Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T00:06:49.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex of first child: like migrant father, like son

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Shan Li*
Affiliation:
School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macau
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: Coral28@gwmail.gwu.edu
Get access

Abstract

As males in Mexico have the authority in households and dominate migration flows to the US, this paper argues that having a son as the first child provides an early additional candidate for the anchor position in Mexico and for migration trips to the US, making households better off. Fathers with longer migration experiences have higher expectations for future migration trips and stronger incentives to manipulate the sex of their first child. The empirical analysis confirms that by presenting positive effects of fathers’ previous migration experiences on the probability of having a son as a firstborn child, though abortions are widely illegal in Mexico.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcaraz, C., Chiquiar, D. and Salcedo, A. (2012) Remittances, schooling, and child labor in Mexico. Journal of Development Economics 97(1), 156165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, F. (1992) Sex preference and its demographic and health implications. International Family Planning Perspectives 18, 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, M. (1998) Family background, gender and schooling in Mexico. The Journal of Development Studies 35(2), 5471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, T. and De, P. K. (2017) Mother's autonomy and child's secondary schooling enrollment in Mexico. Review of Economics of the Household 15(3), 10371053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiswick, B. (1999) Are immigrants favorably self-selected?. American Economic Review 89(2), 181185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruces, G. and Galiani, S. (2007) Fertility and female labor supply in Latin America: new causal evidence. Labour Economics 14(3), 565573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, K. M. (1994) US policy and Mexican migration to the United States, 1942–1992. Social Science Quarterly 75(4), 705729.Google Scholar
Donato, K. M., Wagner, B. and Patterson, E. (2008) The cat and mouse game at the Mexico-US border: gendered patterns and recent shifts. International Migration Review 42(2), 330359.10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00127.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, J. and Massey, D. S. (2004) Crossing the Border: Research from the Mexican Migration Project. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Fuchs, F. and Riis, P. (1956) Antenatal sex determination. Nature 177(4503), 330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guillaume, A., Rossier, C. and Reeve, P. (2018) Abortion around the world. An overview of legislation, measures, trends, and consequences. Population 73(2), 217306.Google Scholar
Hanson, G. H. and Woodruff, C. (2003) Emigration and educational attainment in Mexico. Technical report.Google Scholar
Howell, E. M., Zhang, H. and Poston, D. L. (2018) Son preference of immigrants to the United States: data from US birth certificates, 2004–2013. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 20(3), 711716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayachandran, S. (2017) Fertility decline and missing women. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(1), 118–39.Google Scholar
Juárez, F., Singh, S., Maddow-Zimet, I. and Wulf, D. (2013) Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Mexico: causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
Kishor, S. and Gupta, K. (2009) Gender equality and women's empowerment in India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005–06. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences.Google Scholar
Kishore, A. and Spears, D. (2014) Having a son promotes clean cooking fuel use in urban India: women's status and son preference. Economic Development and Cultural Change 62(4), 673699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2016) The determinants of Mexican migrants duration in the United States: family composition, psychic costs, and human capital. IZA Journal of Migration 5(1), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2018) Investment and interruption: effects of the US experience on the earnings of return migrants in Mexico. Applied Economics 50(4), 426440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstrom, D. P. (1996) Economic opportunity in Mexico and return migration from the United States. Demography 33(3), 357374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markle, G. E. and Nam, C. B. (1971) Sex predetermination: its impact on fertility. Social Biology 18(1), 7383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markle, G. E. and Wait, R. F. (1976) The development of family size and sex composition norms among US children. Number 39. East-West Center.Google Scholar
Massey, D. S. and Zenteno, R. (2000) A validation of the ethnosurvey: the case of Mexico-US migration. International Migration Review 34(3), 766793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, D. and Rapoport, H. (2010) Self-selection patterns in mexico-us migration: the role of migration networks. The Review of Economics and Statistics 92(4), 811821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munshi, K. (2003) Networks in the modern economy: Mexican migrants in the US labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(2), 549599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ost, B. and Dziadula, E. (2016) Gender preference and age at arrival among Asian immigrant mothers in the US. Economics Letters 145, 286290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfutze, T. (2012) Does migration promote democratization? Evidence from the Mexican transition. Journal of Comparative Economics 40(2), 159175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, J. (2008) Parent-child quality time does birth order matter?. Journal of Human Resources 43(1), 240265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, S. and Thom, K. (2013) Migration experience and earnings in the Mexican labor market. Journal of Human Resources 48(3), 768820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senderowicz, L., Sanhueza, P. and Langer, A. (2016) Socioeconomic status and abortion tourism in Mexico city: implications for equity. Contraception 93(5), 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, J. B. and Molina, G. B. (1997) Desired family size and son preference among Hispanic women of low socioeconomic status. Family Planning Perspectives 29, 284287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoff, C. F. and Rindfuss, R. R. (1974) Sex preselection in the United States: some implications. Science 184(4137), 633636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winters, P., De Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E. (2001) Family and community networks in Mexico-US migration. Journal of Human Resources 36, 159184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Li supplementary material

Li supplementary material

Download Li supplementary material(File)
File 95 KB