We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
On the night of November 11, 1817, nineteen-year-old Rufus Choate rushed to Dartmouth Hall from his Hanover boarding room to answer a call of alarm from his classmates. Professors from Dartmouth University, an institution recently created by legislative action, “had violently attacked” the student library under Choate's care “and, after an unsuccessful attempt to force the lock, literally hewed down the door” with an axe. Choate, who rejected these professors as figures of authority, joined his peers to temporarily lock the intruders in an adjoining room while they removed their books. News of the incident enraged the already volatile debate about the future of Dartmouth. Because the library riot involved generational violence, the professors accused the students of immaturity in an effort to exclude them from the Dartmouth debate. But students found that claims of immaturity could cut both ways. Although students occupied a liminal position between dependence and independence, it was not despite their youth, but because of it that they influenced the outcome of the case. The library riot, then, is important not only for understanding the social context of the Dartmouth case, but also the ways young men interpreted the meaning of youth and maturity in the Early Republic.
1 To the Graduated and Honorary Members of the Society of Social Friends, 17 November 1817, DC Hist 881.H2543, Rauner Special Collections Library, Dartmouth College (hereafter cited as RSCL).Google Scholar
2 A growing tradition of scholarship has explored how youth gained new meaning during the American Revolution. In building a society based on consent, political leaders stressed the importance of rational development in childhood. See Kett, Joseph F., Rites of Passage: Adolescence in America, 1790 to the Present (New York: Basic Books, 1977); Marten, James Alan, ed., Children and Youth in a New Nation (New York: New York University Press, 2009); Hessinger, Rodney, Seduced, Abandoned, and Reborn: Visions of Youth in Middle-Class America, 1780–1850 (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005).Google Scholar
3 Johnson, Eldon L., “The Dartmouth College Case: The Neglected Educational Meaning,” Journal of the Early Republic 3, no. 1 (Spring 1983): 45–67; Novak, Steven J., “The College in the Dartmouth College Case: A Reinterpretation,” The New England Quarterly 47, no. 4 (December 1974): 550–63.Google Scholar
4 Herbst, Jurgen, From Crisis to Crisis: American College Government, 1636–1819 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982); Whitehead, John S., The Separation of College and State: Columbia, Dartmouth, Harvard, and Yale, 1776–1876 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973); Whitehead, John S. and Herbst, Jurgen, “How to Think about the Dartmouth College Case,” History of Education Quarterly 26, no. 3 (Autumn 1986): 333–49.Google Scholar
5 Neem, Johann N., Creating a Nation of Joiners: Democracy and Civil Society in Early National Massachusetts (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
6 The faculty of Dartmouth College during this period consisted of John Wheelock, president and professor of history; Roswell Shurtleff, professor of theology; Ebenezer Adams, professor of mathematics and natural philosophy; and Zephaniah Moore, professor of Greek and Latin languages (who left: his position in 1815).Google Scholar
7 Choate, Rufus to Choate, David, 16 June 1816, Rufus Choate Papers, RSCL.Google Scholar
8 The image of American colleges in “retrogression” has been successfully challenged by a number of scholars. The historiography now demonstrates that institutions gained broader appeal and adapted to new educational demands. See Mattingly, Paul, “The Political Culture of American Antebellum Colleges,” The History of Higher Education Annual 17 (1997): 73–96; Geiger, Roger L., ed., The American College in the Nineteenth Century (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2000); Burke, Colin B., American Collegiate Populations: A Test of the Traditional View (New York: New York University Press, 1982); Novak, Steven J., The Rights of Youth: American Colleges and Student Revolt, 1798–1815 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
9 Allmendinger, David F., “New England Students and the Revolution in Higher Education,” History of Education Quarterly 11, no. 4 (Winter 1971): 381–89. For more on the demographic changes and its influence on collegiate discipline, see Allmendinger, David F., Paupers and Scholars: The Transformation of Student Life in Nineteenth-Century New England (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1975); Hessinger, Rodney, “‘The Most Powerful Instrument of College Discipline': Student Disorder and the Growth of Meritocracy in the Colleges of the Early Republic,” History of Education Quarterly 39, no. 3 (Fall 1999): 237–62.Google Scholar
10 Rufus Choate to David Choate, 8 March 1816, file 92519, RSCL.Google Scholar
11 Brewer, Holly, By Birth or Consent: Children, Law, and the Anglo-American Revolution in Authority (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2005); Fliegelman, Jay, Prodigals and Pilgrims: The American Revolution Against Patriarchal Authority, 1750–1800 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
12 Novak, , The Rights of Youth. Google Scholar
13 Hessinger, , “The Most Powerful Instrument of College Discipline,” 250.Google Scholar
14 Steven J. Novak's article “The College in the Dartmouth Case” in the New England Quarterly adds much to our understanding of the origins of the Dartmouth controversey. The schism in Hanover's religious community continued during the legislative controversy. I have omitted this discussion because the students did not portray the debate as religiously motivated in their writings.Google Scholar
15 William Plumer quoted in Johnson, “The Dartmouth College Case,” 51. Johnson argues that the Dartmouth case was fundamentally a debate about the direction of higher education. Plumer advocated liberalization of the curriculum, with practical courses and modern languages. While Johnson's argument is insightful, the students never spoke in those terms.Google Scholar
16 Throughout this paper, College will refer to the institution under the original charter and University will refer to the institution created by the legislature in 1816.Google Scholar
17 Lydia Huntington to Andrew Huntington, 13 July 1817, file 817413, RSCL.Google Scholar
18 Philo, , “‘Philo’ in reply to ‘Justitia',” The People's Advocate, 11 January 1817.Google Scholar
19 Republicanism, which according to John Adams “may signify any thing, every thing, or nothing,” remains a disputed issue, but scholars in recent years have become more willing to leave it as a flexible set of principles. Wood, Gordon S., The Radicalism of the American Revolution (New York: A.A. Knopf, 1992), 95. For the historiographical debate on the meaning of republicanism, see Shalhope, Robert E., “Toward a Republican Synthesis: The Emergence of an Understanding of Republicanism in American Historiography,” William and Mary Quarterly 29, no. 1 (January 1972): 49–80; Kramnick, Isaac, “Republican Revisionism Revisited” The American Historical Review 87, no. 3 (June 1982): 629–64; Rogers, Daniel T., “Republicanism: The Career of a Concept,” The Journal of American History 79, no. 1 (June 1992): 11–38.Google Scholar
20 Neem, , Creating a Nation of Joiners, 7.Google Scholar
21 Neem argues that Federalists’ position in the Dartmouth case was more a matter of practical necessity than ideological principle. The parties would take opposite sides in a similar case involving Harvard University in 1820. See Neem, , Creating a Nation of Joiners, 81–113.Google Scholar
22 Chase, Carlton to Chase, Horace, 22 March 1817, file 817224, RSCL.Google Scholar
23 Dickey, David to Dickey, Joseph, 28 April 1817, file 817278, RSCL.Google Scholar
24 Harding, Thomas, College Literary Societies: Their Contribution to Higher Education in the United States, 1815–1876 (New York: Pageant Press International, 1971).Google Scholar
25 The Society of Social Friends was instituted in 1783 in order to manage a student library and hold weekly debates. In 1786, members of the Social Friends seceded and formed the United Fraternity. The “Socials” and the “Fraters” competed to initiate the best freshmen. They also clashed over the honor of performing dramatic pieces during commencement celebrations. The conflicts between the Socials and the Fraters led to the Social Friends’ records being burned by Fraternity members on three occasions. “Guide to the Dartmouth College Society of Social Friends Records, 1783–1904,” February 2000, RSCL.Google Scholar
26 Yearly membership dues ranged from five dollars for freshmen to one dollar for seniors. Seniors could withdraw as many as four books at one time, while freshmen were not allowed more than two. Fines for overdue books were four cents per day regardless of class. The United Fraternity also instituted a 25 cent fine for talking in the library during designated reading hours.Google Scholar
27 Society of Social Friends Constitution, folder 8, box 3, series 3, DO-2, RSCL.Google Scholar
28 United Fraternity minutes, 19 July 1816, folder 2, box 1, series 1, DO-4, RSCL.Google Scholar
29 Wheelock, John, “To be communicated to the Society of Social Friends,” October 1814, file 814569, RSCL.Google Scholar
30 “The Committee's Plan,” n.d. [March 1815], file 814590, RSCL.Google Scholar
31 Trees, Andrew S., The Founding Fathers and the Politics of Character (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004), 45.Google Scholar
32 Dickey, David to Dickey, Joseph, 28 April 1817, file 817278, RSCL.Google Scholar
33 Ames, David to Morrill, Ezekiel, April 1817, file 817254, RSCL.Google Scholar
34 Dickey, David to Dickey, Joseph, 28 April 1817, file 817278, RSCL.Google Scholar
35 Trustees of Dartmouth College v Woodward, New Hampshire Superior Court, 1 N.H. 111, 136 (1817).Google Scholar
36 Iam borrowing the phrase “college-in-exile” from Menand, Louis, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001), 243.Google Scholar
37 Niles, Nathaniel, “Remarks on an anonymous Pamphlet, entitled ‘Sketches of the History of Dartmouth College,’ &c.,” New-Hampshire Patriot, 15 August 1815.Google Scholar
38 “Detector,” “Miscellany. For the N. H. Patriot. The Ass in the Lion's Skin,” New-Hampshire Patriot, 23 April 1816.Google Scholar
39 [Isaac Hill], “Dartmouth University,” New-Hampshire Patriot, 17 March 1817.Google Scholar
40 Chase, Carlton to Chase, Horace, 22 March 1817, file 817224, RSCL.Google Scholar
41 Allen, William, “To the Parents & Friends of the Students, late members of Dartmouth College,” 8 November 1817, RSCL. For more on the shift to affectionate parental relations, see Mintz, Steven and Kellogg, Susan, Domestic Revolutions: A Social History of American Family Life (New York: The Free Press, 1988).Google Scholar
42 Allen, , “To the Parents & Friends,” 8 November 1817, RSCL.Google Scholar
43 Social Friends minutes, 21 May 1817, folder 3, box 1, series 1, DO-2, RSCL. The phrase “committee of safety” was used in the eighteenth century by New England patriots during early phases of resistance to British policy.Google Scholar
44 To the Graduated and Honorary Members of the Society of Social Friends, 17 November 1817, DC Hist 881.H2543, RSCL (hereafter cited as Society of Social Friends).Google Scholar
45 Choate, Rufus to Choate, David, 8 November 1817, file 92519, RSCL.Google Scholar
46 Hobbs, Josiah to his father, 15 November 1817, RSCL. In a postscript, Hobbs assured his father “I was an eye witness of the riot… but not a participant.”Google Scholar
47 Rogers, William to Fletcher, Samuel, 12 November 1817, file 817612, RSCL.Google Scholar
48 Chase, Frederick and Lord, John King, A History of Dartmouth College and the Town of Hanover, New Hampshire (Cambridge, MA: J. Wilson, 1891–1913), 135–6.Google Scholar
49 Freeman, Joanne B., Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the Early Republic (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
50 Society of Social Friends, DC Hist 881.H2543, RSCL.Google Scholar
51 To the Graduated and Honorary Members of the United Fraternity, 19 November 1817, DC Hist Z881.H2545, RSCL (hereafter cited as United Fraternity). Google Scholar
52 Society of Social Friends, 17 November 1817, RSCL.Google Scholar
53 United Fraternity, 19 November 1817, RSCL.Google Scholar
54 Society of Social Friends, 17 November 1817, RSCL.Google Scholar
55 Ibid.Google Scholar
56 Allen, William, “To the Public,” The Farmer's Cabinet, 29 November 1817.Google Scholar
57 Ibid.Google Scholar
58 “Iolas,” “For the N.H. Patriot,” New-Hampshire Patriot, 2 December 1817.Google Scholar
59 Chamberlain, William, “To the editor of the Concord Gazette” 2 December 1817, file 817152, RSCL.Google Scholar
60 Ibid.Google Scholar
61 Asa Lyon to the Society of Social Friends, January 1818, file 818101, RSCL.Google Scholar
62 United Fraternity, 19 November 1817, RSCL.Google Scholar
63 Chase, and Lord, , A History of Dartmouth College, 136.Google Scholar
64 Brown, Francis, “Hanover, Feb 25,” Boston Daily Advertiser, 3 March 1818.Google Scholar
65 Chase, and Lord, , A History of Dartmouth College, 149.Google Scholar
