Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:20:31.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Home as a Workplace: Deconstructing Dichotomies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2009

Eileen Boris
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 415 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1994

References

1 I cover some of the issues addressed in this paper also in the essay, “Beyond Dichotomy: North American Women's Labor History”, Journal of Women's History, 4 (Winter 1993), pp. 162–179, See also, Kerber, Linda, “Seperate Spheres, Female Worlds, Woman's place: The Rhetoric of Women's History”, Journal of American History, 75 (06 1988), pp. 9–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baron, Ava, “Gender and Labor History”, in Baron, Ava (ed.), Work Engendered: Toward a New History of American Labor (Ithaca and London, 1991), pp. 1–46Google Scholar.

2 For a parallel project to locate labor history in terms of production and reproduction as seen in the law, see Christopher Tomlins, “Law and Authority As Subjects in Labor History”, International Labor and Working Class History, forthcoming.

3 For example, Strom, Sharon Hartman, Beyond the Typewriter (Urbana, 1992)Google Scholar; Cobble, Dorothy Sue, Dishing It Out (Urbana, 1991)Google Scholar; White, Deborah Gray, Ar'n't I A Woman? Female Slaves in the Plantation South (New York, 1985)Google Scholar; Jones, Jacqueline, The Dispossessed (New York, 1992)Google Scholar.

4 Boydston, Jeanne, Home and Work: Housework, Wages, and the Ideology of the Early Republic (New York, 1992), p. xiGoogle Scholar; Matthews, Glenna, “Just a Housewife”: The Rise and Fall of Domesticity in America (New York, 1987)Google Scholar.

5 Ehrenreich, Barbara and English, Deidre, “The Manufacture of Housework”, Socialist Revolution, 5 (10–12 1975), pp. 5–41Google Scholar; Romero, Mary, Maid in the U.S.A. (New York and London, 1992)Google Scholar; Strasser, Susan, Never Done: A History of American Housework (New York, 1981)Google Scholar; Cowan, Ruth Schwartz, More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave (New York, 1983)Google Scholar; Hayden, Dolores, The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Design for American Homes, Neighborhoods, and Cities (Cambridge, Mass., 1981)Google Scholar.

6 Fox, Bonnie (ed.), Hidden in the Household: Women's Domestic Labor Under Capitalism (Toronto, 1980)Google Scholar; Boydston, Home and Work, p. 55.

7 Hareven, Tamara K., “The Home and the Family in Historical Perspective”, Social Research, 58 (Spring 1991), pp. 253–285Google Scholar.

8 Ladd-Taylor, Molly, Mother-Work: Women, Child Welfare, and the State, 1890–1930 (Urbana, 1994)Google Scholar; Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda, “A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State”, Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19 (Winter 1994), pp. 309–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Nancy Folbre, “The Unproductive Housewife: Her Evolution in Nineteenth-Century Economic Thought”, ibid., 16 (Summer 1991), pp. 463–484; Fraser and Gordon, “A Genealogy of Dependency”; Wilson, William Julius, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Piiblic Policy (Chicago, 1987)Google Scholar; Jencks, Christopher, Rethinking Social Policy: Race, Poverty, and the Underclass (Cambridge, Mass., 1992)Google Scholar; Murray, Charles, Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (New York, 1984)Google Scholar. Feminist debate on this issue takes place on the internet network connected to the journal, Social Politics.

10 Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth, Within the Plantation Household: Black and White Women of the Old South (Chapel Hill, 1988)Google Scholar; Ulrich, Laurel Thatcher, Good Wives (New York, 1981)Google Scholar; Jones, Jacqueline, Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work and the Family from Slavery to the Present (New York, 1985), pp. 3–35Google Scholar; White, Ar'n't I A Woman?.

11 Deutsch, Sarah, No Separate Refuge: Culture, Class, and Gender on an Anglo-Hispanic Frontier in the American Southwest, 1880–1940 (New York, 1987)Google Scholar; Devens, Carol, Countering Colonization: Native American Women and Great Lakes Missions, 1630–1900 (Berkeley, 1992)Google Scholar.

12 Stansell, Christine, City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789–1860 (Urbana, 1987)Google Scholar; Cameron, Ardis, Radicals of the Worst Sort: Laboring Women in Lawrence, Massachusetts, 1860–1912 (Urbana, 1993)Google Scholar.

13 Shaw, Stephanie, “Mothering Under Slavery in the Antebellum South”, in Glenn, Evelyn Nakano, Chang, Grace and Forcey, Linda Rennie (eds), Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency (New York and London, 1994), pp. 237–258Google Scholar; on working-class mothers, see note 12 above; Sanchez, George J., “‘Go After the Women’: Americanization and the Mexican Immigrant Woman, 1915–1929”, in DuBois, Ellen Carol and Ruiz, Vicki L. (eds), Unequal Sisters: A Multi-Cultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (1st ed., New York and London, 1990), pp. 250–263Google Scholar; Robert A. Trennert, “Educating Indian Girls at Nonreservation Boarding Schools, 1878–1920”, in ibid. pp. 224–237; Scott, Rebecca J., “The Battle over the Child: Child Apprenticeship and the Freedmen's Bureau in North Carolina”, in Hiner, N. Ray and Hawes, Joseph M. (eds), Growing Up in America in Historical Perspective (Urbana, 1985), pp. 193–207Google Scholar. On intervention into immigrant families, Gordon, Linda, Heroes of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence (New York, 1988)Google Scholar.

14 Shaw, “Mothering Under Slavery”; Campbell, John, “Work, Pregnancy, and Infant Mortality among Southern Slaves”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 14 (Spring 1984), pp. 793–812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

15 On surrogacy, see for example, Field, Martha, Surrogate Motherhood (Cambridge, Mass., 1988)Google Scholar.

16 McMillen, Sally, “Mothers' Sacred Duty: Breast-feeding Patterns among Middle and Upper Class Women in the Antebellum South”, Journal of Southern History, 51 (08 1985), pp. 333–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dye, Nancy Schrom and Smith, Daniel Blake, “Mother Love and Infant Death, 1750–1920”, Journal of American History, 73 (1986), pp. 329–353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

17 Blum, Linda M., “Mothers, Babies, and Breastfeeding in Late Capitalist America: The Shifting Contexts of Feminist Theory”, Feminist Studies, 19 (Summer 1993), pp. 291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar; on equality and difference among feminists, Vogel, Lise, Mothers on the Job: Maternity Policy in the U.S. Workplace (New Brunswick, NJ, 1993)Google Scholar.

18 Glenn, Evelyn Nakano, “From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproductive Labor”, Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18 (08 1992), pp. 1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Palmer, Phyllis, Domesticity and Dirt: Housewives and Domestic Servants in the United States, 1920–1945 (Philadelphia, 1989)Google Scholar.

20 Evelyn Nakano Glenn, “Racial Ethnic Women's Labor: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Class Oppression”, Review of Radical Political Economy, 17 (3), pp. 119–137; Jones, The Dispossessed; Ewen, Elizabeth, Immigrant Women in the Land of Dollars (New York, 1985)Google Scholar; Hagood, Margaret, Mothers of the South: Portraiture of the White Tenant Farm Woman (Chapel Hill, 1939)Google Scholar.

21 Clark-Lewis, Elizabeth, “‘This Work Had an End’: African American Domestic Workers in Washington, D.C., 1910–1940”, in Groneman, Carol and Norton, Mary Beth (eds), “To Toil the Livelong Day”: America's Women at Work, 1780–1980 (Ithaca and London, 1987)Google Scholar; Katzman, David, Seven Days a Week: Women and Domestic Service in Industrializing America (New York, 1981)Google Scholar.

22 Nakano Glenn, “From Servitude to Service Work” Abel, Emily, “Adult Daughters and Care for the Elderly”, Feminist Studies, 12 (Fall 1986), pp. 479–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ward, Debbie, “The Kin Care Trap: The Unpaid Labour of Long-Term Care”, Socialist Review, 93 (1993), pp. 83–105Google Scholar.

23 Nelson, Margaret K., “Negotiating Care: Relationships Between Family Daycare Providers and Mothers”, Feminist Studies, 15(Spring 1989), pp. 7–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 What follows comes from Boris, Eileen, Home to Work: Motherhood and the Politics of Industrial Homework in the United States (New York, 1994)Google Scholar.

25 For example, see “Men's Ready-Made Clothing”, Report on Condition of Women and Child Wage Earners in the United States (Washington, 1911), pp. 302–306.

26 Survey material relating to Sullivan, Mary Loretta and Blair, Bertha, “Women in Texas Industries: Hours, Wages, Working Conditions, and Home Work”, Bulletin of the U.S. Women's Bureau, no. 126 (Washington, 1936), n. 36Google Scholar; survey material relating to Harriet A. Byrne and Bertha Blair, “Industrial Home Work in Rhode Island, With Special Reference to the Lace Industry”, ibid., no. 131 (Washington, 1935), n. 5–1–17, both in National Archives, Record Group 86.

27 Lovejoy, Owen R., “Some Unsettled Questions About Child Labor”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 33, supp. (03 1909), p. 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kelley, Florence, Some Ethical Gains Through Legislation (New York, 1905), p. 7Google Scholar.

28 Howard, Marjorie, “Home Work: Escape from Office Means Stress Can Hit You Where You Live”, Boston Herald, 29 01 1989, A24Google Scholar; Kotlowitz, Alex, “Working at Home While Caring for Your Child Sounds Fine – in Theory”, Wall Street Journal, 30 03 1987, sec. 2, p. 21Google Scholar.