Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T19:03:38.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Presidential Failure in South America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Margaret E. Edwards
Margaret E. Edwards*
Affiliation:
Truman State University. megedwards@truman.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the issue of presidential failure in South America by evaluating the multiple factors that create risk of resignation, removal, or impeachment of presidents. The study draws on various economic variables that have not been thoroughly investigated in the past and uses survival analysis to identify what factors are influential. In performing this testing, the importance of variables such as civil protest, executive wrongdoing, and specific measures of economic hardship—inflation and prolonged recession—becomes clear. Majority legislative support also remains significant, supporting early arguments about the influence of presidential institutions. This investigation provides a unique perspective on presidential survival while evaluating the importance of previously excluded variables in a comprehensive manner.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , Summer 2015 , pp. 111 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez, Michael E., and Marsteintredet, Leiv. 2010. Presidential and Democratic Breakdowns in Latin America: Similar Causes, Different Outcomes. In Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America: Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies, ed. Llanos, Mariana and Marsteintredet, . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 33–55.Google Scholar
Barr, Robert R. 2005. Bolivia: Another Uncompleted Revolution. Latin American Politics and Society 47, 3 (Fall), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Adam. 2013. Psephos. Website of electoral statistics. http://psephos.adam-carr.net.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2002. Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 35, 3: 284–312.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chinn, Menzie D., and Ito, Hiro. 2006. What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81, 1 (October): 163–92.Google Scholar
Cleves, Mario, Gould, William W., and Gutiérrez, Roberto G.. 2002. Introduction to Survival Data Analysis with Stata. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Cotler, Julio. 1978. A Structural-Historical Approach to the Breakdown of Democratic Institutions: Peru. In The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Latin America, ed. Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred C.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 178–205.Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., and Kelly, Michael J.. 1999. The Socioeconomic Impacts of Structural Adjustment. International Studies Quarterly 43, 3 (September): 533–52.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel. 2006: Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a New Index of Globalization. Applied Economics 38, 10: 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, Axel. Europa World Year Book. 1975-2009. London: Europa Publications.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis 2, 1: 131–50.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco. 2005. Fragile Democracy and Schizophrenic Liberalism: Exit, Voice, and Loyalty in the Andes. International Political Science Review 26, 1 (January): 125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2006. Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America. Comparative Politics 38, 4 (July): 401–18.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Palma, Albert. 2007. Return to the Streets: the Changing Face of Contention in South America. Paper presented at the conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 12–15.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Edwards, Margaret E.. 2009. Failed Presidencies: Identifying and Explaining a South American Anomaly. Journal of Politics in Latin America 1, 2: 31–57.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Solt, Frederick. 2004. Successes and Failures of Neoliberalism. Latin American Research Review 39, 3: 150–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Young Hun, and Bahry, Donna. 2008. Interrupted Presidencies in Third Wave Democracies. Journal of Politics 703: 807–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korzeniewicz, Roberto Patricio, and Smith, William C.. 2000. Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in Latin America: Searching for the High Road to Globalization. Latin American Research Review 35, 3: 7–54.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne. 1998. Why Trade Liberalisation is Good for Growth. Economic Journal 108, 450 (September): 1513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe. n.d. Database. http://web.lexis-nexis.com.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1, 1 (Winter): 51–69.Google Scholar
Llanos, Mariana, and Marsteintredet, Leiv. 2010. Conclusions: Presidential Breakdowns Revisited. In Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America: Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies, ed. Llanos, and Marsteintredet, . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 213–28.Google Scholar
Lucero, José Antonio. 2009. Decades Lost and Won: Indigenous Movements and Multicultural Neoliberalism in the Andes. In Beyond Neoliberalism in Latin America: Societies and Politics at the Crossroads, ed. Burdick, John, Oxhorn, Philip, and Roberts, Kenneth M.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 63–81.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1990. Presidentialism in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 25, 1: 157–79.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: the Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies 26, 2 (July): 198–228.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2005. Latin American Democratization Since 1978: Regime Transitions, Breakdowns, and Erosions. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, . New York: Cambridge University Press. 14–59.Google Scholar
Marsteintredet, Leiv, and Berntzen, Einar. 2008. Reducing the Perils of Presidentialism in Latin America through Presidential Interruptions. Comparative Politics 41, 1 (October): 83–101.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, Javier Negri, Juan, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2008. Parliamentary Opposition in Non-Parliamentary Regimes: Latin America. Journal of Legislative Studies 14, 1–2 (March–June): 160–89.Google Scholar
Morley, Samuel A., Machado, Roberto, and Pettinato, Stefano. 1999. Indexes of Structural Reform in Latin America. Santiago: ECLAC.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. 2006. Minority Presidents and Democratic Performance in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 3 (Fall): 63–92.Google Scholar
Observatorio Electoral Latinoamericano. n.d. Database. Election results. www.observatorioelectoral.org.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2003. Presidential Crises and Political Accountability in Latin America, 1990–1999. In What Justice? Whose Justice? Fighting for Fairness in Latin America, ed. Eckstein, Susan and Wickham-Crowley, Timothy P.. Berkeley: University of California Press. 98–129.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2005. Democratization and Constitutional Crises in Presidential Regimes: towards Congressional Supremacy? Comparative Political Studies 38, 1: 51–74.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2006. Evaluating Presidential Runoff Elections. Electoral Studies 25: 129–46.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. Modernization: Theories and Facts. World Politics 49, 2: 155–83.Google Scholar
Salman, Ton. 2006. The Jammed Democracy: Bolivia's Troubled Political Learning Process. Bulletin of Latin American Research 25, 2: 163–82.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 2009. Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 2004. Latin American Presidencies Interrupted. Journal of Democracy 15, 4 (October): 5–19.Google Scholar
Walton, Michael. 2004. Neoliberalism in Latin America: Good, Bad, or Incomplete? Latin American Research Review 39, 3: 165–83.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1998. Peasants or Bankers in Venezuela? Presidential Popularity and Economic Reform Approval, 1989–1993. Political Research Quarterly 51, 2 (June): 341–62.Google Scholar
World Development Indicators. 2014. Washington, Dc: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zamosc, Leon. 2007. The Indian Movement and Political Democracy in Ecuador. Latin American Politics and Society 49, 3 (Fall): 1–34.Google Scholar