¹ US Department of State Trafficking in Persons Rweport 2004, 6.Google Scholar

² KC Ryf ‘The First Modern Anti-Slavery Law: The Trafficking Victim Protection Act 2000’ (2002) 34 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 45, 47.Google Scholar

³ UNICEF UK End Child Exploitation: Stop Traffic! (London UNICEF UK 2003) 11.Google Scholar

⁴ GA RES 55/25, 8 Jan 2001, Annexes I and n. The Organized Crime Convention and the Trafficking Protocol entered into force on September and December 2003 respectively. As of September 2004, 117 States are Parties to the Trafficking Protocol. See Signatories to the UN Convention against Transnational Crime and its Protocols at <www.unodc.org/unodc/en/crime_cicp_signatures.html> (last visited: 25 Sept 2004). For a drafting process of these instruments, see, A Gallagher ‘Human Rights and the New UN Protocols on Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling: A Preliminary Analysis’ (2001) 23 Human Rights Quarterly 975.+(last+visited:+25+Sept+2004).+For+a+drafting+process+of+these+instruments,+see,+A+Gallagher+‘Human+Rights+and+the+New+UN+Protocols+on+Trafficking+and+Migrant+Smuggling:+A+Preliminary+Analysis’+(2001)+23+Human+Rights+Quarterly+975.>Google Scholar

⁵ Prosecutor v Kunarac (Trial Judgment) IT-96–23 (22 Feb 2001) 542.Google Scholar

⁶ A/CONF. 183/9 (17 July 1998).Google Scholar

⁷ International Agreement for the Suppression of the White Slave Traffic 1904, 1 LNTS 83, International Convention for the Suppression of the White Slave Traffic 1910, 3 LNTS 278, International Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Women and Children 1921, 9 LNTS 415, International Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Women of Full Age 1933, 150 LNTS 431, and Convention for the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others 1949, 96 UNTS 271.Google Scholar

⁸ Trafficking Protocol, above n 4.Google Scholar

⁹ Salt, J and Hogarth, J ’Migrant Trafficking and Human Smuggling in Europe: Review of the Evidence‘ in Laczko, F and Thompson, D (eds) Migrant Trafficking and Human Smuggling in Europe: A Review of Evidence with Case Studies from Hungary, Poland and Ukraine (IOM Geneva 2000) 19.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Above n 4, Annex III.Google Scholar

¹¹ Ibid.

¹² Malone, LA ’Economic Hardship as Coercion under the Protocol on International Trafficking in Persons by Organised Crime Elements‘ (2001) 25 Fordham International Law Journal (2001) 54, 89–91,Google Scholarand Chuang, J ‘Redirecting the Debate over Trafficking in Women: Definitions, Paradigms and Contexts’ (1998) 11 Harvard Human Rights Journal 65, 93–1.Google Scholar

¹³ Above n 7.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Hughes, DM ‘The “Natasha” Trade: The Transnational Shadow Market of Trafficking in Women’ (2000) 53 Journal of International Affairs 625, 628, quoting an estimate given by the United Nations.Google Scholar

¹⁵ A/AC 254/4/Add 3/Rev 2.Google Scholar

¹⁶ A/AC 254/5/Add 19.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Potts, LG ‘Global Trafficking in Human Beings: Assessing Success of the United Nations Protocol to Prevent Trafficking in Persons’ (2003) 35 George Washington International Law Review 227, 238–9.Google Scholar

¹⁸ From first through seventh drafts A/AC 254/Add 3/Rev 1–7.Google Scholar

¹⁹ A/AC 254/4/Add 3/Rev 5, n 18.Google Scholar

²⁰ Ibid.

²¹ Trafficking Protocol, above n 4.Google Scholar

²² Organized Crime Convention, ibid.

²³ Inglis, SC ‘Expanding International and National Protections against Trafficking for Forced Labour Using a Human Rights Framework’ (2001) 7 Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 55, 96–7.Google Scholar

²⁴ Rome Statute, above n 6. While this category of crime was considered as an extension of war crimes when it was defined for the first time under the Nuremberg Charter, it is generally accepted now that crimes against humanity can be committed during peacetime as well. See Bassiouni, MC ‘Crimes against Humanity’ in Bassiouni, MC (ed) International Criminal Law (2nd ednTransnational Publisher New York 1999) 52;Google ScholarBassiouni, MC ‘Crimes Against Humanity: The Need for a Specialized Convention’ (1994) 31 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 457,Google Scholarand A Cassese International Criminal Law (OUP Oxford 2003) 64.Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid.

²⁶ 60 LNTS 253. Art 1(1) defines slavery as ‘the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the power attaching to the right of ownership are exercised’.Google Scholar

²⁷ Rijken, CTrafficking in Persons, Prosecution from A European Perspective (TMC Asser Press The Hague 2003) 75.Google Scholar

²⁸ Above n 5 at 543.Google Scholar

²⁹ Ibid 542.

³⁰ Piotrowicz, R ‘European Initiatives in the Protection of Victims of Trafficking Who Give Evidence Against Their Traffickers’ (2002) 14 IJRL 263, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³¹ Chuang, , above n 12 at 65.Google Scholar

³² Ibid 79, quoting the separate definitions of trafficking and subsequent exploitation (forced labour and slavery-like practices) adopted by the Global Alliance Against Trafficking in Women (GAATW), and Rijken, above n 27 at 57–61.

³³ Rome Statute, above n 6.Google Scholar

³⁴ Art 7(2)(d), ibid.

³⁵ Report of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court, Finalised Draft Text of the Elements of the Crimes, UN Doc PCNICC/2000/INF/3/Add 2 (6 July 2000) 11.Google Scholar

³⁶ Prosecutor v Static (Trial Judgment) IT-97–24 (31 July 2003) 680. It should be noted, however, that the Trial Chamber in the past made a distinction between deportation and forcible transfer. Deportation presumed transfer beyond State borders, whereas forcible transfer related to displacements within a State. Prosecutor v Krstic (Trial Judgment) IT-98–33 (2 Aug 2001) 521.Google Scholar

³⁷ Rome Statute, Art 7(2)(i), above n 6.Google Scholar

³⁸ Art 7(l)(k), ibid.

³⁹ Written Statement Submitted by Human Rights Advocates International, E/CN4/2002/NGO/45 (24 Jan 2002) 12 and 13.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Report of the Special Rapporteur on Migrants: Mission to the Border between Mexico and the United States of America, E/CN/4/2003/85/Add 3 (30 Oct 2002) 4.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid 19 and Written Statement Submitted by Human Rights Advocates International, E/CN.4/1999/NGO/96 (11 Mar 1999) 5. For a link between sexual violence and torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, see Prosecutor v Furundzia (Trial Judgment) IT-95–17/1 (10 Dec 1998) 170.

⁴² Kunarac Trial Judgment, above n 5 at 416, Prosecutor v Krnojelac (Trial Judgment) IT-97–25 (15 Mar 2002) 54, Prosecutor v Vasiljevic (Trial Judgment) IT-98–32 (29 Nov 2003) 29, Prosecutor v Simic et al (Trial Judgment) IT-95–9 (17 Oct 2003) 39–40. The Trial Chamber of the ICTR notes that an attack is an unlawful act enumerated in Art 3 of its Statute, such as murder, extermination, and enslavement. Prosecutor v Akayesu (Trial Judgment) ICTR-96–4-T (2 Sept 1998) 581.Google Scholar

⁴³ Art 7(2)(a) of the Rome Statute. Above n 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Prosecutor v Tadic (Trial Judgment) IT-94–1-T (7 May 1997) 648, Prosecutor v Blasldc (Trial Judgment) IT-95–14-T (3 Mar 2000) 206 and Akayesu Trial Judgment, above n 42 at 580.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ International Law Commission ‘Commentary of the International Law Commission in relation to the Draft Code of Crimes against Peace and Security of Mankind’ Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Forty-Eighth Session (1996) GAOR, 51st Sess, Supp No 10, UN Doc A/51/10, 94–5.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Ibid and Blastic Trial Judgment, above n 44 at 206.

⁴⁷ Tadic Trial Judgment, above n 44 at 648, Blaskic Trial Judgment, above n 44 at 203, and Akayesu Trial Judgment, above n 42 at 580.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Prosecutor v Kunarac (Appeal Judgment) IT-96–23 (12 June 2002) 102.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Kunarac Trial Judgment, above n 5 at 434.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Art 6 of the Rome Statute, above n 6 and Akayesu Trial Judgment, above n 42 at 498.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Except for persecution which requires a discriminatory intent. Prosecutor v Akayesu (Appeal Judgment) ICTR-96–4-T (1 June 2001) 467. In order for a conduct to constitute a crime against humanity under the ICTR Statute, however, the attack itself must be discriminatory, at 464 and 469. See also Prosecutor v Tadic (Appeal Judgment) IT-94–1-T (15 July 1999) 305.Google Scholar

⁵² Kunarac Trial Judgment, above n 5 at 433.Google Scholar

⁵³ International Law Commission ‘Opinion of the International Law Commission (ILC) on the work of its 43rd Session’ 1991 ILC Report 266. See also Art 18 of the ILC Draft Code of Crime Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, which stipulates that a crime against humanity is committed ‘in a systematic manner or on a large scale and instigated or directed by a government or by any organization or group.’ In the Commentary on this article, the ILC states that ‘the instigation or direction of a Government or any organization or group, which may or may not be affiliated with a Government, gives the act its great dimension and makes it a crime against humanity imputable to private persons or agents of a State’ The Commentary of ILC, above n 45.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Tadic Trial Judgment, at 655 and Blaskic Trial Judgment at 205. Both above n 44.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ See, for instance, the Opinion of the Advocate General in Barbie Case, Vol 78, ILR, 1988, 147; and Kadic v Karadzic, 70 F 3d 232 (2nd Cir 1995), cert denied, 64 USLW 3832 (18 June 1996).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ratner, SR and Abrams, JSAccountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy (OUP Oxford 1997) 66,Google ScholarFry, JD ‘Terrorism as a Crime Against Humanity and Genocide: The Backdoor to Universal Jurisdiction’ (2002) 7 UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 169, 187 and Cassese, above n 24 at 83.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Ibid 93.

⁵⁸ Blasckic Trial Judgment, above n 44 at 204.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Kunarac Appeal Judgment, above n 48 at 98.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ See in general, Schloenhardt, A ‘Organised Crime and the Business of Migrant Trafficking: An Economic Analysis’ (1999) 32 Crime, Law and Social Change 203,CrossRefGoogle ScholarSecretariat of the Budapest Group, The Relationship between Organised Crime and Trafficking in Aliens (International Centre for Immigration Policy and Development (ICMPD) Vienna 1999),Google Scholarand Guymon, CD ‘International Legal Mechanisms for Combating Transnational Organized Crime: The Need for a Multilateral Convention’ (2000) 18 Berkeley Journal of International Law 53.Google Scholar

⁶¹ US Department of State Trafficking in Persons Report 2003, 6.Google Scholar

⁶² Boister, N ‘Transnational Criminal Law?’ (2003) 14 EJIL 953, 962. He notes, at 972, that transnational criminal law, as opposed to international criminal law, does not create individual criminal responsibility under international law and therefore that States remain the locus of penal power. The Trafficking Protocol belongs to this category of international law.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶³ Rome Statute, Art 15(2), above n 6.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Art 15(3), ibid.

⁶⁵ Art 68, ibid.

⁶⁶ Art 79, ibid.

⁶⁷ Dieng, A ‘International Criminal Justice: From Paper to Practice: A Contribution from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to the Establishment of the International Criminal Court’ (2002) 25 Fordham International Law Journal 688, 698–9.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Rome Statute, Arts 13(a) and 14, above n 6.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Art 12 (2), ibid.

⁷⁰ Art 17, ibid.

⁷¹ Art 13(b), ibid.

⁷² Art 13 (c), ibid.

⁷³ Art 12 (2), ibid.

⁷⁴ Art 17, ibid.

⁷⁵ UNSC Res 1373 (28 Sept 2001), UN Doc S/RES/1373, in which the Security Council notes the connection between terrorism and transnational organized crime. See also UNSC Res 1456 (20 Jan 2003), UN Doc S/RES/1456.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ In UNSC Res 1460 (30 Jan 2003), UN Doc S/RES/1460, for instance, the Council notes (at 10) with concern the cases of sexual exploitation and abuse of women and children in humanitarian crises.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Danilenko, GM ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court and Third States’ (2000) 21 Michigan Journal of International Law 445, 455–6. An exception is when a case is referred by the Security Council under Ch VII of the UN Charter, whose decision is mandatory in character whether or not a particular State is a party to the Rome Statute.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Cassese, , above n 24 at 284–5. See also Attorney General of Israel v Eichmann 36 ILR 277.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Restatement of the Law (Third): Foreign Relations Law of the United States 2 American Law Institute (1987) 404.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Orentlicher, DF ‘Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime’ (1991) 100 Yale LJ 2537, 2555, 2593–4 and Fry, above n 56 at 175–6. See also R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 1), 4 All ER 897 (HL 1998) and Demjanjuk v Petrovsky, 612 F Supp 544, in which the United States District Court held that perpetrators of crimes against humanity and war crimes are subject to universal jurisdiction, at 556. The Court of Appeal in the same case also delivered the same opinion. 776 F 2d, 582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸¹ ECPAT Europe Law Enforcement Group Extraterritorial Legislation as a Tool to Combat Sexual Exploitation of Children (ECPAT Amsterdam 1999),Google ScholarSeabrook, JNo Hiding Place: Child Sex Tourism and the Role of Extraterritorial Legislation (ECPAT London 2000)Google Scholarand Trapalis, V ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: A Step Toward Eradicating the Trafficking of Women into Greece for Forced Prostitution’ (2002) 32 Golden Gate University Law Review 207, 232. She goes further to assert that trafficking of women should be regarded as jus cogens.Google Scholar

⁸² Council Decision 2003/335/JHA, OJ 2003 L 118/12.Google Scholar

⁸³ Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, OJ 2002 L 190/1.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ For an analysis of the EU action against trafficking, see Obokata, T ‘EU Council Framework Decision on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings: A Critical Appraisal’ (2003) 40 CML Rev 917.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ See, for instance, Informal Note by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights A/AC.254/16 (1 June 1999); Report of the Secretary General on Trafficking in Women and Girls E/CN.4/2003/74 (20 Jan 2003); GAATW Human Rights and Trafficking in Persons: A Handbook (GAATW Bangkok 2001);Google Scholarand Murray, J ‘Who Will Police the Peace-Builders? The Failure to Establish Accountability for the Participation of the United Nations Civilian Police in Trafficking of Women in Post-Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (2003) 34 Columbia Human Rights Law Review 475.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Obokata, T ‘Human Trafficking, Human Rights, and the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002’ (2003) EHRLR 410, 411–18.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Ibid 412.