Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T03:47:22.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crisis prevention and the Austrian State Treaty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Deborah Welch Larson
Get access

Extract

Much has been written about how the United States and the Soviet Union have managed crises since World War II, avoiding dangerous escalation and war; little on how the two superpowers have avoided confrontations. In part scholarly neglect of the question of crisis avoidance reflects the acute suspicion and hostility of the cold war. When U.S.-Soviet rivalry was perceived as a struggle between incompatible ideologies and ways of life, it was unthinkable that the superpowers might have any common interests, much less that they could collaborate, even tacitly, to control the conflict in their relationship.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Winter 1987 , pp. 27 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. George, Alexander L., “Political Crises,” in Nye, Joseph S., ed., The Making of America's Soviet Policy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), pp. 138–39Google Scholar; George, , Managing U.S.- Soviet Rivalry: Problems of Crisis Prevention (Boulder: Westview, 1983).Google Scholar

2. Black, Cyril E., Falk, Richard A., Klaus, Knorr, and Young, Oran R., Neutralization and World Politics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1968), pp. xi–xiii.Google Scholar

3. “Report to the National Security Council on Future Courses of U.S. Action with Respect to Austria,” NSC 38/5, Foreign Relations of the United States: 1950 4 (Washington, D.C.:GPO, 1980), pp. 388–94Google Scholar (hereafter cited as FR, followed by appropriate year, volume, part, and page numbers); FR: 1951 4, 2, pp. 1097–1100, 1105, 1124nGoogle Scholar; minutes, National Security Council (NSC), 30 April 1953, Dwight D. Eisenhower Papers, Ann C. Whitman File, NSC Series, Dwight D. Eisenhower Library (DDEL), Abilene, Kans.; NSC Staff Study, “U.S. Objectives and Policies with Respect to Austria, October 14, 1953,” NSC 164/1, White House Office, Office of the Special Assistant for National Security Affairs (SANSA): Records, 1952–61, NSC Series, Policy Papers Subseries, DDEL.

4. Robert, Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic, 1984)Google Scholar; Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 214.Google Scholar

5. Morton, Deutsch, The Resolution of Conflict (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973), pp. 179–81.Google Scholar

6. Larson, Deborah Welch, Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 37–38.Google Scholar

7. Osgood, Charles E., Alternative to War or Surrender (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1962), pp. 85–134Google Scholar; Osgood, , “Suggestions for Winning the Real War with Communism,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 3 (1959), pp. 295–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lindskold, Svenn, “Trust Development, the GRIT Proposal, and the Effects of Conciliatory Acts on Conflict and Cooperation,” Psychological Bulletin 85 (1978), pp. 772–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Kelley, Harold H., “Attribution in Social Interaction,” in Jones, Edward E. et al. , eds., Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (Morristown, N.J.: General Learning, 1971).Google Scholar

9. Gouldner, Alvin W., “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,” American Sociological Review 25 (04 1960), pp. 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Osgood, , “Winning the Real War with Communism,” p. 316Google Scholar; Pruitt, Dean G., Negotiation Behavior (New York: Academic, 1981), pp. 124–25Google Scholar; Komorita, S. S., “Concession-making and Conflict Resolution,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 17 (1973), pp. 745–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Swinth, Robert L., “The Establishment of the Trust Relationship,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 11 (1967), pp. 335–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Dallin, David J., Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1962), p. 249.Google Scholar

12. Hughes diary, 17 and 27 March, 2 April 1953, Emmet J. Hughes Papers, Seeley Library, G. Mudd, Princeton, N. J.; telephone conversation with James Hagerty, 2 April 1953, John Foster Dulles Papers, Telephone Conversations Memoranda Series, White House Subseries, “01 21, 1953–04 1953,” DDELGoogle Scholar; Mackintosh, J. M., Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963), pp. 74–75Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 125–28Google Scholar; Stebbins, Richard P., The United States in World Affairs: 1953 (New York: Harper & Bros., 1956), p. 123.Google Scholar

13. Hughes diary, 6, 10, and 11 March 1953, Hughes Papers; minutes, NSC Meeting, 11 March 1953, Eisenhower Papers, Whitman File, NSC Series, DDEL; minutes, NSC Meeting, 30 April 1953, ibid; memorandum by Under Secretary of State Walter B. Smith, 10 March 1953, “Comments by Department of State on the Draft Outline of Plan for Psychological Exploitation of Stalin's Death,” C. D. Jackson Records, “PSB Plans for Psychological Exploitation of Stalin's Death,” DDEL.

14. Hughes diary, 16 March 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton; telephone conversation with Emmet Hughes, 16 March 1953, John Foster Dulles Papers, Telephone Conversations Memoranda Series, White House Subseries, “January 21, 1953-April 1953,” DDEL.

15. Holsti, Ole R., “Cognitive Dynamics and Images of the Enemy: Dulles and Russia,” in Finlay, David J. et al., eds., Enemies in Politics (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967), pp. 25–96.Google Scholar

16. Hughes diary, 17 march 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

17. Hughes diary, 27 march 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

18. Minutes, special meeting of the NSC, 31 March 1953, FR: 1952–1954 2, 1, p. 268; Hughes diary, 29 March, 3 April 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

19. Nitze to Dulles, 2 April 1953, John Foster Dulles Papers, Presidential Speech Series, “Drafts: ‘Chance for Peace’ Speech (1),” DDEL; Stebbins, , The United States in World Affairs: 1953, p. 125Google Scholar; Hughes diary, 9 april 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

20. Hughes diary, 6 april 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

21. Hughes diary, 11, 12, 13 april 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

22. Dulles to Hughes, 10 April 1953, John Foster Dulles Papers, Presidential Speech Series, “Drafts: ‘Chance for Peace' Speech (1),” DDEL; Hughes diary, 11 April 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

23. Stebbins, , The United States in World Affairs: 1953, p. 124.Google Scholar

24. Bohlen to Washington, 25 April 1953, White House Central Files, Confidential Series, “Russia: Stalin's Death and Reaction,” DDEL, reprinted in Rostow, W. W., Europe after Stalin: Eisenhower's Three Decisions of March 11, 1953 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982), pp. 161–63Google Scholar; George F. Kennan to Allen Dulles, 25 April 1953, Jackson Records, “Kennan, George,” DDEL; Mackintosh, , Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, p. 75.Google Scholar

25. Stebbins, , The United States in World Affairs: 1953, p. 137Google Scholar; Mosely, Philip E., “The Kremlin's Foreign Policy since Stalin,” Foreign Affairs 32 (10 1953), pp. 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. Stearman, William Lloyd, The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria (Bonn: Siegler, 1961), pp. 131–34Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 250–51.Google Scholar

27. Mosely, , “The Kremlin's Foreign Policy Since Stalin,” pp. 24–25Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 172–75Google Scholar; Mackintosh, , Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, pp. 77, 172–73Google Scholar; Victor, Baras, “Beria's Fall and Ulbricht's Survival,” Soviet Studies 32 (07 1975), pp. 383–85, 391Google Scholar; Baras, , “Stalin's German Policy after Stalin,” Slavic Review 37 (06 1978), pp. 265–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wolfgang, Leonhard, The Kremlin since Stalin (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1962), pp. 70–72Google Scholar; Stebbins, , The United States in World Affairs: 1953, pp. 146–47Google Scholar; Nicolaevsky, Boris I., Power and the Soviet Elite: “The Letter of an Old Bolshevik” and other Essays by Boris I. Nicolaevsky, ed. Zagoria, Janet D. (New York: Praeger, 1965), pp. 134, 136, 146.Google Scholar

28. Telephone conversation with Allen Dulles, 10 July 1953, John Foster Dulles Papers, Telephone Conversations Memoranda Series, “July 1953-October 31, 1953 (5),” DDEL;Hughes diary, 10 July 1953, Hughes Papers, Princeton.

29. Stebbins, , The United States in World Affairs: 1953, pp. 192–93Google Scholar; Ulam, Adam B., Expansion and Coexistence: Soviet Foreign Policy, 1917–73 (New York: Praeger, 1974), pp. 546–47Google Scholar; Linden, Carl A., Khrushchev and the Soviet Leadership, 1957–64 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966), pp. 27–28Google Scholar; Conquest, R., Power and Policy in the U.S.S.R., 1945–60 (New York: Harper & Row, 1961), p. 229.Google Scholar

30. Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 121–22, 135–37Google Scholar; Leonhard, , The Kremlin since Stalin, pp. 52–53Google Scholar; Ulam, , Expansion and Coexistence, p. 543Google Scholar; Paul, Marantz, “Internal Politics and Soviet Foreign Policy: A Case Study,” Western Political Quarterly 28 (03 1975), p. 132n.Google Scholar

31. Stebbins, , The United States in World Affairs: 1953, pp. 194–95, 198, 384–87Google Scholar; Shepherd, Gordon, The Austrian Odyssey (London: Macmillan, 1957), pp. 252–53Google Scholar; Bell, Coral, Negotiation from Strength: A Study in the Politics of Power (London: Chatto & Windus, 1962), pp. 105–6Google Scholar; Documents on American Foreign Relations: 1953, ed. Curl, Peter V. (New York: Harper & Bros., 1954), pp. 227–29Google Scholar; Ulam, , Expansion and Coexistence, pp. 547–48.Google Scholar

32. 2 December 1953, Whitman File, Ann C. Whitman Diary Series, “ACW Diary Nov.-Dec. 1953 (2),” DDEL.

33. Memorandum of conversation, 6 February 1954, Whitman File, John Foster Dulles Christian Herter Series, “Dulles, John Foster, Feb. 1954 (1),” DDEL; Livingston Merchant, “The Berlin Conference,” off-the-record talk before National War College, Livingston T. Merchant Papers, “Berlin Conference, 1954,” Box 2, Princeton; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 142–43, 145–46, 251–52Google Scholar; Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, p. 145–46Google Scholar; Berlin to Washington, 13 February 1954, Whitman File, Dulles-Herter Series, “Dulles, John Foster, Feb. 1954 (1),” DDEL; memorandum of conversation with the president, 20 January 1954, John Foster Dulles Papers, White House Memoranda Series, “Meetings with the President 1954 (4),” DDEL.

34. Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, p. 147.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., p. 148; Dallin, Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, p. 255.

36. Horelick, Arnold L. and Myron, Rush, Strategic Power and Soviet Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966), pp. 19–22, 25–27Google Scholar; Mackintosh, , Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, pp. 94–96Google Scholar; Leonhard, , The Kremlin since Stalin, pp. 88–89, 92–93Google Scholar; Garthoff, Raymond L., Soviet Strategy in the Nuclear Age (New York: Praeger, 1958), pp. 22–23Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 220–21Google Scholar; Hough, Jerry F. and Merle, Fainsod, How the Soviet Union Is Governed (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979), p. 208.Google Scholar

37. Horelick, and Rush, , Strategic Power and Soviet Foreign Policy, p. 21Google Scholar; Wolfe, Thomas W., Soviet Power and Europe, 1945–1970 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970), pp. 73, 78–79Google Scholar; Hough, and Fainsod, , How the Soviet Union Is Governed, p. 208Google Scholar; Pethybridge, Roger William, A Key to Soviet Politics: The June Crisis of 1957 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1962), pp. 55–57, 65Google Scholar; Conquest, Power and Policy in the U.S.S.R., pp. 248–51Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Statin, p. 221Google Scholar; Garthoff, , Soviet Strategy in the Nuclear Age, pp. 22–23Google Scholar; Leonhard, , The Kremlin since Stalin, p. 88Google Scholar; Mackintosh, , Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, p.89Google Scholar; Ulam, , Expansion and Coexistence, pp. 555–56Google Scholar; Vojtech, Mastny, “Kremlin Politics and the Austrian Settlement,” Problems of Communism 31 (07–08 1982), p. 41.Google Scholar

38. Conquest, Power and Policy in the U.S.S.R., pp. 264, 270; Pethybridge, , A Key to Soviet Politics, pp. 36, 62–64Google Scholar; Bloomfield, Lincoln P., Clemens, Walter C., and Franklyn, Griffiths, Khrushchev and the Arms Race (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1966), pp. 73–74Google Scholar; Marantz, , “Internal Politics and Soviet Foreign Policy,” pp. 136–37Google Scholar; Uri, Ra'anan, The USSR Arms the Third World: Case Studies in Soviet Foreign Policy (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1969), pp. 87–88, 93.Google Scholar

39. Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 228, 230, 232, 254–55Google Scholar; Marantz, , “Internal Politics and Soviet Foreign Policy,” p. 137Google Scholar; Linden, , Khrushchev and the Soviet Leadership, pp. 31–32Google Scholar; Khrushchev, Nikita S., Khrushchev Remembers: The Last Testament, trans, and ed. Strobe, Talbott (1974; reprint ed., New York: Bantam Books, 1976), pp. 562–63Google Scholar; Ra'anan, , The USSR Arms the Third World, pp. 97–101, 105.Google Scholar

40. Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, pp. 148–49.Google Scholar

41. “The ‘Deed’ We Wanted?” Nation, 23 04 1955, p. 339Google Scholar; John, MacCormack, “Austrian Treaty Set for Signing as Soviet Yields,” New York Times, 13 05 1955Google Scholar; Schlesinger, Thomas O., Austrian Neutrality in Postwar Europe: The Domestic Roots of a Foreign Policy (Wien Stuttgart: Wilhelm Braumuller, 1972), pp. 23–24Google Scholar; Dallin, . Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 255–57Google Scholar; Barber, Hollis W., ed., The United States in World Affairs: 1955 (New York: Harper & Bros., 1957), pp. 47–48Google Scholar; Shepherd, , The Austrian Odyssey, p. 210, 247–48Google Scholar; Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, p. 150Google Scholar; “U.S. Objectives and Policies with Respect to Austria, October 14, 1953,” NSC 164/1, White House Office, Office of the Special Assistant for National Security Affairs: Records, 1952–61, NSC Series, Policy Papers Subseries, DDEL; Mathewson, L., Director, Joint Staff, Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense, 22 04 1955Google Scholar, White House Office, SANSA Policy Papers, “NSC 164/1—Policy Toward Austria (1),” DDEL.

42. Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, pp. 151–52Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 258–59Google Scholar; Barber, , ed., The United States in World Affairs: 1955, p. 46.Google Scholar

43. Memorandum of conversation with the president, 6 May 1955, Dulles Papers, Chronological Series, “May 1955 (3),” DDEL; Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, pp. 152–53Google Scholar; Shepherd, , Austrian Odyssey, p. 262Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 258–59Google Scholar; Dulles to Eisenhower, 12 May 1955, Whitman File, Dulles-Herter Series, “Dulles, John Foster, May 1955,” DDEL; C. D. Jackson to Henry Luce, 13 May 1955, Jackson Papers, “Log 1954,” DDEL; Bader, William B., Austria between East and West 1945–1955 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966), p. 185.Google Scholar

44. Alexander, Kendrick, “Fishing for Germany with Austrian Bait,” New Republic, 2 03 1955, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

45. Ferring, , “The Austrian State Treaty and the Cold War,” p. 660Google Scholar; minutes, NSC Meeting, 22 April, 20 May 1955, Whitman File, NSC Series, DDEL; John Foster Dulles, “An Historic Week—Report to the President,” television report to the president, 17 May 1955, Dulles Papers, Box 96, DDEL; background news conference, Vienna, 15 May 1955, Dulles Papers, Box 89, Princeton; Richard, Lowenthal, World Communism: Disintegration of a Secular Faith (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964), pp. 50, 76Google Scholar; Imre, Nagy, On Communism: In Defense of the New Course (New York: Praeger, 1957), pp. 32–34Google Scholar, Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 373–78.Google Scholar

46. James, Reston, “Soviet's New Tactics,” New York Times, 21 04 1955Google Scholar; New York Times, 19 may 1955.

47. New York Times, 10 may 1955. See also New York Times, 8 and 24 april 1955.

48. New York Times, 17, 18, and 28 04, 12 and 15 may 1955; Eisenhower, Dwight D., Mandate for Change: 1953–1956 (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1963), pp. 505–6.Google Scholar

49. Eisenhower to Churchill, 1 December 1954, Whitman File, Dwight D. Eisenhower Diary Series, “12 1954 (1),” DDEL.

50. Background news conference, Vienna, 15 may 1955, Dulles Papers, Princeton.

51. John, Foster Dulles, “An Historic Week—Report to the President,” television report to the president, 17 05 1955, Dulles Papers, Box 96, Princeton.Google Scholar

52. Telephone conversation with Allen Dulles, 23 May 1955, John Foster Dulles Papers, Telephone Conversations Memoranda Series, “05 2, 1955–08 31, 1955 (7),” DDEL.

53. del Vayo, J. A., “Toward a Big Four Talk: Public Pressure Increases” Nation, 7 05 1955, p. 389Google Scholar; “When the Big Four Meet,” New Republic, 23 05 1955, p. 3Google Scholar; New York Times, 12, 15, and 22 may 1955.

54. New York Times, 15 05 1955; “When the Big Four Meet,” New Republic, 23 05 1955, p. 8Google Scholar; Mackintosh, Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, pp. 97–99; Peter, Lyon, Eisenhower: Portrait of the Hero (Boston: Little, Brown, 1974), p. 650Google Scholar; Bloomfield, Clemens, and Griffiths, , Khrushchev and the Arms Race, pp. 22–24.Google Scholar

55. New York Times, 15 may 1955; remarks of Secretary Dulles at Magazine Editors and Publishers' Meeting, Greenbrier Hotel, White Sulphur Springs, W. Va., 23 May 1955, Dulles Papers, Box 98, DDEL; “Toward ‘Active Coexistence,’” Nation, 11 06 1955, p. 493Google Scholar; Lowenthal, , World Communism, pp. 50, 76Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 229–30, 335.Google Scholar

56. Bader, , Austria between East and West, pp. 201–2Google Scholar; Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, p. 162.Google Scholar

57. James, Reston, “Soviet's New Tactics,” New York Times, 21 04 1955Google Scholar; Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 262–65, 278–79Google Scholar; Planck, Charles E., The Changing Status of German Reunification in Western Diplomacy, 1955–1966 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967), pp. 22–23Google Scholar; Hanrieder, Wolfram F., The Stable Crisis: Two Decades of German Foreign Policy (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), pp. 92–95Google Scholar; Michael, Balfour, West Germany (New York: Praeger, 1968), p. 217.Google Scholar

58. New York Times, 15 may 1955; Handler, M. S., “Molotov Names Neutrality as Price for German Unity,” New York Times, 16 05 1955Google Scholar; Stearman, , The Soviet Union and the Occupation of Austria, p. 164–65Google Scholar; Ferring, Robert L., “The Austrian State Treaty of 1955 and the Cold War,” Western Political Quarterly 21 (12 1968), pp. 657, 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59. New York Times, 16 april 1955.

60. New York Times, 17, 21, and 24 april 1955; James, Reston, “Soviet's New Tactics,” New York Times, 21 04 1955Google Scholar; Sulzberger, C. L., “The Compleat Angler Goes Fishing along the Rhine,” New York Times, 27 04 1955Google Scholar; Richardson, James L., Germany and the Atlantic Alliance: The Interaction of Strategy and Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 25, 29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barber, , The United States in World Affairs: 1955 (New York: Harper & Bros., 1957), p. 43Google Scholar; Ferring, , “The Austrian State Treaty of 1955 and the Cold War,” p. 660Google Scholar; Williams, J. Emlyn, “An Independent Germany,” New Republic, 30 05 1955Google Scholar; del, Vayo, “Toward a Big Four Talk: Public Pressure Increases”, p. 390Google Scholar; Hanrieder, , Stable Crisis, pp. 136–37.Google Scholar

61. New York Times, 21, 25, and 26 may 1955; Hanreider, , Stable Crisis, p. 137.Google Scholar

62. Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, pp. 222–23, 228, 273–74, 290, 294–95, 296–302, 307Google Scholar; Ferring, , “The Austrian State Treaty of 1955 and the Cold War,” p. 658Google Scholar; Bloomfield, Clemens, and Griffiths, , Khrushchev and the Arms Race, pp. 61–62.Google Scholar

63. Bader, , Austria between East and West, p. 202Google Scholar; New York Times editorial, 24 may 1955; Mackintosh, , Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, p. 104Google Scholar; Garthoff, , Soviet Strategy in the Nuclear Age, pp. 150–51Google Scholar; Khrushchev, , Khrushchev Remembers: The Last Testament, pp. 251–52.Google Scholar

64. New York Times, 15 may 1955; Edward, Weintal, “Russia: Retreat but Not Surrender,” Newsweek, 11 07 1955, p. 28Google Scholar; Eisenhower, , Mandate for Change, p. 508.Google Scholar

65. Dallin, , Soviet Foreign Policy after Stalin, p. 272Google Scholar; Mackintosh, , Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, p. 111Google Scholar; Wolfe, , Soviet Power and Europe, p. 80.Google Scholar

66. Mackintosh, , Strategy and Tactics of Soviet Foreign Policy, p. 105.Google Scholar

67. Kuhlman, D. Michael and Marshello, Alfred F. J., “Individual Differences in Game Motivation as Moderators of Preprogrammed Strategy Effects in Prisoner's Dilemma,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1975), pp. 922–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

68. See, for example, Axelrod, , Evolution of Cooperation, pp. 12, 18, 123, 173–74, 182.Google Scholar

69. Shulman, Marshall D., Stalin's Foreign Policy Reappraised (1963; reprint ed., Boulder:Westview, 1985), pp. 4–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marantz, , “Internal Politics and Soviet Foreign Policy,” pp. 131–32, 143–44Google Scholar; Audrey, Kurth Cronin, Great Power Politics and the Struggle over Austria, 1945–1955 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 161Google Scholar; Ulam, , Expansion and Coexistence, p. 566.Google Scholar