Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T14:19:02.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructing Hysteria: Legal Signals as Producers of Siting Conflicts Over Sexually Violent Predator Placements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Sexually violent predator (SVP) statutes define some sex offenders as dangerous enough to be segregated from society, but then require their release into local communities. This article examines how decision makers and community members interpret and respond to this inherent contradiction during disputes over SVP placements. The article departs from traditional moral panic explanations of reactions to sex offenders by linking literature on local siting conflicts to insights from legal mobilization studies in order to understand the origins and features of community opposition to sex offenders. Data from three case studies of SVP placements in California suggest that interpretations of what I call legal signals, or implicit messages embedded in state laws, produced these conflicts. The findings shed new light on the role of law in siting conflicts and collective action by explaining how state laws facilitate communities’ exclusion from siting decisions, encourage local opposition, and disempower already marginalized communities.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abrego, Leisy. 2008. Legitimacy, Social Identity, and the Mobilization of Law: The Effects of Assembly Bill 540 on Undocumented Students in California. Law & Social Inquiry 33 (3): 709–34.Google Scholar
Aldrich, Daniel. 2008. Location, Location, Location: Selecting Sites for Controversial Facilities. Singapore Economic Review 53 (1): 145–72.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Konisky, David M. 2009. Public Attitudes Toward Construction of New Power Plants. Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (3): 566–77.Google Scholar
Bandy, Rachel. 2011. Measuring the Impact of Sex Offender Notification on Community Adoption of Protective Behaviors. Criminology & Public Policy 10 (2): 237–63.Google Scholar
Barthe, Yannick, and Mays, Claire. 2001. Communication and Information in France's Underground Laboratory Siting Process: Clarity of Procedure, Ambivalence of Effects. Journal of Risk Research 4 (4): 411–30.Google Scholar
Bates, Andrew, Saunders, Rebecca, and Wilson, Christopher. 2007. Doing Something About It: A Follow-Up Study of Sex Offenders Participating in Thames Valley Circles of Support and Accountability. British Journal of Community Justice 5 (1): 1942.Google Scholar
Beamish, Thomas. 2015. Community at Risk: Biodefense and the Collective Search for Security. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Berrey, Ellen, Hoffman, Steve G., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2012. Situated Justice: A Contextual Analysis of Fairness and Inequality in Employment Discrimination Litigation. Law & Society Review 46 (1): 136.Google Scholar
Blackstone, Amy, Uggen, Christopher, and McLaughlin, Heather. 2009. Legal Consciousness and Responses to Sexual Harassment. Law & Society Review 43 (3): 631–68.Google Scholar
Bonds, Anne. 2013. Economic Development, Racialization, and Privilege: “Yes in My Backyard” Prison Politics and the Reinvention of Madras, Oregon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (6): 13891405.Google Scholar
Bullard, Robert Doyle. 2000. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Keri, and Mingus, William. 2008. Not in My Neighborhood: Assessing Registered Sex Offenders’ Experiences with Local Social Capital and Social Control. Criminal Justice and Behavior 35 (3): 356–74.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Keri, Sample, Lisa L., and Lytle, Robert. 2014. Public Interest in Sex Offenders: A Perpetual Panic? Criminology, Criminal Justice Law, & Society 15 (3): 96117.Google Scholar
Cesaroni, Carla. 2001. Releasing Sex Offenders into the Community Through “Circles of Support”—A Means of Reintegrating the “Worst of the Worst.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 34 (2): 8598.Google Scholar
Cooke, Bill, and Uma, Kothari, eds. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cousin, Marie-Eve, Dohle, Simone, and Siegrist, Michael. 2011. The Impact of Specific Information Provision on Base Station Siting Preferences. Journal of Risk Research 14 (6): 703–15.Google Scholar
Cousin, Marie-Eve, and Siegrist, Michael. 2010. The Public's Knowledge of Mobile Communication and its Influence on Base Station Siting Preferences. Health, Risk & Society 12 (3): 231–50.Google Scholar
D'Orazio, Deidre, Arkowitz, Steven, Adams, Jay, and Maram, Wesley. 2009. The California Sexually Violent Predator Statute: History, Description, & Areas for Improvement. Sacramento: California Coalition on Sexual Offending.Google Scholar
Duwe, Grant. 2013. Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) Work in the United States? Preliminary Results from a Randomized Experiment in Minnesota. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 25 (2): 143–65.Google Scholar
Eason, John. 2010. Mapping Prison Proliferation: Region, Rurality, Race and Disadvantage in Prison Placement. Social Science Research 39 (6): 1015–28.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Leachman, Gwendolyn, and McAdam, Doug. 2010. On Law, Organizations, and Social Movements. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6:653–85.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S. 1998. The Common Place of Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Kathryn J. 2015. Contextualizing the Policy and Pragmatics of Reintegrating Sex Offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Advance online publication. 1079063215574711.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Ruth Wilson. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hannem, Stacey, and Petrunik, Michael. 2007. Circles of Support and Accountability: A Community Justice Initiative for the Reintegration of High Risk Sex Offenders. Contemporary Justice Review 10 (2): 153–71.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2003. The Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (4): 939–41.Google Scholar
Hudson, Kirsty. 2005. Offending Identities: Sex Offenders’ Perspectives of Their Treatment and Management. Portland: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Hunold, Christian, and Leitner, Steven. 2011. “Hasta La Vista, Baby!” The Solar Grand Plan, Environmentalism, and Social Constructions of the Mojave Desert. Environmental Politics 20 (5): 687704.Google Scholar
Jackson, Rebecca L., and Covell, Christmas N. 2013. Sex Offender Civil Commitment. In The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Legal and Ethical Aspects of Sex Offender Treatment and Management, ed. Harrison, Karen and Rainey, Bernadette, 406–23. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Janus, Eric. 2006. Failure to Protect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Philip. 1998. Moral Panic: Changing Concepts of the Child Molester in Modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krutli, Pius, Stauffacher, Michael, Pedolin, Dario, Moser, Corinne, and Scholz, Roland W. 2012. The Process Matters: Fairness in Repository Siting for Nuclear Waste. Social Justice Research 25 (1): 79101.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Roger N. 2011. Sex Panic and the Punitive State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Leon, Chrysanthi. 2011. Sex Fiends, Perverts, and Pedophiles: Understanding Sex Crime Policy in America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Liam, Doran, Peter, and Fagan, Honor. 2009. A Burning Issue? Governance and Anti-Incinerator Campaigns in Ireland, North and South. Environmental Politics 18 (6): 896916.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jill S. 2009. Sex Offender Residence Restrictions. In Sex Offender Laws: Failed Policies, New Directions, ed. Wright, Richard, 267–90. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jill S., and Tewksbury, Richard. 2009. Collateral Damage: Family Members of Registered Sex Offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice 34:5468.Google Scholar
Logan, Wayne A. 2009. Knowledge as Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-Glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona. 2002. Pedophiles and Cyber-Predators as Contaminating Forces: The Language of Disgust, Pollution, and Boundary Invasions in Federal Debates on Sex Offender Legislation. Law & Social Inquiry 27 (3): 529–57.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Peter. 2009. From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City. City 13 (2–3): 185–97.Google Scholar
McAlinden, Anne-Marie. 2006. Managing Risk: From Regulation to the Reintegration of Sexual Offenders. Criminology and Criminal Justice 6 (2): 197218.Google Scholar
McAlinden, Anne-Marie. 2007. The Shaming of Sexual Offenders: Risk, Retribution, and Reintegration. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, Meghan G. 2013. “Becoming a Waste Land Where Nothing Can Survive”: Resisting State-Corporate Environmental Crime in a “Forgotten” Place. Contemporary Justice Review 16 (4): 394411.Google Scholar
Mohai, Paul, Pellow, David, and Roberts, J. Timmons. 2009. Environmental Justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 (1): 405–30.Google Scholar
Morrill, Calvin, Tyson, Karolyn, Edelman, Lauren B., and Arum, Richard. 2010. Legal Mobilization in Schools: The Paradox of Rights and Race Among Youth. Law & Society Review 44 (3–4): 651–94.Google Scholar
Paris, Michael. 2006. Legal Mobilization and the Politics of Reform: Lessons from School Finance Litigation in Kentucky, 1984–1995. Law & Social Inquiry 26 (3): 631–81.Google Scholar
Paris, Michael. 2010. Framing Equal Opportunity: Law and the Politics of School Finance Reform. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Manuel, Sadd, Jim, and Hipp, John. 2001. Which Came First? Toxic Facilities, Minority Move-In, and Environmental Justice. Journal of Urban Affairs 23 (1): 121.Google Scholar
Pellow, David Naguib. 2004. Garbage Wars: The Struggle for Environmental Justice in Chicago. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Planty, Michael, Lynn, Langton, Christopher, Krebs, Marcus, Berzofsky, and Hope, Smiley-McDonald. 2013. Female Victims of Sexual Violence, 1994–2010. NCJ 240655. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Prentky, Robert A., Barbaree, Howard E., and Janus, Eric S. 2015. Sexual Predators: Society, Risk, and the Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Purcell, Mark. 1997. Ruling Los Angeles: Neighborhood Movements, Urban Regimes, and the Production of Space in Southern California. Urban Geography 18 (8): 684704.Google Scholar
Quick, Kathryn S., and Feldman, Martha S. 2011. Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (3): 272–90.Google Scholar
Ruming, Kristian. 2013. “It Wasn't About Public Housing, It Was About the Way It Was Done”: Challenging Planning Not People in Resisting the Nation Building Economic Stimulus Plan, Australia. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment March:1–22.Google Scholar
Saha, Robin, and Mohai, Paul. 2005. Historical Context and Hazardous Waste Facility Siting: Understanding Temporal Patterns in Michigan. Social Problems 52 (4): 618–48.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H. 1950. The Sexual Psychopath Laws. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1931–1951:543–54.Google Scholar
Taylor, Dorceta E. 2014. Toxic Communities: Environmental Racism, Industrial Pollution, and Residential Mobility. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Terry, Karen J. 2011. What Is Smart Sex Offender Policy? Criminology & Public Policy 10 (2): 275–82.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2012. Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK. Law & Society Review 46 (3): 523–56.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robin J., Cortoni, Franca, and McWhinnie, Andrew J. 2009. Circles of Support & Accountability: A Canadian National Replication of Outcome Findings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 21 (4): 412–30.Google Scholar
Wolsink, Maarten, and Devilee, Jeroen. 2009. The Motives for Accepting or Rejecting Waste Infrastructure Facilities. Shifting the Focus from the Planners’ Perspective to Fairness and Community Commitment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52 (2): 217–36.Google Scholar
Zgoba, Kristen M. 2004. Spin Doctors and Moral Crusaders: The Moral Panic Behind Child Safety Legislation. Criminal Justice Studies 17 (4): 385404.Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600(a)(1). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed July 1, 2015).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6604.9(d). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6608(i). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6608.5. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed August 14, 2015).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6609.1(a)(1). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6609.2. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600(a)(1). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed July 1, 2015).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6604.9(d). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6608(i). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6608.5. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed August 14, 2015).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6609.1(a)(1). http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar
California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6609.2. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=wic&group=06001-07000&file=6600-6609.3 (accessed May 28, 2016).Google Scholar