Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T20:19:15.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The case against international cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2020

Ian Hurd Open the ORCID record for Ian Hurd [Opens in a new window]
Ian Hurd*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: ianhurd@northwestern.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea that international law and institutions represent cooperative means for resolving inter-state disputes is so common as to be almost taken for granted in International Relations scholarship. Global-governance scholars often use the terms international law and cooperation interchangeably and treat legalization as a subset of the broader category of inter-governmental cooperation. This paper highlights the methodological and substantive problems that follow from equating ‘global governance’ with ‘international cooperation’ and suggests an alternative. The traditional model applies liberal political theory to the study of international institutions and interprets global governance as the realization of shared interests. It deflects research away from questions about trade-offs and winners or losers. In place of cooperation theory, I outline an overtly political methodology that assumes that governance – global or otherwise – necessarily favors some interests over others. In scholarship, the difference is evident in research methods, normative interpretation, and policy recommendations, as research is reoriented toward understanding how international institutions redistribute inequalities of wealth and power.

Keywords

international cooperationinternational theoryliberalisminternational institutionsliberal world order
Type
Research Article
Information
International Theory , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , July 2022 , pp. 263 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., and Madsen, Mikael Rask, eds. 2018. The Authority of International Courts in a Complex World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198795582.003.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Alejandro E. 2019. “Trend of Discussion on the Promotion of the Rule of Law in the Global Community/Sharing Information on and Experiences: the UN Perspective.” Proceedings of the American Society of International Law.10.1017/amp.2019.54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha. 2011. “The Legitimate Authority of International Human Rights.” In The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes, edited by Føllesdal, Andreas, Schaffer, Johan Karl, and Ulfstein, Geir, 32–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Andreas. 2016. International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725114.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, Max. 2019. “Trump's Pet Intellectuals are Embarrassing Themselves.” Washington Post, 15 May.Google Scholar
Bower, Adam. 2015. “Arguing with Law: Strategic and Legal Argumentation, US Diplomacy, and Debates over the International Criminal Court.” Review of International Studies 41 (2): 337–60.10.1017/S0260210514000217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie. 1992. “Law among Liberal States: Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine.” Columbia Law Review 92 (8): 1907–96.10.2307/1123016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. “On Compliance.” International Organization 47 (3): 311–31.10.1017/S0020818300027910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, Arjun. 2018. The Myth of International Order: Why Weak States Persist & Alternatives to the State Fade Away. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coate, Roger A., and Murphy, Craig N.. 1995. “Editor's Note.” Global Governance 1 (1): 1–2.10.1163/19426720-001-01-90000002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, David. 2017. Engines of Liberty: How Citizen Movements Succeed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
de Waal, Thomas. 2019. “Rethinking International Peace.” In Think Peace: Essays for an Age of Disorder, edited by de Waal, Thomas, 1–7. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Dill, Janina. 2015. Legitimate Targets? Social Construction, International Law, and US Bombing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization 50 (3): 379–406.10.1017/S0020818300033427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark. eds. Forthcoming (2021). International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 2009. Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffrey A., Lake, David A., and Schultz, Kenneth A.. 2019. World Politics: Interests, Interactions, Institutions. 4th ed. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Shannon. 2018. “The Office of the Prosecutor: Seeking Justice or Serving Global Imperialism?” International Criminal Law Review 18 (6): 988–1014.10.1163/15718123-01806005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1986. “Anarchy, Egoism, and Third Images: The Evolution of Cooperation and International Relations.” International Organization 40 (1): 167–86.10.1017/S0020818300004513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400823710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterres, António. 2018. “Address to the General Assembly.” United Nations. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2018-09-25/address-73rd-general-assembly.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305562.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakimi, Monica. 2017. “The Work of International Law.” Harvard International Law Journal 58 (1): 1–46.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015. “Transnational Legal Orders.” In Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Shaffer, Gregory, 3–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107707092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassanein, Ahmed Samir. 2017. “Self-Referral of Situations to the International Criminal Court: Complementarity in Practice – Complementarity in Crisis.” International Criminal Law Review 17 (1): 107–34.10.1163/15718123-01703002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. “Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?” Yale Law Journal 111 (8): 1935–2042.10.2307/797642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J.. 2018. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2016. “Enchanted and Disenchanted International Law.” Global Policy 7 (1): 96–101.10.1111/1758-5899.12299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2017. How to Do Things with International Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc77cj7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2019. “If I had a Rocket Launcher: Self-Defense and Forever War in International Law.” Houston Law Review 56 (4): 821–39.Google Scholar
Hussin, Iza. 2014. “Circulations of Law: Cosmopolitan Elites, Global Repertoires, Local Vernaculars.” Law and History Review 32 (4): 773–95.10.1017/S0738248014000479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2020. A World Safe for Democracy: Liberal Internationalism and the Crises of Global Order. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jahn, Beate. 2013. Liberal Internationalism: Theory, History, Practice. New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137348432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, Beate. 2018. “Liberal Internationalism: Historical Trajectory and Current Prospects.” International Affairs 94 (1): 43–61.10.1093/ia/iix231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Leslie. 2015. Strengthening International Courts: The Hidden Costs of Legalization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.7388936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David. 2014. The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen. 2011. The Image before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction Between Combatant and Civilian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9780801449031.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju. 2018. The Trump Administration and International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190912185.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2016. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316415832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martii. 2009. “Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (3): 395–422.10.1177/1354066109338229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life of the Pareto Frontier.” International Organization 43 (3): 336–66.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2018. “International Legitimacy Lost? Rule and Resistance When America is First.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (1): 6–21.10.1017/S1537592717003085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., and Gourevitch, Peter. 2018. “Hundreds of Scholars Have Signed a Statement Defending the International Institutions that Trump Has Attacked.” Washington Post, 14 August.Google Scholar
Linarelli, John, Salomon, Margaret, and Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswarmy. 2018. The Misery of International Law: Confrontations with Injustice in the Global Economy. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198753957.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David. 2010. “Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law.” In The Philosophy of International Law, edited by Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John, 569–588. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magnuson, William. 2017. “Is Brexit the Beginning of the End for International Cooperation?” The Conversation, 28 March.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael. 2018. “Liberal Hegemony, International Order, and US Foreign Policy: A Reconsideration.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21 (1): 47–54.Google Scholar
McKeown, Ryder. 2017. “International Law and its Discontents: Exploring the Dark Side of International Law and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 43: 1–23.10.1017/S0260210517000092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Sara Mitchell, and Hensel, Paul R.. 2007. “International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 721–37.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00277.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John G. 2018. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctv5cgb1wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medhora, Rohinton P. 2017. “Refreshing Global Trade Governance.” Council of Councils Global Memo, 19 January.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1992. “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses.” World Politics 44 (3): 466–96.10.2307/2010546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mingst, Karen A., and Arreguín-Toft, Ivan. 2017. Essentials of International Relations. 7th ed. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (4): 513–53.10.1162/002081897550447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Sam. 2013. “Judith Shklar versus the International Criminal Court.” Humanity 4 (3): 473–500.10.1353/hum.2013.0026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Abraham L., and Posner, Elliot. 2018. Voluntary Disruptions: International Soft Law, Finance, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198818380.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nexon, Dan. 2018. “Toward a Neo-Progressive Foreign Policy: The Case for an Internationalist Left.” Foreign Policy.Google Scholar
Nuñez-Mietz, Fernando G. 2019. The Use of Force Under International Law: Lawyerized States in a Legalized World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen. 2008. The Power and Purpose of International Law: Insights from the Theory and Practice of Enforcement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368949.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. 1908. “The Science of International Law: Its Task and Method.” American Journal of International Law 2: 313–56.10.2307/2186595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, John M. 2018. “Liberalism and its Alternatives, Again.” International Studies Review 20 (2): 309–316.10.1093/isr/viy026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peevers, Charlotte. 2013. The Politics of Justifying Force: The Suez Crisis, the Iraq War, and International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686957.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillinger, Mara, Hurd, Ian, and Barnett, Michael N.. 2016. “How to Get Away with Cholera: The UN, Haiti, and International Law.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (1): 70–86.10.1017/S1537592715003230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powderly, Joseph. 2019. “International Justice in the Age of Perpetual Crisis.” Leiden Journal of International Law 32: 1–11.10.1017/S0922156518000675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate.” International Organization 48 (2): 313–44.10.1017/S0020818300028204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael. 1984. “Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Article 2(4).” American Journal of International Law 78: 642–5.10.2307/2202601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Darryl. 2013. “A Cosmopolitan Liberal Account of International Criminal Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 26: 127–53.10.1017/S0922156512000684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogin, John. 2019. “How Russia is Corrupting the Liberal World Order.” Washington Post, 31 January.Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom. 2011. ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolution in Customary Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Rebecca. 2018. Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190870553.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Shirley V. 1994. “International Law as Ideology: Theorizing the Relationship between International Law and International Politics.” European Journal of International Law 5: 313–25.10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, Lee J.M. 2016. “The ICC and Africa: Rhetoric, Hypocrisy, Management, and Legitimacy.” In Africa and the ICC: Perceptions of Justice, edited by Clarke, Kamari M., Knottnerus, Abel S., and de Volder, Eefje, 107–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316556252.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. Forthcoming (2021). “Legal Realism and International Law.” In International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers, edited by Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, and Ginsburg, Tom. 2012. “The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship.” American Journal of International Law 106 (1): 1–46.10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.1.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1986. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2017. “The Return of Anarchy.” Columbia Journal of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. 2017. Why Wilson Matters: The Origin of American Liberal Internationalism and its Crisis Today. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 85 (3): 701–26.10.2307/1963847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavridis, James. 2019. “Why NATO is Essential for World Peace. According to its Former Commander.” Time.Google Scholar
Stein, Arthur A. 2008. “Neoliberal Institutionalism.” In Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, 201–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511559143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. 2018. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Revised edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2006. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.1017/CBO9780511511073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharoor, Shashi. 2003. “United Nations: It May Not Be Perfect but It's the Best Hope the World Currently Has.” The Independent, 6 March.Google Scholar
Vinjamuri, Leslie, and Snyder, Jack. 2015. “Law and Politics in Transitional Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 303–27.10.1146/annurev-polisci-122013-110512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Neil. 2015. Intimations of Global Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316134221CrossRefGoogle Scholar