Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T14:17:58.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Untangling Social and Political Capital in Latin American Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

John A. Booth  and
Patricia Bayer Richard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Robert Putnam extolled the virtue of social capital by arguing that social networks, civil society, and trust contribute to democracy. Subsequent research, however, identified a weakness in the social capital “model” in its underspecification of the mechanisms by which social capital affects political systems. This article proposes the concept of political capital as a likely product of social capital that links civil society participants to the political system. The article tests this two-stage model of social capital and political capital and their effects on democratization using survey data from eight Latin American nations. Results find that civil society engagement in 2004 affected political capital variables, which, in turn, had positive effects on system-level democracy measures in 2010. The article thus shows that political capital serves as an intervening variable between social capital and democracy and democratization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , Fall 2012 , pp. 33 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alex-Assensoh, Yvette. 2002. Social Capital, Civic Engagement, and the Importance of Context. In McLean et al. 2002a. 203–17.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E., Dagnino, Evelina, and Escobar, Arturo, eds. 1998a. Cultures of Politics, Politics of Cultures: Re-Visioning Latin American Social Movements. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E., Dagnino, Evelina, and Escobar, Arturo, eds. 1998b. Introduction: the Cultural and the Political in Latin American Social Movements. In Alvarez et al. 1998a. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AmericasBarometer. 2004. Survey. Nashville: Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP), Vanderbilt University. http://www.LapopSurveys.org.Google Scholar
AmericasBarometer. 2010. http://www.LapopSurveys.org.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Posner, Daniel N.. 1998. Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance. British Journal of Political Science 28, 4: 686–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, John A., and Richard, Patricia Bayer. 1998a. Civil Society and Political Context in Central America. American Behavioral Scientist 42, 1: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, John A., and Richard, Patricia Bayer. 1998b. Civil Society, Political Capital, and Democratization in Central America. Journal of Politics 60, 3: 780–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, John A., and Richard, Patricia Bayer. 2006. Revolution's Legacy: Residual Effects on Nicaraguan Participation and Attitudes in Comparative Context. Latin American Politics and Society 48, 2: 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. The Forms of Social Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. Richardson, J. G.. New York : Greenwood Press. 242–58.Google Scholar
Brehm, John, and Rahn, Wendy. 1997. Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science 41, 3: 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brucker, Gene. 1999. Civil Traditions in Premodern Italy. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29: 357–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Cathy, and Dawson, Michael. 1993. Neighborhood Poverty and African-American Politics. American Political Science Review 87, 2: 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jean, and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Conceptual History and Theoretical Synthesis. In Civil Society and Political Theory, ed. Cohen, and Arato, . Cambridge : MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Rosenbluth, Frances M., and Theis, Michael F.. 1998. Mobilization, Social Networks, and Turnout: Evidence from Japan. World Politics 50: 447–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crothers, Lane. 2002. Building Social Capital on the Street: Leadership in Communities. In McLean et al. 2002a. 218–36.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastis, Carla M. 1998. Organizational Diversity and the Production of Social Capital: One of These Groups Is Not like the Other. American Behavioral Scientist 42, 1: 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, John. 2003. Social Capital. London : Routledge.Google Scholar
Fine, Robert. 1997. Civil Society Theory, Enlightenment and Critique. In Fine and Rai 1997. 7–28.Google Scholar
Fine, Robert, and Rai, Shirin, eds. 1997. Civil Society: Democratic Perspectives. London : Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1999. Extreme Voices: a Dark Side of Civic Engagement. In Skocpol and Fiorina 1999a. 395–425.Google Scholar
Foley, Michael W. 1996. Laying the Groundwork: the Struggle for Civil Society in El Salvador. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 38, 1 (Spring): 67–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Michael W., and Edwards, Bob. 1996. The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy 7: 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Michael W., and Edwards, Bob. 1997. Editors' Introduction: Escape from Politics? Social Theory and the Social Capital Debate. American Behavioral Scientist 40, 5: 550–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Michael W., and Edwards, Bob. 1998. Editors' Introduction: beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and Social Capital in Comparative Perspective. American Behavioral Scientist 42, 1: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2011. Freedom in the World 2011: the Authoritarian Challenge to Democracy. http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2011. Accessed July 5, 2011.Google Scholar
Gibney, Mark, and Wood, Reed. 2011. Political Terror Scale 1976–2010. http://www.politicalterrorscale.org.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2001. Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for Consolidating Russia's Democratic Transition. American Journal of Political Science 45, 1: 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grew, Raymond. 2001. Finding Social Capital: the French Revolution in Italy. In Rotberg 2001a. 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1987. Networks in Context: the Social Flow of Political Information. American Political Science Review 81, 4: 1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1992. Political Parties and Electoral Mobilization: Political Structure, Social Structure, and the Party Canvass. American Political Science Review 86, 1: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton : Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W., and Miller, Ross A.. 2005. Before Norms: Institutions and Civil Culture. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Jelin, Elizabeth. 1998. Toward a Culture of Participation and Citizenship: Challenges for a More Equitable World. In Alvarez et al. 1998a. 405–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaase, Max. 1999. Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-institutionalised Political Participation in Western Europe. West European Politics 22, 3: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sunhyuk. 1997. State and Civil Society in South Korea's Democratic Consolidation: Is the Battle Really over? Asian Survey 37, 12: 1125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 2002. Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States. American Journal of Political Science 46, 4: 772–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Nan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure in Action. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, William, Smith, Graham, and Stokes, Gerry. 2001. Social Capital and the City. In Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective, ed. Edwards, Bob, Foley, Michael W., and Diani, Mario. Lebanon, NH : Tufts University/University Press of New England. 83–96.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2004. Polity Iv Country Reports 2003. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/polity/country_reports/report.htm. Accessed March 16, 2007.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2011. Polity Iv Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. http://systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Accessed July 5, 2011.Google Scholar
McLean, Scott L., Schultz, David A., and Steger, Manfred B., eds. 2002a. Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and “Bowling Alone.” New York : New York University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, Scott L., Schultz, David A., and Steger, Manfred B.. 2002b. Introduction. In McLean et al. 2002a. 1–17.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 1999. Five Years After the Fall: Trajectories of Support for Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 1994. Civic Culture and Democracy: the Question of Causal Relationships. American Political Science Review 88: 645–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 1999. Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? a Multiple Indicator Assessment. American Journal of Sociology 105, 1: 88–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1998. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. American Sociological Review 24: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton : Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1995. Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6, 1: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1996. The Strange Disappearance of Civic America. American Prospect (Winter): 35–49.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York : Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Richard, Patricia Bayer, and Booth, John A.. 2000. Civil Society and Democratic Transition in Central America. In Repression, Resistance, and Democratic Transition in Central America, ed. Walker, Thomas W. and Armony, Ariel. Wilmington : Scholarly Resources. 233–54.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1999. Getting Things Done in an Antimodern Society. In Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, ed. Dasgupta, P. and Serageldin, I.. Washington, DC : World Bank. 141–71.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. 2001. When Government Fails: Social Capital in an Antimodern Russia. In Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective, ed. Edwards, Bob, Foley, Michael W., and Diani, Mario. Lebanon, NH : Tufts University/University Press of New England. 56–69.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenband, Leonard N. 2001. Social Capital in the Early Industrial Revolution. In Rotberg 2001a. 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I., ed. 2001a. Patterns of Social Capital: Stability and Change in Historical Perspective. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I., ed. 2001b. Social Capital and Political Culture in Africa, America, Australasia, and Europe. In Rotberg 2001a. 1–17.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. Transitions to Democracy: toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics 2 (April): 337–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schild, Verónica. 1998. New Subjects of Rights? Women's Movements and the Construction of Citizenship in the “New Democracies.” In Alvarez et al. 1998a. 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Doh C. 1999. Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Fiorina, Morris P., eds. 1999a. Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, DC/New York : Brookings Institution Press/Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Fiorina, Morris P., eds. 1999b. Making Sense of the Civic Engagement Debate. In Skocpol and Fiorina 1999a. 1–23.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, and Rochon, Thomas R.. 1998. Are All Associations Alike? Member Diversity, Associational Type, and the Creation of Social Capital. American Behavioral Scientist 42, 1: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. Making Social Science Work across Space and Time: a Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work . American Political Science Review 90: 389–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tempest, Clive. 1997. Myths from Eastern Europe and the Legend of the West. Democratization 4, 1 (Spring): 132–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2001. Ethnic Conflict and Civil Society: India and beyond. World Politics 53, 3: 362–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, Kevin. 1999. The Normative Promise of Religious Organizations in Global Civil Society. Journal of Church and State 41, 3: 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Kay B. 1998. Indigenous Movements as a Challenge to the Unified Social Movement Paradigm for Guatemala. In Alvarez et al. 1998a. 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 1997. Bowling in the Bronx: the Uncivil Interstices between Civil Society and Political Society. Democratization 4, 1 (Spring): 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolcock, Michael. 2001. The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2, 1: 1–17.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1999. Mobilizing Civic Engagement: the Changing Impact of Religious Involvement. In Skocpol and Fiorina 1999a. 331–63.Google Scholar