Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T07:00:45.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The National Legislatures in the Enlargement of Mercosur: Paraguay’s Acceptance of Venezuela and Bolivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2023

André Leite Araujo*
Affiliation:
André Leite Araujo holds a Ph.D. degree in Political and Social Sciences from the University of Bologna. andre@araujo.me.

Abstract

Regional integration blocs are subject to the admission of new members, which must be approved by domestic institutions. This article analyzes how the incorporation of Venezuela and Bolivia into Mercosur passed in the Paraguayan Congress. While the first case lasted from 2007 to 2013, demonstrating parliamentary opposition, the second episode took place between 2015 and 2016, suggesting convergence between the executive and legislative branches on the issue. Using process tracing, the unveiled mechanism shows how government and opposition forces act to alter the duration of the bill in Congress and that political parties have a pendular behavior according to political cleavages. Moreover, the findings of this study suggest the existence of a parliamentary veto power in foreign affairs and the importance of having homogeneous coalitions to achieve faster approvals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Competing interests: The author declares none.

References

Alemán, Eduardo, and Calvo, Ernesto. 2010. Unified Government, Bill Approval, and the Legislative Weight of the President. Comparative Political Studies 43, 4: 511–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009355534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arce, Lucas. 2011. En la búsqueda de una estrategia global: la política externa del Paraguay. Cuadernos Sobre Relaciones Internacionales, Regionalismo y Desarrollo 6, 11: 105–27.Google Scholar
Arditi, Benjamín. 1990. Elecciones y partidos en el Paraguay de la transición. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 52, 4: 8398. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3540602.Google Scholar
Baer, Werner, and Birch, Melissa. 1987. The International Economic Relations of a Small Country: The Case of Paraguay. Economic Development and Cultural Change 35, 3: 601–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1153932 Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. 2016. Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. 2019. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Bo, and Ruonavaara, Hannu. 2017. Comparative Process Tracing: Making Historical Comparison Structured and Focused. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47, 1: 4466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116658549 Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T., eds. 2015. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benzi, Daniele, and Zapata, Ximena. 2013. Geopolítica, economía y solidaridad internacional en la nueva cooperación sur-sur: el caso de la Venezuela bolivariana y petrocaribe. América Latina Hoy 63: 6589.Google Scholar
Briceño-Ruiz, José. 2018. Times of Change in Latin American Regionalism. Contexto Internacional 40, 3: 573–94. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.2018400300008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, and Golder, Sona Nadenichek. 2013. Principles of Comparative Politics. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics 44, 4: 823–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429 Google Scholar
Dabène, Olivier. 2007. Virage à gauche et intégration régionale en Amérique Latine. Transcontinentales no. 4 (June): 4558. https://doi.org/10.4000/transcontinentales.595.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 2008. Comparative Analysis: Case-Oriented versus Variable-Oriented Research. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, ed. Keating, Michael and Porta, della. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 198222.Google Scholar
Diniz, Simone. 2005. Interações entre os poderes executivo e legislativo no processo decisório: avaliando sucesso e fracasso presidencial. Dados 48, 1: 333–69. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582005000200004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diniz, Simone. 2012. O Senado Federal e a deliberação de atos internacionais no presidencialismo brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 27, 80: 169–84. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092012000300010 Google Scholar
Doctor, Mahrukh. 2013. Prospects for Deepening Mercosur Integration: Economic Asymmetry and Institutional Deficits. Review of International Political Economy 20, 3: 515–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.671763 Google Scholar
Duarte Recalde, Liliana. 2012. Variaciones en el comportamiento electoral en Paraguay. América Latina Hoy 60: 117–38. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.8976.Google Scholar
Duarte Recalde, Liliana. 2013. Paraguay: interrupción al proceso de consolidación de la democracia. Revista de Ciencia Politica 33, 1: 303–24. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2013000100015 Google Scholar
Duarte Recalde, Liliana. 2017. Democracy and Representation in Paraguay. Partecipazione e Conflitto 10, 1: 6588. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i1p65 Google Scholar
Duina, Francesco, and Raunio, Tapio. 2007. The Open Method of Co-Ordination and National Parliaments: Further Marginalization or New Opportunities? Journal of European Public Policy 14, 4: 489506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701314318.Google Scholar
Dunn, Kevin C., and Neumann, Iver B.. 2016. Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter B. 1993. Building an Integrative Approach to International and Domestic Politics: Reflections and Projections. In Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, ed. Putnam, Robert D., Jacobson, Harold Karan, and Evans. Berkeley: University of California Press. 397430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, Marcelo Pereira, and Wegner, Rubia. 2018. Regional Integration: Mercosur on the Verge of Political Orientations. Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations 7, 13: 245–63.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics 32, 2: 151–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/422395 Google Scholar
Frizzera, Guilherme. 2013. A suspensão do Paraguai no MERCOSUL: problema interno, solução externa. Conjuntura Global 2, 3: 156–64. https://revistas.ufpr.br/conjgloblal/article/view/34623 Acesso:02/09/2013.Google Scholar
Gardini, Gian Luca. 2011. MERCOSUR: What You See Is Not (Always) What You Get. European Law Journal 17, 5: 683700. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00573.x Google Scholar
Giannetti, Daniela, and Pedrazzani, Andrea. 2016. Rules and Speeches: How Parliamentary Rules Affect Legislators’ Speech-Making Behavior. Legislative Studies Quarterly 41, 3: 771800. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Bozzolasco, Ignacio, Escobar, Fernando Martínez, and Labarthe, Sunniva. 2019. La gauche dans la transition démocratique au Paraguay. Analyser 30 ans de démocratie. Problèmes d’Amérique Latine no. 115, 4: 87110. https://doi.org/10.3917/pal.115.0087 Google Scholar
González Urrutia, Edmundo. 2006. Las dos etapas de la política exterior de Chávez. Nueva Sociedad 205: 159–71.Google Scholar
Gratius, Susanne, and Saraiva, Miriam Gomes. 2013. Continental Regionalism: Brazil’s Prominent Role in the Americas. Working Paper 374. February 13. Brussels: CEPS. ’http://wp.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/WD%20No%20374%20Brazil’s%20Continental%20Regionalism.pdf Google Scholar
Heduvan, Julieta H. 2019. Paraguay y la integración regional: un vínculo de larga data. Grupo de Jóvenes Investigadores 2, 6: 1418.Google Scholar
Heduvan, Julieta H. 2020. Veinte años de política exterior Paraguaya: una mirada del 2000 al 2020. Perspectivas Revista de Ciencias Sociales 5, 10: 130–51.Google Scholar
Henehan, Marie T. 2000. Conclusion: Theories and Research on Congressional Behavior on Foreign Policy. In Foreign Policy and Congress: An International Relations Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 145–64.Google Scholar
Hiroi, Taeko. 2008. The Dynamics of Lawmaking in a Bicameral Legislature: The Case of Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 41, 12: 15831606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007308536 Google Scholar
Hofmann, Stephanie C., and Martill, Benjamin. 2021. The Party Scene: New Directions for Political Party Research in Foreign Policy Analysis. International Affairs 97, 2: 305–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaa165 Google Scholar
Jenne, Nicole, Schenoni, Luis Leandro, and Urdinez, Francisco. 2017. Of Words and Deeds: Latin American Declaratory Regionalism, 1994–2014. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30, 2–3: 195215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2017.1383358 Google Scholar
Kesgin, Baris, and Kaarbo, Juliet. 2010. When and How Parliaments Influence Foreign Policy: The Case of Turkey’s Iraq Decision. International Studies Perspective 11: 1936.Google Scholar
Kfuri, Regina, and Lamas, Bárbara. 2008. Paraguai: quo vadis? entre o Mercosul e os Estados Unidos. Cena Internacional 10, 1: 731.Google Scholar
Lambert, Peter. 2016. The Myth of the Good Neighbour: Paraguay’s Uneasy Relationship with Brazil. Bulletin of Latin American Research 35, 1: 3448. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemgruber, Silvia. 2007. Paraguai: Transição inconclusa e integração reticente. In Agenda sul-americana: mudanças e desafios no início do século XXI, ed. Lima, Maria Regina Soares de and Coutinho, Marcelo Vasconcelos. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão. 245–76.Google Scholar
Lima, Maria Regina Soares de. 2000. Instituições democráticas e política exterior. Contexto Internacional 22, 2: 265303.Google Scholar
Lima, Maria Regina Soares de. 2014. Avanços, impasses e desafios da integração. In 2003–2013: uma nova política externa, ed. Maringoni, Gilberto, Schutte, Giorgio, and Berron, Gonzalo. Tubarão: Editora Copiart. 81–120.Google Scholar
López, Magdalena. 2010. La democracia En Paraguay: un breve repaso sobre los partidos políticos tradicionales, el sistema electoral y el triunfo de Fernando Lugo Méndez. Revista Enfoques 8, 13: 89106.Google Scholar
Luciano, Bruno Theodoro, and Campos, André Sanches Siqueira. 2021. Supranationalism as a Taboo: Analysing the 30 Years of Mercosur’s Institutional Development. Brazilian Journal of International Relations 10, 1: 102–24. https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjir/article/view/12551.Google Scholar
Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F.. 2000. Thinking About Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67, 1: 125. http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html.Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés. 2015. Presidentialist Decision Making in Latin American Foreign Policy: Examples from Regional Integration Processes. In Routledge Handbook of Latin America in the World, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Covarrubias, Ana. London: Routledge. 112–23. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753683-15 Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés. 2019. Regional Organizations and Development in Latin America. In The Routledge Handbook of Latin American Development, ed. Cupples, Julie, Palomino-Schalscha, Marcela, and Prieto, Manuel. London: Routledge. 156–67.Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés, and Gardini, Gian Luca. 2012. Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and Its Lessons. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs 47, 1: 116–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2012.655013 Google Scholar
Manow, Philip, and Burkhart, Simone. 2008. Delay as a Political Technique Under Divided Government? Empirical Evidence from Germany, 1976–2005. German Politics 17, 3: 353–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000802300650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2007. Vetoing Co-Operation: The Impact of Veto Players on Preferential Trading Arrangements. British Journal of Political Science 37, 3: 403–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123407000221 Google Scholar
Mariano, Karina L. Pasquariello, and Menezes, Roberto Goulart. 2021. Três décadas de Mercosul: institucionalidade, capacidade estatal e baixa intensidade da integração. Lua Nova no. 112: 147–79. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-147179/112 Google Scholar
Mariano, Karina Pasquariello, Bressan, Regiane Nitsch, and Luciano, Bruno Theodoro. 2021. Liquid Regionalism: A Typology for Regionalism in the Americas. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 64, 2. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202100204 Google Scholar
Marsteintredet, Leiv, Llanos, Mariana, and Nolte, Detlef. 2013. Paraguay and the Politics of Impeachment. Journal of Democracy 24, 4: 110–23. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Martínez, Fernando. 2013. El eje izquierda-derecha en el sistema de partidos políticos del Paraguay. Revista Paraguay Desde las Ciencias Sociales 2: 125.Google Scholar
Masuyama, Mikitaka. 2000. Legislative Time and Agenda Power in the Japanese Diet. Journal of Asian and Pacific Studies 20: 6585.Google Scholar
Melo, Luciano Morais. 2009. Fiel da balança: o Paraguai e a disputa pelos recursos das águas platinas entre Brasil e Argentina (1954–1979). História em Reflexão 3, 6: 1–17.Google Scholar
Merle, Marcel. 1976. Politique intérieure et politique extérieure. Politique Étrangère 41, 5: 409–21. https://doi.org/10.3406/polit.1976.1704 Google Scholar
Migliorati, Marta, and Vignoli, Valerio. 2022. When Politicization Meets Ideology: The European Parliament and Free Trade Agreements. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 52, 3: 346–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.50 Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., and Kubota, Keiko. 2005. Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries. International Organization 59, 1: 107–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830505006X Google Scholar
Molinas, José, Pérez Liñán, Aníbal, and Saiegh, Sebastián. 2004. Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes in Paraguay, 1954–2003. Revista de Ciencia Política 24, 2: 6793.Google Scholar
Mora, Frank O. 2003. Paraguay: The Legacy of Authoritarianism. In Latin American and Caribbean Foreign Policy, ed. Mora, Frank O. and Hey, Jeanne A. K.. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. 309–27.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Amâncio Jorge de. 2003. Legislativo e política externa: das (in)conveniências da abdicação. CAENI Working Paper. São Paulo: Centro de Estudos das Negociações Internacionais.Google Scholar
Paraguay. Cámara de Senadores. 2007. Protocolo de adhesión de La República Bolivariana de Venezuela al Mercosur. Asunción: Cámara de Senadores. http://silpy.congreso.gov.py/expediente/264 Google Scholar
Paraguay. Cámara de Senadores. 2010. Protocolo de adhesión de La República de Venezuela al Mercosur. http://silpy.congreso.gov.py/expediente/3901 Google Scholar
Paraguay. Cámara de Senadores. 2012. Protocolo de adhesión de La República Bolivariana de Venezuela al Mercosur. http://silpy.congreso.gov.py/expediente/5668 Google Scholar
Paraguay. Cámara de Senadores. 2013a. Protocolo de adhesión de La República Boliviariana de Venezuela al Mercosur. http://silpy.congreso.gov.py/expediente/101902 Google Scholar
Paraguay. Cámara de Senadores. 2013b. Diario de sesiones. December 10.Google Scholar
Paraguay. Cámara de Senadores. 2015. Protocolo de adhesión del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia al Mercosur. http://silpy.congreso.gov.py/expediente/105069 Google Scholar
Paraguay. Cámara de Diputados. 2016. Diario de sesiones. May 12.Google Scholar
Paraguay. Tribunal Superior de Justicia Electoral. 2019. Justicia electoral. 2019. https://tsje.gov.py/index.php Google Scholar
Paraguay. Sistema de Información Legislativa. 2020. Asunción: Congreso Nacional. http://silpy.congreso.gov.py Google Scholar
Patty, John W. 2016. Signaling Through Obstruction. American Journal of Political Science 60, 1: 175–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12202 Google Scholar
Pennetta, Piero. 2009. Capitolo secondo. In Integrazione europea ed integrazioni latino-americane e caraibiche: modelli e rapporti. Bari: Cacucci Editore. 55185.Google Scholar
Talia, Pérez, Ernesto, Marcos. 2017. La institucionalización partidista y su relación con la calidad de la democracia: Paraguay y Uruguay en perspectiva comparada. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 62, 229: 299330.Google Scholar
Perrotta, Daniela, and Porcelli, Emanuel. 2016. Mercosur 25 años: desafíos en su nueva etapa. Márgenes 2 (August): 5387.Google Scholar
Rezek, José Francisco. 2011. Direito internacional público: curso elementar. 13th ed. São Paulo: Saraiva.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Pedro Feliú, and Oliveira, Maria Letícia Claro. 2018. Política externa e legislativo no Paraguai do presidente Lugo. Revista de Sociologia e Política 26, 68: 7594. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678987318266805 Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Pedro Feliú, Burian, Camilo López, and Lyra, Rodrigo Pedrosa. 2020. President and Congress in Paraguay: Legislative Success in Foreign and Domestic Policy. Journal of Legislative Studies 27, 3: 317–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2020.1818926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Pedro Feliú, Burian, Camilo López, and Urdinez, Francisco. 2021. Legislative Behavior, Mass Media, and Foreign Policy Making: The Case of Paraguay. Latin American Research Review 56, 2: 334–52. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.592 Google Scholar
Riggirozzi, Pía, and Grugel, Jean. 2015. Regional Governance and Legitimacy in South America: The Meaning of UNASUR. International Affairs 91, 4: 781–97.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Díaz, Damián. 2014. El rol del poder legislativo en la política exterior: un estudio sobre la ratificación del ingreso de Venezuela al MERCOSUR. In Quinto Congreso Uruguayo de Ciencia Política. Uruguay: Asociación Uruguaya de Ciencia Política.Google Scholar
Rosati, Jerel A., and Scott, James M.. 2011. The Politics of United States Foreign Policy. 5th ed. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Sanahuja, José. 2011. Multilateralismo y regionalismo en clave suramericana: el caso de UNASUR. Pensamiento Propio 16, 33: 115–58.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2001. Mechanisms in Political Processes. Annual Review of Political Science 4: 2141.Google Scholar
Toledo, Sara Basilio de. 2015. Mudança política no Paraguai e as relações com o Brasil: o caso da renegociação do Tratado de Itaipu. São Paulo: UNESP.Google Scholar
Trindade, Otávio A. D. Cançado. 2021. A cláusula democrática do MERCOSUL: aspectos jurídicos do argumento diplomático. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão. https://funag.gov.br/biblioteca-nova/produto/1-1168 Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1997. Processo decisório em sistemas políticos: veto players no presidencialismo, parlamentarismo, multicameralismo e pluripartidarismo. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 12, 34. http://www.anpocs.com/index.php/publicacoes-sp-2056165036/rbcs/203-rbcs-34 Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2011. Governments and Parliaments. Chapter 4 in Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 91115.Google Scholar
Van Meegdenburg, Hilde. 2023. Process Tracing: An Analyticist Approach. In Routledge Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis Methods, ed. Mello, Patrick A. and Ostermann, Falk. Lanham: Taylor and Francis. 405–20. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139850-31 Google Scholar
Ventura, Deisy de Freitas Lima, Onuki, Janina, and Medeiros, Marcelo de Almeida. 2012. Internalização das normas do MERCOSUL. Série Pensando o Direito 45: 798.Google Scholar
Vigevani, Tullo, Mariano, Karina Pasquariello, and Oliveira, Marcelo Fernandes de. 2001. Democracia e atores políticos no Mercosul. In Los rostros del Mercosur, ed. Gerónimo de Sierra. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. 183228.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1966. The Two Presidencies. Trans-Action 4, 2: 714. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810961 Google Scholar
Winand, Érica C. A., Pimentel, Luan Vieira, Andrade, Joana Maria B., and Rodrigues, Jorge Matheus Oliveira. 2016. A política externa do Paraguai e a vigência atual de suas principais condicionantes históricas. Um balanço de Lugo a Cartes. Cadernos do Tempo Presente 24: 6793. http://www.seer.ufs.br/index.php/tempo Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K. 2013. Collecting Case Study Evidence: The Principles You Should Follow in Working with Six Sources of Evidence. In Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. 99126. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar