Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T10:52:52.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining the allocation of legislative specialization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2023

Aldo F. Ponce Open the ORCID record for Aldo F. Ponce [Opens in a new window]
Aldo F. Ponce*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Studies, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Mexico City, Mexico
*
Email: aldo.ponce@cide.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explains why there is important variation in the degree of concentration of legislative specialization across legislative parties. Greater concentration of legislative specialization leads parties to concentrate their legislative efforts on a smaller set of policy jurisdictions. Through enhancing their concentration of legislative specialization in certain policy areas, parties might more clearly signal their policy concerns and interests to voters. This study argues and shows that party size alters the concentration of legislative specialization. In particular, I find that a U-shaped curve defines the relationship between party size and the degree of concentration of legislative specialization: niche parties and the largest parties choose higher levels of concentration of legislative specialization.

Keywords

concentration of legislative specializationLatin Americaparty size
Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 391 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J, Clark, M, Ezrow, L and Glasgow, G (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50, 513–529. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=15004618843589596405&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Adams, J, Ezrow, L and Debra, L (2012) Partisan sorting and niche parties in Europe. West European Politics 35, 1272–1294. doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.713746. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=193197787350046618&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Aldrich, J and Griffin, J (2003) The presidency and the campaign: creating voter priorities in the 2000 election. In Nelson, M (ed.), The Presidency and the Political System, 7th edn. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, pp. 239–256. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Aldrich%2C+J+and+Griffin%2C+J+%282003%29+The+Presidency+and+the+Campaign%3A+Creating+Voter+Priorities+in+the+2000+Election&btnG=Google Scholar
Alemán, E and Saiegh, SM (2007) Legislative preferences, political parties, and coalition unity in Chile. Comparative Politics 39, 253–272. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/20434040; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13756139600737022188&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Alemán, E and Tsebelis, G (2016) Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=16891254950889671835&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Alemán, E, Calvo, E, Jones, MP and Kaplan, N (2009) Comparing cosponsorship and roll call ideal points. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34, 87–116. 10.3162/036298009787500358. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11983370525018949381&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Alemán, E, Ponce, A and Sagarzazu, I (2011) Legislative parties in volatile, nonprogrammatic party systems: The Peruvian case in comparative perspective. Latin American Politics and Society 53, 57–81. 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00125. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cluster=16234033082433256216Google Scholar
Amorim Neto, O and Cox, G (1997) Electoral institutions, cleavage structures, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science 41, 149–174. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/2111712; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7965686784263901793&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Aragón, F (2009) Candidate Nomination Procedures and Political Selection: Evidence from Latin American Parties. LSE STICERD Research Paper No. EOPP003. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1546897; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=6710123194717554696&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Barcikowski, R (1981) Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics 6, 267–285. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/1164877; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9548504648506137394&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, D and Ferejohn, J (1989) Bargaining in legislatures. The American Political Science Review 83, 1181–1206. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/1961664; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=6352259558710593888&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Bélanger, E and Meguid, B (2008) Issue salience, issue ownership and issue-based vote choice: evidence from Canada. Electoral Studies 27, 477–491. 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11056698614782864043&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Bos, L, Lefevere, J, Thijssen, R and Sheets, P (2016) The impact of mediated party issue strategies on electoral support. Party Politics 23, 760–771. 10.1177/1354068815626. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=17936426988842359538&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Brunner, M (2012) Parliaments and Legislative Activity: Motivations for Bill Introduction. Wiesbaden: Springer Science & Business Media. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1635854987141004349&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Budge, I and Farlie, D (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Callaghan, K and Schnell, F (2010) Assessing the democratic debate: how the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Communication 18, 183–213. 10.1080/105846001750322970. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1617397024213869901&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Carey, J (2009) Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7971849217950120354&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Carey, J and Polga-Hecimovich, J (2006) Primary elections and candidate strength in Latin America. Journal of Politics 68, 530–543. 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00443.x. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=2468353403954964592&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H, Sanders, D, Stewart, M and Whiteley, P (2004) Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–129. Available at https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&cluster=4667144407987379757Google Scholar
Cox, G (1990) Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 34, 903–935. 10.2307/2111465. Available at https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Centripetal+and+centrifugal+incentives+in+electoral+systems&btnG=Google Scholar
Cox, G and McCubbins, M (1993) Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?cluster=12650997926078938825&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Creedy, J (1998) The Dynamics of Inequality and Poverty: Comparing Income Distributions. Northampton, MA: E. Elgar. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=8137183521898997176&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Damore, D (2004) The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly 57, 391–397. 10.2307/3219849. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=17593191676761631305&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
De Vries, C and Hobolt, S (2012) When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. European Union Politics 13, 246–268. 10.1177/14651165114347. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=10907206354513134546&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Edwards, G, Mitchell, W and Welch, R (1995) Explaining presidential approval: the significance of issue salience. American Journal of Political Science 39, 108–134. 10.2307/2111760. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=18358633557819118215&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Ezrow, L (2008) Research note: on the inverse relationship between votes and proximity for niche parties. European Journal of Political Research 47, 206–220. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00724.x. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=6428197261007170110&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Figueiredo, A and Limongi, F (2000) Presidential power, legislative organization, and party behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics 32, 151–170. 10.2307/422395. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=4325735354632030035&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Fournier, P, Blais, A, Nadeau, E, Gidengil, E and Nevitte, N (2003) Issue importance and performance voting. Political Behavior 25, 51–67. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/3657314; https://scholar.google.com.mx/scholar?cluster=2704293165379379004&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1Google Scholar
Gilligan, T and Krehbiel, K (1987) Collective decision-making and standing committees: an informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3, 287–335. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/764831; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1192428332826686806&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C (2010) Bringing parties into parliament: the development of parliamentary activities in Western Europe. Party Politics 16, 347–369. Available at 10.1177/1354068809341057 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=10254115497756470814&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C and Mortensen, P (2015) Avoidance and engagement: issue competition in multiparty systems. Political Studies 63, 747–764. 10.1111/1467-9248.12121. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7407023295186060644&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Green, J and Hobolt, S (2008) Owning the issue agenda. Party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies 27, 460–476. 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14446850815749046313&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Green, J and Jennings, W (2019) Party reputations and policy priorities: how issue ownership shapes executive and legislative agendas. British Journal of Political Science 49, 443–466. 10.1017/S0007123416000636. Available at https://scholar.google.com.mx/scholar?cluster=2189950143770085555&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1Google Scholar
Hamm, K, Hedlund, R and Post, S (2011) Committee specialization in U.S. State legislatures during the 20th century: do legislatures tap the talents of their members? State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11, 299–324. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/41575827; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12988682160625176824&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Hayes, D (2005) Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: a theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science 49, 908–923. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00163.x. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=17659901615980200631&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Herfindahl, O (1950) Concentration in the Steel Industry (Doctoral Dissertation), Columbia University. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Concentration+in+the+steel+industry&btnG=Google Scholar
Hirschman, A (1945) National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13642290884391487542&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Holian, D (2004) He's stealing my issues! Clinton's crime rhetoric and the dynamics of issue ownership. Political Behavior 26, 95–124. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/4151362; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=133438295553005422&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Horowitz, J, List, J and McConnell, KE (2004) Diminishing marginal value. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado. 10.22004/ag.econ.20297. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=17290255846398825502&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Jenkins, S (1999) INEQDEC0: Stata module to calculate inequality indices with decomposition by subgroup. Statistical Software Components S366007, Boston College Department of Economic. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Stephen+P.+Jenkins%2C+1999.+%22INEQDEC0%3A+Stata+module+to+calculate+inequality+indices+with+decomposition+by+subgroup&btnG=Google Scholar
Jones, M (2005) The role of parties and party systems in the policymaking process. Paper prepared for Inter-American Development Bank Workshop on State Reform, Public Policies and Policymaking Processes, February 28–March 2, Washington, DC. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=15031927104955788216&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Klüver, H and Sagarzazu, I (2016) Setting the agenda or responding to voters? Political parties, voters and issue attention. West European Politics 39, 380–398. 10.1080/01402382.2015.1101295. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=3473682147305954327&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Krehbiel, K (1991) Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14120666270118410063&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Laakso, M and Taagepera, R (1979) The ‘effective’ number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12, 3–27. 10.1177/001041407901200101. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13870868923305472042&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Langston, J (2017) Democratization and Authoritarian Party Survival: Mexico's PRI. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=15383924655104837250&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Lazarus, J (2013) Issue salience and bill introduction in the house and senate. Congress and the Presidency 40, 215–229. 10.1080/07343469.2013.822944. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14041819900481096771&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Lefevere, J, Tresch, A and Walgrave, S (2015) Introduction: issue ownership. West European Politics 38, 755–760. 10.1080/01402382.2015.1039375. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=15423759735378935800&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Limongi, F and Cheibub Figueiredo, A (2007) The budget process and legislative behavior: individual amendments, support for the executive and government programs. World Political Science Review 3, 1–34. 10.2202/1935-6226.1024. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12977929225790172048&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S (ed.) (2018) Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. New York: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Party+Systems+in+Latin+America%3A+Institutionalization%2C+Decay%2C+and+Collapse+book&btnG=Google Scholar
Meguid, B (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review 99, 347–359. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/30038944; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1535228314770554387&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Myerson, R (1993) Incentives to cultivate favored minorities under alternative electoral systems. American Political Science Review 87, 856–869. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/2938819; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14617074556088816740&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Nadeau, R, Blais, A, Gidengil, E and Nevitte, N (2001) Perceptions of party competence in the 1997 election. In Thorburn, H and Whitehorn, A (eds), Party Politics in Canada. Toronto: Prentice-Hall, pp. 413–430. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Perceptions+of+Party+Competence+in+the+1997+Election&btnG=Google Scholar
Neundorf, A and Adams, J (2018) The micro-foundations of party competition and issue ownership: the reciprocal effects of citizens’ issue salience and party attachments. British Journal of Political Science 48, 385–406. 10.1017/S0007123415000642. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11345853226995129953&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Nicholson, W (2002) Microeconomic theory. Basic principles and extensions. South-Western; Thomson.Google Scholar
Norris, P, Curtice, J, Sanders, D, Scammell, M and Semetko, H (1999) On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7048681286292616118&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Papke, L and Wooldridge, J (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 619–632 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=5263271696875280565&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Pedersen, M (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research 7, 1–26. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1979.tb01267.x. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=The+Dynamics+of+European+Party+Systems%3A+Changing+Patterns+of+Electoral+Volatility&btnG=Google Scholar
Petrocik, J (1996) Issue ownership and presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science 40, 825–850. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/2111797; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=464401105980097158&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Petrocik, J, Benoit, W and Hansen, G (2003) Issue ownership and presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly 118, 599–626. 10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00407.x. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=8930374849571906186&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Ponce, AF (2016) Strong presidents, weak parties, and agenda control: Lawmaking in Democratic Peru. In Alemán, E and Tsebelis, G (eds), Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=cZl28P4AAAAJ&citation_for_view=cZl28P4AAAAJ:j3f4tGmQtD8CGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, G, Prothro, J and Jacoby, W (1982) Salience as a factor in the impact of issues on candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics 44, 41–63. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/2130283; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=4443668328308752452&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Rhoades, S (1993) The Herfindahl–Hirschman index. Federal Reserve Bulletin, March, 188–189. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=4816391282417053115&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Roberts Clark, W and Golder, M (2006) Rehabilitating Duverger's theory: testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws. Comparative Political Studies 39, 679–708. 10.1177/0010414005278420. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=17993876316700223387&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Rohde, D (1991) Parties and Leaders in the Post-Reform House. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saiegh, S (2005) The role of legislatures in the policymaking process. Prepared for delivery at the Workshop on State Reform, Public Policies and Policymaking Processes, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=The+Role+of+Legislatures+in+the+Policymaking+Process&btnG=Google Scholar
Schröder, V and Stecker, C (2018) The temporal dimension of issue dimension. Party Politics 24, 708–718. 10.1177/1354068817693474. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11950266664500475720&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M and Jones, B (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science 46, 218–237. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088424 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12004403903485358539&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Stein, E, Tommasi, M, Echebarría, K, Lora, E and Payne, M (eds) (2006) The Politics of Policies. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. Cambridge: David Rockefeller Center. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1850413924871526471&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Sulkin, T (2005) Issue Politics in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=9885065771502247723&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Toka, G and Henjak, A (2007) Party systems and voting behavior in the Visegrad countries 15 years after the transition. In Saradín, P and Bradová, E (eds), Visegrad Votes: Parliamentary Elections 2005–2006. Olomuc: Palacky University Press, pp. 210–244. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1322764533486915522&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
van der Brug, W (2004) Issue ownership and party choice. Electoral Studies 23, 209–233. 10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00061-6. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=10221539755915584054&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Walgrave, S and De Swert, K (2004) The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok: the media and the success of the Belgian extreme-right party. Political Communication 21, 479–500. 10.1080/10584600490522743. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=15790521261419341158&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Walgrave, S and De Swert, K (2007) Where does issue ownership come from? From party or from the media? Issue-identification in Belgium, 1991–2005. The Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics 12, 37–66. 10.1177/1081180X06297572. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13458168252788722410&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Walgrave, S, Lefevere, J and Nuytemans, M (2009) Issue ownership stability and change: how political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication 26, 153–172. 10.1080/10584600902850718. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=15029462189713838170&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Walgrave, S, Lefevere, J and Tresch, A (2012) The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 771–782. 10.1093/poq/nfs023. Available at https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12269062865775773126&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Weingast, BR and Marshall, WL (1988) The industrial organization of congress; or, Why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets. Journal of Political Economy 96, 132–163. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/1830714; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=11511531026978890666&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Woon, J (2011) Issue attention and legislative proposals in the U.S. Senate. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34, 29–54. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/20680226; https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=13640054613183731481&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ponce supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 402.5 KB