Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:48:08.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The putative Ordovician annelid worm Haileyia adhaerens Ruedemann, 1934 is not a recognizable fossil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

Lucy A. Muir Open the ORCID record for Lucy A. Muir [Opens in a new window]  and
Joseph P. Botting
Lucy A. Muir
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Sciences, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, Cathays Park, CardiffCF10 3NP, UK
Joseph P. Botting
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Sciences, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, Cathays Park, CardiffCF10 3NP, UK Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, 39 East Beijing Road, Nanjing210008, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A number of putative annelid worms have been described from Ordovician strata, and these records are included in large-scale compilations of paleontological data. If these fossils are worms, they may yield important phylogenetic information; conversely, if they are not worms, they should not be included in large-scale databases. In either case, restudy of the type material of these supposed annelids is useful. The type material (holotype and one paratype) of one of these putative annelids, Haileyia adhaerens Ruedemann, 1934, from the Middle Ordovician Normanskill Shale of Idaho, USA, is re-described and re-illustrated. The original description stated that the species is segmented, with parapodia, papillae, and setae, and lived attached to graptolites. Upon re-examination, the setae could not be detected, and the segmentation, parapodia, and papillae are herein re-interpreted as taphonomic, rather than biological, features. The supposed attachment of Haileyia to graptolites is likely to represent fortuitous bedding-surface associations. There is no evidence that Haileyia adhaerens is an annelid, or even a recognizable fossil.

Type
Taxonomic note
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , May 2020 , pp. 589 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © 2019, The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hadding, A., 1913, Undre Dicellograptusskiffern i Skane jamte nagra darmed ekvivalenta Bildningar: Acta Universitatis Lundensis, new series, Section 2, v. 9, p. 1–90.Google Scholar
Hints, O., and Eriksson, M.E., 2007, Diversification and biogeography of scolecodont-bearing polychaetes in the Ordovician: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 245, p. 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hints, O., Eriksson, M., Högstrom, A.E.S., Kraft, P., and Lehnert, O., 2004, Worms, wormlike and sclerite-bearing taxa, in Webby, B.D., Paris, F., Droser, M.L., and Percival, I., eds., The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event: New York, Columbia University Press, p. 223–230.Google Scholar
Howell, B.F., 1962, Worms, in Moore, R.C., ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part W, Miscellanea: conodonts, conoidal shells of uncertain affinities, worms, trace fossils and problematica: Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KS, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, p. W144–W176.Google Scholar
Maletz, J., 2015, Graptolite reconstructions and interpretations: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 89, p. 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, J.C., and Segerberg, C.O., 1906, Bidrag till kännedomen om Ceratopygeregionen med särskild hänsyn till dess utveckling i Fågelsångstrakten: Acta Universitatis Lundensis, new series, v. 17, p. 1–113.Google Scholar
Parry, A., Tanner, A., and Vinther, J., 2014, The origin of annelids: Palaeontology, v., 57, p. 1091–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, J., 1974, Rudolf Ruedemann October 16, 1864–June 18, 1956: National Academy of Sciences Biographical Memoirs, v. 44, p. 287–302.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1901, Hudson River beds near Albany and their taxonomic equivalents: New York State Museum Bulletin, v. 42, p. 489–596.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R., 1934, Paleozoic Plankton of North America: Geological Society of America Memoir, v. 2, 141 p.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J.J. Jr., 2002, A compendium of fossil marine animal genera: Bulletins of American Paleontology, v. 363, 560 p.Google Scholar
Simonetta, A.M., 1961, Osservazioni su Marria Walcotti Ruedemann: un Graptolite e non un Artropodo: Bolletino di zoologia, v. 28, p. 569–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollerton, V.P. Jr., 2006, Strabismus and pseudofossils: a case study of Rudolf Ruedemann (1864–1956): Earth Sciences History, v. 25, p. 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, E.O., 1878, Observations on fossil annelids and descriptions of some new forms: Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, v. 1, p. 87–91.Google Scholar
Vinther, J., Van Roy, P., and Briggs, D.E.G., 2008, Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids: Nature, v. 451, p. 185–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed