Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T02:06:30.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on a formula of the Lévy-Khinchin type in quantum probability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

A. Barchielli
Affiliation:
Università di Milano, Dipartimento di Matematica, Via Saldini 50, I-20133 Milano, Italy and Istituto Nationale di Fisica Nucleare Istituto Nationale di Fisica Nucleare
A. M. Paganoni
Affiliation:
Università di Milano, Dipartimento di Matematica, Via Saldini 50, I-20133 Milano, Italy and Istituto Nationale di Fisica Nucleare Istituto Nationale di Fisica Nucleare
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the past few years there has been an increasing interest in a certain class of stochastic differential equations (SDE’s) in Hilbert spaces for applications in quantum mechanics (measurements continuous in time [1-5]) and in quantum optics (photon-detection theory and numerical simulations of master equations [6-10]). Part of the mathematical theory of these equations has been developed in [11], where also “structural properties” of this class of equations have been studied. In the paper [11] it has been shown that such equations are connected with certain semigroups of linear operators and the form of the generator of semigroups related to such SDE’s has been established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Editorial Board of Nagoya Mathematical Journal 1996

References

[ 1 ] Belavkin, V. P., Nondemolition measurements, nonlinear filtering and dynamic programming of quantum stochastic processes, In Blaquiere, A. (ed.), Modelling and Control of Systems, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 121, Springer, Berlin, 1988, pp. 245265.Google Scholar
[ 2 ] Diósi, L., Continuous quantum measurement and Ito formalism, Phys. Lett. A129 (1988), 419423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ 3 ] Barchielli, A., Belavkin, V. P., Measurements continuous in time and a posteriori states in quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 24 (1991), 14951514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ 4 ] Barchielli, A., Stochastic differential equations and ‘a posteriori’ states in quantum mechanics, Int. J. Theor. Phys., 32 (1993), 22212232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ 5 ] Barchielli, A., On the quantum theory of measurements continuous in time, Rep. Math. Phys., 33 (1993), 2134.Google Scholar
[ 6 ] Belavkin, V. P., Staszewski, P., A continuous observation of photon emission, Rep. Math. Phys., 29 (1991), 213225.Google Scholar
[ 7 ] Barchielli, A., Some stochastic differential equations in quantum optics and measurement theory: the case of counting processses. In Diósi, L., Lukács, B. (ed.), Stochastic Evolution of Quantum States in Open Systems and in Measurement Processes, World Scientific, Singapore, 1994, pp. 114.Google Scholar
[ 8 ] Carmichael, H. J., An Open System Approach to Quantum Optics, Lect. Notes in Physics, Series m, vol. 18, Springer, Berlin, 1993.Google Scholar
[ 9 ] Wiseman, H. M., Milburn, G. J., Interpretation of quantum jump and diffusion processes illustrated on the Bloch sphere, Phys. Rev. A, 47 (1993), 16521666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[10] Gisin, N., Knight, P. L., Percival, I. C., Thompson, R. C., Wilson, D. C., Quantum state diffusion theory and a quantum jump experiment, J. Mod. Opt, 40 (1993), 16631671.Google Scholar
[11] Barchielli, A., Holevo, A. S., Constructing quantum measurement processes via classical stochastic calculus, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 58 (1995) 293317.Google Scholar
[12] Barchielli, A., Probability operators and convolution semigroups of instruments in quantum probability, Probab. Theory Rel. Fields, 82 (1989), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Barchielli, A., Lupieri, G., A quantum analogue of Hunt’s representation theorem for the generator of convolution semigroups on Lie groups, Probab. Theory Rel. Fields, 88 (1991), 167194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Barchielli, A., Holevo, A. S., Lupieri, G., An analogue of Hunt’s representation theorem in quantum probability, J. Theor. Probab., 6 (1993), 231265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Davies, E. B., Quantum Theory of Open Systems, Academic Press, London, 1976.Google Scholar
[16] Sakai, S., C *-algebras, Springer, Berlin, 1971.Google Scholar
[17] Rudin, W., Real and Complex Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[18] Lindblad, G., On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Commun. Math. Phys., 48 (1976), 119130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Ozawa, M., Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables, J. Math. Phys., 25 (1984), 7987.Google Scholar
[20] Reed, M., Simon, B., Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I: Functional Analysis, Academic, New York, 1972.Google Scholar