Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T23:24:47.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governance from below in Bolivia: A Theory of Local Government with Two Empirical Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jean-Paul Faguet
Jean-Paul Faguet*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics. j.p.faguet@lse.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines decentralization through the lens of the local dynamics it unleashed in the much-noted case of Bolivia. It argues that the national effects of decentralization are largely the sum of its local-level effects. To understand decentralization, therefore, we must first understand how local government works. The article explores the deep economic and institutional determinants of government quality in two extremes of municipal performance. From this it derives a model of local government responsiveness as the product of political openness and substantive competition. The quality of local politics, in turn, emerges endogenously as the joint product of the lobbying and political engagement of local firms and interests and the organizational density and ability of civil society. The analysis tests the theory's predictions on a database containing all Bolivian municipalities. The theory proves robust. The combined methodology provides a higher-order empirical rigor than either approach can alone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , Winter 2009 , pp. 29 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albó, Xavier. 1990. Los Guaraní-Chiriguano: la comunidad hoy. La Paz : CIPCA.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab. 1996. The Economics of Decentralization. Unpublished mss. Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The Process of Government. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Zion, Uri, and Eytan, Zeev. 1974. On Money, Votes, and Policy in a Democratic Society. Public Choice 17: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, Theodore, and Goodman, Robert. 1973. Private Demand for Public Goods. American Economic Review 63: 280–96.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1948. On the Rationale of Group Decision Making. Journal of Political Economy 56: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2000. Federalism with and without Political Centralization: China versus Russia. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7616. Cambridge, MA: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, Juan Carlos. 1997. Director, Cbn bottling plant. Author interview. Viacha, October 16.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Roberts Clark, William, and Golder, Matt. 2005. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14: 63–82.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de (Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat). 1785. Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluraliste des voix. Paris. English translation appears in Classics of Social Choice, ed. McLean, I. and Urken, A.. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 1995. 91–112.Google Scholar
Crook, Richard C., and Sverrisson, Alan S.. 1999. To What Extent Can Decentralized Forms of Government Enhance the Development of pro-Poor Policies and Improve Poverty-Alleviation Outcomes? Unpublished mss. Washington, DC: World Bank. <http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPOVERTY/Resources/WDR/DfiD-Project-Papers/crook.pdf> Accessed September 30, 2009.+Accessed+September+30,+2009.>Google Scholar
De Mello, Luiz R. 2004. Can Fiscal Decentralization Strengthen Social Capital? Public Finance Review 32: 4–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodgson, Charles L. 1884. The Principles of Parliamentary Representation. London : Harrison.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York : Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2006. Decentralization's Nondemocratic Roots: Authoritarianism and Subnational Reform in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 1 (Spring): 1–26.Google Scholar
Faguet, Jean-Paul. 2004. Does Decentralization Increase Responsiveness to Local Needs? Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics 88: 867–94.Google Scholar
Finer, Samuel. E. 1997. The History of Government from the Earliest Times. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisman, Raymond, and Gatti, Roberta. 2002. Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries. Journal of Public Economics 83: 325–45.Google Scholar
González, Luis. 1997. Departmental Director, Social Investment Fund. Author interview. Viacha, March 17.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver. 1995. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. New York : Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Oliver, and Moore, John H.. 1990. Property Rights and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1119–58.Google Scholar
Huther, Jeff, and Shah, Anwar. 1998. Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper 1894. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies 33: 845–79.Google Scholar
Kubal, Mary Rose. 2006. Contradictions and Constraints in Chile's Health Care and Education Decentralization. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 4 (Winter): 105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manor, James. 1999. The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington , DC : World Bank.Google Scholar
Medina, Javier, ed. 1994. Arakuarenda: un centro intercultural de capacitación para el desarrollo Guaraní. La Paz : Arakuarenda/FIS.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis 1989. Public Choice II. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz Franco, Fernando Dr. 1997. Departmental Director, Social Investment Fund. Author interview. Santa Cruz, March 31.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 2000. Power and Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships. New York : Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Schroeder, Larry, and Wynne, Susan. 1993. Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development: Infrastructure Policies in Perspective. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Palda, K. Filip, and Palda, Kristian S.. 1985. Ceilings on Campaign Spending: Hypothesis and Partial Test with Canadian Data. Public Choice 45: 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Andrew. 1995. Decentralization: the Way Forward for Rural Development? Policy Research Working Paper 1475. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Piriou-Sall, Suzanne. 1998. Decentralization and Rural Development: a Review of Evidence. Unpublished mss. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Romer, Thomas. 1985. Patterns of Political Action Committee Contributions to the 1980 Campaigns for the United States House of Representatives. Public Choice 47: 63–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presencia (La Paz). 1997. Los vecinos viacheños marchan hoy para que se vaya su alcalde. March 22.Google Scholar
Prud'homme, Rémy. 1995. On the Dangers of Decentralization. World Bank Research Observer 10: 210–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York : Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, Dennis A., Shabbir Cheema, G., and Nellis, John. 1983. Decentralization in Developing Countries: a Review of Recent Experience. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 581. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Rubinfeld, Daniel, Shapiro, Perry, and Roberts, Judith. 1987. Tiebout Bias and the Demand for Local Public Schooling. Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 426–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samoff, Joel. 1990. Decentralization: the Politics of Interventionism. Development and Change 21: 513–30.Google Scholar
Secretaría Nacional de Participación Popular. 1997. Resumen de auditorías SAYCO efectuados a la fecha. La Paz : Secretaría Nacional de Participación Popular.Google Scholar
Sequier, Gabriel, Fr. (“Pirou, Tianou”). 1997. Parish priest. Author interview. Izozo, April 3.Google Scholar
Shah, Anwar, Thompson, Theresa, and Zou, Heng-Fu. 2004. The Impact of Decentralization on Service Delivery, Corruption, Fiscal Management and Growth in Developing and Emerging Market Economies: a Synthesis of Empirical Evidence. CESifo Report 1: 10–14.Google Scholar
Slater, David. 1989. Territorial Power and the Peripheral State: the Issue of Decentralization. Development and Change 20: 501–31.Google Scholar
Smith, Brian C. 1985. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London : Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Smoke, Paul. 2001. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: a Review of Current Concepts and Practice. Democracy, Governance and Human Rights Programme Paper No. 2. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
Tanzi, Vito. 1995. Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: a Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects. Paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 1999. Political Decentralization and Economic Reform: a Game-Theoretic Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 43: 488–517.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York : Knopf.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 1993. Informe sobre desarrollo humano 1993. Madrid : CIDEAL.Google Scholar
Vargas Portales, Abelardo. 1997. President, Charagua Municipal Council (Adn). Author interview. Charagua, April 1.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Lehman Schlozman, Kay, Brady, Henry, and Nie, Norman H.. 1993. Citizen Activity: Who Participates? What Do They Say? American Political Science Review 87: 303–18.Google Scholar
Wallis, John J., and Oates, Wallace E.. 1988. Decentralization in the Public Sector: An Empirical Study of State and Local Government. In Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies, ed. Rosen, Harvey S.. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. 5–32.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1995. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 1–31.Google Scholar
Bank, World. 1994. World Development Report: Infrastructure for Development. New York : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zax, Jeffrey S. 1989. Initiatives and Government Expenditures. Public Choice 63: 267–77.Google Scholar