Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:42:14.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ULVS XIV: Archaeozoological Evidence for Stock-raising and Stock-management in the Pre-desert

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

Gillian Clark
Gillian Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the preliminary results of analysis of faunal material from eight sites of Romano-Libyan and Islamic date. The sites are located in the pre-desert of Tripolitania. The samples were in general small and the bones were not well preserved, the degree of fragmentation being high. Although a range of species is represented, the economic strategy depended upon the exploitation of sheep and goats. In the southern part of the study area gazelles were also of importance. Sheep and goats were raised primarily as meat animals, being killed principally during their second year of life. The basic economic system seems to have persisted for a long time, although slight differences can be detected between sites of Romano-Libyan date and of Islamic date.

Type
Articles
Information
Libyan Studies , Volume 17 , 1986 , pp. 49 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Libyan Studies 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, G. W. W. and Jones, G. D. B. 1982. The UNESCO Libyan Valleys Survey 1979–1981: palaeo-economy and environmental archaeology in the pre-desert. Libyan Studies 13: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, G. W. W. and Jones, G. D. B. (eds.). 1984. The UNESCO Libyan Valleys Survey VI: investigations of a Romano-Libyan farm, part I. Libyan Studies 15: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, R. 1976. Anatomie Comparée des Mammifères Domestiques. Paris, Vigot.Google Scholar
Boessneck, J. 1969. Osteological differences between sheep (Ovis aries Linné) and goats (Capra hircus Linné). In Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. S. (eds.), Science in Archaeology (second edition): 331–358. London, Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Boessneck, J., Müller, H. and Teichert, M. 1964. Osteologische Unterscheidungsmerkmale zwischen Schaf (Ovis aries Linné) und Ziege (Capra hircus Linné). Kühn-Archiv 78: 1–129.Google Scholar
Cornwall, I. W. 1956. Bones for the Archaeologist. London, Phoenix House.Google Scholar
Driesch, A. von den. 1976. A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Cambridge (Mass.), Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology (Bulletin 1).Google Scholar
Pales, L. and Garcia, M. 1981. Atlas Ostéologique pour Servir à l'Identification des Mammifères du Quaternaire. Vol. II. Tête, Ruchis, Ceintures Scapulaire et Pelvienne, Membres. Carnivores, Homme, Herbivores. Paris, CNRS.Google Scholar
Pales, L. and Lambert, C. 1971. Atlas Ostéologique pour Servir à l'Identification des Mammifères du Quaternaire. Vol. I. Les Membres. Carnivores, Herbivores. Paris, CNRS.Google Scholar
Payne, S. 1973. Kill-off patterns in sheep and goats: the mandibles from Asvan Kale. Anatolian Studies 23: 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. 1968. Animal Bones in Archaeology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Schmid, E. 1972. Atlas of Animal Bones. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Silver, I. 1969. The ageing of domestic animals. In Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. S. (eds.), Science in Archaeology (second edition): 283–302. London, Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
van der Veen, M. 1985. The UNESCO Libyan Valleys Survey X: botanical evidence for ancient farming in the pre-desert. Libyan Studies 16: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar