Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T23:53:01.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a class of near-rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

George Szeto
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Bradley UniversityPeoria, Illinois 61606, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [3], Ligh proved that every distributively generated Boolean near-ring is a ring, and he gave an example to which the above fact can not be extended. That is, let G be an additive group and let the multiplication on G be defined by xy = y for all x, y in G. Ligh called this Boolean near-ring G a general Boolean near-ring. near-ring. Then in [4], Ligh called Ra β-near-ring if for each x in R, x2 = x and xyz = yxz for all x, y, z in R, and he proved that the structure of a β-near-ring is “very close” to that of a usual Boolean ring. We note that general Boolean near-rings and Boolean semirings as defined in [5] are β-near-rings. The purpose of this paper is to generalize the structure theorem on β-near-rings given by Ligh in [4] to a broader class of near-rings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1972

References

[1]Birkhoff, G., ‘Subdirect unions in universal algebra’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 50 (1944), 764768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Blackett, D., ‘Simple and semisimple near-rings’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1953), 772785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ligh, S., ‘On Boolean near-rings’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 1 (1969), 375379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Ligh, S., ‘The structure of a special class of near-rings’, J. Austral Math. Soc. (to appear).Google Scholar
[5]Subrahmanyam, N., ‘Boolean semirings’, Math. Ann. 148 (1962), 395401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar