Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T21:14:38.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The paired fins of anaspids: one more hypothesis about their function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Philippe Janvier*
Affiliation:
U.A. 12 du C.N.R.S., Institut de Paléontologie 8, rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertin, L., and Arambourg, C. 1958. Superordre des Téléostéens, p. 22042500. In Grassé, P. P. (ed.), Traité de Zoologie. Masson, Paris, 13(3).Google Scholar
Harris, J. E. 1936. The role of the fins in the equilibrium of the swimming fish. 1. Wind-tunnel tests on a model of Mustelus canis (Mitchill). Journal of Experimenta. Biology, 13:474493.Google Scholar
Hopson, J. A. 1974. The functional significance of the hypocercal tail of anaspid ostracoderms. Fieldiana, Geology, 33(5):8393.Google Scholar
Forey, P. L. 1984. Yet more reflections on agnathan-gnathostome relationships. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 4:330343.Google Scholar
Forey, P. L., and Gardiner, B. G. 1981. J. A. Moy-Thomas and his association with the British Museum (Natural History). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 35(3):131144.Google Scholar
Janvier, P. 1978. Les nageoires paires des Ostéostracés et la position systématique des Céphalaspidomorphes. Annales de Paléontologie, 64:113142.Google Scholar
Janvier, P. 1981. The phylogeny of the Craniata, with special reference to the significance of fossil “agnathans.” Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1:121159.Google Scholar
Jarvik, E. 1980. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates, 1. Academic Press, London and New York, 575 p.Google Scholar
Kermack, K. A. 1943. The functional significance of the hypocercal tail in Pteraspis rostrata . Journal of Experimental Biology, 20:2327.Google Scholar
Parrington, F. R. 1958. On the nature of the Anaspida, p. 108128. In Westoll, T. S. (ed.), Studies on Fossil Vertebrates. The Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A. 1964. New lights on the morphology of the Norwegian Anaspida. Norsk Videnskapsakademiens Skrifter (Matematiske-Naturvidenskapslige Klasse), 14:135.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A. 1968. New evidence on Jamoytius kerwoodi White, an important ostracoderm from the Silurian of Lanarkshire, Scotland. Palaeontology, 11:2139.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A. 1980. The Late Silurian anaspid genus Rhyncholepis, from Oesel, Estonia, and Ringerike, Norway. American Museum Novitates, 2699, 18 p.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A. 1984. Conflicting interpretations of the Silurian agnathan Jamoytius . Scottish Journal of Geology, 20:249256 Google Scholar
Schaeffer, B., and Thomson, K. S. 1980. Reflections on agnathan-gnathostome relationships, p. 1933. In Jacobs, L. L. (ed.), Aspects of Vertebrate History. Museum of Northern Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E. 1927. The Downtonian and Devonian vertebrates of Spitsbergen. 1. Family Cephalaspidae. Skrifter om Svalbard og Nordishavet, 12:1391.Google Scholar
Stensiö, E. 1964. Les Cyclostomes fossiles ou Ostracodermes, p. 96382. In Piveteau, J. (ed.), Traité de Paléontologie, 4(1). Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Thomson, K. S. 1971. The adaptation and evolution of early fishes. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46:139166.Google Scholar
Whiting, H. P. 1972. Cranial anatomy of agnathan fish, p. 120. In Joysey, K. A. and Kemp, T. S. (eds.), Studies in Vertebrate Evolution. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar