Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T12:57:00.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(110) facets and dislocation structure of low-angle grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7−δ and Y0.7Ca0.3Ba2Cu3O7−δ thin film bicrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Xueyan Song
Xueyan Song*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: xsong@wisc.edu
Get access

Abstract

The facet and dislocation structure of 5° and 7° [001]-tilt grain boundaries of YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO) and Y0.7Ca0.3Ba2Cu3O7−δ (YCaBCO) thin film bicrystals were studied. A 24° [001]-tilt YBCO grain boundary was also examined to contrast with the low angle grain boundary faceting behavior. All the low-angle grain boundaries exhibit strong faceting along (100)/(010) and (110) and possess both straight symmetric segments containing equally spaced [100] unit dislocations and step asymmetric segments composed of (110) and (100)/(010) facets. Grain boundaries with a higher degree of meander acquired up to 40% (110) facets. The atomic structure of (110) facets was revealed by the atomic resolution Z-contrast imaging. The (110) facets are dissociated for both the YBCO and YCaBCO grain boundaries. We also found the Ca-doped (110) facets to be more extended along the grain boundary plane, consistent with our earlier finding of a dissociated dislocation core in Ca-doped (100) facets. These 5° and 7° misorientations that we studied are just in the range at which YBCO grain boundaries start to become obstacles to current flow. The above results will be helpful for understanding the current transport across YBCO low-angle grain boundaries.

Keywords

Grain boundariesScanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , April 2007 , pp. 950 - 957
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Feldmann, D.M., Reeves, J.L., Polyanskii, A.A., Kozlowski, G., Biggers, R.R., Nekkanti, R.M., Maartense, I., Tomsic, M., Barnes, P., Oberly, C.E., Peterson, T.L., Babcock, S.E., and Larbalestier, D.C.: Influence of nickel substrate grain structure on YBa2Cu3O7−δ supercurrent connectivity in deformation-textured coated conductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2906 (2000).Google Scholar
2Verebelyi, D.T., Christen, D.K., Feenstra, R., Cantoni, C., Goyal, A., Lee, D.F., Paranthaman, M., Arendt, P.N., DePaula, R.F., Groves, J.R., and Prouteau, C.: Low angle grain boundary transport in YBa2Cu3O7−δ coated conductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1755 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Hilgenkamp, H. and Mannhart, J.: Grain boundaries in high-Tc superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 485 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Kim, S.I., Feldmann, D.M., Verebelyi, D.T., Thieme, C., Li, X., Polyanskii, A.A., and Larbalestier, D.C.: Influence of the grain boundary network on the critical current density of deformation-textured MOD YBa2Cu3O7−x coated conductors. Phys. Rev. B 71, 104501 (2005).Google Scholar
5Fernandez, L., Holzapfel, B., Schindler, F., de Boer, B., Attenberger, A., Hanisch, J., and Schultz, L.: Influence of the grain boundary network on the critical current of YBa2Cu3O7 films grown on biaxially textured metallic substrates. Phys. Rev. B 67, 052503 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Zhu, Y.M., Zuo, J.M., Moodenbaugh, A.R., and Suenaga, M.: Grain-boundary constraint and oxygen deficiency in YBa2Cu3O7−δ—Application of the coincidence site lattice model to a noncubic system. Philos. Mag. A 70, 969 (1994).Google Scholar
7Song, X., Daniels, G., Feldmann, D.M., Guriech, A., and Larbalestier, D.: Electromagnetic, atomic structure and chemistry changes induced by Ca-doping of low-angle YBa2Cu3O7−d grain boundaries. Nat. Mater. 4, 470 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Chisholm, M.F. and Pennycook, S.J.: Structural origin of reduced critical currents at YBa2Cu3O7−δ grain-boundaries. Nature 351, 47 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Browning, N.D., Buban, J.P., Nellist, P.D., Norton, D.P., Chisholm, M.F., and Pennycook, S.J.: The atomic origins of reduced critical currents at [001] tilt grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films. Physica C 294, 183 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Norton, M.G., Tietz, L.A., Summerfelt, S.R., and Carter, C.B.: Observation of the early stages of growth of superconducting thin films by transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 2348 (1989).Google Scholar
11Chang, C.C., Wu, X.D., Ramesh, R., Xi, X.X., Ravi, T.S., Venkatesan, T., Hwang, D.M., Muenchausen, R.E., Foltyn, S., and Nogar, N.S.: Origin of surface roughness for c-axis oriented Y–Ba–Cu–O superconducting films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1814 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Hawley, M., Raistrick, I.D., Beery, J.G., and Houlton, R.J.: Growth-mechanism of sputtered films of YBa2Cu3O7 studied by scanning tunneling microscopy. Science 251, 1587 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Miller, D.J., Roberts, T.A., Kang, J.H., Talvacchio, J., Buchholz, D.B., and Chang, R.P.H.: Meandering grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3Oy bi-crystal thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2561 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Alarco, A.J., Olsson, E., Ivanov, Z.G., Nilsson, P.A., Winkler, D., Stepantsov, E.A., and Tzalenchuk, A.Ya.: Microstructure of an artificial grain-boundary weak-link in an YBa2Cu3O7−delta thin-film grown on a (100)(110), [001]-tilt Y-ZrO2 bicrystal. Ultramicroscopy 51, 239 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Kabius, B., Seo, J.W., Amrein, T., Dahne, U., Scholen, A., Siegel, M., Urban, K., and Schults, L.: Grain-boundary structure of thin films of YBa2Cu3O7 and Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 on bicrystalline substrates. Physica C 231, 123 (1994).Google Scholar
16Hammerl, G., Schmehl, A., Schulz, R., Boetz, B., Bielefeldt, H., Schneider, C., Hilgenkamp, H., and Mannhart, J.: Enhanced supercurrent density in polycrystalline YBa2Cu3O7−δ at 77 K from calcium doping of grain boundaries. Nature 407, 162 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Daniels, G.A., Gurevich, A., and Larbalestier, D.C.: Improved strong magnetic field performance of low angle grain boundaries of calcium and oxygen overdoped YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3251 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Schmehl, A., Goetz, B., Schulz, R.R., Schneider, C.W., Bielefeldt, H., Hilgenkamp, H., and Mannhart, J.: Doping induced enhancement of the critical currents of grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Europhys. Lett. 47, 110 (1999).Google Scholar
19Guth, K., Krebs, H.U., Freyhardt, H.C., and Jooss, Ch.: Modification of transport properties in low-angle grain boundaries via calcium doping of YBa2Cu3Ox thin films. Phys. Rev. B 64, 140508 (2001).Google Scholar
20Weber, A., Hammerl, G., Schmehl, A., Schneider, C.W., and Mannhart, J.: Ca-doping-induced enhancement of the critical currents of coated conductors grown by ion-beam-assisted deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 772 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Kucera, J.T. and Bravman, J.C.: Transport characterization of calcium-doped YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films. Phys. Rev. B 51, 8582 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Böttger, G., Mangelschots, I., Kaldis, E., Fischer, P., Krüger, Ch., and Fauth, F.: The influence of Ca doping on the crystal structure and superconductivity of orthorhombic YBa2Cu3O7−δ. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8, 8889 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Schofield, M.A., Beleggia, M., Zhu, Y., Guth, K., and Jooss, C.: Direct evidence for negative grain boundary potential in Ca-doped and undoped YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 195502 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Mannhart, J. and Muller, D.A.: Catching dopants in action. Nat. Mater. 4, 431 (2005).Google Scholar
25Klie, R.F., Buban, J.P., Varela, M., Franceschetti, A., Jooss, C., Zhu, Y., Browning, N.D., Pantelides, S.T., and Pennycook, S.J.: Enhanced current transport at grain boundaries in high-Tc superconductors. Nature 435, 475 (2005).Google Scholar
26Kung, H., Hirth, J.P., Foltyn, S.R., Arednt, P.N., Jia, Q.X., and Maley, M.P.: A comparison of [001] low-angle tile grain boundaries of (100) and (110) grain boundary planes in YBa2Cu3O7−δ coated conductors. Physica C 357–360, 959 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Kirkland, E.J., Loane, R.F., and Silcox, J.: Simulation of annular dark field STEM images using a modified multislice method. Ultramicroscopy 23, 77 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Shibata, J., Oka, A., Izumi, T., Shiohara, Y., Hirayama, T., and Ikuhara, Y.: Influence of antiphase boundaries on critical current densities in YBa2Cu3O7−δ single crystals. J. Mater. Res. 16, 1935 (2001).Google Scholar
29Merkle, K.L.: High-resolution electron microscopy of interfaces in fcc materials. Ultramicroscopy 37, 130 (1991).Google Scholar
30Wen, J.G., Takagi, T., and Koshizuka, N.: Microstructural studies on YBCO film bicrystals with large single facet grain boundaries grown by liquid phase epitaxy. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 13, 820 (2000).Google Scholar
31Gao, Y., Merkle, K.L., Bai, G., Chang, H.L.M., and Lam, D.J.: [001] tilt grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7−x thin films. Ultramicroscopy 37, 326 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Tsu, I-F., Babcock, S.E., and Kaiser, D.L.: Faceting, dislocation network structure, and various scales of heterogeneity in a YBa2Cu3O7 low-angle [001] tilt boundary. J. Mater. Res. 11, 1383 (1996).Google Scholar
33Song, X. (unpublished).Google Scholar
34Kung, H., Hirth, J.P., Foltyn, S.R., Arendt, P.N., Jia, Q.X., and Maley, M.P.: Dissociation of grain boundary dislocations in YBa2Cu3O7−δ-coated conductors. Philos. Mag. Lett. 81, 85 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Hirth, J.P. and Lothe, J.: Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1982), p. 705.Google Scholar