Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T02:49:53.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Campanian rudists (Hippuritida, Bivalvia) from Costa Rica (Central America)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2016

Jose Maria Pons ,
Enric Vicens  and
Reinhard Schmidt-Effing
Jose Maria Pons
Affiliation:
Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain 〈josepmaria.pons@uab.cat〉, 〈enric.vicens@uab.cat〉
Enric Vicens
Affiliation:
Departament de Geologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain 〈josepmaria.pons@uab.cat〉, 〈enric.vicens@uab.cat〉
Reinhard Schmidt-Effing
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Geographie (Geologie-Paläontologie), Philipps-Universität, D-35032 Marburg, Germany, and Potsdamer Str. 8, D-35039 Marburg, Germany 〈schmidte@staff.uni-marburg.de〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Campanian rudist fauna identified from the localities Playa Panamá, Santa Rosa National Park, Colorado de Abangares, and Bolsón in Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica, is composed of the antillocaprinids Antillocaprina sp. aff. A. suboccidentalis Chubb, 1967, Antillocaprina sp. and Antillocaprinidae indet.; the multiple-fold hippuritids Barrettia monilifera Woodward, 1862, Parastroma trechmanni Chubb, 1967, and cf. Whitfieldiella gigas (Chubb, 1955); the plagioptychids Plagioptychus trechmanni Chubb, 1956, Plagioptychus sp. cf. P. zansi Chubb, 1956, Mitrocaprina costaricaensis new species, Mitrocaprina multicanaliculata Chubb, 1956, and Plagioptychidae indet.; and the radiolitids Radiolites sp. aff. R. multicostata (Adkins, 1930), Alencasterites new genus mooretownensis (Trechmann, 1924), Bournonia? tetrahedron (Chubb, 1967), Chiapasella sp., Guanacastea costaricaensis new genus new species, cf. Potosites sp. aff. P. tristantorresi Alencáster and Pons in Pons et al., 2010, and aff. Thyrastylon sp. Although some differences in rudist diversity and sedimentary setting were observed among localities, most species indicate the same age for all occurrences, which correspond to the Campanian, probably mid-Campanian. Radiolitid specimens appear better preserved than those of other taxa and are thus discussed more in detail. Both the number of radiolitid genera exclusively known from the New World, and reasonable doubts about the correct attribution of some New World species to Old World genera, indicate important differences between rudist faunas at both sides of the Atlantic (Mediterranean and American Tethys, respectively) during the Late Cretaceous.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 211 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W.S., 1930, New rudistids from the Texas and Mexican Cretaceous: The University of Texas Bulletin, no. 3001, p. 77–100, 122–133.Google Scholar
Alencáster, G., 1971, Rudistas del Cretácico Superior de Chiapas. Parte 1: Paleontología Mexicana, no. 34, 91 p., 24 pls.Google Scholar
Alvarado, G.E., Kussmaul, S., Chiesa, S., Gillot, P.-Y., Appel, H., Wörner, G., and Rundle, C., 1992, Resumen cronoestratigráfico de las rocas ígneas de Costa Rica, basado en dataciones radiométricas: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 6, no. 3, p. 151–168.Google Scholar
Bayle, E., 1878, Explication de la Carte Géologique de la France, 4, Atlas. Fossiles Principaux des Terrains: Imprimerie Nationale, Paris, 700 p.Google Scholar
Boehm, G., 1895, Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Kreide in den Südalpen. 1 Die Schiosi- und Calloneghe-Fauna: Palaeontographica, v. 41, p. 81–148.Google Scholar
Boissevain, H., and MacGillavry, H.J., 1932, Some remarks on Barrettia sparcilirata Whitfield and Chiapasella radiolitiformis (Trechmann): Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Proceedings of the Section of Sciences, v. 35, no. 10, p. 1303–1312.Google Scholar
Calvo, C., 1998, Kretazische Subduktionsprozesse in Südzentralamerika: Profil, no. 15, p. 1–161.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1955, A revision of Whitfield’s type specimens of the rudist mollusks from the Cretaceous of Jamaica, British West Indies: American Museum Novitates, no. 1713, p. 1–15.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1956a, Some rarer rudists from Jamaica, B. W. I.: Palaeontographica Americana, v. 4, no. 26, p. 1–30.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1956b, Thyrastylon, a new rudist genus from the Upper Cretaceous of Guatemala, the Antilles and Persia, with a discussion of the functions of rudist oscules and pillars: Palaeontographica Americana, v. 4, no. 26, p. 31–48.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1967, New rudists species from the Cretaceous rocks of Jamaica: The Journal of the Geological Society of Jamaica, v. 9, p. 24–31.Google Scholar
Chubb, L.J., 1971, Rudists of Jamaica: Paleontographica Americana, v. 7, no. 45, p. 161–257.Google Scholar
Dommelen, H. van, 1971, Ontogenetic, Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Studies of the American Species of Pseudovaccinites and of Torreites and the Multiple-fold Hippuritids [Ph. D. dissertation]: University of Amsterdam, 125 p.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1888, Études sur les Caprines: Bulletin de la Societé Géologique de France (3), v. 16, p. 699–730.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1894, Études sur les Rudistes. Révision des principales espèces d’Hippurites: Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France: Paléontologie, v. 4, p. 95–138, pls. 16–20. Mémoire 6.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1926, Quelques fossiles du Crétacé supérieur de Cuba: Bulletin de la Societé Géologique de France (4), v. 26, p. 127–138.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H., 1927, Nouveau rudistes du Crétacé de Cuba: Bulletin de la Societé Géologique de France (4), v. 27, p. 49–56.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1880–1887, Manuel de Conchyliologie et de Paléontologie Conchyliologique ou Histoire Naturelle des Mollusques Vivants et Fossiles, 3 volumes, 11 parts: Librairie F. Savy, Paris, 1369 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli, C., and Schmidt-Effing, R., 1977, Estratigrafía de la cubierta sedimentaria supra-ofiolítica cretácica de Costa Rica: Ciencia Tec., v. 1, no. 1, p. 87–96.Google Scholar
Gray, J.E., 1848, On the arrangement of the Brachiopoda: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 2, no. 2, p. 435–440.Google Scholar
Grubić, A., 2004, Revision of the rudists Subfamily Barrettinae Chubb: Bulletin de l’Académie Serbe des Sciences et des Arts, v. 128. Classe des Sciences Mathématiques et Naturelles. Sciences Naturelles, v. 42, p. 139–197.Google Scholar
Gursky, H.J., Gursky, M., Schmidt-Effing, R., and Wildberg, H., 1984, Karten zur Geologie von Nordwest-Costa Rica (Mittelamerika) mit Erläuterungen: Geologica et Palaeontologica, v. 18, p. 173–182.Google Scholar
Jaccard, S., Münster, M., Baumgartner, P.O., Baumgartner-Mora, C., and Denyer, P., 2001, Barra Honda (Upper Paleocene-Lower Eocene) and El Viejo (Campanian-Maastrichtian) carbonate platforms in the Tempisque area (Guanacaste, Costa Rica): Revista Geológica de América Central, v. 24, p. 9–28.Google Scholar
Jung, P., 1970, Torreites sanchezi (Douvillé) from Jamaica: Palaeontographica Americana, v. 7, p. 1–13.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B., 1801, Système des Animaux sans Vertèbres ou Tableau Général des Classes, des Ordres et des Genres de ces Animaux: Leroux, Paris, 432 p.Google Scholar
Mac Gillavry, H.J., 1937, Geology of the Province of Camaguey, Cuba, with revisional studies in rudist Paleontology [Ph. D. dissertation]: University of Utrecht, 168 p.Google Scholar
Matheron, P., 1842, Catalogue méthodique et descriptif des Corps organisés fossiles du département des Bouches-du-Rhône et lieux circunvoisins; précedé d’un Mémoire sur les terrains supérieurs au grès bigarré du S.E. de la France: Répertoire des travaux de la Société de Statistique de Marseille, v. 6, p. 81–341, +10 plates.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., 2003, Morphology, microstructure and stratigraphy of some Late Cretaceous radiolitid rudists from Jamaica: Geologia Croatica, v. 56, p. 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., 2010a, Morphology, taxonomy and lifestyle of the Maastrichtian rudist bivalve Thyrastylon: Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 19, p. 635–642.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., 2010b, Revision of three large species of Barrettia from Jamaica: Caribbean Journal of Earth Science, v. 41, p. 1–16.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., 2013, Revision of the Antillocaprinidae Mac Gillavry (Hippuritida, Bivalvia) and their position within the Caprinoidea d’Orbigny: Geobios, v. 46, p. 423–446.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., and Gunter, G.C., 2002, Biostratigraphy and taxonomy of the rudist Chiapasella in the Titanosarcolites Limestones (Maastrichtian) of Jamaica: Cretaceous Research, v. 23, p. 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., and Gunter, G.C., 2004, First record of the rudist bivalve Mitrocaprina tschoppi (Palmer) from the Maastrichtian of Jamaica: Caribbean Journal of Science, v. 40, p. 392–396.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., and Gunter, G.C., 2006, New tube-bearing antillocaprinid rudist bivalves from the Maastrichtian of Jamaica: Palaeontology, v. 49, p. 35–57.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., and Pons, J.M., 2010, Systematic and biostratigraphic significance of the American rudist bivalve Durania aguilae Adkins, 1930: Journal of Paleontology, v. 84, p. 554–555.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., and Ramsook, R., 2009, Rudist bivalve assemblages from the Back Rio Grande Formation (Campanian, Cretaceous) of Jamaica and their stratigraphical significance: Cretaceous Research, v. 30, p. 307–321.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S.F., Gunter, G.C., and Ramsook, R., 2007, Paleoecology of the Maastrichtian rudist Biradiolites in Jamaica. in R.W. Scott (ed.), Cretaceous Rudists and Carbonate Platforms: Environmental Feedback. SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) Special Publication, 87:81–94.Google Scholar
Moulins, C. des, 1826, Essai sur les Sphérulites qui existent dans les collections de Mm. F. Jouanet et Ch. Des Moulins et considérations sur la famille à laquelle ces fossiles appartiennent: Bulletin d’Histoire Naturelle de la Société Linéenne de Bordeaux, v. 1, p. 148–303.Google Scholar
Müllerried, F.K., 1931, Chiapasella, un paquiodonto extrañísimo de la América: Anales del Instituto de Biologia UNAM, v. 2, p. 243–254.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d’, 1840, Note sur le genre Caprine: Revue Zoologique de la Société Cuvierienne, v. 1839, p. 168–170.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. d’, 1847, Sur les Brachiopodes ou Palliobranches (deuxième Mémoire): Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, v. 25, p. 266–269.Google Scholar
Oviedo, A., 2005, Rudistas del Cretácico superior del centro al sureste de México (Recuento sistemático de rudistas americanos) [Ph. D. Dissertation]: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 113 p. <http://www.tdx.cat/TDX-0620106-232433>..>Google Scholar
Oviedo, A., Pons, J.M., Pichardo-Barrón, Y., Aguilar-Pérez, J., and Alencáster, G., 2007, Stratigraphical distribution of the hippuritid rudists in the Upper Cretaceous of central Mexico. p. 309–313 in Díaz-Martínez, E., and Rábano, I., eds., 4th European Meeting on the Palaeontology and Stratigraphy of Latin America: Cuadernos del Museo Geominero No. 8. Madrid, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.H., 1933, Nuevos Rudistas de Cuba: Revista de Agricultura, Comercio y Trabajo, v. 14, no. 15–16, p. 92–125.Google Scholar
Parona, C.F., 1901, Le Rudiste e le Camacee di S. Polo Matese raccolte da Francesco Bassani: Memorie della Accademia Reale delle Scienze di Torino, v. 50, p. 197–214.Google Scholar
Pons, J.M., and Vicens, E., 2008, The structure of the outer shell layer in radiolitid rudists, a morphoconstructional approach: Lethaia, v. 41, p. 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, J.M., Vicens, E., Pichardo, Y., Aguilar, J., Oviedo, A., Alencáster, G., and García-Barrera, P., 2010, A new early Campanian rudist fauna from San Luis Potosí in Mexico and its taxonomic and stratigraphic significance: Journal of Paleontology, v. 84, p. 974–995.Google Scholar
Pons, J.M., Vicens, E., Oviedo, A., Aguilar, J., García-Barrera, P., and Alencáster, G., 2013, The rudist fauna of the Cárdenas Formation, Maastrichtian, San Luis Potosí State, Mexico: Journal of Paleontology, v. 87, p. 726–754.Google Scholar
Riding, R., 2002, Structure and composition of organic reefs and carbonate mud mounds: concepts and categories: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 58, p. 163–231.Google Scholar
Rutten, M.G., 1936, Rudistids from the Cretaceous of northern Santa Clara province, Cuba: Journal of Paleontology, v. 10, p. 134–142.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Roig, M., 1929, La fauna cretácica de la región central de Cuba: Memorias de la Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural ‘Felipe Poey’, v. 7, p. 83–102.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Effing, R., 1975, El primer hallazgo de ammonites en América Central Meridional y notas sobre las facies cretácicas en dicha región: Instituto Geográfico Nacional de Costa Rica (Informe Semestral de Enero-Junio 1974), p. 53–61.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Effing, R., 1979, Alter und Genese des Nicoya-Komplexes. Einer ozeanischen Paläokruste (Oberjura bis Eozän) im südlichen Zentralamerika: Geologische Rundschau, v. 68, no. 2, p. 457–494.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Effing, R., 1980, Rasgos fundamentales de la historia del Complejo de Nicoya (América Central Meridional): Brenesia, v. 18, p. 231–252.Google Scholar
Stephenson, L.W., 1922, Some Upper Cretaceous shells of the rudistid group from Tamaulipas, Mexico: Proceedings U.S. Natural Museum, v. 61, p. 1–28.Google Scholar
Steuber, T., 2002, A Palaeontological database of rudist bivalves. Taxonomic Database. <http://www.paleotax.de/rudists/index.htm>..>Google Scholar
Stibane, F.R., Schmidt-Effing, R., and Madrigal, R., 1977, Zur stratigraphisch-tektonischen Entwicklung der Halbinsel Nicoya (Costa Rica) in der Zeit der Ober-Kreide bis Unter-Tertiär: Giessener Geologische Schriften, v. 12 (Festtschrift R. Weyl), p. 315–358.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C.T., 1922, The Barrettia beds of Jamaica: Geological Magazine, v. 59, p. 501–514.Google Scholar
Trechmann, C.T., 1924, The Cretaceous Limestones of Jamaica and their Mollusca: Geological Magazine, v. 61, p. 385–410.Google Scholar
Valerio, A.L., 2001, Fauna de rudistas de Playa Panamá, provincia de Guanacaste, Costa Rica: Brenesia, v. 55–56, p. 149–152.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R.P., 1897a, Descriptions of species of Rudistae from the Cretaceous rocks of Jamaica: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 9, p. 185–196.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R.P., 1897b, Observations on the genus Barrettia Woodward, with descriptions of two new species: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 9, p. 233–246.Google Scholar
Woodward, S.P., 1862, Some account of Barrettia, a new and remarkable fossil shell from the Hippurite limestone of Jamaica: The Geologist, October, 1862, p. 1–8, 2 pls.Google Scholar