Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T10:57:59.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarkable crayfish remains (Decapoda: Cambaridae) from Oklahoma—evidence of predation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Rodney M. Feldmann  and
William May
Rodney M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242
William May
Affiliation:
6213 Northwest Cedarwood Drive, Lawton, Oklahoma 73505
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Direct physical evidence for predation upon decapod crustaceans is extremely limited in the fossil record. Although it is well recognized that decapods serve as a food resource for a wide variety of vertebrate and invertebrate predators and that the remains of decapods, in the forms of molts and corpses, are readily scavenged, direct evidence for these activities is limited (Tshudy et al., 1989). Bishop (1975) summarized evidences for predation in the fossil record and, although he frequently referred to decapods as predators, cited only one example (Bishop, 1972) of the group as prey. Thus, the discovery of three specimens of freshwater decapods, referable to the crayfish family Cambaridae, that clearly exhibit the effects of predation is significant.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 65 , Issue 5 , September 1991 , pp. 884 - 886
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bent, A. C. 1921. Life histories of North American gulls and terns. U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 113, 337 p.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A. 1972. Crab bitten by a fish from the Upper Cretaceous Pierre Shale of South Dakota. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 83:3823–3826.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. A. 1975. Chapter 13, Traces of predation, p. 261–281. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, D. W., and Barr, D. W. 1968. Handbook of the Crayfishes of Ontario. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 158 p.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R., and McCullock, A. R. 1916. Sub-fossil crustaceans from the coasts of Australia. Records of the Australian Museum, 11:1–14.Google Scholar
Herrick, F. H. 1911. Natural history of the American lobster. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, 29 (Document 747), 408 p.Google Scholar
Miser, H. D. 1954. Geologic Map of Oklahoma. U.S. Geological Survey and Oklahoma Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Penn, G. H. 1950. Utilization of crawfishes by cold-blooded vertebrates in the eastern United States. American Midland Naturalist, 44:643–658.Google Scholar
Seton, E. T. 1953. Lives of Game Animals, Vol. 1–4, 2 Parts. C. T. Branford, Boston, 3,115 p.Google Scholar
Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society Encyclopedia of North American Birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1,109 p.Google Scholar
Tshudy, D. M., Feldmann, R. M., and Ward, P. D. 1989. Cephalopods: biasing agents in the preservation of lobsters. Journal of Paleontology, 63:621–626.Google Scholar