Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T22:30:25.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Charitability Gap: Misuses of Interpretive Charity in Academic Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2023

Claire A. Lockard
Claire A. Lockard*
Affiliation:
Department of Theology and Philosophy, Mount Mary University, 2900 Menomonee River Parkway Milwaukee, WI 53222
*
Corresponding author. Email: lockardc@mtmary.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I explore some harms that emerge from the call for charity in academic philosophy. A charitability gap, I suggest, exists both between who we tend to read charitably and who we tend to expect charitability from. This gap shores up the disciplinary status quo and (re)produces epistemic oppression, which helps preserve philosophy's status as a discipline that is, to use Charles Mills's language, conceptually and demographically dominated by whiteness and maleness (Mills 1998, 2). I am particularly interested in calls for charity made in response to critiques of racist or sexist authors/texts. I suggest that in these cases, interpretive charity perpetuates epistemic violence by creating conditions for testimonial smothering (Dotson 2011); that it functions as an orientation device (Ahmed 2006) designed to bring “unruly” philosophers back in line with disciplinary practices and traditions; and that it requires resistant philosophers to remain in oppressive worlds (Lugones 2003a; Pohlhaus 2011). Although charitability is risky—and charity is disproportionately demanded from already marginalized philosophers—I am hesitant to abandon charity entirely. The outright rejection of charitable orientations toward texts or others commits philosophers to a purity politics that, following Alexis Shotwell, I suggest we resist (Shotwell 2016).

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , Winter 2023 , pp. 22 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abundez-Guerra, Victor. 2018. How to deal with Kant's racism—In and out of the classroom. Teaching Philosophy 41 (2): 117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer phenomenology: Objects, orientations, others. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The promise of happiness. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a feminist life. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2006. Visible identities: Race, gender, and the self. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Luvell and Erlenbusch, Verona. 2017. Modeling inclusive pedagogy: five approaches. Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (1): 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggini, Julian, and Fosl, Peter S.. 2010. The philosopher's toolkit: A compendium of philosophical concepts and methods. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bailey, Alison. 2018. On anger, silence, and epistemic injustice. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84: 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejan, Petru. 2010. Trust as a hermeneutic principle. Balkan Journal of Philosophy 2 (1): 41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenstain, Nora. 2020. White feminist gaslighting. Hypatia 35 (4): 773–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Emanuela. 2014. The feminine symptom: Aleatory matter in the Aristotelian cosmos. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Botts, Tina Fernandes, Bright, Liam Kori, Cherry, Myisha, Mallarangeng, Guntur, and Spencer, Quayshawn. 2014. What is the state of blacks in philosophy? Critical Philosophy of Race 2 (2): 224–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana. 1995. In spite of Plato: A feminist rewriting of ancient philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chang, Ti-Ting, Galarza, Litzy, Gary, Mercer, Grimm, Erika, Lenau, Ryan, Marrero-Ramos, Cynthia, and Thomas, Kierstan. 2018. “Lugones Lexicon.” Paper presented at the Towards Decolonial Feminisms: A Conference Inspired by the Work of María Lugones, Penn State University, May 11–13, 2018.Google Scholar
Cherry, Myisha. 2017. The errors and limitations of our “anger-evaluating” ways. In The moral psychology of anger, ed. Cherry, Myisha and Flanagan, Owen. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Concepción, David. 2004. Reading philosophy with background knowledge and metacognition. Teaching Philosophy 27 (4): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984/2001. On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, Marguerite. 2009. Sexual difference in Aristotle's Politics and in his biology. Classical World 102 (3): 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2011. Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26 (2): 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2012. A cautionary tale: On limiting epistemic oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 33 (1): 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2013a. How is this Paper philosophy? Comparative Philosophy 3 (1): 3–29.Google Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2013b. Radical love. The Black Scholar: Journal of Black Studies and Research 43 (4): 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, Lorna. 2015. The political is political: Conformity and the illusion of dissent in contemporary political philosophy. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975/1989. Truth and method. Trans. Glen-Doepel, W. and revised by Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Henning, Tempest. 2018. Bringing wreck. Symposium 5 (2): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtzen, Curtis, and Hill, Matthew Nelson. 2016. Gadamer's hermeneutic of trust: Ontological and reflective. In In spirit and truth. Claremont, Calif.: Claremont Press.Google Scholar
Howes, Moira, and Hundleby, Catherine. 2018. The epistemology of anger in argumentation. Symposium 5 (2): 229–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 2007/1984. Sister outsider. Berkeley, Calif.: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003a. Hard-to-handle anger. In Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Roman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2003b. Playfulness, “world”-traveling, and loving perception. In Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Lugones, María C., and Spelman, Elizabeth V.. 1983. Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism and the demand for “the woman's voice.” Women's Studies International Forum 6 (6): 573–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, David. 2019. Kant was a racist: Now what? APA Newsletter on Teaching Philosophy 18 (2): 2–9.Google Scholar
Medina, José. 2003. On being “other-minded”: Wittgenstein, Davidson, and logical aliens. International Philosophy Quarterly 43 (4): 464–75.Google Scholar
Medina, José. 2013. The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, José. 2020. Complex communication and decolonial struggles: The forging of deep coalitions through emotional echoing and resistant imaginations. Critical Philosophy of Race 8 (1–2): 212–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak. 2013. Charitable interpretations and the political domestication of Spinoza, or, Benedict in the land of the secular imagination. In Philosophy and its history: Aims and methods in the study of early modern philosophy, ed. Lærke, Mogens, Smith, Justin E. H., and Schlisser, Eric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles. 1998. Blackness visible: Essays on philosophy and race. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles. 2017. Black rights/white wrongs: The critique of racial liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, Jennifer. 2019. The politics of reading. In Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2016. In-between: Latina feminist phenomenology, multiplicity, and the self. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Molly, Figdor, Carrie, and Tiberius, Valerie. 2012. Quantifying the gender gap: An empirical study of the underrepresentation of women in philosophy. Hypatia 27 (4): 949–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlhaus, Gaile Jr.. 2011. Wrongful requests and strategic refusals to understand. In Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge, ed. Grasswick, Heidi. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Pohlhaus, Gaile Jr.. 2012. Relational knowing and epistemic injustice: Toward a theory of willful hermeneutical ignorance. Hypatia 27 (4): 715–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1970. Freud and philosophy: an essay on interpretation. Trans. Savage, Denis. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ruíz, Elena Flores. 2020. Between hermeneutic violence and alphabets of survival. In Theories of the flesh, ed. Pitts, Andrea J., Ortega, Mariana, and Medina, José. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. “Paranoid reading and reparative reading, or, you're so paranoid, you probably think this essay is about you.” In Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, and performativity, 123–51. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaikh, Nermeen. 2007. Interrogating charity and the benevolence of empire. Development 50 (2): 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, Sarah Borden. 2016. An Aristotelian feminism. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, Alexis. 2010. Appropriate subjects: Whiteness and the discipline of philosophy. In The center must not hold: White women philosophers on the whiteness of philosophy, ed. Yancy, George. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Shotwell, Alexis. 2016. Against purity: Living ethically in compromised times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Skitolsky, Lissa. 2019. The episteme, epistemic injustice, and the limits of white sensibility. In Overcoming epistemic injustice: Social and psychological perspectives, ed. Sherman, Benjamin R. and Goguen, Stacey. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Spade, Dean. 2020. Mutual aid: building solidarity during this crisis (and the next). New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the subaltern speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Tom. 2016. Some third thing: Nietzsche's words and the principle of charity. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 47 (2): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Morgan. 2017. Explanations of the gender gap in philosophy. Philosophy Compass 12 (3): doi: 10.1111/phc3.12406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinsheimer, Joel. 2000. Charity militant: Gadamer, Davidson, and post-critical hermeneutics. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 54 (213): 405–22.Google Scholar
Whitney, Shiloh. 2018. Affective intentionality and affective injustice: Merleau-Ponty and Fanon on the body schema as a theory of affect. Southern Journal of Philosophy 56 (4): 488–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Japhy. 2014. Fantasy machine: Philanthrocapitalism as an ideological formation. Third World Quarterly 35 (4): 1144–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Neil L. 1959. Substances without substrata. Review of Metaphysics 12 (4): 521–39.Google Scholar