Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T22:04:47.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Rabies Cases Received by the Shomal Pasteur Institute in Northern Iran: A 2-Year Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Saeid Kavoosian Open the ORCID record for Saeid Kavoosian [Opens in a new window] ,
Ramezan Behzadi Open the ORCID record for Ramezan Behzadi [Opens in a new window] ,
Mohsen Asouri Open the ORCID record for Mohsen Asouri [Opens in a new window] ,
Ali Asghar Ahmadi Open the ORCID record for Ali Asghar Ahmadi [Opens in a new window] ,
Mehrab Nasirikenari Open the ORCID record for Mehrab Nasirikenari [Opens in a new window] ,
Alireza Salehi Open the ORCID record for Alireza Salehi [Opens in a new window]  and
Osman Faruk Bayramlar
Saeid Kavoosian
Affiliation:
North Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Amol, Iran
Ramezan Behzadi
Affiliation:
North Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Amol, Iran Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
Mohsen Asouri
Affiliation:
North Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Amol, Iran Zoonoses Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Amol, Iran
Ali Asghar Ahmadi
Affiliation:
North Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Amol, Iran
Mehrab Nasirikenari
Affiliation:
North Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Amol, Iran
Alireza Salehi*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Alireza Salehi; alireza.salehi74@yahoo.com

Abstract

The rabies virus, which belongs to the genus Lyssavirus, the family Rhabdoviridae, is the causative agent of rabies, a contagious, deadly, and progressive neurological infection. This illness is commonly distributed worldwide and affects all warm-blooded animals. Regarding the zoonotic aspects of rabies, the prevalence of rabies was investigated in this study. Over 2 years, 188 samples were examined via the direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) and mouse inoculation test (MIT) techniques by using brain tissue samples. Our findings showed that 73.94% of samples were rabies positive. The highest number of samples belonged to cows and dogs, respectively. The positivity rate in cows was 71.88%, followed by dogs with a 57.78% infection rate. These findings suggested that despite the heavy monitoring protocols in Iran, rabies is still a prevalent disease, and it is advised that vaccinations and screening programs should be carried out more frequently with heavier observation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics , Volume 2023 , 2023 , e10
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Saeid Kavoosian et al.

1. Introduction

According to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), rabies is caused by lyssaviruses, including the rabies virus and the Australian bat lyssavirus. It spreads when an infected animal (host) scratches or bites another animal or human [1]. Rabies is a viral disease with inflammation of the brain in humans and most mammals. Early symptoms include fever and tingling at the site of exposure in most animals including humans [Reference Brunker and Mollentze2]. There are other symptoms such as violent movements, uncontrolled excitement, fear of water, inability to move parts of the body, confusion, and loss of consciousness. When symptoms appear, prognosis is mostly death [Reference Leung, Davies and Hon3]. The time between encountering the virus and the beginning of symptoms is usually one to three months but may vary from less than one week to more than one year [1]. The length of this golden time depends on how far the virus must travel along the peripheral nerves to reach the central nervous system (CNS) [Reference Abbas, Fausto and Robbins4]. Infected saliva can also transmit the virus if saliva makes contact with mucus, for example, by contacting the eyes, mouth, or nose. Regarding rabies, dogs are the most famous host worldwide [1]. More than 99% of rabies-infected cases were caused by dogs by simply getting bitten [Reference Tintinalli5]. However, in the USA, bat bites are the most common source of rabies infections in humans and less than 5% of cases are from dogs [1, Reference Tintinalli5]. Also, it should be noted that rodents are unlikely to be infected with rabies [Reference Tintinalli5]. In northern Iran, most cows are mixed-breed including mixed Simmental and mixed Holstein [Reference Salehi, Rahimi and Masoumi6]. They are the main source of meat, dairy products, and consequently income [Reference Nouri, Rahmatian and Salehi7]. Meanwhile, dogs are not mostly kept by farmers, and they are also mixed-breed. This lack of ownership leads to a brutal competition for limited food resources and turns dogs into aggressive animals in this region.

Unfortunately, rabies can only be diagnosed after symptoms appear. However, animal control and vaccination programs have reduced the risk of catching the disease from dogs in some regions. Thus, immunizing people before they are exposed is recommended for those at high risk, including those who work with bats or spend prolonged periods in areas of the world where rabies is common. In people who have been exposed to rabies, the rabies vaccine and sometimes rabies immunoglobulin are effective in preventing the acute disease if the person receives the treatment before the start of rabies symptoms [1]. Washing the bitten and scratched areas for 15 minutes with soap and water, povidone iodine, or any antiviral detergent may reduce the number of viral particles and may be effective in preventing transmission [1, Reference Fooks and Jackson8]. In 2016, only fourteen people survived the rabies infection after symptoms were presented [Reference Manoj, Mukherjee, Johri and Kumar9, Reference Weyer, Msimang-Dermaux and Paweska10]. Rabies is estimated to cause 59000 human deaths annually in over 150 countries, with 95% of cases occurring in Africa and Asia [1]. To be more specific, according to the WHO, 31000 human deaths occurred in Asia, with nearly 20000 of them concentrated in India [Reference Harris, Vyawahare and Mandhana11]. About 40% of deaths occur in children under the age of 15 [Reference Brunker and Mollentze2]. Rabies is present in more than 150 countries and on all continents except for Antarctica [1]. More than 3 billion people live in regions of the world where rabies likely occurs [1]. Several countries, including Australia and Japan, as well as much of Western Europe, do not have rabies among dogs [12, Reference Control13]. Also, many islands do not have rabies at all [Reference Control13], so it is classified as a neglected tropical disease [Reference Vetter14].

The Rabies Laboratory of the Pasteur Institute of Iran has been known as the national reference for rabies diagnosis since the beginning of rabies diagnostic tests in Iran. In addition, according to the national protocol, the major reference for diagnosing all suspected rabies samples in humans and domestic and wild animals is the Pasteur Institute of Iran. For example, an earlier study of rabies infection was conducted in 2015 [Reference Rahpeyma15]. As was reported, the positivity of suspected cases was 59.5% among 116 samples, and it was mostly observed among dogs. Accordingly, this study was conducted to assay the prevalence of rabies among different animal species between 2016 and 2018 in order to evaluate the changes in the rabies infection rate.

This study was conducted at the Shomal Pasteur Institute in the north of Iran, which is one of the four Pasteur research centers in Iran. This institute is mainly responsible for rabies monitoring across the whole country since its establishment, and the Shomal center covers the four provinces of Ardabil, Gilan, Golestan, and Mazandaran. Therefore, in this study, all suspicious samples from these provinces were considered.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection Protocols

This experimental study was based on samples, which were received from four provinces of Iran (Ardabil, Gilan, Golestan, and Mazandaran) by the North Research Center of the Pasteur Institute of Iran in the city of Amol from March 2016 to March 2018 (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Investigated provinces in this research. The red parts are regions that were under observation, and samples were collected.

Based on the protocol, the bitten domestic animals were quarantined for 15 days, and in case of rabies symptoms, they were euthanized. The brain samples were collected from suspected animals and packed in a vial containing 50% glycerin and 50% phosphate buffer saline (PBS) [Reference Rahpeyma15]. In the case of no symptom detection, the suspected animal was kept in quarantine for another 15 days, and if no rabies symptoms appeared, it was returned to its original place of living.

Regarding wild animals, if they were trapped by veterinarians or environmental officers while showing bitten or any suspicious signs, they were first quarantined according to the same procedure, and if symptoms appeared, they were euthanized. The brain sample was sent to the laboratory. These wild animals act as a link (carrier) between wildlife and domestic animals. Furthermore, they can be the main carriers of the virus from its reservoir (jackal) to other animals.

2.2. Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test (DFAT)

Smear preparation started by opening the received vials. A small piece (20–50 mg) of the brain was picked up with a tip and placed on a wooden spatula. An imprint of the sample was made by pressing a glass slide on the piece of the brain over the spatula. The smear was fixed in high-grade cold acetone. 0.1 ml of clarified anti-rabies nucleocapsid conjugate (Bio-Rad, France) was placed on the sample, and the sample was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Following incubation, the smear was rinsed twice with distilled water after several minutes of being stored in PBS. The stained samples were then analyzed under a fluorescent microscope (Motic AE30-31, Spain) for the presence of Negri bodies [Reference Rahpeyma15–Reference Rodrigues, Marcusso and Souza17].

2.3. Mouse Inoculation Test (MIT)

While a positive DFAT result indicates an infection, a negative result does not rule out the possibility of infection. Therefore, after microscopic observation of the negative samples, the brain tissues were prepared and the mouse inoculation test (MIT) was performed. The MIT was conducted by adding a clarified supernatant of a homogenate of the brain material in an isotonic buffered solution containing antibiotics (10 ml of brain suspension with 50 μl of penicillin and 20 μl of streptomycin). Then, the skull of ten mice, 3–4 weeks old (12–14 grams), was injected with the suspension of 50 μl of the brain sample. The mice were anesthetized by ether before inoculation. For intracerebral inoculation, sterilized needles (27 and 26 gauges) were used. Next, the mice were observed daily for 28 days. Any deaths occurring during the first 4 days were regarded as nonspecific, and every dead mouse after the 4th day was considered positive, and the brain was obtained and sent for the DFAT examination [Reference Rodrigues, Marcusso and Souza17, Reference Corona, Boger, Rocha, Svoboda and Gomes18].

2.4. Statistical Method

The collected data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp), and the chi-square test [Reference Salehi, Razavi and Vahedi Nouri19] was employed to compare the number of suspected and positive samples. p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference [Reference Valaei, Azadeh and Mostafavi Niaki20]. Moreover, a p value was estimated down to 0.0001 for further confidence levels [Reference Salehi, Hosseini and Kazemi21, Reference Rahimi, Asadi Louie, Salehi and Faed Maleki22].

3. Results

In this study, 188 specimens were tested for rabies infection. Out of the 188 suspected wildlife specimens, 137 cases of rabies were confirmed as positive. Among these, the cow’s brain tissue samples had the highest percentage, followed by dogs with 34 specimens, and the lowest proportion belonged to the horses, foxes, and camels with only one sample (Table 1). Jackals, wolves, foxes, horses, and camels had the most positive rabies rate in terms of animal species as 100% of the samples from these animals were positive.

Table 1 Distribution of suspected and positive (infected) samples in Iran between 2016 and 2018.

a Significant difference between the number of infected domestic animals with Pearson chi-square value 36.614 was p < 0.006.

b Significant difference between the number of infected domestic and wild animals with Pearson chi-square value 50.267 was p < 0.012.

c Significant difference between the numbers of suspected domestic animals with Pearson chi-square value 25.798 was p < 0.011.

d Significant difference between the numbers of suspected wild animals with Pearson chi-square value 5.000 was p < 0.025.

e Significant difference between the numbers of suspected animals with Pearson chi-square value 35.187 was p < 0.0001.

f Significant difference between the total number of domestic animals with Pearson chi-square value 49.471 was p < 0.0001.

g Significant difference between the total number of infected and suspected animals with Pearson chi-square value 69.362 was p < 0.0001.

Comparing the samples regarding the provinces, the highest rate was in Gilan province with 86 cases, followed by Ardabil with 50 cases (Table 2). Also, cows had the highest number of infected cases among all animals with 92 cases (66.19%), followed by dogs, sheep, and goats, respectively (Table 1).

Table 2 Comparison of suspected cases (percentage of positive cases) in different provinces of Iran. Each value presents the number of suspected cases (with the infection rate percentage).

Bold values represent the highest number in each column.

4. Discussion

This study investigated the received samples from four provinces in the north of Iran, which consisted of ten different species. The samples were examined carefully and evaluated via the DFAT technique. After analyzing the data, it turned out that 72.87% of cases were rabies positive. Generally, animal bites can cause serious health problems [Reference Dadypour, Salahi and Ghezelsofla23], and exposure to stray dogs was reported as the major cause of human bites [Reference Najafi24].

Most of the studied regions in this research are covered by forests and mountains, which have made it difficult to monitor rabies. In addition, all four provinces share a border with the neighboring countries of Iran, which makes it a lot harder to control animal reservoirs inside the country and decreases the possibility of controlling animals that travel between the borders. In order to control rabies and reduce human casualties, programs such as education of people and students, vaccination, and serum therapy of individuals and animals are among the most important, which, despite spending a lot of money, were not greatly successful in controlling the disease.

An earlier study was also conducted on rabies epidemiology in northern Iran [Reference Esfandiari25]. As can be seen in Table 3, the overall rate of rabies cases has decreased in all four provinces after almost 15 years. However, the number of rabies-infected cases in cows, which are the most important and frequent animal, was reduced in the current study compared to that in the previous one. The reason is likely related to a better vaccination protocol during these years. In addition, an earlier study [Reference Esfandiari25] showed a significantly higher infection rate in this area, but fortunately, the overall positivity of cases was massively decreased in this study.

Table 3 Comparison of the findings of previously conducted studies in Iran with those of the current study.

Also, there are certain areas, where animals potentially could carry the virus [Reference Vahdati26, Reference Gholami, Fayaz and Farahtaj27]. The result of this study was in line with those of previous studies in neighboring countries, which indicated an almost similar condition of virus dispersion in those areas [Reference Ata, Tageldin, al Sumry and al-Ismaily28–Reference Kasem, Hussein and Al-Doweriej31]. As an example, it was observed in an earlier study in Saudi Arabia that there are 158 (79.4%) positive cases among 199 suspected animals [Reference Kasem, Hussein and Al-Doweriej31], while this infection rate in Iran was slightly lower (Figure 2). According to our findings, the largest sample proportion belonged to cows, of which 71.88% were rabies positive. Also, more than half of the rabies cases occurred in Gilan province. This may be due to the forests in that area and poor vaccination status, of which the latter requires quick and effective treatment protocols. Given the economic value of a cow, its vaccination can prevent its mortality chance, which directly affects economic and livestock markets. Moreover, the results showed that dogs in the northern provinces of Iran were substantially infected with rabies. In addition, Mazandaran province had the highest number of rabies cases in dogs, with 52% of them being rabies positive, while Gilan province had the highest positive rate with 64%. Regarding the behavior of the dog and how aggressive it can get, the animal can act as a vector for the virus. Dogs can share this disease with a wide range of humans [Reference Abdulmoghni, Al-Ward, Al-Moayed, Al and Khader32]. They can also be the reason why the positivity rate of the cow was high since most of the dairy units in the area are still traditionally operated. To be brief, since stray dogs are the most common carrier and cows are the easiest target for being attacked by those dogs, there is no surprise that most of the suspected cases belonged to cows. Also, cows are the main source of meat in some areas, and they are likely to make contact with stray dogs more than other species. However, there could be a higher number of infected cows, but some bitten animals were kept in villages or jungles, which were never found or examined, and these kinds of cases were not similarly included in most of these kinds of studies.

Figure 2 Comparison of the number of rabies-suspected cases and the positivity of them between Iran and other countries during the same time [Reference Rahpeyma15, Reference Kasem, Hussein and Al-Doweriej31, Reference Al-Shamahy, Sunhope and Al-Moyed33–Reference Zinsstag35].

These results are consistently similar to those of the previous studies [Reference Saitou, Kobayashi and Hirano36–Reference Hampson, Coudeville and Lembo41] (Table 3). However, it should be noticed that in a study by Rahpeyma et al. [Reference Rahpeyma15], the data included all provinces, while this study focused on the four northern provinces. This is probably the reason for an increased rate of positive cases (Table 3). Regarding wild animals including jackals, wolves, and foxes, all samples were positive for rabies. This high prevalence can be a sign of the irrefutable contamination of wildlife animals, as well as their role in the survival of the virus in nature. The findings are similar to the findings of Wolfe et al. [Reference Wolfe, Dunavan and Diamond42, Reference Pavlin, Schloegel and Daszak43]. The 100% prevalence of rabies in any animal can be a serious warning about the need to complete antirabies prophylactic therapy after getting bitten by these animals [Reference Bellan, Cizauskas and Miyen44].

According to an earlier epidemiological study, rabies is an endemic infection in Iran, and it is a critical zoonotic disease. As was seen previously, the main transmitter of rabies is wolves. According to our findings, the incidences of rabies in animals and following humans are increasing annually. For example, more than 130000 people received postexposure prophylaxis in 2006 [Reference Janani, Fayaz and Simani45]. Also, data suggested that the majority of human exposures were due to dog biting. However, investigations showed that, in many cases, wolves were responsible for rabies transmission to humans [Reference Janani, Fayaz and Simani45]. In this study, wolves were shown to be a critical threat with a 100% infection rate.

Nevertheless, we can hope for the eradication of rabies when either the virus is removed from animal reservoirs or animal bites are managed to be inhibited. According to our findings, a total of 96.28% of the samples sent to the laboratory by veterinary centers were of domestic animals and 77.35% of them were of cows, sheep, and goats. The major reason for this high number of farm animals among the suspected cases is the high amount of interaction between these animals and wild carriers. The other possible reason is that government supports livestock farmers to eliminate infected animals by paying compensation for preventing the entry of contaminated meat into the country’s food cycle. Also, it should be noted that one of the reasons behind the low number of wild animal samples is the difficulty of tracking wild animals in remote areas.

The wildlife spectrum in the northern provinces of Iran is diverse. Each region has some different carnivores. The infection of these animals with the rabies virus indicates the need for studying the density of these animals on the one hand and the need for immunization of these animals on the other hand. Countries are often attributed to low prioritization, epidemiological and operational constraints, and insufficient financial resources. Unfortunately, this was due to the lack of referral to health centers after exposure to an infected dog, which requires more information on prevention after an anomalous reminder. The disease is also prevalent in the countries of the region [Reference Horton, Ismail and Siryan46]. Finally, it must be noted that the only limitation was the lack of access to the wild biters in jungles and outskirts.

5. Conclusion

The findings of this study showed that Gilan, Ardebil, Mazandaran, and Golestan provinces had the highest rates of contamination, respectively. In the northern provinces, employing the control programs and the elimination of rabies can result in identifying the main hotspots. The findings of this study are supported by the fact that despite the wide range of annual measures against prevention, there is rabies currently. Unfortunately, the disease is still endemic with a high prevalence in Iran and is still one of the most important health challenges. It is suggested that control programs, such as vaccinations, especially in cows, and dogs, should be carried out with prophylaxis and increased community awareness of the disease to reduce and eliminate rabies disease.

Data Availability

Data are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Ethical Approval

The permission of studying the suspected animals by Pasteur institutes was issued by the country’s veterinary organization through approval ID no. 22997/31-8/4/81 dated 2002. Also, the Rabies Care and Control Law was promulgated in 1971, and according to Resolution No. 128102/45949 dated 29/06/2013 of the Council of Ministers of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its executive regulations were updated in order to follow all ethical protocols. Also, there were no exclusion criteria in this study. In addition, the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 were followed [Reference Percie du Sert, Hurst and Ahluwalia47]. Finally, the permission ID to release the data was A/P/1032.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

References

W. H. Organization, Rabies Fact Sheet N 99, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014Google Scholar
Brunker, K. and Mollentze, N., “Rabies virus,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 886–887, 2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, A. K. C., Davies, H. D., and Hon, K.-L. E., “Rabies: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prophylaxis,” Advances in Therapy, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1340–1347, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abbas, A. K., Fausto, N., and Robbins, S. L., Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease, Elsevier Saunders, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005.Google Scholar
Tintinalli, J., Tintinallis Emergency Medicine A Comprehensive Study Guide, McGraw-Hill Education, 2015, https://lib.hpu.edu.vn/handle/123456789/32417.Google Scholar
Salehi, A., Rahimi, O., Masoumi, M. et al., “Correlation of the breeds and dental lesions in cattle of northern Iran”, Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nouri, N. V., Rahmatian, R., and Salehi, A., “Prevalence of helminthic infections in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle in mazandaran province (northern Iran),” Journal of Parasitology Research, vol. 2022, Article ID 7424647, 7 pages, 2022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fooks, A. R. and Jackson, A. C., Rabies: Scientific Basis of the Disease and its Management, Academic Press, Cambridge, CA, USA, 2020.Google Scholar
Manoj, S., Mukherjee, A., Johri, S., and Kumar, K. V. S. H., “Recovery from rabies, a universally fatal disease,” Military Medical Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–23, 2016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weyer, J., Msimang-Dermaux, V., Paweska, J. T. et al., “A case of human survival of rabies, South Africa: brief report,” Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 66–68, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G., Vyawahare, M., and Mandhana, N., “Where streets are thronged with strays baring fangs,” New York Times, vol. 6, 2012.Google Scholar
Who, WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies: Second Report, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.Google Scholar
Control, C., Rabies-Free Countries and Political Units, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Organization, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013.Google Scholar
Vetter, N., “Editor’s c,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahpeyma, M., “Epidemiological study of rabies infection in specimens sent to Pasteur institute of Iran in 2015,” Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 65–70, 2015.Google Scholar
Tekki, I. S., Ponfa, Z. N., Nwosuh, C. I. et al., “Comparative assessment of seller’s staining test (SST) and direct fluorescent antibody test for rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of rabies,” African Health Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 123–127, 2016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, A., Marcusso, R., Souza, D. et al., “A comparative study of direct fluorescent antibody, mouse inoculation, and tissue culture infection testing for rabies diagnoses,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 300, Article ID 114426, 2022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corona, T. F., Boger, B., Rocha, T. Cd, Svoboda, W. K., and Gomes, E. C., “Comparative analysis of mouse inoculation test and virus isolation in cell culture for rabies diagnosis in animals of parana, Brazil,” Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salehi, A., Razavi, M., and Vahedi Nouri, N., “Seasonal prevalence of helminthic infections in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep in mazandaran province, northern Iran,” Journal of Parasitology Research, vol. 2022, Article ID 7392801, 8 pages, 2022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valaei, A., Azadeh, F., Mostafavi Niaki, S. T. et al., “Antioxidant and anticancer potentials of the olive and sesame mixture against dimethylhydrazine-induced colorectal cancer in wistar rats,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2022, Article ID 5440773, 12 pages, 2022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salehi, A., Hosseini, S. M., and Kazemi, S., “Antioxidant and anticarcinogenic potentials of propolis for dimethylhydrazine-induced colorectal cancer in wistar rats,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2022 Article ID 8497562, 12 pages, 2022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahimi, O., Asadi Louie, N., Salehi, A., and Faed Maleki, F., “Hepatorenal protective effects of hydroalcoholic extract of solidago canadensis L. Against paracetamol-induced toxicity in mice,” Journal of Toxicology, vol. 2022, Article ID 9091605, 11 pages, 2022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadypour, M., Salahi, R., and Ghezelsofla, F., “Epidemiological survey of animal bites in Kalaleh district, North of Iran (2003-05),” Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences, vol. 11, no. 1, 2009, https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093303092.Google Scholar
Najafi, N., “Animal bites and rabies in northern Iran, 2001–2005,” Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 4, no. 4, 2009, https://brieflands.com/articles/archcid-93403.html.Google Scholar
Esfandiari, B., “Comparison of animal rabies from northern provinces of Iran referred to the Amol research center (ARC) during 2007,” The Internet Journal of Microbiology, vol. 6, 2008.Google Scholar
Vahdati, S. S., “Demographics of rabies exposure in north-west of Iran: 5 years experience,” J Analyt Res Clin Med, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–21, 2013.Google Scholar
Gholami, A., Fayaz, A., and Farahtaj, F., “Rabies in Iran: past, present and future,” Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014, http://jommid.pasteur.ac.ir/article-1-49-en.html.Google Scholar
Ata, F., Tageldin, M., al Sumry, H., al-Ismaily, S., “Rabies in the sultanate of Oman,” The Veterinary Record, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 68–69, 1993, https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19932279737CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, N., Un, H., Fooks, A. R. et al., “Rabies epidemiology and control in Turkey: past and present,” Epidemiology and Infection, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 305–312, 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faizee, N., Hailat, N. Q., Ababneh, M. M. K., Hananeh, W. M., and Muhaidat, A., “Pathological, immunological and molecular diagnosis of rabies in clinically suspected animals of different species using four detection techniques in Jordan,” Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 154–164, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasem, S., Hussein, R., Al-Doweriej, A. et al., “Rabies among animals in Saudi Arabia,” Journal of infection and public health, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 445–447, 2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdulmoghni, R. T., Al-Ward, A. H., Al-Moayed, K. A., Al, M. A., and Khader, Y. S., “Incidence, trend, and mortality of human exposure to rabies in Yemen, 2011-2017: observational study,” JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, vol. 7, no. 6, Article ID e27623, 2021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Shamahy, H. A., Sunhope, A., and Al-Moyed, K. A., “Prevalence of rabies in various species in Yemen and risk factors contributing to the spread of the disease,” Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 404–410, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, M. Z., Al, N. K., Al, A. N. et al., “Quantifying and mapping the burden of human and animal rabies in Iraq,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 14, no. 10, Article ID e0008622, 2020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinsstag, J., “Transmission dynamics and economics of rabies control in dogs and humans in an African city,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 71, Article ID 0904740106, 2009.Google Scholar
Saitou, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Hirano, S. et al., “A method for simultaneous detection and identification of Brazilian dog-and vampire bat-related rabies virus by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 168, no. 1-2, pp. 13–17, 2010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menezes, R., “Rabies in India,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 564–566, 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cisterna, D., Bonaventura, R., Caillou, S. et al., “Antigenic and molecular characterization of rabies virus in Argentina,” Virus Research, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 139–147, 2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleaveland, S., “A dog rabies vaccination campaign in rural Africa: impact on the incidence of dog rabies and human dog-bite injuries,” Vaccine, vol. 21, no. 17-18, pp. 1965–1973, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knobel, D. L., “Dog rabies and its control”, Rabies, pp 591–615, 3 edition, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, K., Coudeville, L., Lembo, T. et al., “Correction: estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e0003786, 2015.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, N. D., Dunavan, C. P., and Diamond, J., “Origins of major human infectious diseases,” Nature, vol. 447, no. 7142, pp. 279–283, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlin, B. I., Schloegel, L. M., and Daszak, P., “Risk of importing zoonotic diseases through wildlife trade, United States,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1721–1726, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellan, S. E., Cizauskas, C. A., Miyen, J. et al., “Black-backed jackal exposure to rabies virus, canine distemper virus, and Bacillus anthracis in Etosha National Park, Namibia,” Journal of Wildlife Diseases, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 371–381, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janani, A. R., Fayaz, A., Simani, S. et al., “Epidemiology and control of rabies in Iran,” Developments in Biologicals, vol. 131, pp. 207–211, 2008, https://europepmc.org/article/med/18634481.Google ScholarPubMed
Horton, D. L., Ismail, M. Z., Siryan, E. S. et al., “Rabies in Iraq: trends in human cases 2001–2010 and characterisation of animal rabies strains from Baghdad,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e2075, 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A. et al., “The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1769–1777, 2020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1 Investigated provinces in this research. The red parts are regions that were under observation, and samples were collected.

Figure 1

Table 1 Distribution of suspected and positive (infected) samples in Iran between 2016 and 2018.

Figure 2

Table 2 Comparison of suspected cases (percentage of positive cases) in different provinces of Iran. Each value presents the number of suspected cases (with the infection rate percentage).

Figure 3

Table 3 Comparison of the findings of previously conducted studies in Iran with those of the current study.

Figure 4

Figure 2 Comparison of the number of rabies-suspected cases and the positivity of them between Iran and other countries during the same time [15, 31, 33–35].