (2022), DOI: 10.1080/19434472.2022.2104910; Daniela Peterka-Benton and Bond Benton, ‘Online radicalization case study of a mass shooting: The Payton Gendron manifesto’, Journal for Deradicalization, 35 (2023), pp. 1–31.
10 See, for example, Abbas, ‘Ethnicity and politics’; Sara Doering and Garth Davies, ‘The contextual nature of right-wing terrorism across nations’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 33:5 (2019), pp. 1071–93.
11 See, for example, Michael P. Arena and Bruce A. Arrigo, ‘Social psychology, terrorism, and identity: A preliminary re-examination of theory, culture, self, and society’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23 (2005), pp. 485–506; Randy Borum, ‘Psychological vulnerabilities and propensities for involvement in violent extremism’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 32 (2014), pp. 286–305; Bertjan Doosje, Fathali M Moghaddam, Arie W. Kruglanski, et al., ‘Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization’, Current Opinion in Psychology, 11 (2016), pp. 79–84; Christopher Dean, ‘The role of identity in committing acts of violent extremism – and in desisting from them’, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 27 (2017), pp. 281–5; Neil Ferguson and James W. McAuley, ‘Dedicated to the cause: Identity development and violent extremism’, European Psychologist, 26:1 (2021), pp. 6–14.
12 Cas Mudde, ‘The far right and European elections’, Current History, 113:761 (2014), pp. 98–103.
13 Mudde, ‘The far right’; Bjørgo and Ravndal, ‘Extreme-right violence’, p. 2.
14 John M. Berger, Extremism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018), p. 44.
15 Thomas Perry Thornton, ‘Terror as a weapon of political agitation’, in Herry Eckstein (ed.), Internal War: Problems and Approaches (New York: The Free Press, 1964), pp. 41–63.
16 Gerard Saucier, Laura Geuy Akers, Seraphine Shen-Miller, Goran Knežević, and Lazar Stankov, ‘Patterns of thinking in militant extremism’, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4:3 (2009), pp. 256–71.
17 Paul Wilkinson, Terrorism versus Democracy: The Liberal State Response (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 1–19.
18 Andrew Silke, ‘The devil you know: Continuing problems with research on terrorism’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 13:4 (2001), pp. 1–14; Bart Schuurman and Quirine Eijkman, ‘Moving terrorism research forward: The crucial role of primary sources’, The International Centre for Counter-Terrorism-The Hague, 4:2 (2013), pp. 1–13.
19 Alex Schmid and Albert J. Jongman, Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories & Literature (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 1988).
20 Ahmed and Lynch, ‘Terrorism Studies’.
21 Rakib Ehsan and Paul Stott, Far-Right Terrorist Manifestos: A Critical Analysis (London: Henry Jackson Society, 2020), available at {henryjacksonsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/HJS-Terrorist-Manifesto-Report-WEB.pdf}.
22 Julia Kupper, Tanya Karoli Christensen, Dakota Wing, et al., ‘The contagion and copycat effect in transnational far-right terrorism: An analysis of language evidence’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 16:4 (2022), pp. 4–26.
23 Jacob Ware, ‘Testament to murder: The violent far-right’s increasing use of terrorist manifestos’, ICCT Policy Brief (March 2020), available at {www.icct.nl/publication/testament-murder-violent-far-rights-increasing-use-terrorist-manifestos}.
24 Richard Branscomb, ‘Making manifest: White supremacist violence and the ethics of alethurgy’, Journal for the History of Rhetoric, 24:2 (2021), pp. 140–70.
25 Julia Ebner, Christopher Kavanagh, and Harvey Whitehouse, ‘Is there a language of terrorists? A comparative manifesto analysis’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism (2022), DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2022.2109244.
26 Alice Siggery, Daniel Hunt, and Calli Tzani, ‘Language profile of lone actor terrorist manifestos: A mixed methods analysis’, Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 15:3 (2023), pp. 390–408.
27 Julia Ebner, Christopher Kavanagh, and Harvey Whitehouse, ‘Assessing violence risk among far-right extremists: A new role for natural language processing’, Terrorism and Political Violence (2023), DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2023.2236222.
28 Peterka-Benton and Benton, ‘Online radicalization’.
29 Peterka-Benton and Benton, ‘Online radicalization’.
30 Chetan Bhatt, ‘White extinction: Metaphysical elements of contemporary Western fascism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 38:1 (2021), pp. 27–52.
31 Tanya Telfair Sharpe, ‘The Identity Christian movement: Ideology of domestic terrorism’, Journal of Black Studies, 30:4 (2000), pp. 604–23.
32 Kumar Ramakrishna, ‘Tarrant’s last laugh? The spectre of white supremacist penetration of Western security forces’, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, (September 2020), p. 2, available at {www.hsdl.org/c/view?docid=851639}.
33 Fran Shor, ‘The long life of US institutionalized white supremacist terror’, Critical Sociology, 46:1 (2020), pp. 5–18.
34 Ebner et al., ‘Assessing violence risk’.
35 Bhatt, ‘White extinction’, pp. 28, 32.
36 Arena and Arrigo, ‘Social psychology’.
37 Quintan Wiktorowicz, Radical Islam Rising: Muslim Extremism in the West (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005), pp. 20–4.
38 Borum, ‘Psychological vulnerabilities’.
39 Fathali M. Moghaddam, ‘The staircase to terrorism’, American Psychologist, 6:2 (2005), pp. 161–9; Clark McCauley and Sophia Moskalenko, ‘Mechanisms of political radicalisation: Pathways toward terrorism’, Terrorism and Political Violence, 20:3 (2008), pp. 415–33; Peter R. Neumann, ‘The trouble with radicalization’, International Affairs, 89:4 (2013), pp. 873–93; Matteo Vergani, Muhammad Iqbal, Ekin Ilbahar, and Greg Barton, ‘The three Ps of radicalization: Push, pull, and personal. A systematic scoping review of the scientific evidence about radicalization into violent extremism’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43:10 (2020), pp. 1–32.
40 Moghaddam, ‘The staircase to terrorism’.
41 Schwartz et al., ‘Terrorism: An identity theory perspective’.
42 Henri Tajfel and John Turner, ‘An integrative theory of intergroup conflict’, in William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979), pp. 33–47.
43 William B. Swann, Jolanda Jetten, Angel Gomez, Harvey Whitehouse, and Brock Bastian, ‘When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion’, Psychological Review, 119:3 (2012), pp. 441–56 (p. 442).
44 Naomi Ellemers and S. Alexander Haslam, ‘Social identity theory’, in Paul A. M. Van Lange, Arie W. Kruglanski, and E. Tory Higgins (eds), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (London: Sage, 2012), pp. 379–98.
45 Felicia Pratto, Jim Sidanius, and Shana Levin, ‘Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward’, European Review of Social Psychology, 17:1 (2006), pp. 271–320.
46 Saucier et al.,‘Patterns of thinking in militant extremism’.
47 Swann et al., ‘When group membership gets personal’, pp. 442–3.
48 Swann et al., ‘When group membership gets personal’, p. 451.
49 Scott Atran, Hammad Sheikh, and Ángel Gómez, ‘For cause and comrade: Devoted actors and willingness to fight’, Cliodynamics, 5:1 (2014), pp. 41–57.
50 Harvey Whitehouse, ‘Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41 (2018), pp. 1–62.
51 Ebner et al., ‘Is there a language of terrorists?’. Ebner et al., ‘Assessing violence risk’.
52 Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983).
53 Swann et al., ‘When group membership gets personal’.
54 Schwartz et al., ‘Terrorism: An identity theory perspective’.
55 Michael A. Hogg, ‘From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23:5 (2014), pp. 338–42.
56 Stephen Reicher, S. Alexander Haslam, and Rakshi Rath, ‘Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2:3 (2008), pp. 1313–44.
57 Branscomb, ‘Making manifest’, p. 158; Kristy Campion, ‘Australian right wing extremist ideology: Exploring narratives of nostalgia and nemesis’, Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 14:3 (2019), pp. 208–26.
58 Lauren Wilcox, Bodies of Violence: Theorizing Embodied Subjects in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 26, 27.
59 Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France 1975–76, trans. David Macey (New York: Picador, 2003).
60 Achille Mbembe, ‘Necropolitics’, Public Culture, 15:1 (2003), p. 11–40. The eugenics refers to normalisation practices in the Foucaultian means, whereby undesirable individuals are eliminated in order to bring order to society.
61 Reicher et al., ‘Making a virtue of evil’.
62 Peter Simi, Bryan F. Bubolz, and Ann Hardman. ‘Military experience, identity discrepancies, and far right terrorism: an exploratory analysis’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36:8 (2013), pp. 654–71.
63 Reicher et al., ‘Making a virtue of evil’.
64 Angel Gomez, Matthew L. Brooks, Michael D. Buhrmester, et al., ‘On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100:5 (2011), pp. 918–33; Swann et al., ‘When group membership gets personal’; Whitehouse, ‘Dying for the group’; Ebner et al., ‘Is there a language of terrorists?’.
65 Kathy Charmaz, ‘Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing Social Justice Studies’, in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (New York: Sage, 2005), pp. 507–535.
66 Graham Macklin, ‘The El Paso terrorist attack: The chain reaction of global right-wing terror’, CTC Sentinel, 12:11 (2019), pp. 1–10.
67 Kupper et al., ‘The contagion and copycat effect’.
68 Ronald Crelinsten, Terrorism, Democracy, and Human Security: A Communication Model (Abingdon: Routledge, 2021), p. 19.
69 Siggery et al., ‘Language profile of lone actor terrorist manifestos’.
70 Walter Laqueur, Voices of Terror: Manifestos, Writings and Manuals of Al Qaeda, Hamas, and Other Terrorists from around the World and throughout the Ages (New York: Reed Press, 2004).
71 Thomas James Vaughan Williams, Calli Tzani, and Maria Ioannou, ‘Foreshadowing terror: Exploring the time of online manifestos prior to lone wolf attacks’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism (2023), DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2023.2205973.
72 Berger, ‘The dangerous spread of extremist manifestos’.
73 Berger, ‘The dangerous spread of extremist manifestos’.
74 Klaus Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (London: Sage, 2004), p. 18.
75 Dylann Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’ (2015), available at {media.thestate.com/static/roofmanifesto.pdf}.
76 Brenton Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’ (2019), available at {img-prod.ilfoglio.it/userUpload/The_Great_Replacementconvertito.pdf}.
77 Tarrant is often regarded as a copycat of Breivik. See Florian Hartleb, Lone Wolves: The New Terrorism of Right-Wing Single Actors (Cham: Springer, 2020), p. 132.
78 Ehsan and Stott, Far-Right Terrorist Manifestos, p. 6.
79 Bhatt, ‘White extinction’, p. 47.
80 John Timothy Earnest, ‘An open letter’ (2019), available at {https://bcsh.bard.edu/files/2019/06/Earnest-Manifesto-042719.pdf}.
81 Patrick Crusius, ‘The inconvenient truth’ (2019), available at {https://randallpacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/The-Inconvenient-Truth.pdf}.
82 Payton Gendron. ‘You wait for a signal while your people wait for you’ (2022), available at {https://www.hoplofobia.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/PG-Manifesto.pdf}.
83 Alex Schmid, ‘The revised academic consensus definition of terrorism’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 6:2 (2012), pp. 158–9.
84 Martha Crenshaw, ‘The causes of terrorism’, Comparative Politics, 13:4 (1981), pp. 379–99; Martha Crenshaw, ‘The logic of terrorism: Terrorist behaviour as a product of strategic choice’, in Walter Reich (ed.), Origins of Terrorism (Washington: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998), pp. 7–24.
85 Ware, ‘Testament to murder’, p. 7.
86 Peterka-Benton and Benton, ‘Online radicalization’, p. 7.
87 Reicher et al., ‘Making a virtue of evil’.
88 Branscomb, ‘Making manifest’, pp. 141–2.
89 Ware, ‘Testament to murder’, p. 6.
90 Earnest, ‘An open letter’.
91 Gendron, ‘You wait for’.
92 Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’.
93 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, p. 1.
94 Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’, p. 24.
95 Earnest, ‘An open letter’, p. 2.
96 Earnest, ‘An open letter’, p. 6.
97 Ebner et al., ‘Is there a language of terrorists?’.
98 Ebner et al., ‘Assessing violence risk’.
99 Daniel Byman, ‘Counterterrorism and modern white supremacy’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism (2021), DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2021.1956100.
100 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, p. 4.
101 Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’, p. 28, 43.
102 Nasar Meer, ‘The wreckage of white supremacy’, Identities, 26:5 (2019), pp. 501–9.
103 Campion, ‘Australian right wing’, p. 208.
104 Shor, ‘White supremacist terror’, p. 2.
105 Earnest, ‘An open letter’, p. 3.
106 Crusius, ‘The inconvenient truth’, p. 3.
107 Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’, pp. 44, 63.
108 Reicher et al., ‘Making a virtue of evil’, p. 1331.
109 Byman, ‘Counterterrorism and modern white supremacy’, p. 2.
110 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, pp. 1, 2.
111 Crusius, ‘The inconvenient truth’.
112 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, pp. 1, 3.
113 It is important to note that such degrading and dehumanising descriptions are a continuation of the tradition of racialisation inherited from colonialism.
114 Gendron, ‘You wait for’, pp. 2, 3; Earnest, ‘An open letter’, p. 4.
115 Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and Ambivalence (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991).
116 Barbara Perry and Ryan Scrivens, ‘Uneasy alliances: A look at the right-wing extremist movement in Canada’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39:9 (2016), pp. 819–41.
117 David Campbell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, rev. ed. (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), p. 8.
118 Cynthia Miller-Idriss, ‘White supremacist extremism and the far right in the U.S’ (2021), available at {https://www.gale.com/intl/essays/cynthia-miller-idriss-white-supremacist-extremism-far-right-us}.
119 Teun van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2nd ed. (London: Sage, 2011).
120 Richard Kearney, Strangers, Gods, and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness (London: Routledge, 2002), p. 65.
121 Miller-Idriss, ‘White supremacist extremism’.
122 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, p. 3.
123 Earnest, ‘An open letter’, p. 6.
124 Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’, p. 11.
125 Crusius, ‘The inconvenient truth’, p. 1.
126 Earnest, ‘An open letter’.
127 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, p. 5.
128 Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’.
129 Berger, Extremism.
130 Florian Hartleb, Lone Wolves: The New Terrorism of Right-wing Single Actors (Cham: Springer, 2020), p. 137.
131 Berger, Extremism, p. 100.
132 In particular, they link the erosion of traditional male roles and the deterioration of homogeneous identity and promote hyper-masculine violence as a ‘defence strategy’ in response to these perceived threats. Right-wing extremist groups often use this ‘protector narrative’ to target propaganda and recruitment strategies at certain men, responding to their fears of powerlessness and replacement. See Aleksandra Dier and Gretchen Baldwin, ‘Masculinities and violent extremism’, International Peace Institute and UN Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (June 2022), p. 7.
133 Branscomb, ‘Making manifest’.
134 Ebner et al., ‘Assesing violence’, p. 10.
135 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, p. 5.
136 Gendron, ‘You wait for’, p. 3; Tarrant, ‘The Great Replacement’, p. 5.
137 Earnest, ‘An open letter’, p. 2.
138 Crusius, ‘The inconvenient truth’, p. 5.
139 Per-Erik Nilsson, ‘Manifestos of white nationalist ethno-soldiers’, Critical Research on Religion, 10:2 (2022), pp. 221–35.
140 Reicher et al., ‘Making a virtue of evil’.
141 Max Harwood, ‘Living death: Imagined history and the Tarrant manifesto’, Emotions: History, Culture, Society, 5:1 (2021), pp. 25–50.
142 Gendron, ‘You wait for’, p. 18.
143 Earnest, ‘An open letter’, pp. 1, 2.
144 Roof, ‘The last Rhodesian’, pp. 3, 5.
145 Crusius, ‘The inconvenient truth’, p. 4.
146 Crenshaw, ‘The causes of terrorism’.