No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Holomorphic mapping into algebraic varieties of general type, II
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2016
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This announcement is a continuation of Hu [3]. Our results improve Theorem 1 of [3], but the latter is needed in the proof of the former.
Let f: M → N be a holomorphic mapping from a connected complex manifold M of dimension m to a projective algebraic manifold N of dimension n.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1990
References
[1]
Carlson, J. and Griffiths, Ph., A defect relation for equidimensional holomorphic mappings between algebraic varieties, Ann. of Math., (2) 95 (1972), 557–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]
Griffiths, Ph. and King, J., Nevanlinna theory and holomorphic mappings between algebraic varieties, Acta. Math., 130 (1973), 145–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]
Hu, P. C., Holomorphic mapping into algebraic varieties of general type, (to appear)Google Scholar
[4]
Lang, S., Hyperbolic and Diophantine analysis. Bull, of Amer, Math., Soc.
14 (1986), 158–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]
Stoll, W., Value distribution on parabolic spaces. Lecture Notes in Math., 600 (1977), Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
[6]
Stoll, W., Value distribution theory for meromorphic maps. Aspects of Math., E7 (1985), Vieweg.Google Scholar
[7]
Stoll, W., Deficit and Bezout estimates. Value Distribution Theory. Part B. Pure and Appl, Math., 25 (1973), New York.Google Scholar
You have
Access