Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T06:08:57.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bats and the Camazotz: Correcting a Century of Mistaken Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James E. Brady  and
Jeremy D. Coltman
James E. Brady
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, California State University, Los Angeles, CA 90032 (jbrady@calstatela.edu)
Jeremy D. Coltman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At the end of the nineteenth century, Eduard Seler identified the bats depicted on a ceramic vessel excavated by Erwin Dieseldorff at the site of Chama, Guatemala, as the camazotz, or death bat, from the K’iche’ Maya myth, the Popol Vuh. The attribution was never critically reviewed. Nevertheless, it became so deeply entrenched that virtually every image of a Maya bat is identified as a camazotz. We have located no ancient depictions of the Hero Twins in the chamber of the camazotz, which calls into question the salience of this scene for the ancient Maya. In iconography and ethnohistory, multiple figures with bat-like characteristics exist, both bats and anthropomorphic bat-men. Clearly, the situation is complex. We argue that bats appear principally in four roles. The first is as an emblematic symbol representing some group. The bat played a second role as a messenger, often paired on vessels with a bird. A third category relates to pollination, vegetation, and fertility, and here the bat may be paired with the hummingbird. The last and largest category is wahy beings, which most epigraphers now think were bestial forms of personified diseases. Included here are the many vessels depicting the fire-breathing bat, including Dieseldorff's Chama vessel. We argue that the identification with the camazotz should be dropped altogether and that the associations proposed by Seler need to be rethought.

Resumen

Resumen

A finales del siglo diecinueve, Eduard Seler identificó a los murciélagos en la vasija de Chama de Dieseldorff como el camazotz del Popol Vuh. Esta atribución nunca fue críticamente revisada, sin embargo, llegó a arraigarse tan profundamente que virtualmente cada imagen de un murciélago Maya es identificada como un camazotz. No hemos encontrado ninguna representación de los héroes gemelos en la cámara del camazotz, lo que pone en duda la relevancia de esta escena de los antiguos Mayas. En la iconografía y la etnohistoria, existen múltiples figuras con características de murciélago, tanto murciélagos como murciélago/hombres antropomórficos. Claramente, la situación es compleja. Argumentamos que los murciélagos aparecen principalmente en cuatro roles. El primero es como símbolo emblemático que representa algún grupo. El murciélago jugó un segundo papel como mensajero, a menudo emparejado en las vasijas con un pájaro. Una tercera categoría se refiere a la polinización, la vegetación y la fertilidad donde el murciélago puede estar emparejado con el colibrí. Por último, la más grande de las categorías es como seres wahy. Esto incluye la gran cantidad de vasijas que representan al murciélago que respira fuego, así como la vasija de Chama de Dieseldorff. Nosotros argumentamos que la identificación con el camazotz debería abandonarse por completo y las asociaciones propuestas por Seler necesitan ser repensadas.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 227 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Alcorn, Janis B. 1984 Huastec Mayan Ethnobotony. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Ankli, Anita, Sticher, Otto, and Heinrich, Michael 1999 Medical Ethnobotany of the Yucatec Maya: Healers’ Consensus as a Quantitative Criterion. Economic Botany 53:144–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthel, Thomas S. 1968 Demonio Murciélago Mesoamérica. In Traducciones Mesoanericanistas, Tomo II. Socieded Mexicana de Antropología, Nexico.Google Scholar
Benson, Elizabeth P. 1988 The Maya and the Bat. Latin American Indian Literatures Journal 4:99–124.Google Scholar
Benson, Elizabeth P., and de la Fuente, Beatriz 1996 Olmec Art of Ancient Mexico. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Blaffer, Sarah C. 1972 The Black-Man of Zinacantan: A Central American Legend. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Boone, Elizabeth Hill 1983 The Codex Magliabechiano and the Lost Prototype of the Magliabechiano Group. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Boone, Elizabeth Hill 2007 Cycles of Time and Meaning in the Mexican Books of Fate. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Brady, James E. 1988 The Sexual Connotation of Caves in Mesoamerican Ideology. Mexicon 10:51–55.Google Scholar
Brady, James E., and Prufer, Keith M. 2005 Maya Cave Archaeology: A New Look at Religion and Cosmology. In Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the Cave Context, edited by Prufer, Keith M. and Brady, James E., pp. 365–379. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Brady, James E., Cobb, Allan, Palit, Linda, Arburn, Donald, Garza, Sergio, Christiansen, Christian, Perez, Arturo, Scott, Ann M., and Delgado, Arnulfo 2009 Quen Santo Revisited: Updating Eduard Seler's 19th Century Cave Studies. In Exploring Highland Maya Ritual Cave Use: Archaeology & Ethnography in Huehuetenango, Guatemala, edited by Brady, James E., pp. 9–25. Association for Mexican Cave Studies, Austin.Google Scholar
Calnek, Edward E. 1988 Highland Chiapas before the Spanish Conquest. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation, No. 55. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Christenson, Allen J. 2007 Popol Vuh: Sacred Book of the Maya. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael D. 1978 Lords of the Underworld: Masterpieces of Classic Maya Ceramics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael D. 1982 Old Gods and Young Heroes: The Perlman Collection of Maya Ceramics. American Friends of the Israel Museum, New York.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael D., and Whittaker, Gordon 1982 Aztec Sorcerers in Seventeenth Century Mexico: The Treatise on Superstitions of Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies Publication 7. State University of New York at Albany, Albany.Google Scholar
Dieseldorff, Erwin P. 1904 A Clay Vessel with a Picture of a Vampire-Headed Deity. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 28:665–666. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Edmonson, Munro S. 1982 The Ancient Future of the Itza: The Book of Chilam Balam of Tizimin. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Fash, Barbara W., and Fash, William L. 1994 Copán Temple 20 and the House of Bats. In Seventh Palenque Round Table, 1989, edited by Robertson, Merle Greene and Field, Virginia, pp. 61–68. Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Grollig, Frances Xavier 1959 San Miguel Acatán, Huehuetenango, Guatemala: A Modern Maya Village. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Grube, Nikolai 2004 Akan: The God of Drinking, Disease, and Death. In Continuity and Change: Maya Religious Practices in Temporal Perspective, 5th European Maya Conference, University of Bonn, December 2000, edited by Graña-Behrens, Daniel, Grube, Nikolai, Prager, Christian M., Sachse, Frauke, Teufel, Stefanie, and Wagner, Elisabeth, pp. 59–76. Acta Mesoamericana 14, Verlag Anton Saurwein, Markt Schwaben.Google Scholar
Grube, Nikolai, and Nahm, Werner 1994 A Census of Xibalba: A Complete Inventory of Way Characters on Maya Ceramics. In The Maya Vase Book, Vol. 4, edited by Kerr, Justin, pp. 686–715. Kerr Associates, New York.Google Scholar
Guiteras Holmes, C. 1947 Clanes y sistema de parentesco de Cancún (México). Acta Americana 5:1–17.Google Scholar
Hays-Gilpin, Kelley, and Hill, Jane H. 1999 The Flower World in Material Culture: An Iconographic Complex in the Southwest and Mesoamerica. Journal of Anthropological Research 55:1–37.Google Scholar
Heyden, Doris 1975 An Interpretation of the Cave Underneath the Pyramid of the Sun in Teotihuacan, Mexico. American Antiquity 40:131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Stephen D. 2001 Comment on The Power and Ideology of Artistic Creation: Elite Craft Specialists in Classic Maya Society by Takeshi Inomata. Current Anthropology 42:336–337.Google Scholar
Houston, Stephen D., and Stuart, David 1989 The Way Glyph: Evidence for Co-Essences among the Classic Maya. Research Reports in Ancient Maya Writing 30, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Houston, Stephen D., Stuart, David, and Taube, Karl 2006 The Memory of Bones: Body, Being, and Experience among the Classic Maya. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Ishcol, B., Richardo, L., Calel, Rosalío Saquic, and Cabrera, Daniel Aragón 1970 Monografía del Municipio de Nahualá, Departamento de Sololá. Guatemala Indígena 5(2):8–49.Google Scholar
La Farge, Oliver 1947 Santa Eulalia: The Religion of a Cuchumatán Indian Town. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Martin, Simon, and Grube, Nikolai 2000 Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens: Deciphering the Dynasties of the Ancient Maya. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Miller, Virginia E. 1991 The Frieze of the Palace of the Stuccoes, Acanceh, Yucatan, Mexico. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology, No. 31, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Miller, Walter S., and Rojas, Alfonso Villa 1956 Cuentos Mixes. Instituto Nacional Indigenista, Pub. 2, Mexico.Google Scholar
Muñoz Espinosa, María Teresa 2006 El culto al dios Murciélago en Mesoamérica. Arqueología Mexicana 14 (80): 17–23.Google Scholar
Nash, June 1970 In the Eyes of the Ancestors: Belief and Behavior in a Maya Community. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Henry B. 2006 The Stones of the Death Monsters. In Arqueología e Historia del Centro de México: Homenaje a Eduardo Matos Moctezuma, edited by Lujan, Leonardo López, Carrasco, David, and Cue, Lourdes, pp. 369–388. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico.Google Scholar
Orellana, Sandra L. 1981 Idols and Idolatry in Highland Guatemala. Ethnohistory 28(2):157–177.Google Scholar
Patel, Shankari 2005 Caves and Pilgrimage on Cozumel. In Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the Cave Context, edited by Prufer, Keith M. and Brady, James E., pp. 149–166. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Recinos, Adrian 1980 Memorial de Solola: Anales de los Cakchiqueles y título de los señores de Totonicapán. Editorial Piedra Santa, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Recinos, Adrian, and Goetz, Delia 1953 The Annals of the Cakchiquels and Title of the Lords of Totonicapan. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Recinos, Adrian, Goetz, Delia, and Morley, Sylvanus G. 1950 Popol Vuh: The Sacred Book of the Quiche Maya. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Reents-Budet, Dorie 1994 Painting the Maya Universe: Royal Ceramics of the Classic Period. Duke University Press, Durham.Google Scholar
Romero Sandoval, Roberto 2013 Zotz: El murciélago en la cultura Maya. Centro de Estudios Mayas, Cuaderno 39, Universidad Autónoma de México, Mexico.Google Scholar
Seler, Eduard 1904 The Bat God of the Maya Race. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 28:231–241. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Siegel, Morris 1941 Religion in Western Guatemala: A Product of Acculturation. American Anthropologist 43:62–76.Google Scholar
Smith, Mary Elizabeth 1973 Picture Writing from Ancient Southern Mexico. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Stone, Andrea 2005 Scribes and Caves in the Maya Lowlands. In Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the Cave Context, edited by Prufer, Keith M. and Brady, James E., pp. 135–147. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Stone, Andrea, and Zender, Marc 2011 Reading Maya Art. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Stuart, David 2005 The Way Beings. In Sourcebook for the 29th Maya Hieroglyphic Forum, edited by Stuart, David, pp. 160–165. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Taube, Karl 2010 At Dawn's Edge: Tulum, Santa Rita and Floral Symbolism in the International Style of Late Postclassic Mesoamerica. In Astronomers, Scribes, and Priests: Intellectual Interchange between the Northern Maya Lowlands and Highland Mexico in the Late Postclassic Period, edited by Vail, Gabrielle and Hernandez, Christine, pp. 145–91. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Thompson, J. Eric S. 1962 A Catalog of Maya Hieroglyphs. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. Eric S. 1966 Maya Hieroglyphs of the Bat as Metaphorgrams. Man, New Series 1(2):176–184.Google Scholar
Villa Ramírez, Bernardo 1966 Los Murciélagos de México: Su Importancia en la Economía y la Salubridad, su Clasificación Sistemática. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.Google Scholar
Vogt, Evon Z., and Stuart, David 2005 Some Notes on Ritual Caves among the Ancient and Modern Maya. In In the Maw of the Earth Monster: Mesoamerican Ritual Cave Use, edited by Brady, James E. and Prufer, Keith, pp. 155–185. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zender, Marc 2005 Teasing the Turtle from its Shell: AHK and MAHK in Maya Writing. The PARI Journal 6(3):1–14.Google Scholar
Zingg, Robert M. 1938 The Huichols. University of Denver Contributions to Anthropology 1:1–826.Google Scholar