Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T08:27:39.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Permian ammonoid cephalopod Cyclolobus from Western Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Brian F. Glenister ,
Cathy Baker ,
W. M. Furnish  and
J. M. Dickins
Brian F. Glenister
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
Cathy Baker
Affiliation:
2Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Simpson College, Indianola, Iowa 50125
W. M. Furnish
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
J. M. Dickins
Affiliation:
3Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A single specimen of Cyclolobus persulcatus Rothpletz (1892), a species interpreted as a primitive member of the genus, is described from the Cherrabun Member of the Hardman Formation, Liveringa Group, Canning Basin, Western Australia. It is the youngest Permian ammonoid known from Australia. Type and other representatives of C. persulcatus from Indonesia (Timor) are part of the “Amarassi fauna,” which is considered post-Guadalupian. Cyclolobus is sporadically abundant and widely distributed in the Dzhulfian Stage, and probably extends into the overlying Dorashamian Stage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 399 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archbold, N. W. 1989. Studies on Western Australian Permian brachiopods. Part 8, The Late Permian brachiopod fauna of the Kirkby Range Member, Canning Basin. Proceedings, Royal Society of Victoria, 100:33–38.Google Scholar
Audley-Charles, M. G. 1965. A Miocene gravity slide deposit from eastern Timor. Geological Magazine, 102:267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bando, Y. 1979. Upper Permian and Lower Triassic ammonoids from Abadeh, Central Iran. Faculty Education Memoirs, Kagawa University, 29:103–138.Google Scholar
Dickins, J. M. 1963. Permian pelecypods and gastropods from Western Australia. Australia, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin, 63, 203 p.Google Scholar
Diener, C. 1903. Permian fossils of the central Himalayas. Geological Survey of India Memoir, Palaeontologia Indica, ser. 15, 1(5), 204 p.Google Scholar
Ehiro, M. 1987. Permian ammonoids of the Southern Kitakami Massif, northeast Japan—their stratigraphic distribution and zonation of the Permian. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, 93:823–832 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Ehiro, M., and Bando, Y. 1985. Late Permian ammonoids from the Southern Kitakami Massif, northeast Japan. Transcripts of the Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, new ser., 137:25–49.Google Scholar
Frebold, H. 1932. Marines Unterperm in Ostgrönland und die Frage der Grenzziehung zwischen dem pelagischen Oberkarbon und Unterperm. Meddelelser om Gr⊘nland, 84(4):1–35.Google Scholar
Furnish, W. M., and Glenister, B. F. 1970. Permian ammonoid Cyclolobus from the Salt Range, West Pakistan, p. 153–175. In Kummel, B. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Stratigraphic Boundary Problems: Permian and Triassic of West Pakistan. Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Special Publication 4.Google Scholar
Glenister, B. F., and Furnish, W. M. 1987. New Permian representatives of ammonoid superfamilies Marathonitaceae and Cyclolobaceae. Journal of Paleontology, 61:982–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenister, B. F., Baker, C., Furnish, W. M., and Thomas, G. A. 1990. Additional Early Permian ammonoid cephalopods from Western Australia. Journal of Paleontology, 64:392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. Jr., and Merriam, C. W. 1961. Late Permian ammonoids in the Inyo Range, California, and their significance. Geological Survey Professional Paper 424-D:238–239.Google Scholar
Haniel, C. A. 1915. Die Cephalopoden der Dyas von Timor. Paläontologie von Timor, II. Leiferung 3, Abhandlungen, 6, 153 p.Google Scholar
Nassichuk, W. W., Furnish, W. M., and Glenister, B. F. 1966. The Permian ammonoids of Arctic Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 56 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothpletz, A. 1892. Die Perm-, Trias-, und Jura-Formation auf Timor und Rotti im indischen Archipel. Palaeontolographica, 39:57–106.Google Scholar
Ruzhentsev, V. E., and Sarycheva, T. G. (eds.). 1965. Razvitiye i smena morskikh organizmov na rubezhe paleozoya i mezozoya [Development and Change in Marine Organisms between the Paleozoic and Mesozoic]. Akademiia Nauk SSSR, Paleontologicheskogo Institut Trudy, 108, 146 p.Google Scholar
Stepanov, D. L., Golshani, F., and Stöcklin, J. 1969. Upper Permian and Permian-Triassic boundary in North Iran. Geological Survey of Iran Report 12, 112 p.Google Scholar
Taraz, H. 1969. Permo-Triassic Section in Central Iran. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 53:688–693.Google Scholar
Taraz, H. 1971. Uppermost Permian and Permo-Triassic Transition Beds in Central Iran. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 55:1280–1294.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. A. 1958. The Permian Orthotetacea of Western Australia. Australia, Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics Bulletin 39, 159. p.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. A., and Dickins, J. M. 1954. Correlation and age of marine Permian formations of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Science, 16:219–223.Google Scholar
Toumansky, O. G. 1939. On the correlation of the Permian deposits of the USSR with the deposits of other countries [K voprosu o parallelizatsii permskikh otlozhenii SSSR s otlozheniyami drugikh stran]. Société Nature Moscou Bulletin, Section Géologique, 17(2-3):17–27.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. 1872. On the occurrence of Ammonites, associated with Ceratites, and Goniatites in the Carboniferous of the Salt Range. Geological Survey of India Memoir, 9:351–358.Google Scholar
Waagen, W. 1879. Salt Range fossils. Productus Limestone fossils. India Geological Survey Memoir, Palaeontologia Indica, ser. 13, 1(1):1–72.Google Scholar
Zakharov, Yu. D. 1983. Novye permskiye tsiklolobidy (Goniatitida) yuga SSSR [New Permian Cyclolobids (Goniatitida) from the south of the USSR]. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 1983(2):126–130.Google Scholar
Zakharov, Yu. D., and Pavlov, A. M. 1986. Permian cephalopods of the Pacific Maritime Province and problem of Permian stratigraphic zonation of the Tethys, p. 5–32. In Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Far-Eastern Scientific Centre Institute of Biology and Pedology—Correlation of Permo-Triassic Sediments of East USSR.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Glenister, B. F., and Furnish, W. M. 1989. Two-fold or three-fold?—concerning geological time scale of Permian Period. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, 28:269–282 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. 1895. Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie). R. Oldenbourg, München and Leipzig, 971 p.Google Scholar