Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T04:38:08.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Institutionalization of Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Paul M. Collins Jr.  and
Lori A. Ringhand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses an original database of confirmation hearing dialogue to examine how the Senate Judiciary Committee's role in Supreme Court confirmations has changed over time, with particular attention paid to the 1939–2010 era. During this period, several notable developments took place, including a rise in the number of hearing comments, increased attention to nominees’ views of judicial decisions, an expansion of the scope of issues addressed, and the equalization of questioning between majority and minority party senators. We demonstrate that these changes were shaped by both endogenous and exogenous factors to promote the legitimization of the Judiciary Committee's role in the confirmation process and to foster the instrumental goals of senators. This research contributes to our understanding of the development of political institutions, interbranch interactions, and how institutional change affects the behavior of legal and political actors.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Winter 2016 , pp. 126 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abraham, Henry J. 2008. Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Bush II. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Batta, Anna, Collins, Paul M. Jr., Miles, Tom, and Ringhand, Lori A. 2012. Let's Talk: Judicial Decisions at Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings. Judicature 96 (1): 7–15.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, and Jones, Bryan. 2013. Policy Agendas Project. http://www.policyagendas.org (accessed January 15, 2013).Google Scholar
Beth, Richard S., and Palmer, Betsy. 2011. Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789–2011. CRS Report for Congress, March 11.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith. 2011. Will the Real Elena Kagan Please Stand Up? Conflicting Public Images in the Supreme Court Confirmation Process. Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy 1 (1): 137–55.Google Scholar
C‐SPAN. 2005. Homepage. https://web.archive.org/web/20050913183339/http:/www.c‐span.org/(accessed November 6, 2014).Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., Kastellec, Jonathan P., and Park, Jee‐Kwang. 2013. Voting for Justices: Change and Continuity in Confirmation Voting, 1937–2010. Journal of Politics 75 (2): 283–99.Google Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. 1994. The Confirmation Mess: Cleaning Up the Federal Appointments Process. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Collins, Paul M. Jr., and Ringhand, Lori A. 2013. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings and Constitutional Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comiskey, Michael. 1999. Not Guilty: The News Media in the Supreme Court Confirmation Process. Journal of Law & Politics 15 (1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Crowe, Justin. 2012. Building the Judiciary: Law, Courts, and the Politics of Institutional Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dancey, Logan, Nelson, Kjersten R., and Ringsmuth, Eve M. 2011. “Strict Scrutiny?” The Content of Senate Judicial Confirmation Hearings During the George W. Bush Administration. Judicature 95 (3): 126–35.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2009. Justice Sotomayor: The Unjust Hearings. New York Review of Books, September 24.Google Scholar
Egerton, John. 1995. Speak Now Against the Day: The Generation Before the Civil Rights Movement in the South. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher L. 2007. The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2000. Measuring Issue Salience. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 66–83.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2005. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farganis, Dion, and Wedeking, Justin. 2011. “No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews”: An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Nominee Candor from Harlan to Kagan. Law & Society Review 45 (3): 525–59.Google Scholar
Farganis, Dion, and Wedeking, Justin. 2014. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings in the U.S. Senate: Reconsidering the Charade. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1962. The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration. American Political Science Review 56 (2): 310–24.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claude S. 2011. Made in America: A Social History of American Culture and Character. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1989. Emergence of Legislative Institutions: Standing Committees in the House and Senate, 1810–1825. Legislative Studies Quarterly 14 (1): 39–66.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Michael J. 2006. Super Precedent. Minnesota Law Review 90 (5): 1204–31.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and Wolpert, Robin M. 1996. Opinion‐Holding and Public Attitudes Toward Controversial Supreme Court Nominees. Political Research Quarterly 49 (1): 163–76.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon. 1997. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt Through Reagan. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (5): 936–57.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1988. Legislative Institutionalization with Illustrations from the British House of Commons. American Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 681–712.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1965. Political Development and Political Decay. World Politics 17 (3): 386–430.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Howard. 2009. Sotomayor Hearings Fail to Excite Adrenaline‐Fueled Media. Washington Post, July 20.Google Scholar
Library of Congress. 2012. Supreme Court Nominations—Not Confirmed or Withdrawn. http://www.loc.gov/law/find/court‐withdrawn.php (accessed September 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E. 1973. A Klansman Joins the Court: The Appointment of Hugo L. Black. University of Chicago Law Review 41 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Maltese, John Anthony. 1995. The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734–49.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1965. Reflections on the Warren Court. Virginia Law Review 51 (7): 1229–70.Google Scholar
McFeely, William S. 1981. Grant: A Biography. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. 2004. The Institutionalization of the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis 12 (2): 128–42.Google Scholar
Mersky, Roy M., and Jacobstein, J. Myron, eds. 1977. The Supreme Court of the United States: Hearings and Reports on Successful and Unsuccessful Nominations of Supreme Court Justices by the Senate Judiciary Committee, 1916–1975. Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63.Google Scholar
Nagel, Stuart S. 1965. Court‐Curbing Periods in American History. Vanderbilt Law Review 18 (3): 925–44.Google Scholar
Newman, Roger K. 2003, Hugo Black: A Biography. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1937a. Bar Asks Inquires on Future Judges. New York Times, October 2.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1937b. Radio Talk Is Brief. New York Times, October 2.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1939. Hearings Are Set on Frankfurter. New York Times, January 8.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2009a. Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings, Day 2. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/14/us/politics/14confirm‐text.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (accessed September 6, 2012).Google Scholar
New York Times. 2009b. Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings, Day 3. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/us/politics/15confirm‐text.html?pagewanted=all (accessed September 6, 2012).Google Scholar
New York Times. 2009c. Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings, Day 4. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/us/politics/16confirm‐text.html?pagewanted=all (accessed September 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Pacelle, Richard L. Jr., Curry, Brett W., and Marshall, Bryan W. 2011. Decision Making by the Modern Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parrillo, Nicholas R. 2013. Leviathan and Interpretive Revolution: The Administrative State, the Judiciary, and the Rise of Legislative History, 1890–1950. Yale Law Journal 123 (2): 266–529.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. The Limits of Design: Explaining Institutional Origins and Change. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13 (4): 475–99.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson. 1968. The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 62 (1): 144–68.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith. 2013. The Polarization of the Congressional Parties. http://voteview.com/political_polarization.asp (accessed May 8, 2013).Google Scholar
Ragsdale, Lyn, and Theis, John J. III. 1997. The Institutionalization of the American Presidency, 1924–92. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1280–1318.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Glenn Harlan. 1992. Taking Advice Seriously: An Immodest Proposal for Reforming the Confirmation Process Southern California Law Review 65 (March): 1572–82.Google Scholar
Ringhand, Lori A., and Collins, Paul M. Jr. 2011. May it Please the Senate: An Empirical Analysis of the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings of Supreme Court Nominees, 1939–2009. American University Law Review 60 (3): 589–641.Google Scholar
Robinson, Michael J. 1974. The Impact of the Televised Watergate Hearings. Journal of Communication 24 (2): 17–30.Google Scholar
Rutkus, Denis Steven. 2010. Supreme Court Appointment Process: Roles of the President, Judiciary Committee, and Senate. CRS Report for Congress, February 19.Google Scholar
Rutkus, Denis Steven, and Bearden, Maureen. 2009. Supreme Court Nominations, 1789–2009: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President. CRS Report for Congress, May 13.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cover, Albert D. 1989. Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review 83 (2): 557–65.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Mark. 1994. Judicious Choices: The Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1988. The Distribution of Committee Positions in the U.S. Senate: Explaining Institutional Change. American Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 276–301.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly. Journal of Politics 54 (4): 1026–54.Google Scholar
Stras, David R. 2009. Pierce Butler: A Supreme Technician. Vanderbilt Law Review 62 (2): 695–756.Google Scholar
Swift, Elaine K. 1996. The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787–1841. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
US Senate. 2012. Nomination Hearings for Supreme Court Justices. http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/one_item_and_teasers/Supreme_Court_Nomination_Hearings.htm (accessed September 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Vining, Richard L. Jr. 2011. Grassroots Mobilization in the Digital Age: Interest Group Response to Supreme Court Nominees. Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 790–802.Google Scholar
Vining, Richard L. Jr., Zorn, Christopher, and Smelcer, Susan Navarro. 2006. Judicial Tenure on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1790–1868: Frustration, Resignation, and Expiration on the Bench. Studies in American Political Development 20 (2): 198–210.Google Scholar
Washington Post. 2010a. Transcript: The Elena Kagan Hearings—Day 2. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp‐srv/politics/documents/KAGANHEARINGSDAY2.pdf (accessed January 30, 2012).Google Scholar
Washington Post. 2010b. Transcript: The Elena Kagan Hearings—Day 3. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp‐srv/politics/documents/KAGANHEARINGSDAY3.pdf (accessed January 30, 2012).Google Scholar
Watson, George, and Stookey, John. 1988. Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings: A View from the Senate. Judicature 71 (4): 186–96.Google Scholar
Wedeking, Justin, and Dion, Farganis. 2010. The Candor Factor: Does Nominee Evasiveness Affect Judiciary Support for Supreme Court Nominees? Hofstra Law Review 39 (2): 329–68.Google Scholar
Williams, Margaret, and Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Questioning Judges About Their Decisions: Supreme Court Nominees Before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Judicature 90 (2): 73–80.Google Scholar
Yalof, David A. 2008. Confirmation Obfuscation: Supreme Court Confirmation Politics in a Conservative Era. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 44:143–73.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964).Google Scholar
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).Google Scholar