Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T20:54:37.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constitutional Innovation and Animal Protection in Egypt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article examines constitutional innovation through the case study of the emergence of animal protection in Egypt's 2014 Constitution. Egypt's provision, which is a state obligation to provide al-rifq bi-l-hayawan (kindness to animals), was adopted in Article 45 as part of the country's second constitution following the 2011 revolution that ousted President Hosni Mubarak. Three aspects proved crucial to the adoption of the provision: a decision by animal protection activists to influence the constitutional process; the ability of citizens to convey their ideas to the constitutional drafters, albeit in a limited way; and, most importantly, the use of frame bridging. The activists and then the constitutional drafters presented the new cause of constitutional animal protection in terms of well-established areas of social, and constitutional, concern in the country, including Islamic law, women's rights, human rights, and the protection of the environment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Amnesty International. 2013. Egypt: President Morsi Must Send Clear Message Against Attacks on Shia Muslims. June 24. http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/news-item/egypt-president-morsi-must-send-clear-message-against-attacks-on-shi-a-muslims (accessed April 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Brooke. n.d. About-Brooke/Our-Strategy. http://www.thebrooke.org (accessed April 14, 2017).Google Scholar
al-Bukhari, Muhammad b. Ismail. 1997. Jami‘ al-sahih. 9 vols., trans. Muhsin Khan, Muhammad. Riyadh: Darussalam.Google Scholar
Choudhry, Sujit, ed. 2006. The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diwan, Abdullah. 2012. Al-Dustur al-muntazir [The Awaited Constitution]. MidanMasr, August 27. http://www.midanmasr.com/printerfriendly.aspx?ArticleID=150 (accessed April 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Eisen, Jessica, and Stilt, Kristen. 2017. Animals, Protection of. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law, ed. Grote, Rainer, Lachenmann, Frauke, and Wolfrum, Rüdiger. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://oxcon.ouplaw.com/home/MPECCOL (accessed July 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Evans, Erin. 2010. Constitutional Inclusion of Animal Rights in Germany and Switzerland: How Did Animal Protection Become an Issue of National Importance? Society and Animals 18:231–50.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Melton, James, and Elkins, Zach. Forthcoming. Innovation and Diffusion in Constitutional Rights. Manuscript on file with the author.Google Scholar
Gluck, Jason, and Brandt, Michele. 2015. Participatory and Inclusive Constitution Making. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Hellyer, H. A. 2012. A Better Egyptian Constitution. Foreign Policy, December 6. http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/12/06/a-better-egyptian-constitution/ (accessed May 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Ibn Majah, Muhammad b. Yazid. 2007. Sunan Ibn Majah. 5 vols., trans. al-Khattab, Nasiruddin. Riyadh: Darussalam.Google Scholar
Katz, Marion Holmes. 2002. Body of Text: The Emergence of the Sunni Law of Ritual Purity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kingsley, Patrick, and Abdo, Mano. 2015. At Least 32 Killed in Egypt as Militants Attack Army and Police Targets in Sinai. Guardian, January 30. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/29/egypt-army-police-sinai-el-arish-sheikh-zuwayed-rafah (accessed May 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Law, David. 2008. Globalization and the Future of Constitutional Rights. Northwestern University Law Review 102:12771349.Google Scholar
Luway, Rihab. 2013. Hatta al-qitat wa-l-kilab tutalib bi-maddat li-l-hawhawa wa-l-nawnawa fi-l-dustur [Even the Cats and Dogs Demand a Provision to Meow and Bark in the Constitution]. Al-Watan, November 25. http://www.elwatannews.com/news/details/360969 (accessed April 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Makhluf, Hasanayn Muhammad. 1964. Al-rifq bi-l-hayawan fi-l-shari‘a al-islamiyya. Cairo: Matba‘at al-Madani.Google Scholar
al-Mawsu‘a al-fiqhiyya. 1995. “Kalb” [Dog]. 35:123–34. Kuwait: Ministry of Pious Endowments and Islamic Affairs.Google Scholar
May, James, and Daly, Erin. 2014. Global Environmental Constitutionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, E. 1986. ‘Id al-Adha. In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2d ed., ed. Bearman, P. et al., 3:1007–8. Leiden: Brill, 1960–2004.Google Scholar
al-Nasa'i, Ahmad b. Shu‘ayb. 2007. Sunan al-Nasa'i, 6 vols., trans. al-Khattab, Nasiruddin. Riyadh: Darussalam.Google Scholar
Robson, J. 1986. Hadith. In Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2d ed., ed. Bearman, P. et al., 3:2328. Leiden: Brill, 1960–2004.Google Scholar
Salmawy, Mohamed. 2013. Interview with Mahmoud Sa‘ad. Akhir al-nahar. Al-Nahar TV Channel, November 14. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSEUSOWV0jo (accessed April 26, 2016).Google Scholar
Shearlaw, Meave. 2016. Egypt Five Years On: Was It Ever a “Social Media Revolution?” Guardian, January 25. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/25/egypt-5-years-on-was-it-ever-a-social-media-revolution (accessed May 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Al-Sijistani, Abu Dawud Sulayman b. al-Ash‘ath. 2008. Sunan Abi Dawud, 5 vols., trans. Qadhi, Yaser. Riyadh: Darussalam.Google Scholar
Snow, David, A., Rochford, E. Burke Jr., Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51:464–81.Google Scholar
Stilt, Kristen. 2009. Al-rifq bi-l-hayawan fi-l-shari‘a al-islamiyya and Animal Welfare in Islamic Law. n.p.Google Scholar
Stilt, Kristen. 2010. “Islam Is the Solution”: Constitutional Visions of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Texas International Law Journal 46:73108.Google Scholar
Stilt, Kristen. 2014. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes: The Egyptian Constitution of 1971. In Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Simpser, Alberto, 111–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stilt, Kristen, Waheedi, Salma, and Griffin, Swathi Gandhavadi. Forthcoming. The Ambitions of Muslim Family Law Reform. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender. Google Scholar
Tirmidhi, Muhammad b. ‘Isa. 2007. Jami‘ al-sahih, 6 vols., trans. Abu Khalil. Riyadh: Darussalam.Google Scholar
Tlili, Sarra. 2012. Animals in The Qur'an. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2009. The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law. Virginia Journal of International Law 49:9851006.Google Scholar
Vogel, Frank. 1999. Conformity with Islamic Sharia and Constitutionality Under Article Two: Some Issues of Theory, Practice, and Comparison. In Democracy, the Rule of Law and Islam, ed. Cotran, Eugene and Sherif, Adel Omar, 529–44. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Wagman, Bruce, Waisman, Sonia S., and Frasch, Pamela D. 2014. Animal Law: Cases and Materials, 5th ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wahba, May. 2012. Protection of the Environment and Natural Resources in the New Constitution. Al-Sabah, July 2. http://www.elsaba7.com/NewsDtl.aspx?id=15207 (accessed April 14, 2017).Google Scholar
World Animal Protection. 2014. Egypt. http://api.worldanimalprotection.org/country/egypt (accessed April 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Zulficar, Dina. 2012. Interview with Amr al-Laythi. 90 Minutes. Al-Mihwar TV Channel, November 14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ROK5xAV6L4 (accessed April 14, 2017).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Agricultural Law of 1966.Google Scholar
Constitution of Egypt 1971.Google Scholar
Constitution of Egypt 1980.Google Scholar
Constitution of Egypt 2012.Google Scholar
Constitution of Egypt 2014.Google Scholar
Environmental Law of 1994.Google Scholar
Penal Code of 1937.Google Scholar