Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T07:53:40.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ontogeny of a new species of Paraparchites (Ostracoda) from the Lower Permian Speiser Shale in Kansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Kristina Watabe
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence 66045-7613,
Roger L. Kaesler
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence 66045-7613, Paleontological Institute and Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-7613,

Extract

Both ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the Ostracoda are important for understanding their evolution. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ontogeny and possible sexual dimorphism, of the ostracode species Paraparchites punctatus n. sp. by assessing size, shape, and ornamentation at the stages of its growth for which we were able to obtain specimens: adults and five or six instars. Brooks's rule suggests that with each molt crustaceans double their volume (Brooks, 1886; Teissier, 1960; see also Przibram, 1931). The degree of adherence to Brooks's rule during ontogeny bears on the importance of heterochrony in evolution. The new species follows Brooks's rule rather closely. Another aspect of morphology investigated herein is sexual dimorphism: although many ostracodes have sexually dimorphic valves and carapaces, this is not true of all species of Paraparchites Ulrich and Bassler, 1906, and some other major groups (Scott, 1959; Moore, 1961).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bate, R. H., and Robinson, E. 1978. Ostracod morphology, p. 2140. In Bate, R. H. and Robinson, E. (eds.), A Stratigraphical Index of British Ostracoda. Seel House Press, Liverpool.Google Scholar
Boll, E. 1856. Herr Boll an Herrn Beyrich. Deutsch Geologisches Gesellschaft Zeitschrift, 8:321324.Google Scholar
Brooks, W. K. 1886. Report on the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger. Zoology, 16, Pt. 45.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. L. 1945. Moult stages of the Pennsylvania ostracode Ectodemites plummeri. Journal of Paleontology, 19(4):368375.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. L. 1946. Pennsylvania ostracodes in Illinois. Illinois Geological Survey Bulletin 701, 177 p.Google Scholar
Coryell, H. N. 1928. Some new Pennsylvania Ostracoda. Journal of Paleontology, 2(2):8794.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. R. 1990. Paleoenvironments and vertebrate paleontology of the Speiser Shale (Council Grove Group; Wolfcampian, Permian) in northeastern Kansas, p. 2530. In Cunningham, C. R. and Maples, C. G. (eds.), 1990 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Upper Paleozoic of Eastern Kansas Excursion Guidebook. Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Foster, D. W., and Kaesler, R. L. 1988. Shape analysis: ideas from the Ostracoda, p. 5369. In McKinney, M. L. (ed.), Heterochrony in Evolution: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Heckel, P. H. 1977. Origin of phosphatic black shale facies in Pennsylvanian cyclothems of mid-continent North America. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 61(7):10451068.Google Scholar
Hembree, D. I. 2002. Paleontology and ichnology of an ephemeral pond deposit within the middle Speiser Shale (Lower Permian) near Eskridge, Kansas. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 87 p.Google Scholar
Hunt, G., and Chapman, R. E. 2001. Evaluating hypotheses of instargrouping in arthropods: a maximum likelihood approach. Paleobiology, 27(3):466484.Google Scholar
Izuka, S. K., and Kaesler, R. L. 1986. Biostratinomy of ostracode assemblages from a small reef flat in Maunalua Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Journal of Paleontology, 60:347360.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L. 1972. Morphology of Cypridopsis vidua (O. F. Müller): variation with environment, p. 225244. In Swain, F. M. (ed.), Biology and Paleobiology of Ostracoda. Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L. 1995. Paraparchites: Paleoenvironmental hypotheses, p. 7990. In Ríha, J. (ed.), Ostracoda and Biostratigraphy. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L., and Denver, L. E. 1988. Distribution and diversity of nearshore Ostracoda: environmental control in the Early Permian, p. 671683. In Hanai, T., Ikeya, N., and Ishizaki, K. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of Ostracoda. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L., and Kontrovitz, M. 1989. Taphonomy of subfossil, intertidal Ostracoda: experimental approach. Abstracts, 28th International Geological Congress, 2:144.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L., Kontrovitz, M., and Taunton, S. 1993. Crushing strength of Puriana pacifica (Ostracoda), an experimental approach to taphonomy. Journal of Paleontology, 67(6):10051010.Google Scholar
Kellett, B. 1933. Ostracodes of the Upper Pennsylvanian and the Lower Permian strata of Kansas: I. The Aparchitidae, Beyrichiidae, Glyptopleuridae, Kloedenellidae, Kirkbyidae, and Youngiellidae. Journal of Paleontology, 7:59108.Google Scholar
Kontrovitz, M. 1967. An investigation of ostracode preservation. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences, 29:171177.Google Scholar
Kontrovitz, M. 1988. Crushing strength of ostracode shells: an aspect of taphonomy. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 19:731732.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1964. Population structure in paleoecology, p. 91106. In Imbrie, J. and Newell, N. D. (eds.), Approaches to Paleoecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1964. Paleoecology of the Council Grove Group (Lower Permian) in Kansas, based upon microfossil assemblages. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin, 170:123.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1806. Genera crustaceorum et insectorum, Tomus I, 1806, p. I–XVIII. 303 p.Google Scholar
Maness, T. R., and Kaesler, R. L. 1987. Ontogenetic changes in the carapace of Tyrrhencythere amnicola (Sars): a hemicytherid ostracode. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 118:115.Google Scholar
Martinsson, A. 1956. Studies on the ostracode family Primitiopsidae. Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala, new series. University of Uppsala Institute of Geology, Uppsala, Sweden, 36(1):131.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C., (ed.). 1961. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. Q, Ostracoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Boulder and Lawrence, 442 p.Google Scholar
Olempska, E. 2002. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism in the Middle/Late Devonian rhomboentomozoid ostracod Franklinella. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 21:916.Google Scholar
Peck, R. E. 1934. Late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic Charophyta. American Journal of Science, 27:4955.Google Scholar
Pennant, T. 1777. British Zoology. Volume IV. Crustacea, Mollusca, Testacea. B. White, London.Google Scholar
Przibram, H. 1931. Growth, p. 2436. In Przibram, H. (ed.), Connecting Laws in Animal Morphology. University of London Press, London.Google Scholar
Schallreuter, R. 1973. Tvaerenellidae (Ostracoda, Palaeocopina) from Backsteinkalk Boulders (Middle Ordovician) of northern Germany. Palaeontographica, Abt. A, (144):55111.Google Scholar
Schultze, H.-P. R. 1985. Marine to onshore vertebrates in the Lower Permian of Kansas and their paleoenvironmental implications. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 113:118.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, P. N. 1990. Inference of ecology from the ontogeny of microfossils. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 190 p.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, P. N., Kaesler, R. L., and Lohmann, G. P. 1986. Ontogeny and heterochrony in the ostracode Cavellina Coryell from Lower Permian rocks in Kansas. Paleobiology, 12(3):290301.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1959. Type species of Paraparchites Ulrich and Bassler. Journal of Paleontology, 33(4):670674.Google Scholar
Scott, H. W. 1961. Classification of Ostracoda, p. 7492. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. Q, Ostracoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Siebold, C. T. E. von., and von Veit, H. Stannius (eds.). 1845. Lehrbuch ver Vergleichenden Anatomie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry (third edition). W. H. Freeman, New York, 887 p.Google Scholar
Spjeldnaes, N. 1951. Ontogeny of Beyrichia jonesi Boll. Journal of Paleontology, 25(6):745755.Google Scholar
Taunton, S., and Kaesler, R. L. 1991. Experimental taphonomy of the Ostracoda: tumbling and transportation of Cyprideis beaconensis (LeRoy, 1943). Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 23(5):A344A345. (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Teissier, G. 1960. Reticulate growth, p. 541544. In Waterman, T. H. (ed.), The Physiology of Crustacea. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Bassler, R. S. 1906. New American Paleozoic Ostracoda: notes and descriptions of Upper Carboniferous genera and species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 30(1446). Smithsonian Institution, 30(1446):149164.Google Scholar
Warthin, A. S. Jr. 1930. Micropaleontology of the Wetumka, Wewoka, and Holdenville formations. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Bulletin 35, Norman, 95 p.Google Scholar
Watabe, K. 2001. Ontogeny and Heterochrony of Paraparchites (Ostracoda) from the Lower Permian Speiser Shale in Kansas. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 85 p.Google Scholar
West, R. R. 1990. Thoughts on the upper Palaeozoic history of Kansas, p. 524. In Cunningham, C. R. and Maples, C. G. (eds.), 1990 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Upper Paleozoic of Eastern Kansas Excursion Guidebook. Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Whatley, R. C., and Stephens, J. M. 1977. Precocious sexual dimorphism in fossil and recent Ostracoda, p. 6991. In Löffler, H. and Danielopol, D. (eds.), Aspects of Ecology and Zoogeography of Recent and Fossil Ostracoda. Dr. W. Junk b.v., The Hague.Google Scholar
Whatley, R. C., Trier, K., and Dingwall, P. M. 1982. Some preliminary observations on certain mechanical and biophysical properties of the ostracod carapace, p. 76104. In Bate, R. H., Robinson, E., and Sheppard, L. M. (eds.), Fossil and Recent Ostracodes. British Micropalaeontological Society, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.Google Scholar