Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T16:17:30.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Falsolikanella campanensis (Azéma and Jaffrezo, 1972) Granier, 1987 revisited on type material, evidence of polyphysacean nature (green algae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Filippo Barattolo
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra dell'Ambiente e delle Risorse, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II,” Complesso universitario di Monte Sant'Angelo, via Cintia, 21 - 80126 Napoli, Italy
Nicola Carras
Affiliation:
I.G.M.E., Spirou Loui 1, Olympic Village, Acharnes, Greece
Marc André Conrad
Affiliation:
Chemin de Planta 71–1223 Cologny, Switzerland
Rajka Radoičić
Affiliation:
Kralja Petra 38, 11158 Stari Grad, Beograd, Serbia

Abstract

The genus Falsolikanella, introduced by Granier (1987), was based on the basal Cretaceous species Likanella campanensis Azéma and Jaffrezo (1972) and assigned to the tribe Diploporeae (Pia, 1920) emend. Güvenc, 1979 within the green alga order Dasycladales. Later, other species were assigned to Falsolikanella. Sections of the type specimens of Likanella campanensis are reviewed. They show that in this species, the arrangement of the laterals is not metaspondyl, but typical of the genus Actinoporella (Gümbel in Alth, 1882) emend Conrad, Praturlon, and Radoičić, 1974, with coronae arising from a single primary lateral. Therefore, the species is assigned to the genus Actinoporella within the tribe Acetabularieae Decaisne, 1842, family Polyphysaceae Kützing, 1843, and the generic attribution of other species previously assigned to Falsolikanella is discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alth, A. von, 1878, O Galicyjskich gatunkach skamienialych otwornic rodzaju Gyroporella Gümb: Rosprawy i Sprawozdania z Posiedzen Wydzialu Matematyczno-Przyrodniczego Akademii Umiejetrosciw Krakowie, v. 5, p. 71112.Google Scholar
Alth, A. von, 1881, Wapień Niźniowski i jego skamieliny: Rozprawy i Sprawozdania z Posiedzen Wydzialu Matematyczno-Przyrodniczego, III Akademii Umiejetnosciw Krakowie, v. 6, 160 p.Google Scholar
Alth, A. von, 1882, Die Versteinerungen des Niźniower Kalksteines: Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, v. 1, p. 183332.Google Scholar
Azéma, J., and Jaffrezo, M., 1972, Description de Likanella n. sp. algue dasycladacée du Portlandien ou du Berriasien du Puig Campana (Province d'Alicante, Espagne): Revista Española de Micropaleontologia, numero extraordinario XXX Aniversario E.N. Adaro, p. 125129.Google Scholar
Barattolo, F., 1978, Su di una nuova dasicladacea (alghe verdi) nel Paleocene dell'Appennino meridionale: Bollettino della Società dei Naturalisti in Napoli, v. 87, p. 83157.Google Scholar
Barattolo, F., 1983, Osservazioni su Triploporella steinmannii n. sp. (alghe verdi, Dasicladali) del Cretacico del Messico: Bollettino della Società dei Naturalisti in Napoli, v. 91, p. 89123.Google Scholar
Barattolo, F., 1998, Dasycladacean green algae and microproblematica of the uppermost Cretaceous–Paleocene in the Karst area (NE Italy and Slovenia): Dela-Opera SAZU 4 razr., v. 34, p. 65127.Google Scholar
Barattolo, F., and Carras, N., 1990, Pseudoclypeina distomensis n. sp. (green algae, Dasycladales) from the Malm of Greece: Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, v. 29, p. 145162.Google Scholar
Barattolo, F., De Castro, P., and Radoičić, R., 1988, Notes on the genus Selliporella Sartoni & Crescenti 1963 (Chlorophyta, Dasycladales): Società Geologica Italiana - Atti del 74° Congresso Nazionale. Sorrento, Italy, Società Geologica Italiana, p. A35–A38.Google Scholar
Bassoullet, J.P., Bernier, P., Conrad, M.A., Deloffre, R., and Jaffrezo, M., 1978, Les algues Dasycladales du Jurassique et du Crétacé. Révision critique: Geobios, mémoire spécial 2, p. 1–330.Google Scholar
Bassoullet, J.P., Bernier, P., Deloffre, R., Génot, P., Jaffrezo, M., and Vachard, D., 1979, Essai de classification des Dasycladales en tribus: Bulletin Centre de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, v. 3, p. 429442.Google Scholar
Berger, S., and Kaever, M., 1992, Dasycladales. An Illustrated Monograph of a Fascinating Algal Order: Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, 247 p.Google Scholar
Berger, S., Fettweiss, U., Gleissberg, S., Liddle, L., Richter, U., Sawitzky, H., and Zuccarello, G., 2003, 18S rDNA phylogeny and evolution of cap development in Polyphysaceae (formerly Acetabulariaceae; Dasycladales, Chlorophyta): Phycologia, v. 42, p. 506561.Google Scholar
Brown, R., 1819, Fucus Peniculus, in Turner, D., Fuci or Coloured Figures and Descriptions of the Plants Referred by Botanists to the Genus Fucus, Volume 4: London, McCreery, 153 p.Google Scholar
Bucur, I.I., 1981, Algues calcaires du Crétacé inférieur des Monts Padurea Craiului: Nymphaea - Folia naturae Bihariae, v. 8–9, p. 5368.Google Scholar
Bucur, I.I., 1992, Revised description of some dasyclad species from the Romanian Lower Cretaceous: Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 11, p. 447461.Google Scholar
Bucur, I.I., 1999, Lower Cretaceous dasyclad algae from the Padurea Craiului Massif (Northern Apuseni Mountains, Romania): Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 2, p. 5372.Google Scholar
Bucur, I.I., Koch, R., Kirmaci, Z.M., and Tatli, K., 2000, Les algues Dasycladales du Crétacé inférieur (Calcaire de Berdiga) de Kircaova (région de Kale-Gümüshane, NE Turquie): Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 19, p. 435463.Google Scholar
Bucur, I.I., Rashidi, K., and Senowbari-Daryan, B., 2012, Early Cretaceous calcareous algae from Central Iran (Taft formation, south of Aliabad, near Yazd): Facies, v. 58, p. 605636.Google Scholar
Canérot, J., 1979, Les algues et leur environment dans le Malm et le Crétacé inférieur des chaînes ibériques et catalanes (Espagne): Bulletin du Centre Recherches Exploration-Production Elf Aquitaine, v. 3, p. 505518.Google Scholar
Conrad, M.A., 1970, Barremian and lower Aptian Dasycladaceae in the area surrounding Geneva (Switzerland): Geologica Romana, v. 9, p. 63100.Google Scholar
Conrad, M.A., 1977, The Lower Cretaceous calcareous algae in the area surrounding Geneva (Switzerland): Biostratigraphy and depositional environments, in Flügel, E., ed., Fossil Algae: Recent Results and Developments: Berlin, Springer-Verlag, p. 295300.Google Scholar
Conrad, M.A., and Peybernés, B., 1976, Hauterivian Albian Dasycladaceae from the Urgonian limestones in the French and Spanish eastern Pyrenees: Geologica Romana, v. 15, p. 175197.Google Scholar
Conrad, M.A., and Peybernès, B., 1978, Sur quelques Dasycladales de l'Urgo-Aptien du Prébalkan bulgare: Compte Rendu des Séances de la Société de Physique et d'Histoire naturelle de Genève, nouvelle série, v. 12, p. 6983.Google Scholar
Conrad, M.A., Praturlon, A., and Radoičić, R., 1974, The Genus Actinoporella Guembel in Alth 1882, Dasycladales, green algae. A revision: Geologica Romana, v. 13, p. 115.Google Scholar
Decaisne, J., 1842, Essais sur une classification des algues et des polypiers calcifères de Lamouroux: Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, seconde série, v. 17, p. 297380.Google Scholar
De Castro, P., 1997, Introduzione allo studio in sezione sottile delle dasicladali fossili: Quaderni dell'Accademia Pontaniana, v. 22, 261 p.Google Scholar
Deloffre, R., 1988, Nouvelle taxonomie des Algues Dasycladales [New taxonomy of Dasycladale Algae]: Bulletin du Centre Recherches Exploration-Production Elf Aquitaine, v. 12, p. 165217.Google Scholar
Dumais, J., and Harrison, L.G., 2000, Whorl morphogenesis in the dasycladalean algae: The pattern formation viewpoint: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, series B, v. 355, p. 281305.Google Scholar
Elliott, G.F., 1968, Permian to Paleocene calcareous algae (Dasycladaceae) of the Middle East: Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology), Supplement 4, 111 p.Google Scholar
Elliott, G.F., 1977. A consideration of the tribe Thyrsoporelleae, dasyclad algae: Palaeontology, v. 20, p. 705714.Google Scholar
Emberger, J., 1955, Les Clypeines (Algues siphonees verticillees) des Monts Oulad Nail (Atlas saharien, Algerie): Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, v. 5, p. 543552.Google Scholar
Emberger, J., 1956, Les Clypéines (Algues siphonées verticillées) des Monts des Oulad-Naïl, Atlas saharien, Algérie : Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, v. 5, p. 543552.Google Scholar
Farinacci, A., and Radoičić, R., 1991, Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Dasycladales (green algae) from Western Pontides, Turkey, in Farinacci, A., Ager, D.V., and Nicosia, U., eds., Geology and Paleontology of Western Pontides, Turkey: Geologica Romana, v. 27, p. 135165.Google Scholar
Favre, J., and Richard, A., 1927, Etude du Jurassique supérieur de Pierre-Châtel et de la Cluse de la Balme: Mémoires de la Société paléontologique suisse, v. 46, p. 138.Google Scholar
Fourcade, E., Jerez, L., Rodriguez, T., and Jaffrezo, M., 1972, El Jurasico terminal y el Cretacico inferior de la Sierra de la Muela (Provincia de Murcia). Consideraciones sobre las biozonas con foraminiferos del Albense-Aptense del Sureste de Espana: Revista Española de Micropaleontologia, num. extraord., XXX Aniversario E.N. Adaro, p. 215–248.Google Scholar
Génot, P., Saint-Martin, J.-P., and Bucur, I.I., 2008, Polyphysaceae fertile caps in Hungarian Sarmatian sediments: Geologia Croatica, v. 61, p. 341344.Google Scholar
Granier, B., 1987, Révision de Likanella campanensis Azema et Jaffrezo, 1972 algue dasycladacée du Crétacé inférieur du sud-est de l'Espagne: Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 6, p. 207212.Google Scholar
Granier, B., 1988, Algues chlorophyceae du Jurassique terminal et du Crétacé inférieur en Alicante: Mediterránea: Serie de Estudios Geológicos, v. 5, p. 596.Google Scholar
Granier, B., 1992, Les Algues et Foraminifères benthiques du Jurassique supérieur et du Crétacé inférieur du Sénégal: Journal of African Earth Sciences, v. 14, p. 239253.Google Scholar
Granier, B., 1994, The genus Actinoporella (Gümbel in Alth, 1881) and its representatives. A review: Beiträge zur Paläontologie, v. 19, p. 113127.Google Scholar
Granier, B., and Berthou, P.Y., 1994, Description de Milanovicella momciliana n. gen. n. sp., algue Dasycladale du Portlandien de l'Algarve central (Portugal), et validation de quelques taxons affins: Revue de Micropaléontologie, v. 37, p. 113121.Google Scholar
Granier, B., and Brun, R., 1991, Cylindoporella cruciformis et Holosporella arabica, deux Dasycladacées nouvelles du Groupe Thamama, (?Portlandien-) Berriasien-Aptien d'Abu Dhabi, Emirats Arabes Unis: Cretaceous Research, v. 12, p. 403410.Google Scholar
Granier, B., and Deloffre, R., 1993, Inventaire critique des algues Dasycladales fossiles - II partie - Les algues Dasycladales du Jurassique et du Crétacé: Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 12, p. 1965.Google Scholar
Granier, B., Bucur, I.I., and Trabold, G., 1999, Falsolikanella danilovae Radoicic ex Barattolo 1978, n. comb., a diploporacean alga from the Urgonian facies: Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 2, p. 177181.Google Scholar
Granier, B., Clavel, B., Charollais, J., and Weidmann, M., 2014, Latest Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Dasycladalean Algae (Chlorophyta) from the Morand drilling at Montricher (Canton of Vaud, Switzerland): Acta Palaeontologica Romaniae, v. 10, p. 2538.Google Scholar
Gümbel, C.W., 1882, Genus Actinoporella, in Alth A.v., Die Versteinerungen des Niźniower Kalksteines: Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, I, p. 321322.Google Scholar
Harvey, W.H., 1859, Characters of new algae, chiefly from Japan and adjacent regions, collected by Charles Wright in the North Pacific Exploring Expedition under Captain John Rodgers: Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, v. 4, p. 327335.Google Scholar
Howe, M.A., 1909, Phycological studies-IV. The genus Neomeris and notes on other Siphonales: Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, v. 36, p. 75104.Google Scholar
Jaffrezo, M., 1974, Les algues calcaires du Jurassique supérieur et du Crétacé inférieur des Corbières (2ème partie): Revue de Micropaléontologie, v. 17, p. 2332.Google Scholar
Kützing, F.T., 1843, Phycologia Generalis oder Anatomie, Physiologie und Systemkunde der Tange: Leipzig, F.A. Brockhaus, 458 p.Google Scholar
Kützing, F.T., 1863, Diagnosen und Bemerkungen zu drei und siebenzig neun Algenspecies. Zu der öffentlichen Prüfung sämmtlicher Klassen der Realschule zu Nordhausen: Nordhausen, Realschule zu Nordhausen, p. 119.Google Scholar
Lamouroux, J.V., 1816, Histoire des Polypiers Coralligènes Flexibles, Vulgairement Nommés Zoophytes: Caën, F. Poisson, 635 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758, Systema Naturae (tenth edition), Volume 1: Holmiae, Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lorenz, T., 1902, Geologische Studien im Grenzgebiete zwischen helvetischer und ostalpiner Facies: Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg im Breisgau, v. 12, p. 3462.Google Scholar
Maslov, V.P., 1958, New findings of Dasycladaceae in Jurassic of Krym: Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, v. 121, p. 354357.Google Scholar
Masse, J.P., 1993a, Valanginian–Early Aptian Carbonate Platforms from Provence, Southeastern France, in Toni Simo, J.A., Scott, R.W., and Masse, J.P., Cretaceous Carbonate Platforms: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, v. 56, p. 363374.Google Scholar
Masse, J.P., 1993b, Early Cretaceous Dasycladales biostratigraphy from Provence and adjacent regions (South of France, Switzerland, Spain). A reference for Mesogean correlations, in Barattolo, F., De Castro, P., and Parente, M., eds., Studies on Fossil Benthic Algae: Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, spec. vol. 1, p. 311324.Google Scholar
Michelin, H., 1840, Iconographie zoophytologique. Description par localités et terrains des Polypiers fossiles de France et pays environnants: Paris, P. Bertrand, 348 p.Google Scholar
Milanovic, M., 1966, Likanella, a new Permian genus of the family Dasycladaceae: Geoloski vjesnik, v. 19, p. 914.Google Scholar
Pascher, A., 1931, Systematische Übersicht über die mit Flagellaten in Zusammenhang stehenden Algenreihen und Versuch einer Einreihung dieser Algenstämme in die Stämme des Pflanzenreiches: Beihefte zum Botanischen Centralblatt, v. 48, p. 317332.Google Scholar
Peybernès, B., 1979, Les Algues du Jurassique et du Crétacé inférieur des Pyrénées Franco-Espagnoles. Intérêt biostratigraphique et paléoécologique, in 2ème Symposium International sur les Algues Fossiles. Paris, 23–26 avril 1979: Bulletin du Centre de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine, v. 3, p. 733741.Google Scholar
Pia, J., 1917, Familie: Dasycladaceae (Endl.) Cram. em., in Trauth, F., ed., Das Eozänvorkommen bei Radstat im Pongau und seine Beziehungen zu den gleichalterigen Ablagerungen bei Kirchberg am Wechsel und Wimpassing am Leithagebirge: Denkschriften der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, v. 95, p. 209213.Google Scholar
Pia, J., 1920, Die Siphoneae verticillatae vom Karbon bis zur Kreide. Abhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, v. 11, p. 3263.Google Scholar
Praturlon, A., 1964, Calcareous algae from Jurassic–Cretaceous limestones of Central Apennines (Southern Latium - Abruzzi): Geologica Romana, v. 3, p. 171202.Google Scholar
Radoičić, R., 1969, Likanella? danilovae n. sp. and some other Lower Cretaceous Dasycladaceae from the outer Dinarides: Vestnik Zavod za Geološka i Geofizička Istraživanja, (A) 26, p. 176194, 237–275.Google Scholar
Radoičić, R., 1974, A new Palaeocene Actinoporella (Dasycladaceae) (A preliminary report): Bulletin Scientifique du Conseille de l'Academie des Sciences RSF de Yougoslavie, Section A Sciences Naturelles, Techniques et Médicales v. 19, p. 230231.Google Scholar
Radoičić, R., 1975, Likanella hammudai sp. nov. from the Upper Cretaceous of Tripoli area (Libya) and the age of strata containing Dissocladella undulata Raineri: Annales Géologiques de la Péninsule Balkanique, v. 39, p. 147152.Google Scholar
Radoičić, R., 1978, O rasprostranjenju dazikladacea u donjoj kredi Kurilova, Istočna Srbija [On distribution of dasycladacea in the Lower Cretaceous of Kurilovo, Eastern Serbia]: Bulletin du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgrade, v. 33, série A, p. 183197.Google Scholar
Radoičić, R., 1986, O jednoj novoj klipeini i nekim drugim dazikladaceama iz Jure i Krede Crne Gore [On a new Clypeina and some other dasyclads from the Jurassic and the Cretaceous of Montenegro]: Geoloski Glasnik - Bulletin Géologique, v. 10, p. 5365.Google Scholar
Radoičić, R., 1995, On the age of limestones with Actinoporella kukoci Radoičić, 1975 and Praturlonella salernitana Barattolo, 1978 (Dasycladacean algae): Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 14, p. 95105.Google Scholar
Radoičić, R., Jurkovšek, B., and Jovanović, D., 2011, Clypeina teakolarae sp. nov., a dasycladalean alga from the lower Eocene of Rakitovec (Čičarija, Slovenia): Geologija, v. 54, p. 1330.Google Scholar
Raviv, V., and Lorch, J., 1970, Verticilloporella, a new Mesozoic genus of Dasycladaceae, with discussion on Munieria and Actinoporella: Israel Journal of Botany, v. 19, p. 225235.Google Scholar
Raviv, V., and Lorch, J., 1992, Mesozoic Dasycladaceae (Chlorophyceae) from Israel: Israel Journal of Botany, v. 41, p. 154.Google Scholar
Sartoni, S., and Crescenti, U., 1963, Ricerche biostratigrafiche nel Mesozoico dell'Appennino meridionale: Giornale di Geologia, v. 29, p. 153302.Google Scholar
Schafhäutl, K.E., 1853, Beiträge zur näheren Kenntnis der Bayern'schen Voralpen: Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, v. 1853, p. 299319.Google Scholar
Schafhäutl, K.E., 1863, Süd-Bayerns Lethaea Geognostica. Der Kressenberg und die südlich von ihm gelegenen Hochalpen geognostisch betrachtet in ihren Petrefacten: Leipzig, Voss, 504 p.Google Scholar
Schindler, U., and Conrad, M.A., 1994, The Lower Cretaceous Dasycladales from the Northwestern Friuli Platform and their distribution in chronostratigraphic and cyclostratigraphic units: Revue de Paléobiologie, v. 13, p. 5996.Google Scholar
Silva, P.C., 1952, A review of nomenclatural conservation in the algae from the point of view of the type method: University of California Publications in Botany, v. 25, p. 241323.Google Scholar
Simmons, M.D., Emery, D., and Pickard, N.A.H., 1991, Hensonella dinarica, an originally calcitic Early Cretaceous dasycladacean alga: Palaeontology (London), v. 34, p. 955961.Google Scholar
Sokač, B., and Velić, I., 1978a, Biostratigraphic investigations of the Lower Cretaceous of the Outer Dinarides I. The Neocomian of western Istria: Geoloski vjesnik, v. 30, p. 243250.Google Scholar
Sokač, B., and Velić, I., 1978b, Redescription of the genus Selliporella (Calcareous algae; Dasycladaceae): Geoloski vjesnik, v. 30, p. 225242.Google Scholar
Sokač, B., and Velić, I., 1981, Humiella teutae n. gen. n. sp. (Dasycladaceae) from the Neocomian of Southern Herzegovina: Geoloski Vjesnik, v. 33, p. 101105.Google Scholar
Sokač, B., Velić, I., Grgasović, T., Ćosović, V., and Vlahović, I., 2012, Taxonomy and stratigraphy of an algal assemblage in Palaeogene deposits of the northern foothills of Mt. Biokovo (Southern Croatia): Geologia Croatica, v. 65, p. 161205.Google Scholar
Solms-Laubach, H. Graf Zu, 1895, Monograph of the Acetabularieae: Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, series 2, Botany, v. 5, p. 139.Google Scholar
Soták, J., and Mišik, M., 1993, Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous dasycladacean algae from the Western Carpathians, in Barattolo, F., De Castro, P., and Parente, M., eds., Studies on Fossil Benthic Algae: Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, special volume 1, p. 383404.Google Scholar
Valet, G., 1968, Contribution à l'étude des Dasycladales. 1. Morphogenèse: Nova Hedwigia, v. 16, p. 2182.Google Scholar
Valet, G., 1969, Contribution à l’étude des Dasycladales. 2 - Cytologie et reproduction, 3 - Révision systématique: Nova Hedwigia, v. 17, p. 551644.Google Scholar
Yamada, Y., 1934, The marine Chlorophyceae from Ryukyu, especially from the vicinity of Nawa: Journal of the Faculty of Sciences, Hokkaido Imperial University, series 5, Botany, v. 3, p. 3388.Google Scholar