Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T15:38:12.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ascocerid cephalopods from the Hirnantian?–Llandovery stages of the southern Paraná Basin (Paraguay, South America): first record from high paleolatitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

M. Cichowolski
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Área de Paleontología, Ciudad Universitaria, Pab. 2, C1428EGA, Buenos Aires, Argentina 〈mcicho@gl.fcen.uba.ar〉 CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Estudios Andinos “Don Pablo Groeber” (IDEAN), Buenos Aires, Argentina
N.J. Uriz
Affiliation:
División Geología del Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. 〈nuriz@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar〉, 〈malfaro@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar〉
M.B. Alfaro
Affiliation:
División Geología del Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. 〈nuriz@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar〉, 〈malfaro@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar〉
J.C. Galeano Inchausti
Affiliation:
Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Comunicaciones de Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay 〈galeanoijc@hotmail.com〉

Abstract

Ascocerid cephalopods are described for the first time from high paleolatitudes of Gondwana. Studied material was collected from the Hirnantian?–Llandovery strata of the Eusebio Ayala and Vargas Peña formations, Paraná Basin, southeastern Paraguay. The specimens are poorly preserved and were questionably assigned to the subfamily Probillingsitinae Flower, 1941, being undetermined at genus and species rank because diagnostic characters are not visible. A particular feature seen in our material is the presence of both parts of the ascocerid conch (the juvenile or cyrtocone and the mature or brevicone) joined together, which is a very rare condition in the known paleontological record. The specimens are interpreted as at a subadult stage of development because fully grown ascocerids would have lost the juvenile shell. A planktonic vertical migrant mode of life with a subvertical attitude is proposed for the juvenile, and a horizontal demersal nektonic mode for the adult form, as has been previously suggested. A subvertical orientation near the bottom is proposed for the subadult stage. We suggest that the immigration of ascocerids to southwestern Gondwana was possible through ocean currents that would carry the planktonic juveniles from low to high latitudes during the end-Ordovician postglacial transgression that flooded the intracratonic basins of the region.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aceñolaza, F.G., and Beresi, M.S, 2002, Ordovician nautiloids of Argentina, in Aceñolaza, F.G., ed., Aspects of the Ordovician System in Argentina: INSUGEO, Serie Correlación Geológica, v. 16, p. 107120.Google Scholar
Alfaro, M.B., Uriz, N.J., Cingolani, C.A., Bidone, A.R., and Galeano Inchausti, J.C., 2010, Hallazgo de la Biozona de Persculptograptus persculptus en la Formación Eusebio Ayala (Ordovícico Superior?–Llandovery), Paraguay Oriental: Décimo Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía y Séptimo Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología, La Plata, Argentina, 2010, Actas, p. 41.Google Scholar
Alfaro, M.B., Uriz, N.J., Cingolani, C.A., Tortello, F., Bidone, A.R., and Galeano Inchausti, J.C., 2013, Graptolites and trilobites from the Eusebio Ayala Formation (Hirnantian?–early Llandovery), Paraná Basin, eastern Paraguay: Geological Journal, v. 48, p. 236247.Google Scholar
Aubrechtová, M., and Meidla, T., 2016, The oldest ascocerid cephalopod from the Silurian of Estonia and notes on the biogeography of the Order Ascocerida (class Cephalopoda): Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 65, p. 98104.Google Scholar
Babcock, L.E., Gray, J., Boucot, A.J., Himes, G.T., and Siegele, P.K., 1990, First Silurian conularids from Paraguay: Journal of Paleontology, v. 64, p. 897902.Google Scholar
Baldis, B.A., and Hansen, H., 1980, Trilobites dalmanítidos de Paraguay Oriental: Segundo Congreso Argentino de Paleontología y Bioestratigrafía y Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1978, Actas, v. 1, p. 4967.Google Scholar
Barrande, J., 1867, Système silurien du centre de la Bohême 2, Céphalopodes, texte, pt. 1: Prague, Chez l’auteur, p. 1–712.Google Scholar
Barrande, J., 1877, Système silurien du centre de la Bohême, I.ère partie: Recherches Paléontologiques, v. 2, Classe de Mollusques, Ordre des Céphalopodes: Prague, Chez l’auteur, p. 743–505.Google Scholar
Benedetto, J.L., 2002, The Rhynchonellide brachiopod Eocoelia in the Llandovery of Paraguay, Paraná basin: Ameghiniana, v. 39, p. 307312.Google Scholar
Benedetto, J.L., Halpern, K., and Galeano Inchausti, J.C., 2013, High-latitude Hirnantian (latest Ordovician) brachiopods from the Eusebio Ayala Formation of Paraguay, Paraná Basin: Palaeontology, v. 56, p. 6178.Google Scholar
Boucot, A.J., and Racheboeuf, P.R., 1993, Biogeographic summary of the Malvinokaffric Realm Silurian and Devonian fossils, in Suarez-Soruco, R., ed., Fósiles y facies de Bolivia v. II. Invertebrados y Paleobotánica: Revista Técnica de YPFB, v. 13–14, p. 7175.Google Scholar
Boucot, A.J., de Melo, J.H., Santos Neto, E.V., and Wolff, S., 1991, First Clarkeia and Heterorthella (Brachiopoda; lower Silurian) occurrence from the Paraná Basin in Eastern Paraguay: Journal of Paleontology, v. 65, p. 312314.Google Scholar
Cecioni, G., 1953, Contribución al conocimiento de los nautiloideos Eo-Paleozoicos argentinos. Parte I: Protocycloceratidae–Cyclostomiceratidae: Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, v. 26, p. 57109.Google Scholar
Cecioni, G., 1965, Contribución al conocimiento de los nautiloideos Eo-Paleozoicos argentinos. Parte II: Robsonoceratidae, Ellesmeroceratidae, Proterocameroceratidae, Baltoceratidae: Boletín del Museo de Historia Natural, v. 29, p. 124.Google Scholar
Cichowolski, M., and Rustán, J.J., 2017, First report of Devonian bactritids (Cephalopoda) from South America: Paleogeographic and biostratigraphic implications: Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 417433.Google Scholar
Cichowolski, M., Rustán, J.J., and Uriz, N.J., 2018, Middle Palaeozoic cephalopods from southwestern Gondwana and their palaeobiogeographic meaning: Tenth International Symposium: Cephalopods —“Present and Past”—Fes, Morocco, 2018, Abstracts, p. 21.Google Scholar
Ciguel, J.H.G., Rosler, O., and Clerici, A.M.V.C., 1987, Skolithos verticalis e Skolithos ayalis, Formaçao Eusebio Ayala (Grupo Itacurubi, borda ocidental da Bacia do Paraná no Paraguai) e sua importancia no ambiente deposicional: Décimo Congreso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 1987, Anais, p. 253– 269.Google Scholar
Cingolani, C.A., Uriz, N.J., Alafaro, M.B., Tortello, F., Bidone, A.R., and Galeano Inchausti, J.C., 2011, The Hirnantian–early Llandovery transition sequence in the Paraná Basin, Eastern Paraguay, in Gutiérrez-Marco, J.C., Rábano, I., and García-Abellido, D, eds., Ordovician of the World: Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, v. 14, p. 103108.Google Scholar
Cocks, L.R.M., 2001, Ordovician and Silurian global geography: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 158, p. 197210.Google Scholar
Crick, R.E., 1988, Buoyancy regulation and macroevolution in nautiloid cephalopods: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 69, p. 1342.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G., 1797, Tableau élémentaire de l’histoire naturelle des animaux: Paris, Baudouin, 710 p.Google Scholar
Degraff, J.M., Franco, F., and Orué, D., 1981, Interpretación geofísica y geológica del valle de Ypacaraí (Paraguay) y su formación: Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, v. 36, p. 240256.Google Scholar
Dyck, M., 1991, Stratigraphie, Fauna, Sedimentologie und Tektonik im Ordoviziun und Silur von ost-Paraguay und vergleich mit den Argentinisch-Bolivianischen Anden [Ph.D. dissertation]: Hannover, Hannover University, 263 p.Google Scholar
Dzik, J., 1984, Phylogeny of the Nautiloidea: Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 45, 219 p.Google Scholar
Evans, D.H., 1993, The cephalopod fauna of the Killey Bridge Formation (Ordovician, Ashgill), Pomeroy, County Tyrone: Irish Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 12, p. 155189.Google Scholar
Figueredo, L., 1995, Descripción geológica del pozo RD 116 Santa Elena-Paraguay, in González Nuñez, M., Lahner, L., Cubas, N., and Adelaida, D., eds., Mapa Geológico de la República del Paraguay, Hoja Coronel Oviedo 5670 1:100.000: Cooperación Técnica BGR-MOPC, Asunción, 30 p.Google Scholar
Flower, R.H., 1941, Development of the Mixochoanites: Journal of Paleontology, v. 15, p. 523548.Google Scholar
Flower, R.H., 1962, Notes on the Michelinoceratida: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, State Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Memoir v. 10, p. 2140.Google Scholar
Flower, R.H., 1963, New Ordovician Ascoceratida: Journal of Paleontology, v. 37, p. 6985.Google Scholar
Foerste, A.F., 1928, Cephalopoda, in Twenhofel, W.H., ed., Geology of Anticosti Island: Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 154, p. 257321.Google Scholar
Furnish, W.M., and Glenister, B.F., 1964, Nautiloidea-Ascocerida, in Moore, R.C, ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part K, Mollusca 3: Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. K261K277.Google Scholar
Galeano Inchausti, J.C., and Poiré, D.G., 2006, Trazas fósiles de la Formación Eusebio Ayala (Silúrico inferior), Paraguay: Cuarto Congreso Latinoamericano de Sedimentología y Decimoprimera Reunión Argentina de Sedimentología, Bariloche, Argentina, 2006, Resúmenes, p. 103.Google Scholar
Godoy Ciguel, J.H., 1988, Tentaculites itacurubiensis n. sp. dos depósitos regressivos do Paraguai Oriental, Siluriano Inferior da Bacia do Paraná: Revista Brasileira de Geociencias, v. 18, p. 8892.Google Scholar
Harrington, H.J., 1950, Geología del Paraguay Oriental: Contribuciones Científicas, Serie E: Geología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Física y Naturales, Universidad Buenos Aires, v. 1, p. 9–80.Google Scholar
Harrington, H.J., 1972, Silurian of Paraguay, in Beery, W.B.N., and Boucot, A.J., eds., Correlation of South American Silurian rocks: Boulder, Geological Society of America Special Papers, v. 133, p. 4150.Google Scholar
Hewitt, R.A., and Watkins, R., 1980, Cephalopod ecology across a late Silutian shelf tract: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, v. 160, p. 96117.Google Scholar
Holland, C.H., 1999, The nautiloid cephalopod Order Ascocerida in the British Silurian: Palaeontology, v. 42, p. 683689.Google Scholar
Huxley, T.H., and Etheridge, R.A., eds., 1865, A Catalogue of the Collection of Fossils in the Museum of Practical Geology: London, G.E. Eyre and W. Spottiswoode, 381 p.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A., 1883–1884, Genera of fossil cephalopods: Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, v. 22, p. 253–338.Google Scholar
Kesling, R.V., 1961, A new species of Billingsites, an ascoceratid cephalopod, from the Upper Ordovician Ogontz Formation of Michigan: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, the University of Michigan, v. 17, p. 77121.Google Scholar
Kröger, B., 2003, The size of the siphuncle in cephalopod evolution: Senckenbergiana Lethaea, v. 83, p. 3952.Google Scholar
Kröger, B., 2007, Concentrations of juvenile and small adult cephalopods in the Hirnantian cherts (Late Ordovician) of Porkuni, Estonia: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, v. 52, p. 591608.Google Scholar
Kröger, B., 2008, Nautiloids before and during the origin of ammonoids in a Siluro-Devonian section of the Tafilalt, Anti-Atlas, Morocco: Special Papers in Palaeontology, v. 79, p. 5–110.Google Scholar
Kröger, B., 2013, The cephalopods of the Boda Limestone, Late Ordovician, of Dalarna, Sweden: European Journal of Taxonomy, v. 41, 110 p.Google Scholar
Kuhn, O., 1949, Lehrbuch der Palaozoologie: Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart, 326 p.Google Scholar
Lindström, G., 1890, The Ascoceratidae and the Lituitidae of the Upper Silurian Formation of Gotland: Kungliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, v. 23, p. 154.Google Scholar
Manda, Š., 2008, Palaeoecology and palaeogeographic relations of the Silurian phragmoceratids (Nautiloidea, Cephalopoda) of the Prague Basin (Bohemia): Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 83, p. 3962.Google Scholar
Manda, Š., and Frýda, J., 2010, Silurian–Devonian boundary events and their influence on cephalopod evolution: Evolutionary significance of cephalopod egg size during mass extinctions: Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 85, p. 513540.Google Scholar
Manda, Š., and Kříž, J., 2006, Environmental and biotic changes in subtropical isolated carbonate during the Silurian Koslowskii Event, Pague Basin: GFF, v. 128, p. 161168.Google Scholar
Milani, E.J., and de Wit, M.J., 2007, Correlations between classic Paraná and Cape-Karoo basins of South America and southern Africa and their basin infills flanking the Gondwanides: Du Toit revisited, in Pankhurst, R.J., Trouw, R.A.J., Brito Neves, B.B., and de Wit, M.J., eds., West Gondwana: Pre-Cenozoic correlations across the South Atlantic Region: Geological Society of London, Special Publication v. 294, p. 319342.Google Scholar
Miller, A.K., 1932, The mixochoanitic cephalopods: University of Iowa Studies, Studies in Natural History, v. 14, 67 p.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H., 2012, Siphuncular structure in Silurian discosorid and ascocerid nautiloids (Cephalopoda) from Gotland, Sweden: implications for interpretation of mode of life and phylogeny: GFF, v. 134, p. 2737.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H., 2013, Characterization of nautiloid orders Ellesmerocerida, Oncocerida, Tarphycerida, Discosorida and Ascocerida: New superorder Multiceratoidea: GFF, v. 135, p. 171183.Google Scholar
Mutvei, H., 2015, Characterization of two new superorders Nautilosiphonata and Calciosiphonata and a new order Cyrtocerinida of the subclass Nautiloidea: siphuncular structure in the Ordovician nautiloid Bathmoceras (Cephalopoda): GFF, v. 137, p. 164174.Google Scholar
Steemans, P., and Pereira, E., 2002, Llandovery miospore biostratigraphy and stratigraphic evolution of the Paraná Basin, Paraguay – Palaeogrographic implications: Bulletin de la Société Géologique de la France, v. 173, p. 407414.Google Scholar
Strand, T., 1933, The Upper Ordovician cephalopods of the Oslo area: Norsk Geologiske Tidsskrift, v. 14, 117 p.Google Scholar
Stridsberg, S., 1985, Silurian oncocerid cephalopods from Gotland: Fossils and Strata, v. 18, p. 165.Google Scholar
Sweet, W.C., 1958, The Middle Ordovician of the Oslo region of Norway. 10. Nautiloid cephalopods: Norsk Geologiske Tidsskrift, v. 31, 178 p.Google Scholar
Tortello, M.F., Uriz, N.J., Alfaro, M.B., Cingolani, C.A., Bidone, A.R., and Galeano Inchausti, J.C., 2012, Trilobites and graptolites from the Vargas Peña Formation (early Silurian), Paraná Basin, Eastern Paraguay: Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève, v. v. spec. 11, p. 279298.Google Scholar
Turek, V., and Manda, Š., 2012, “An endocochleate experiment” in the Silurian straight-shelled cephalopod Sphooceras : Bulletin of Geosciences, v. 87, p. 767813.Google Scholar
Uriz, N.J., Alfaro, M.B., and Galeano Inchausti, J.C., 2008, Silurian (Llandovery) monograptids from the Vargas Peña Formation (Paraná Basin, Eastern Paraguay): Geologica Acta, v. 6, p. 181190.Google Scholar
Westermann, G.E.D., 1999, Life habits of nautiloids, in Savazzi, E., ed., Functional Morphology of the Invertebrate Skeleton: Chichester, Wiley, p. 263298.Google Scholar
Wood, G.D., and Miller, M.A., 1991, Distinctive Silurian chitinozoans from the Itacurubi Group (Vargas Peña Shale), Chaco Basin, Paraguay: Palynology, v. 15, p. 181192.Google Scholar