Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T23:47:45.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpreting validity evidence: It is time to end the horse race

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2023

Kevin Murphy Open the ORCID record for Kevin Murphy [Opens in a new window]
Kevin Murphy*
Affiliation:
Department of Work and Employment Studies, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
*
Email: krm10@me.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 341 - 343
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K. R., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K., Cleveland, J. & Hanscom, M. (2018). Performance appraisal and management. Sage.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2019). Understanding how and why adding valid predictors can decrease the validity of selection composites: A generalization of Sackett, Dahlke, Shewach, and Kuncel (2017). International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. R. & Shiarella, A. (1997). Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: Multivariate frameworks for studying test validity. Personnel Psychology, 50, 823–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. R., Dahlke, J. A., Shewach, O. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Effects of predictor weighting methods on incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 1421–1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107, 2040–2068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2023). Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 16(3), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar