No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comparison theorems of Sturm's type
Part of:
Qualitative theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2010
Abstract
Our aim in this paper is to establish new comparison principles. The equation
is compared with the equation
The equations considered can be in canonical or noncanonical forms.
MSC classification
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © University College London 1994
References
1.Chanturia, T. A.. Integral criteria for oscillation of solutions of higher order linear differential equations I. Differencialnye Uravnenija, 16 (1980), 470–482. (Russian)Google Scholar
2.Chanturia, T. A.. Some comparison theorems for higher order ordinary differential equations. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., 256 (1977), 749–756. (Russian).Google Scholar
3.Dšurina, J.Comparison theorems for nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Mat. Slovaca, 1 (1992), 299–315.Google Scholar
4.Erbe, L.. Oscillation theorems for second order linear differential equations. J. London Math. Soc. 27 (1970), 337–343.Google Scholar
5.Harris, B. J.. On the oscillation of solutions of linear differential equations. Mathematika, 31 (1984), 215–226.Google Scholar
6.Kusano, T. and Naito, M.. Oscillation criteria for general linear ordinary differential equations. Pacific J. Math., 92 (1981), 345–355.Google Scholar
7.Kusano, T. and Naito, M.. Comparison theorems for functional differential equations with deviating arguments. J. Math. Soc. Japan, 3 (1981), 509–532.Google Scholar
8.Kwong, M. K.. On certain comparison theorems for second order linear equations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 84 (1982), 539–542.Google Scholar
9.Ladde, G. S., Lakshmikantham, V. and Zhang, B. G.. Oscillation Theory of Differential Equations with Deviating Arguments (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
10.Ohriska, J.. Oscillation of differential equations and u-derivatives. Czech. Math. J., 39 (1989), 24–44.Google Scholar
11.Sturm, J. C. F.. Sur les équations différetielles du second ordre. J. Math. Pures Appl., 1 (1836), 106–186.Google Scholar